Jump to content
mvmac

FlightScope Mevo - Portable Launch Monitor for the Everyday Golfer

281 posts in this topic Last Reply

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Lihu said:

Also in the default mode, only 3 can be stored.

If you’re a coach, can I request you as the instructor or does it go to some random pool?

I ask because I jjust don’t want Kostis :-D

 

If you want @iacas to look at your swing, you can just post a video here: 

;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

8 minutes ago, bmartin461 said:

Not sure if this is helpful or not, but Golf WRX has started a new "Trackman Tuesday" series.

Thanks for posting this!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 1/5/2018 at 1:20 PM, Lihu said:

Although the dots are not absolutely necessary in outdoor conditions, I find them to be a bit more accurate. I ran out of them and am currently using 1/4" copper tape (aluminum tape will likely work as well), and found a source for 1/4" dots for about $34/2000 dots.

http://amzn.to/2qvnTG6

Amazon offers other sizes as well:

http://amzn.to/2CW5sNn

Of course Flightscope doesn't overcharge that much anyway. . . https://flightscope.com/product/metalic-stickers/

My package arrived today. Going to compare them to the one Mevo dot I have left.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Just had a long discussion with Flightscope.

They confirmed what I thought. First of all club head speed is pretty accurate if you have the unit around 5' to 7' away with proper alignment. The issue with ball speed is that if your swing is such that it "covers" the ball it will not pick up ball speed properly.

They also confirmed that low smash factor numbers are very likely due to the use of the 1pc Srixon range balls. Makes sense anyway.

The unit to ball to target alignment turns out to be non-optimal. What they recommended is placing the unit outside that target line. Place the Mevo about 6 inches away from you relative to the ball/target line. They have not finalized this placement yet, and are still experimenting with it before they publish it publicly. So, if you do this know that it is possibly not going to be the "final setup configuration" they recommend.

The error in doing this is quite small if you place the unit 7' away from the ball. cos(6/(7*12))= 0.997 or about 0.3% reduction in readings.

I'm going to test this out this afternoon. 1' is even possible with only 0.9898 reduction in readings. Better than losing a lot more from not getting the velocity of the ball until it's several yards away. That explains why my carry yardages are low compared to observation.

Note that Mevo measures velocity for about 40 yards. Which is more than sufficient for accurate measurements. Outdoors is going to be a lot more accurate.

They also recommended using 2 dots side by side and the target position for the dots is more optimal. I told them I put a 1/2" by 1/4" piece of copper tape on the back, and they thought that was a good idea. That gave me much more consistent spin readings.

So, I'm returning the Amazon dots, and getting the 3/8" size in place of the 1/4" ones I ordered. I only used a couple and the company seemed okay with returning them. Great service. I pay for shipping back to them though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 1/10/2018 at 10:45 AM, bmartin461 said:

Not sure if this is helpful or not, but Golf WRX has started a new "Trackman Tuesday" series.

First one: Trackman Tuesday (Episode 1): Drive it Longer

 

Second one: Trackman Tuesday (Episode 2): Driver Loft

Third one: Trackman Tuesday (Episode 3): Better Ball Striking

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

21 minutes ago, bmartin461 said:

Perhaps a separate topic for these, as they're not really related to the Mevo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Talked with Kevin at Flightscope again. They’re going through all 588 swings of data for me. Told them it’s not a big deal since the Mevo works great for Swing changes, but they want to see how I’m using it I guess?

Speaks volumes for their wonderful technical support!

Edited by Lihu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 minutes ago, dennyjones said:

@iacas do you have these in stock or are you placing an order soon?

B

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

One quick question, do you have to hit a ball for the mevo to register the clubhead speed, or can I use it as a swing speed radar for the superspeed golf system? 

 

Either way, Im pretty sure I'll be pulling the trigger on this soon as well.

Im also looking into a net/turf setup in my yard so I'll be set. 

Will help gauge how well im striking into the net, plus will be useful when I do go to the range, since its slightly uphill its hard to see the ball land on yardages much past 160yds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

27 minutes ago, klineka said:

One quick question, do you have to hit a ball for the mevo to register the clubhead speed, or can I use it as a swing speed radar for the superspeed golf system? 

 

Either way, Im pretty sure I'll be pulling the trigger on this soon as well.

Im also looking into a net/turf setup in my yard so I'll be set. 

Will help gauge how well im striking into the net, plus will be useful when I do go to the range, since its slightly uphill its hard to see the ball land on yardages much past 160yds.

It’s not a swing speed radar, but you might or might not need one with a Mevo. I just happen to have both.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 1/27/2018 at 8:33 AM, Lihu said:

Talked with Kevin at Flightscope again. They’re going through all 588 swings of data for me. Told them it’s not a big deal since the Mevo works great for Swing changes, but they want to see how I’m using it I guess?

Speaks volumes for their wonderful technical support!

So, Flightscope went through all my data, and concluded that the low smash factor was due to the use of range balls. My friends unit was tested using premium balls. The shortness of the carry numbers versus observed was due to the SW algorithm not being able to compensate for really low compression range balls. Normal range balls vary from 100 to 117 while the Srixon 1 PC is 83. It's effectively a limited flight ball with a rated reduction of >6%, and based upon observations is more than likely 10% which consistent with what Srixon stated.

Nothing wrong with my Mevo and nothing wring with the range balls.

I've really enjoyed the time that Flightscope took to satisfy my needs.

Get one. You won't regret it.

Edited by Lihu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Lihu said:

So, Flightscope went through all my data, and concluded that the low smash factor was due to the use of range balls. My friends unit was tested using premium balls. The shortness of the carry numbers versus observed was due to the SW algorithm not being able to compensate for really low compression range balls. Normal range balls vary from 100 to 117 while the Srixon 1 PC is 83. It's effectively a limited flight ball with a rated reduction of >6%, and based upon observations is more than likely 10% which consistent with what Srixon stated.

Nothing wrong with my Mevo and nothing wring with the range balls.

I've really enjoyed the time that Flightscope took to satisfy my needs.

Get one. You won't regret it.

Interesting. Pretty sure the two ranges by me both use the 1-piece range ball (I know for a fact that one does because the end of the range borders on the 2nd hole). That means my range numbers won't be accurate? That's a bit of a bummer.

I mean it works fine on my net where I do most of my practicing anyway, but I'd like to hit actual targets when I start mapping partial wedges and stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

6 minutes ago, billchao said:

Interesting. Pretty sure the two ranges by me both use the 1-piece range ball (I know for a fact that one does because the end of the range borders on the 2nd hole). That means my range numbers won't be accurate? That's a bit of a bummer.

I mean it works fine on my net where I do most of my practicing anyway, but I'd like to hit actual targets when I start mapping partial wedges and stuff.

@billchao, if you have limited flight range balls, they either have different dimples, lower ball speeds, or both. So no, you're going to get bad numbers from those. You need to find a range with at least "regular" range balls, or do the wedge mapping in a field or something. Or your net with YOUR golf balls might work (especially with the dots).

I mean, you can't expect the Mevo to know whether the ball you just hit is a golf ball, a 5%, a 12.2%, or whatever reduced distance ball, you know?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

6 minutes ago, iacas said:

@billchao, if you have limited flight range balls, they either have different dimples, lower ball speeds, or both. So no, you're going to get bad numbers from those. You need to find a range with at least "regular" range balls, or do the wedge mapping in a field or something. Or your net with YOUR golf balls might work (especially with the dots).

I was kind of thinking out loud there and didn't finish the thought, apparently. Basically it's good to know I shouldn't bother with the Mevo at those ranges. I'll have to find a good range to Mevo on.*

I'm sure I'll end up doing some partial wedges on my net anyway; it's better than nothing at the very least.

*yes I'm using Mevo as a verb, like Google. I'm going to make it a thing ;-)

11 minutes ago, iacas said:

I mean, you can't expect the Mevo to know whether the ball you just hit is a golf ball, a 5%, a 12.2%, or whatever reduced distance ball, you know?

Right and I didn't expect it to. It's good to know that the Mevo accurately reads both clubhead speed and ball speed separately. I've hit on some LMs that only measure your ball speed and calculate your clubhead speed based on a fixed smash factor number (or vice versa) and found them lacking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

6 minutes ago, billchao said:

I was kind of thinking out loud there and didn't finish the thought, apparently. Basically it's good to know I shouldn't bother with the Mevo at those ranges.

You can still use it for comparative data. If 1.36 is your best smash factor, that's still going to indicate a better strike than a 1.29. And so on.

But I wouldn't then upload that data. I'd just delete it after you were done.

6 minutes ago, billchao said:

*yes I'm using Mevo as a verb, like Google. I'm going to make it a thing ;-)

It already is. :-)

6 minutes ago, billchao said:

Right and I didn't expect it to. It's good to know that the Mevo accurately reads both clubhead speed and ball speed separately. I've hit on some LMs that only measure your ball speed and calculate your clubhead speed based on a fixed smash factor number (or vice versa) and found them lacking.

Yeah, those are pretty lame. The Mevo measures the fastest thing. So it tracks the clubhead coming in, and then when the speed of the fastest thing instantly jumps, that's the ball and thus impact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2018 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    More to come…
  • Posts

    • I think that a lot of CGA-geeks like Andy Johnson and Zac Blair absolutely do not understand correct strategy. Laying up for a better angle is a terrible idea for basically everybody, unless the course is super tricked up with slopes and/or bunkering. They also do not get that that you should be aiming at the center of the green on most of your approach shots. When they talk about the best angles to approach pins from over 100 yards, my eyes just glaze over. Virtually zero amateur golfers should care about where the flag is, period, so trying to set up the best angle to get that flag is pointless. That said, I strongly prefer playing courses that are CGA-geek approved. They tend to be wider, and thus easier and more fun for me. It is also fun to be able to play a course and see what the architect wants me to do and the decision making that I'm supposed to go through. Plus, I hit a lot of drivers, and that's a lot of fun to do for me as well. For example, there's a Doak course called CommonGround by me that I really enjoy playing. It's probably my favorite course in the Denver area, actually! I understand what Doak wants me to do off the tee and where he wants me to put my shot. As an example, this is the par 5 11th hole: Doak wants us to take that line off the tee. That line is about 250 yards, FWIW. That line gives us the shortest shot into the green. Then you have to decide whether you can carry the water on your second shot and get to the green. It's not the best angle, but the closer you get to that second bunker on the left, the shorter your shot will be. Although right is safe, it will leave you with the longer shot and virtually zero chance to get the green into unless you're a monster hitter. The problem here is that it's stupid to purposefully play too far left. The fairway is about 60 yards wide past that bunker (which is only 230 to carry, i.e., not a problem for most okay golfers in Colorado) You don't want to be in that second bunker on the left, and you don't really have that significant of a penalty for being right. It's going to be a 3 shot hole for most people no matter what. There's not a decision to make if you understand proper strategy like in LSW. You're hitting driver, with the center of your shot zone in the center of the fairway. If you end up on the left side of the fairway, great! You might have a good shot to go for it. If you end up on the right side of the fairway, then that's not a problem. You just won't have much of a chance to get there in 2. It's still a lot of fun, though. Hitting that perfect shot that ends up on the left hand side of the fairway is great! A good shot for me on the left side means I'll have a 5 iron for the approach shot to the green. Right just means I have to avoid that bunker in front of the green with my approach. Nothing wrong with the hole; it's still great fun. But there really isn't a decision to make off the tee at all as Doak intended. There are other holes at this course with similar "decisions" where the answer is, cool, give me my driver.
    • I'm at zero also.  Aanalogies are always a little "not the same though"  but that's as close as I can get (eagle on a par 4). Personally?  I wouldn't be as thrilled at a little short ace vs one I'd consider more 'typical' of a good course.  Though lots of super cool courses also have a very short 3 in there....  But I have a hard time picking a differentiating criteria.  I think a "Par 3 course" is not a good way to discuss it.  Maybe, instead, what yardage is 'too short' to feel like claiming the hole in one, makes one pause a beat and think about it. If a gun was held to my head to draw a line?  I put the split on whether it's a wedge or a longer club Wedge ace?  Yeah, it's a hole in one (frown.....smile a little bit) Iron or longer in?  YEAH!!!!  (Smile) It's so arbitrary......
    • I'd probably rank them… with Talamore a distant third. I'm not sure which I'd put where between Mid-South and Dormie Club. I haven't played Mid-South since before the renovation, so I'm bumping it up in my mind for that… but it may be even better or slightly worse than I imagine. Right now I'm calling it a tie, though.
    • They actually have a combo set of the Blue/White tees, where the scorecard indicated which set of tees you played for each hole. I think it was something like 12 holes from the whites and 6 from the blues IIRC.  It was 6,300 yds and was rated 71/127 which was perfect for us. My buddy is in the 15-20 handicap range and a bit shorter off the tee than me, so I think the full blues would have been a bit much for him.
    • lol When I shoot 85 instead of 75, it's because I couldn't make my putts, or couldn't hit the fairways enough....etc. Other factors like course condition, weather and wind has more effect on my game than the numbers my clubs are spec'ed to generate. I never heard a professional golfer say they didn't play well because of the numbers on a golf screen was off. I bet someone like Phil, or Tiger, can take my old MP53s and still shoot 65.....because their game is 1000 times better than mine.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Baculus
      Baculus
      (26 years old)
    2. Hatchman
      Hatchman
      (65 years old)
    3. KiwiGolfer
      KiwiGolfer
      (44 years old)

×

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...