Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

FIR stat recording ?


Note: This thread is 3244 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, DaveP043 said:

I don't keep formal stats, but I review every round mentally.  For me, a drive is acceptable if its hit reasonably solid and finishes in an acceptable spot.  If I miss a fairway by an inch, or even by 10 feet, that's still pretty decent, unless that inch puts me in a hazard or some other bad place.  Sometimes my aiming point is at the edge of a fairway, to be sure to avoid serious trouble on the other side.  I can hardly beat myself up for missing those shots by a hair to the "rough" side.  So for you, as a tool to evaluate your own game, I'd see no problem with revising your personal definition.  Don't use that stat to compare to anyone else, though, since you could be comparing apples and oranges.

Well said. @lee34 I'd add to Dave's comment that depending on your accuracy / consistency off the tee you may actually want to choose a target / landing spot for you shot zone / typical shot dispersion that is off the fairway if there is trouble on the other side of it and aiming for the fairway would put too many of your tee shots in jeopardy.

So a shot even well in the rough might be 'good' relative to your intended target for the hole.

Edited by natureboy

Kevin


Posted
36 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

50% fairways isn't too bad

Yeah, I should have used a lower percent to make the point. And I agree with your point. 

Matt          My Swing

 

 :ping: G425 Max Driver

Sub 70 3 wood, 3 hybrid and 5-p 639CB

Edison wedges 51, 55, 59

Sub 70 004 Mallet

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, lee34 said:

So for my stats I always count FIR, GIRs and number of putts.

However recently I've been considering being more lenient with my FIRs a bit like NGIRs if you will.

Normally I'm strict so if the ball isn't sat on the fairway it gets an X rather than a tick. As a 24 handicapper I'm wondering whether I should put a tick in my FIR box if I'm happy with my drive. So it may be in light rough just off the fairway but it was a good drive and I'm happy with it.

what are your thoughts on this ?

Personally, I don't really pay attention to fairways hit.  What I pay attention to is having a chance at GIR or not.  Whether my ball is in the fairway or not, all I care about is it's not in a hazard (although some hazards still leave a chance) and I have a go at the green.

How I track it on my scoreboard... F for fairway hit, L for left of fairway, R for right of fairway, and circle the L or R if I'm left with a reasonable chance at GIR.

I do like knowing the % I miss left and right, as it helps to game plan on holes with heavy trouble on on side or the other.

Edited by Denny Bang Bang
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I play at our local  muni golf course. They have 36 holes, two different courses. One is an old links course, long, lined with trees.  The other 18 holes are a more modern looking, with not very many trees. My golf partner will not play the links course because even though he out drives me by 100 yds at times. I drive in the fairway, he is there sometimes. So for me it is a very important issue. My wedges/irons are in the fairway so I get good spin on them. Of course a lot depends on the length and type of rough you are playing. 


Posted
9 hours ago, lee34 said:

There have been several times I've hit a great drive but because it's trickled off the fairway I haven't counted it. IMO this is wrong as an amateur because I've done what I wanted to do. Significantly shortened the hole and given myself a good chance of hitting a GIR.

I agree with this. As long as the lie isn't horrible, there's little difference between a fairway and the rough - at least on the courses I play.

At my level, I just want my tee shots to stay out of the woods and water.

GameGolf says I hit 58% of FIR. If it was that important of a stat, I'd be breaking 90.

  • Upvote 1

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
7 hours ago, JonMA1 said:

GameGolf says I hit 58% of FIR. If it was that important of a stat, I'd be breaking 90.

53% no 58%.

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Lots of good info on this thread.  I do like to keep stats on my card.  I do fairways and putts.  For the FW's I put a F or an arrow to the direction the ball went.  I also mark a little mark on the hole layout picture on the top of the card where each ball landed.  This helps me keep track of how many shots and how I progressed down the hole.  This info is helpful when reviewing the round later in the day or another day when I cant remember the whole round.

Driver: :callaway: Diablo
Woods: :callaway: Big Bertha 2 & 4
Irons: Miura MC 102's 3 - PW & Mizuno MP 67's 3 - W
Wedges: :mizuno: MP-R12 52* & 58*
Putters: :ping: WRX Ti4

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On ‎1‎/‎24‎/‎2017 at 10:38 PM, JonMA1 said:

I agree with this. As long as the lie isn't horrible, there's little difference between a fairway and the rough - at least on the courses I play.

At my level, I just want my tee shots to stay out of the woods and water.

GameGolf says I hit 58% of FIR. If it was that important of a stat, I'd be breaking 90.

I'm of the exact same mind, in terms of rough vs. fairway.  In fact, on many of the courses I play, the fairway can be a little bare and hard to play from, and I prefer a little softer lie from the rough.

DJ

Follow me at Game Golf Profile: http://www.gamegolf.com/player/djfajt71 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 hours ago, djfajt71 said:

I'm of the exact same mind, in terms of rough vs. fairway.  In fact, on many of the courses I play, the fairway can be a little bare and hard to play from, and I prefer a little softer lie from the rough.

After watching some of the Farmers Insurance Open, I suppose the term "rough" at the courses I play is kind of a misnomer.

It depends on which course, the amount of rain and how long it's been since it was mowed, but I'm usually more intimidated by a downhill lie on the fairway than I am a ball that's sitting up on a level part of the rough.

Having said that, one of my courses tends to let the rough get pretty high. I'm not yet at the point in my game where I really know how to hit out of the thick stuff. I think "flailing" might be a good description.

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 1/25/2017 at 5:48 AM, JonMA1 said:

53% no 58%.

When a bunch of us got together at Eagle Creek last month, I broke a record for FW accuracy. My score sucked.

- Shane

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
31 minutes ago, JonMA1 said:

After watching some of the Farmers Insurance Open, I suppose the term "rough" at the courses I play is kind of a misnomer.

From something I heard it was an unusual height / thickness due to recent rains. It was so wet they weren't able to mow as much so it may have gotten a little closer to U.S. Open type conditions that normal PGA events.

Kevin


Posted
37 minutes ago, CarlSpackler said:

When a bunch of us got together at Eagle Creek last month, I broke a record for FW accuracy. My score sucked.

I'll bet I have you beat...

After your post, I had to look up my worst round with a high % of FIR. Ironically, it was the worst 9 hole score I recorded last year.

Screen Shot 2017-01-27 at 9.26.43 PM.png

It was almost 100%. Hole 1 was the only missed fairway and it was only by a few feet.

Just shows the importance of a well-rounded game. Let this be a reminder to all that no matter how bad you think your game is, it could be worse.

 

  • Upvote 1

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
19 minutes ago, JonMA1 said:

I'll bet I have you beat...

After your post, I had to look up my worst round with a high % of FIR. Ironically, it was the worst 9 hole score I recorded last year.

Screen Shot 2017-01-27 at 9.26.43 PM.png

It was almost 100%. Hole 1 was the only missed fairway and it was only by a few feet.

Just shows the importance of a well-rounded game. Let this be a reminder to all that no matter how bad you think your game is, it could be worse.

You definitely have me beat with that one.  :beer:

- Shane

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3244 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Never practiced golf when I was young and the only lesson ever taken was a driver lesson. I feel like I'm improving every year. However, the numbers don't support my feeling about improving. I usually drop to 12-13 during the summer while playing the familiar courses around home and then go on golf trips in the fall to new courses and increase to end the year between 15-17. Been a similar story for a number of years now but hey, it's the best thing there is in life so not too bothered but reaching 9.9 is the objective every year. Maybe a few lessons and practice could help me achieve it since I pretty much have no idea what I'm doing, just playing and never practice.
    • I am semi-loyal. Usually buy four dozen of one ball and only play that until out and then determine whether to continue or try another one. Since starting my semi-loyal path to success, I've been playing the below, not in order: ProV1 ProV1x ProV1x left dash AVX Bridgestone BXS Srixon Z-star XV I am not sure if it has helped anything, but it gives a bit of confidence knowing that it at least is not the ball (while using the same one) that gives different results so one thing less to mind about I guess. On the level that I am, not sure whether it makes much difference but will continue since I have to play something so might as well go with the same ball for a number of rounds. Edit: favorite is probably the BXS followed by ProV1/Srixon Z-star XV. Haven't got any numbers to back it up but just by feel.  
    • Will not do it by myself, going to the pro shop I usually use after Cristmas for input and actually doing the changes, if any, but wanted to get some thoughts on whether this was worthwhile out of curiosity. 
    • In terms of ball striking, not really. Ball striking being how good you are at hitting the center of the clubface with the swing path you want and the loft you want to present at impact.  In terms of getting better launch conditions for the current swing you have, it is debatable.  It depends on how you swing and what your current launch conditions are at. These are fine tuning mechanisms not significant changes. They might not even be the correct fine tuning you need. I would go spend the $100 to $150 dollars in getting a club fitting over potentially wasting money on changes that ChatGPT gave you.  New grips are important. Yes, it can affect swing weight, but it is personal preference. Swing weight is just one component.  Overall weight effects the feel. The type of golf shaft effects the feel of the club in the swing. Swing weight effects the feel. You can add so much extra weight to get the swing weight correct and it will feel completely different because the total weight went up. Imagine swinging a 5lb stick versus a 15lb stick. They could be balanced the same (swing weight), but one will take substantially more effort to move.  I would almost say swing weight is an old school way of fitting clubs. Now, with launch monitors, you could just fit the golfer. You could have two golfers with the same swing speed that want completely different swing weight. It is just personal preference. You can only tell that by swinging a golf club.     
    • Thanks for the comments. I fully understand that these changes won't make any big difference compared to getting a flawless swing but looking to give myself the best chance of success at where I am and hopefully lessons will improve the swing along the way. Can these changes make minor improvements to ball striking and misses then that's fine. From what I understood about changing the grips, which is to avoid them slipping in warm and humid conditions, is that it will affect the swing weight since midsize are heavier than regular and so therefore adding weight to the club head would be required to avoid a change of feel in the club compared to before? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.