Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3223 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Hi all,

I am facing a difficult decision. I am in the process of getting new clubs to replace my Ping iE1 irons.

I went to test shafts for my "upcoming CF16" set, but they didn't have CF16 so I hit JPX900 Forged.

That club feels absolute butter. Absolute butter I say. Ok, it launches a little lower than what you'd expect and has less spin, but now I am torn... I am unable to hit the CF16 and based on reviews CF16 spins more, launches higher but still carries the same, even a bit further than the JPX900. But I have some worries. One of them is that the JPX900 line carries no 3 iron, but I guess I could get something in its place...

So:

- Is the CF16 all that much worse feeling than the JPX900?
- Would you say that the low spin/low launch in JPX900 could present problems in getting the ball to stop on the greens? (this has been mentioned in several reviews)
- Are you bothered by the relatively long blade length of JPX900 ? (I find that a little distracting)
- Which is more forgiving on the heel-side?


Tero

Posted

I may be wrong, but I suspect you answered this question just by noting your experience. 

"Absolute butter" vs "I am unable to hit"

I've learned enough here to know that people are quite happy with a wide variety of clubs. Each person should try a wide selection and go with what suits their eye and their swing (and their budget).  

Good luck! Let us know how it goes. Let's see what else others have to say about these models too, in case that factors in for you. 

My Swing


Driver: :ping: G30, Irons: :tmade: Burner 2.0, Putter: :cleveland:, Balls: :snell:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, RandallT said:

"Absolute butter" vs "I am unable to hit"

I think he meant that he wasn't able to hit the CF16 since they weren't available at his fitter yet.

And...there is your answer, @teropa. Wait until you can hit both before making a decision. If the "feel" and the flight characteristics you describe are important to you, you can't judge them until you try both options.

- John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
8 minutes ago, Hardspoon said:

I think he meant that he wasn't able to hit the CF16 since they weren't available at his fitter yet.

And...there is your answer, @teropa. Wait until you can hit both before making a decision. If the "feel" and the flight characteristics you describe are important to you, you can't judge them until you try both options.

Exactly. No one here has a Callaway fitting cart. Therefore, can't hit them at all.

It would be ideal to be able to hit them side by side. I now have good data for the JPX900F. Just need to try the same shaft in the CF16 so I can finally arrive at the right decision.

Reason I possibly want/crave Apex: reviews, praise.. and the fact that I hit its predecessor at Las Vegas TM experience center a few years ago, and it felt fantastic.

Tero


Posted

 

1 hour ago, Hardspoon said:

I think he meant that he wasn't able to hit the CF16 since they weren't available at his fitter yet.

Hey it was early! :hmm: I honestly read that as "couldn't hit them well but knew others could." Duh.

ive had my coffee now, and I think I'll have better reading comprehension. 

  • Upvote 1

My Swing


Driver: :ping: G30, Irons: :tmade: Burner 2.0, Putter: :cleveland:, Balls: :snell:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

I can't help but so much here but I have hit the CF16 and I thought it felt great. That being said I can't compare to the JPX 900 as I haven't hit that one before. Years ago I did have a set of JPX 800 clubs that I really liked though. I say if you loved the feel of the JPX 900s just go with it. Mizuno always produces solid clubs. 

I think more importantly just get the shaft that fits you the best.

Edited by BirdieLife3

Posted

 

@teropaI have the CF16 and love them. Have never hit an iron that nice in my life. Definitely hold out until you can hit them then make your decision


Posted

I've hit both and found them to be very similar in performance, feel, as well as aesthetics.  The CF16 do run a bit more expensive, which is why I'd recommend the JPX900F.  But definitely try to hit them both with a launch monitor if at all possible so you make the absolute best decision for your swing and what you want from your irons.

Driver: Cobra FlyZ | 9.5 Degrees Draw | Fujikura Pro 63 Tour Spec
Fairway Wood: Cobra F7 3-4 Wood | 14.5 degrees | Fujikura Pro 65
Hybrid: Cobra F7 3-4H | 19 degrees | Fujikura Pro 75H
Irons: Srixon Z545 (4-Iron) | Srixon Z 765 (5-PW)
Wedges: Titleist Vokey SM6 | 50 F Grind | 54 M Grind | 58 K Grind
Putter: Odyssey O-Works 1W WBW


Posted

If you want to hit the CF16, go to one of the upcoming golf expos or demo days. Then you can hit the CF16 in different configurations and get an overall impression.

As far as the JPX900, if it launches a bit low you might try it with different shafts. Shafts can help launch angle.

I tried the CF16 on a couple of different demo days. Overall I liked it. But, as with all irons, some shafts felt and flew better than others.

Remember, the shaft is half the golf club.

BTW, what is your HDCP? The Mizuno iron sets carry suggested HDCP ranges in their promo material.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I would wait and compare side by side... It makes more sense that way... No 3-iron in the JPX-900 line! wait WHAT??!! 

I've heard good things about both. Mizuno's are pretty friggin sweet, just out of my price range and ability level... 

Not really my area of expertise I'm a walking Tour Edge Exotics ad, just ask @krupa, @colin007 or @RFKFREAK they'll tell you. I'm curious to try the CF16 and the JPX-900 forged as well as the TEE CBX Forged... 

My question is do you have an authorized Callaway fitter in your area?

I know you said that no one in your area has a cart @teropa, but I'm sure if you Google "Authorized Callaway fitters near me" you would turn some results.

What's in Shane's Bag?     

Ball: 2022 :callaway: Chrome Soft Triple Track Driver: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond 8° MCA Kai’li 70s FW: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond  H: :callaway: Apex Pro 21 20°I (3-PW) :callaway: Apex 21 UST Recoil 95 (3), Recoil 110 (4-PW). Wedges: :callaway: Jaws Raw 50°, 54°, 60° UST Recoil 110 Putter: :odyssey: Tri-Hot 5K Triple Wide 35”

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
6 hours ago, onthehunt526 said:

I would wait and compare side by side... It makes more sense that way... No 3-iron in the JPX-900 line! wait WHAT??!! 

I've heard good things about both. Mizuno's are pretty friggin sweet, just out of my price range and ability level... 

Not really my area of expertise I'm a walking Tour Edge Exotics ad, just ask @krupa, @colin007 or @RFKFREAK they'll tell you. I'm curious to try the CF16 and the JPX-900 forged as well as the TEE CBX Forged...

next time we meet im calling you "StaffBoy"....

yeah, you dont need the 3, my 3 iron is from a different maker entirely, and also i would say the JPX is definitely suitable for pretty much all mid-cappers.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

CF16 to me had a more of a firm feel at impact vs the JPX900 Forged. if it was me i'd go for the JPX900 they felt softer and the head wasn't chunky looking down at. i did have lil more distance with the callaway but i like the way JPX900 felt and looks. but if i was going to buy some new irons i'm more leaning towards the JPX Tour or wait till callaway releases their new Apex MB.  but for you i'd go with the Mizunos. they go some really great stuff and the JPX Forged and Tour really impresses me.  plus they have a huge shaft selections to pick from

WITB:
Taylormade M2 - 10.5º 
Taylormade M2 - 3w 15º
Callaway - Apex CF16 9i-3i
Vokey - 46º F Grind
Taylormade MG - 54º, 60º   
Scotty Cameron - Newport M1  - 4.5º
Taylormade - TP5X #7
 


Note: This thread is 3223 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.