Jump to content
RussUK

"Playing From a Position" à la Jim Venetos

266 posts / 44176 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

A friend of mine told me the other day that he had decided to take up golf which is great. Now, im happy to give him tips on how to do it on the cheap (balls, shoes, clubs etc.) but i have always said i wouldnt give him swing advice as it wouldnt seem right.

Anyway, he sends me a very excited text" Russ, i have just seen this bloke on the net with a fool proof swing, check him out he's call Jim Venetos"

I humoured him and took a look. Some of you may have seen him. He presets, as he puts it "setup, backswing and impact and plays from a position" by pivotiing on to his lead foot then swings his arms with no lower body movement. He wants about 85% weight on the lead foot. 

Im happy working on my center pivot swing and thanks to explanation of pressure by @iacas its going quite well

My mate kept on at me to have a look so to shut him up i tried it. Put it this way, contact was easy and power seemed ok, but holy crap, the amount of pressure it puts on the left hip was imense and i still aching!

I dont want to tell him not to use it if it works....but..... could the pivot/twist onto the lead foot then the lack of "give" during the swing cause pain in the hip? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

My thoughts, in brief:

Not a bad plan if you want to become quasi-proficient faster. Especially if you can swing your arms fast with little body motion. Without hip turn, he also gets very little shoulder turn.

A bad plan, though, if you want to learn to play your best golf. This will most likely install a ceiling on your improvement, and then you're going to struggle when you start to add in the more traditional components to the golf swing.

And the swing isn't foolproof. You can still move around a little. You can still flip your wrists. You can still toe it, shank it, chunk it, blade it… Pull-hook it, etc.

Kinda depends on your goals in golf. If you just want to get proficient and then stay at that level, go for it. If you want to be as good as you can, there's a reason the more traditional components exist in the swing.

@RussUK, you don't have a Member Swing thread. You - and your new friend - should start one. Even if he wants to use this method of swinging, people can respect that.

https://jimvenetosgolfacademy.com

Also, this looks a lot like the Kiran Kanwar swing. The "Minimalist Golf Swing."

Except that she wants (but never seems to actually achieve) "no wrist hinge."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The Venetos swing hurt my back just watching it.

42 minutes ago, iacas said:

You can still flip your wrists. You can still toe it, shank it, chunk it, blade it… Pull-hook it, etc.

This is all I thought of when trying the swing out.  To each his own!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

58 minutes ago, iacas said:

My thoughts, in brief:

Not a bad plan if you want to become quasi-proficient faster. Especially if you can swing your arms fast with little body motion. Without hip turn, he also gets very little shoulder turn.

A bad plan, though, if you want to learn to play your best golf. This will most likely install a ceiling on your improvement, and then you're going to struggle when you start to add in the more traditional components to the golf swing.

And the swing isn't foolproof. You can still move around a little. You can still flip your wrists. You can still toe it, shank it, chunk it, blade it… Pull-hook it, etc.

Kinda depends on your goals in golf. If you just want to get proficient and then stay at that level, go for it. If you want to be as good as you can, there's a reason the more traditional components exist in the swing.

@RussUK, you don't have a Member Swing thread. You - and your new friend - should start one. Even if he wants to use this method of swinging, people can respect that.

https://jimvenetosgolfacademy.com

Also, this looks a lot like the Kiran Kanwar swing. The "Minimalist Golf Swing."

Except that she wants (but never seems to actually achieve) "no wrist hinge."

Thanks @iacas. I plan on starting a swing thread once the weather here improves and time allows me to get out (christmas is fast approaching, cue the family visits!). My friend (not new, known him for a good few years, but new he's new to golf) basically wants to get out and enjoy golf so, like you said, it "may" help in improve to a degree and if he chooses to use it then fair play plus another person to golf with.

I can understand why a swing like this is tempting for some (i have dabbled with the weird and wonderful in the past), when you see the guy using it it looks so simple. Doesnt show you the potential problems, like you mentioned above.

I googled the swing and a number of people on forums said they struggled with two main things, hooking and lead hip fatigue/pain. For the former, Jim Venetos recommends users moved to better player irons, regardless of how long they have been playing, to stop hooking by decreased offset.

On a seperate point. He reckons the power comes from the shaft flexing. What is your opinion?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

51 minutes ago, RussUK said:

I googled the swing and a number of people on forums said they struggled with two main things, hooking and lead hip fatigue/pain. For the former, Jim Venetos recommends users moved to better player irons, regardless of how long they have been playing, to stop hooking by decreased offset.

Decreased offset has almost nothing to do with it.

Offset, I strongly believe, helps players who slice because it simply helps them line up farther to the left. But you can aim them right if you look at the grooves or whatever to line them up.

51 minutes ago, RussUK said:

On a seperate point. He reckons the power comes from the shaft flexing. What is your opinion?

That has almost nothing to do with it. Shaft flexing "helps" but ultimately it's how fast you can swing the clubhead. I could flex the heck out of a shaft and let it kick into the golf ball… and I might get a good chip length shot out of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The video of Venetos looks alot like one of my practice regimine swings. I get into my set up, address position, then work on 1/2, 3/4, and full swings from a set position at the end of my back swing. 

Not only does it help me with my club swing, it helps me work on my legs, and hip movements in a slow motion sort of way. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, iacas said:

Decreased offset has almost nothing to do with it.

Offset, I strongly believe, helps players who slice because it simply helps them line up farther to the left. But you can aim them right if you look at the grooves or whatever to line them up.

That has almost nothing to do with it. Shaft flexing "helps" but ultimately it's how fast you can swing the clubhead. I could flex the heck out of a shaft and let it kick into the golf ball… and I might get a good chip length shot out of it.

Thanks Erik, sounded a little far fetched tbh. 

in regards to a swing thread, are we ok with mobile phone vids?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

7 minutes ago, RussUK said:

in regards to a swing thread, are we ok with mobile phone vids?

Yes, particularly if they're high speed.

https://thesandtrap.com/b/playing_tips/filming_your_swing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Might be okay place to start for an absolute beginner just to get the feel for how the arms and wrists work and take out some moving parts initially that would be added in over time?

Seems to help a less skilled player more easily avoid a spin-out, achieve a hands ahead of the ball impact position and possibly cleaner contact, which can add some yards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was using a similar method last year for gap wedge, pitching wedge and 9 iron shots. It provided accuracy and clean contact with little loss of distance vs a full swing with those clubs... for a while.

As I see it, the trouble with any swing - regardless of how simple - is that there's always a way to screw it up. What ended up happening is that even though the weight started forward, I'd unknowingly slide the weight back just enough to throw everything off.

Overall, I don't think there's anything wrong with experimenting with unconventional instruction. It hasn't worked out well for me, but neither has conventional instruction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It looks like that abbreviated follow through would be a distance killer. The whole thing looks like a 3/4 swing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It's really easy for everyone to dismiss Jim's methodology.

Here's what I have been through.

I play to around 10-12.

Whenever I play a tournament I play to 18+

I struggle with atleast 1 triple and a couple of double bogeys every round.

In my mind I am way better than I play but lack consistency.

Am good at chipping and have really improved my putting using an unconventional method.

What I figured was my long distance wood/iron play completely lacked consistency. And as the round came to close I would get worse.

Also I would every now and then hit weak fades with my woods, lack consistency with my hybrids. Could never hit a 3,4,5 irons. But was good with my 8,9,pw.

Lastly I would have many swing thoughts which by the time came to hitting the ball I would lose steam.

Out of desperation to get rid of my over the top swing I came across jims YouTube video.

I tried it at the practice range gave me almost the same distance as my normal  swing but with a little more consistency on the first day itself.

I took it to the course.

I found the same distance with a huge jump in consistency and ball striking. My fault was  I still would fall back to my old method for a few shots. Over the years have come to realise that no matter who the coach is some of the things will work for you and some will not. I still use my old method for driving but from a 3 wood to a pitching wedge I find Jims method  great and a lot less strenuous on my hip and back.

Over a month am very impressed with the distances. It's increased by an iron. More than the distance  I find from a habitual slicer have been able to hit the ball straight. I get approximately 160 yards carry with my 7.

I've never hit my 3 wood so consistently as do now.  I do not use his methods for chipping or for putting.

What I am trying to say is whoever you maybe and if you been struggling this is worth a shot.

The golf swing is very complicated for most of us. The weight shift, the timing , the tempo, the positions etc. If this method  works for you you'll end of thanking Jim, if it doesn't you can always go back to your normal Swing.

I am going to work on Jim's swing till I know what's a keeper and what's not, as of now am just surprising alot of my friends with my shot making.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all...I see you are chatting about the swing I teach. Based on some of your comments it's clear to me that you are misperceiving what I teach, which is understandable because what I teach is very different from traditional golf instruction. 

I'll say this briefly...

If you are experiencing any pain in the swing I teach, you are not properly executing the swing. The swing has been proven to be bio-mechanically sound by doctors at USC.

If you think this swing is only for beginners you are gravely mistaken. Every great ball striker on tour has always had a left dominant swing...from Bobby Jones to Nicklaus to Tiger at his best and now Finnau and Koepka. My system simply allows you, the general public and average golfer, to be able to experience this same skill. 

My only goal is to share and help those golfers who are tired of the inconsistencies, disappointments and physical pain of the traditional swing and are ready to move on to a logic based, universally applicable system that eliminates a slice and empowers you with the clarity and physical skill to hit a draw as your stock shot.

If you have any questions I'd be glad to answer them. Best of luck to all and Stay Still.

Jim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Jim Venetos said:

If you are experiencing any pain in the swing I teach, you are not properly executing the swing. The swing has been proven to be bio-mechanically sound by doctors at USC.

Jim, I'll give you some slack, but let's try to avoid stuff like this. At the end of the day these are still athletic movements, and people sometimes have pain writing with a pencil and paper, or walking, or doing anything with their shoulders, arms, backs, wrists, etc. It's quite possible that someone can have pain doing an athletic movement.

17 minutes ago, Jim Venetos said:

If you think this swing is only for beginners you are gravely mistaken. Every great ball striker on tour has always had a left dominant swing...from Bobby Jones to Nicklaus to Tiger at his best and now Finnau and Koepka. My system simply allows you, the general public and average golfer, to be able to experience this same skill.

Oh boy.

Analyzr Image Export.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Iacas, is it not fair for me to respond with the knowledge I have from teaching this swing for 25 years or would you prefer I allow erroneous statements to be made? I stated that the swing is biomechanically sound. That means when executed properly the swing works in coordination with the body’s natural movements. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jim Venetos said:

I stated that the swing is biomechanically sound.

At the end of the day, any good golf swing is going to put stresses and strains on the body. It's a fairly violent action.

I'm not particularly interested in talking about "biomechanically sound" golf swings, in the sense that a bunch of golf swings have been deemed "biomechanically sound" by bunches of people with medical degrees, biomechanics degrees, etc.

Few of us here are medical doctors.

Some of us here, myself included, do know quite a bit about the golf swing. So let's stick to talking about that stuff, not medical stuff you can get a ton of people to say.

Hell, I know a guy who can't practice putting for more than about three minutes at a time because of the strain it puts on his lower back. That doesn't mean his putting stroke isn't "biomechanically sound."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

34 minutes ago, Jim Venetos said:

Iacas, is it not fair for me to respond with the knowledge I have from teaching this swing for 25 years or would you prefer I allow erroneous statements to be made? I stated that the swing is biomechanically sound. That means when executed properly the swing works in coordination with the body’s natural movements. 

Jim, I'm sure you're a nice guy, and may even be a good teacher, but most of us here have been around golf long enough to roll our eyes when he hear things like "what I teach is very different from traditional golf instruction" and "USC doctors" and "biomechnically sound".

Please save that pitch for late night TV. As @iacas said, we're here to talk golf.

Edited by chspeed
https://thesandtrap.com/how-to/mention-members/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Iacas, I simply responded to your claim that the swing I teach hurts the body. I'm not interested in a debate especially since you haven't tried the swing. I suggest to you if you are going to be involved in forums that discuss golf instruction maybe you should try the system before you knock it. 

Very best to you all and like I said, if you have a question I'm happy to answer it. My intention is simply to help golfers play better without the inconsistencies and undue stress on the body of the traditional swing.

Wishing you all stillness in your game and in your posts.

I think this video applies to this topic.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Affiliates

    SuperSpeed
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo
  • Posts

    • I have seen this by playing with some very unusual golfers over the years. Guys that have what most would consider poor swings, but they know where the ball will go. They have some sort of deep competitive nature or want to score so bad. It is like they can score from sheer will power. Some of it might be ignorance. They don't know what they don't know and just get the ball in the cup. If they saw a video of their swing it might change their game/scores for the worse. I have seen a guy that would line up with body and shoulders maybe 30% to the right of the target line and consistently pull the shot maybe 10 degrees left of target. He would hit a lot of greens and was very competitive with his peers. Another hooded his club at address more than I have ever seen anybody. He would line up for a draw/hook that would be a low runner. He shot 2 over on the 9 holes we played. I worked so hard and concentrated so much to beat him by by one stroke. The most intense 9 holes ever for me. We were playing with 6 other of his regulars and they I know they all wanted him to beat me. I was not going to let the hunchback of Notre Dame beat me. (that is what he looked like in his set up and swing) I knew another guy who had a beautiful set of clubs and had started playing 3 years before. Not an athlete by any means and well into middle age. He shot a 92 with the most consistent slice I have ever witnessed. He stayed right on my heels through most of the round. Don't remember him ever losing a ball. He knew the distances on his clubs and knew where the ball would land and how it would roll. He would line up on the tee well to the left and most tee shots would land in the fairway. Maybe 200 to 210 yards. From a mental perspective he seemed a little like Moe Norman. If you tried to "straighten" out any of them with some instruction I would put money that they would never recover, LOL.
    • Yesterday my brother and I went out and played a course that we haven’t played since March. It’s a slightly easier course than my home course, so I was going into the round thinking I would easily shoot in the 80s. I didn’t, but I wasn’t that far off. I didn’t hit the ball great on the front, but was able to hang in there and shoot 46. Two highlights: •I chunked my tee shot on the par-5 fifth and didn’t even reach the dogleg, but I was still on the green in four. I rolled in my difficult six-footer for par. That was a confidence-builder, since I almost never play that hole well. •I had about 145 in on the ninth hole, off a slight downhill lie. 8I again to four feet. This may have been the best shot of the day (my approaches on 17 and 18 are also solid contenders), but I unfortunately missed the birdie putt. The back nine was better, and I actually walked to the seventeenth tee needing to birdie one of the last two holes to keep it under 90. Both were good opportunities, the 17th being a reachable par 5 (453 whites), the 18th a short par 4 (354 whites), but the seventeenth is the better chance. My drive wasn’t quite long enough to have a good shot at the green, so I laid up with a 3/4 9I (there’s a small pond about 100 yards short of the green), which left me about 135 yards into the wind. I decided to hit a knockdown 8I, and it came off perfectly and settled eight feet out, exactly pin-high. Grazed the edge with my birdie putt, which left me with a tap-in par. Although I wanted the birdie, I was satisfied, because I hit three good shots to give myself a legit birdie chance, and I hit a good putt. I wanted a three on the eighteenth hole, which would give me 89. My last drive found the last fairway, and I had about 140 to the pin. I went with the 8I again, full swing this time. As soon as I let it fly, I knew it was gonna be good. Twelve feet out. I knew I had another chance. However, I seemed to forget that putts from above the hole on this particular green tend to slide quite a bit if you missed it long. I had the line perfectly, but I gave it too much gas, and it rolled past and just kept on rolling until I had a longish par putt. I lined up my eight-foot par putt and missed it, so I tapped in for an ugly three-putt bogey to finish at 91. With the exception of that three-putt, I played the last two holes very well. For some reason during this round, and it’s not because of my fade, I had a tendency to lose my iron shots to the right, which was frustrating because that isn’t normal for me. I didn’t hit them poorly at all, I just pushed them a bit.  My brother played his first full eighteen in about three months, and he was doing pretty well until he pulled a muscle in his leg on the 14th tee. I still don’t know how that happened. I thought he was gonna quit right there, but he didn’t. He battled on, and managed to hang in there until the 17th. After he putted out, he told me he was done. So he sat out the last hole and watched me play it.  Im probably only gonna play one more time before Saturday, which is when I’m playing my “birthday round”. I mentioned on this forum about this time last week that I was playing Lonnie Poole, but my dad went on the website last Friday, and the earliest tee time we could’ve gotten was around 2:30, meaning, because it’s typically a busy course, we probably weren’t going to get all 18 holes in.  So I looked on the list of courses I made just in case we couldn’t play Lonnie Poole, and the course that stuck out to me the most was UNC Finley. I remember when I was in middle school, I had a friend who played there a lot, and he said it was a great course. We were able to get a tee time there, for 11:24. I’m looking forward to it!
    • You are overthinking it. You are basically going to have such similar shafts by hard stepping the 6.5 or softing the 7.0 (both in flex and more importantly in weight), that if you can hit one, you can hit the other or vise versa. You will get much more definitive results from bending the lofts to adjust trajectory.  You would really need to move into a different weight class before I would say you would see any noticeable difference over the long haul between shafts.
    • Coincidentally, this article came out and lists a lot of what we say in LSW and so on. Scoring lower again involves: Not taking penalty shots. Not taking doubles or, when you get better, not making a bad bogey. (You're still going to make some bogeys.) Playing for pars and letting the birdies happen is tough for people to get. Understanding where to miss the ball and fitting the "better side" into your shot pattern/Shot Zone. The last part answers your question of sorts: If you can develop a ball that only curves or misses one direction, that's a pattern. You can play a patterned Shot Zone much more easily than you can play a "fern" Shot Zone (where the shots have a root and then spread out in all directions from there, two dimensionally, like a fern). I'm not sure what "fighting" a one-way miss means - if the vast majority of your shots are, for example, missing left, either open the face to take off some of that left miss/curve or just aim right and play it. If there's trouble left, aim WAY right. The smart-player's guide to dropping 10 shots — guaranteed Improving at golf doesn't require hours of range time. Recreational players just need to take advantage of the stat-based scoring opportunities out there.    
    • Things like this are why I initially brought the question up. I have nowhere to try these on. I spoke with FootJoy and they stated that you buy according to your normal waist size but that those sizes are made with the assumption that they are going over the top of your golf clothing and are sized a bit bigger
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Aldo Aitken
      Aldo Aitken
      (30 years old)
    2. Also Aitken
      Also Aitken
      (30 years old)
    3. CJK
      CJK
      (62 years old)
    4. Coffin-dodger
      Coffin-dodger
      (70 years old)
    5. Greg55
      Greg55
      (65 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...