Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Jordan Spieth's spectacular 2015 season now looks like a fluke that is unlikely to ever happen again


Note: This thread is 3397 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Not a great article. Very shallow analysis. Only uses a tour trend from two years of driving distance vs. average score. Also left out Jordan's 2013 which was statistically stronger than 2014 (his worst year).

Besides distance is correlated with scoring, but much more weakly than GIR. It's great to hit it far, but far better to hit it far and straight. Jordan's strength at driving in 2013 and 2015 was slightly above average distance (not losing ground) with excellent positioning for the approach. Then he further gained strokes by top 20 iron play. The iron play is down this year, but he's still a top scorer since he's gaining even more strokes with the putter.

In terms of golf excellence, it's where the dots are positioned along the vertical axis, not the horizontal one that matters. Sure above average distance helps your scoring by getting easy birdies on par 5's, but if you don't convert those opportunities you still don't score better despite being longer. The chart proves Jordan is superior at scoring to many longer players despite their relative distance advantage.

What we'd see if 2013 was included that Jordan is consistently in the top 10 scorers. Sure a season like 2015 raises unrealistic expectations, but it's not like it was a flash in the pan. He's clearly shown top level talent across several years. He's a solid ballstriker with proven top level putting (which he could still improve on from short range).

Kevin


Posted (edited)

Found some interesting stats, he really is ALL putter/around the green.  

http://www.pgatour.com/stats/stat.103.html  142 Total GIR's 

http://www.pgatour.com/stats/stat.199.html 42 GIR's other than FW.  Surprisingly enough a few years back I noticed a few of his distances, 150, 175 etc he was actually close in prox to the pin from the rough than the fairway.  We aren't talk just 4-5 opportunities either, he was well in the 20's-30's, enough swings to sort of paint a picture.  

http://www.pgatour.com/stats/stat.02330.html T110 less than 100 @  84.66

http://www.pgatour.com/stats/stat.078.html T155 75-100

http://www.pgatour.com/stats/stat.079.html 34 < 75 S

http://www.pgatour.com/stats/stat.02332.html 100+ 126 

Solid ball striking is not showing up in these stats.  

He has that abbreviated back swing with what looks like a very strong grip, almost like amature would use to offset an over the top downswing.  He also checks his left elbow out like the classic chicken wing, I can't believe he will ever be good at ball striking with that swing.  It doesn't appear as much on his woods, but mid irons and most certainly his wedges the left elbow creates that 90 L after impact.  

What are you thoughts on his game?  

My first reaction is all putter, but I am a realist and understand he has other parts of his game that are top notch as well.  He is much better around the green.  He is ~30 in sand saves http://www.pgatour.com/stats/stat.111.html and 5th!!! in scrambling http://www.pgatour.com/stats/stat.130.html.  

Interesting player, my eyes tell me he has no business hanging with guys like Adam Scott, Jason Day, Dustin Johnson or Rory but he does..... 

@natureboy check this.  http://www.pgatour.com/stats/stat.114.html  2 in birdies on par 5's.  That really caught me by surprise especially with the average length and poor GIR.  

Edited by Database Head

Posted
9 hours ago, Database Head said:

Found some interesting stats, he really is ALL putter/around the green.  

Solid ball striking is not showing up in these stats.  

He has that abbreviated back swing with what looks like a very strong grip, almost like amature would use to offset an over the top downswing.  He also checks his left elbow out like the classic chicken wing, I can't believe he will ever be good at ball striking with that swing.  It doesn't appear as much on his woods, but mid irons and most certainly his wedges the left elbow creates that 90 L after impact.  

What are you thoughts on his game?

@natureboy check this.  http://www.pgatour.com/stats/stat.114.html  2 in birdies on par 5's.  That really caught me by surprise especially with the average length and poor GIR.  

Rather than listing links, it might be more informative to write out explicitly what you think is significant. Could not decipher some of your codes and acronyms. Generally you'd probably be better off just using the SG categories (tee, approach, around green, and putting) to compare relative strengths / weaknesses.

I don't think he's a top ballstriker (excellent), but a solid ballstriker (average to very good). In his worst year of ballstriking '14 he still gained 0.320 strokes on the field from long game. This year he's a better driver in strokes gained off the tee than Day who drives it miles past him. Accuracy / consistency matters. Years when his long game is on, he's very accurate and long enough not to lose too much ground.

Pretty swings don't necessarily translate into results. I'd take Jordan's or Furyk's game with their funky swings over Robert Rock's. They clearly work and produce good results. Furyk is generally deadly on approach, but does lack distance for longer courses and isn't very strong out of the rough.

My thoughts are that Jordan's game is clearly not ALL putting / short game. His relative strengths are weighted toward short game, but he's generally a solid all-around player gaining strokes in each facet of the game and really shining in others. Of the original 8 qualifiers for Ryder Cup, he was 4th in long game strokes gained ~ 0.1 strokes / round behind Koepka. Clearly not in DJ's league there, though. Just solid. 

One aspect that may not show up in statistics other than scrambling is his creativity as a shot-maker. Remember at his blown Masters the 18th hole when he was behind the Magnolia tree? He intentionally hit a smother hook to bounce it along the ground under the tree to take any chance of a branch deflection out of the picture. Gave himself a shot to force a playoff. Requires imagination and club control skill. He's not a one-dimensional player.

Kevin


Posted

Based on the title of the article I don't put a lot of faith into these predictions unless the author has also used his future seeing powers to make billions in the stock market and predict both major world and sports events.

 

—Adam

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
5 minutes ago, Groucho Valentine said:

Spieth gets that putter going again he can win as much as he wants... It doesn't matter how bad you're striking the ball when you're draining 20 footers all the time...lol

I'm not so sure about the bold part.  When the 20-footers are for par, and not for birdie, he's not going to win a whole lot.  

That said, the path forward isn't generally smooth.  I find predictions like this to be more about filling up the demand for product than something that's actually informative.  It seems probable that a single outstanding season is an outlier, a fluke, until another outstanding season comes along.  If Spieth gets back  close to his 2015 form next year, I doubt the same author will be retracting this article in September 2017.  I doubt that anyone will even remember that he wrote it.  But he'll still have been paid for providing content for a webpage for at least one day.

  • Upvote 2

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
30 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

I'm not so sure about the bold part.  When the 20-footers are for par, and not for birdie, he's not going to win a whole lot.  

That said, the path forward isn't generally smooth.  I find predictions like this to be more about filling up the demand for product than something that's actually informative.  It seems probable that a single outstanding season is an outlier, a fluke, until another outstanding season comes along.  If Spieth gets back  close to his 2015 form next year, I doubt the same author will be retracting this article in September 2017.  I doubt that anyone will even remember that he wrote it.  But he'll still have been paid for providing content for a webpage for at least one day.

Yeah, thats right. Its easy to write him off as a fluke. Especially since his game has looked horrendous at times this year.  Its sensational. Gets the clicks going. I would say his US Open win was a fluke, but i think theres other majors in his future. Speith just isn't going to be the Tiger killer a lot of people were hoping he would be. 


Posted

Theres no such thing as a fluke year. Maybe a fluke win but not a fluke year. I think Jordans problem this year is hes put more pressure on himself and tried to get more distance off tee that he does not need. You cant fall into the distance trap because the other top golfers are hitting it farther. You play your game and not theirs.

  • Upvote 1

Posted
21 minutes ago, Aflighter said:

Theres no such thing as a fluke year. Maybe a fluke win but not a fluke year. I think Jordans problem this year is hes put more pressure on himself and tried to get more distance off tee that he does not need. You cant fall into the distance trap because the other top golfers are hitting it farther. You play your game and not theirs.

I think I agree with you. You can certainly label a win as a "fluke"...but an entire season? I don't think so.

Spieth is an amazing talent, and I'd be shocked if he doesn't have have an impressive career. Perhaps his record won't compare with Tiger...but maybe it will. I'm of the opinion that Spieth's biggest problem is the space between his ears. If he can get past that, he has unlimited potential.

It's also interesting that Database Head identifies Spieth as someone he roots against, but nobody criticizes him for that. Anytime I've noted that Tiger Woods is someone that I root against, I get jumped on as if I'd been convicted of being a child molester. Go figure.

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Dominating season after season is something that very few golfers have done and the ones that did have gone down as the very best in the game.  Spieth isn't Tiger or Jack and the golfers he's playing against are a lot better than the guys Jack and Tiger played against when they dominated.  

 

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, newtogolf said:

Dominating season after season is something that very few golfers have done and the ones that did have gone down as the very best in the game.  Spieth isn't Tiger or Jack and the golfers he's playing against are a lot better than the guys Jack and Tiger played against when they dominated. 

Well said. I agree Jordan doesn't seem to have the combination of relative distance edge (at least in Tiger's early years), consistently top iron play, plus putting that Jack and Tiger had. Trevino or Mickelson level, is more likely in the cards.

It's quite possible for him to repeat 2015 IMO as far as his stats. Results depend on how the other guys play. 2015 was his 2nd best driving season in SG and only .03 strokes per round better than this year. He's putting better than last year (he's improved in SG putting each year on tour) and he's still got room for improvement on shorter putt make %.

His iron play in 2015 was the best of his four seasons, beating 2013 by .14 strokes per round.

Short game in 2015 was the best of his seasons too, but only about .08 strokes per round better than this year.

His overall ballstriking was best in 2015, about .25 strokes per round better than 2013 and .32 strokes better than this year. The margin between his peak year when he put it all together and some of his other season's demonstrated level of skill doesn't seem like that much of a departure from what he's shown he's capable of. Three very strong scoring seasons (between 1.5 and 2.2 SG / round) out of his first four years on tour is very solid.

Peaking so well for each Major as in 2015, may be the harder part to repeat. The top ~ 5 guys (Day, DJ, & Rory) seem more competitively matched than ever.

Spoiler

While I agree fields are deeper than they used to be, I think Hogan, Tiger, Jack, Palmer, Nelson, etc. would have still won about the same in any era they played given the same relative equipment, tech training advantages / disadvantages of that era but there's a thread for that.

 

Edited by natureboy

Kevin


Posted

You get jumped on for rooting against Tiger because he has alot of lemmings that follow him.Lemmings are them yellow lil creatures that follow each other around like cows going to feeding time.I dont exactly pull for Jordan cause his actions can be irritating especially his commentary about why he misses a putt or shot but hes a good kid and its hard not to like him. The other guy we all know where his morals are.


Posted (edited)
On 9/23/2016 at 0:55 AM, Database Head said:

Interesting player, my eyes tell me he has no business hanging with guys like Adam Scott, Jason Day, Dustin Johnson or Rory but he does..... 

@natureboy check this.  http://www.pgatour.com/stats/stat.114.html  2 in birdies on par 5's.  That really caught me by surprise especially with the average length and poor GIR.  

The idea he has 'no business' hanging with longer hitters conveys an impression that you think golf is basically a long-driving contest. That's why Broadie's SG is such an improvement over traditional stats. Sure distance is valuable, but there's a huge cost to being in the rough or in a 'recover' position on proximity / holding greens, which translates into longer first putts.

Jason Day stayed number one this year largely thanks to his putting. His long game in terms of strokes gained this year was actually worse than Jordan, so in terms of scoring he was a worse ballstriker in 2016. Adam Scott is a better ballstriker than either of them by a lot (~ 1.3-1.4 strokes per round), but gives away a lot of ground with short game and putting.

Jodan's success on par 5's doesn't surprise me. He hits long enough to reach some greens in 2 and he makes long putts and lags it solidly. His short game is sharp enough to give him a makeable putt if he misses or if he lays up.

Edited by natureboy

Kevin


Posted
10 hours ago, Aflighter said:

You get jumped on for rooting against Tiger because he has alot of lemmings that follow him.Lemmings are them yellow lil creatures that follow each other around like cows going to feeding time.I dont exactly pull for Jordan cause his actions can be irritating especially his commentary about why he misses a putt or shot but hes a good kid and its hard not to like him. The other guy we all know where his morals are.

Lol at you. Pathetic to root against someone. You have no clue of anyone's morals. Most people you think are good guys have skeletons. 


Posted
8 minutes ago, StefanUrkel said:

Lol at you. Pathetic to root against someone. You have no clue of anyone's morals. Most people you think are good guys have skeletons. 

Thats true but im going by who got caught.


Note: This thread is 3397 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Like others have said, get fitted. Since 2011, I have played some combination of 4W + 7W. I had a Cobra 3H and 4H a couple of years back, and would swap out the 7W for a 3H in cold months (keep out of cold wind, and rough thinner for wayward drives.) The 7W matched up with yardage often with 3H; the current 4H goes almost as long as 7W, but has a lower trajectory. 4H also bumped out 4i in last bag redo; I learned to hit stinger with 4H so that's my driving iron on tight holes with shallow landing area. Again, a side-by-side test will tell you which way to go. If 5W or 3H is meh, keep the 7W. Also, are you looking to replace the 7W with a 5W or 3H, or add a second bridge club (5W or 3H) to your bag?
    • Makes sense and aligns with other literature. Static stretching, especially for longer durations, can impede performance in strength and power activities. I would not want to do like hamstring, quad, and calf stretches then go immediately sprint. To me that sounds like a terrible Idea. I would rather start off walking, then jogging, then running, then ramp up to sprinting.  To me, static stretching isn't even a warmup activity. I like the term warmup; you want to get some exertion going before the activity.      a { text-decoration: none; color: #464feb; } tr th, tr td { border: 1px solid #e6e6e6; } tr th { background-color: #f5f5f5; }
    • Going to Florida for the usual February golf trip, and with our current weather, that date won't get here soon enough. Heading to Augusta GA for the Tuesday Master's practice round, will definitely get some golf in while I'm in the area for a few days. Hope to be able to catch up with @coachjimsc if he's around. Then it's back to Scotland first of July.  Playing 7 new courses, can't wait for that.  Then somewhere after that is the Rhode Island CC Member-Guest and then my normal October golf trip to Myrtle Beach.  
    • It sucks to carry around a lot of water, but ideally it should be way more than we think.  I buy those gallon jugs of water and hang them from my pushcart when I walk. I agree with the electrolytes as well. You don't just sweat out water, but you lose electrolytes as well. 
    • A 2010 study from the Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research compares the effects of different pre-round stretch routines for competitive golfers. Active Dynamic Warm-up: Swing Medicus driver, hit 3 shots each with selected clubs. Passive Static Stretches: Various athletic stretches such as hamstrings, chest stretch and reverse trunk twist. The subjects were collegiate golfers with a HDCP index of 5 or less who engaged regularly in strength and fitness routines. All golfers had two test days: one with active dynamic (AD) warmup, a second with AD followed by static stretches (SS). The results were then compared, within golfers and across golfers. For performance testing after the warmups, golfers hit three driver shots at time 0, 15, 30 and 45 minutes after the warmup. The study shows that static stretch formats produced poorer performance outcomes in the four measures shown in Table 5, which shows Time Zero results. The performance deficits under the PSS protocol decreased over time. Some suggestions on why the passive protocol was tied to lower performance than the active protocol: The passive stretches routine induced excessive range of motion,  basically producing wobbles in the golf swing. Other research indicates that the stretching produced slack in the tendons, lessening the amount of muscle force that could be transferred into the shot. One caveat: The study had good scientific controls and balancing of treatments (test routines). This was, however, an exploratory study and raises as many questions as it answers. Also, although the study was done back in 2010, it is still cited as a primary work in recent reviews. A quick online search did not reveal any follow-ups on the study. For those interested, the study PDF is below. PassiveStretchGOLF.pdf  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.