Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3235 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I went to the PGA Superstore near my house and hit some balls with my driver on the practice simulators they have. I've always been skeptical about how accurate they are. I usually hit it farther than this during my rounds, but if these numbers are accurate, what should I do to get more distance with my driver. I feel like I should be able to hit it farther than this.

IMG_5600.JPG


Posted

http://flightscope.com/products/trajectory-optimizer/

I went here and plugged in your 167mph launch speed, because I was surprised they were only showing you 250-260yds with that kind of swing speed (127mph- yikes).

I found that with those general parameters of speed, launch angle and spin- that they were putting you at 280yds carry- so quite a discrepancy. Not sure if I'm just plugging in the numbers wrong.

But by tweaking the launch angle down and spin down, it appeared you could theoretically gain 15yds or so from that. 

Also, for that 127mph swing speed, it seems like a 167mph ball speed at launch might be a tad low. I think the long drivers shoot for a 1.5 smash factor, but yours calculates to quite a bit lower than that- in the 1.3 range.

Seems like their launch monitor might not be measuring either of those speeds correctly, as that 1.3 would be quite poor contact- from what I understand. Would you say you were hitting the balls center club face during this session?

Edit: Adding chart from http://blog.trackmangolf.com/smash-factor/Screen Shot 2017-02-07 at 6.40.26 AM.png

Something is not right, as your smash factor is off the chart low.

My Swing


Driver: :ping: G30, Irons: :tmade: Burner 2.0, Putter: :cleveland:, Balls: :snell:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

77 yards peak height sounds like a pop fly.

Could be you just aren't aiming/setting up correctly on the launch monitor. Regardless I wouldn't go about making changes based on an unsupervised session with a launch monitor.

If you are someone comfortable using lm's, and have someone knowledgeable assisting you, I think they are good tools to show people the positive/negative effects certain equipment have. Going beyond that enters the realm of instruction.

If you are serious about hitting the driver better/further, the answer is in practicing properly, and basically treating the content here like some sort of lost treasure on the art of a good golf swing.

TST Instructional Content

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 hours ago, Mattmccain15 said:

I went to the PGA Superstore near my house and hit some balls with my driver on the practice simulators they have. I've always been skeptical about how accurate they are. I usually hit it farther than this during my rounds, but if these numbers are accurate, what should I do to get more distance with my driver. I feel like I should be able to hit it farther than this.

IMG_5600.JPG

Seems like you're hitting too high on the face?

22.4 degree launch angle and 3141 rpm spin are kind of high too. Are you hitting down too much?

Try a lower tee, stiffer shaft, ascending AoA?

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The tee was pretty low so I could have been hitting down on the ball and high on the club face. I've never gotten fit for a driver but I have a stiff shaft in my current one so maybe stiffer wouldn't be a bad thing to look into!


Posted

Not a techie but yeah the swing speed and distance caught my eye and if the numbers are correct my first guess was swing related. But the good news is you say you are hitting it further on the course and you probably are. If you had access to this technology on a grass range you would have more clues. 


Posted
On 2/7/2017 at 1:54 PM, Mattmccain15 said:

The tee was pretty low so I could have been hitting down on the ball and high on the club face. I've never gotten fit for a driver but I have a stiff shaft in my current one so maybe stiffer wouldn't be a bad thing to look into!

I doubt it. A launch angle of 22 degree is abnormal for a driver. With your swing speed it should be down near 12-13. You would want to see around 2000-2200 rpm spin rates. 

To me these numbers speak of a bad ball flight monitor. They are just out of whack. At 22 degree launch, your spin loft should be high. 22 degrees of launch, is the launch angle for either a 9 iron or PW on the PGA Tour. 

I wouldn't trust that machine.

  • Upvote 1

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Or you hit a ballon with your driver or the machine is wrong. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

With a 127 mph swing speed, your ideal numbers should look like this:

Ball Speed = 189 mph

Backspin = 2000-2200 rpms

Launch Angle = 9.5-10.5*

Total Distance = 320-325 yds

It's hard to say if the launch monitor needs to be calibrated or maybe was on the wrong setting, or if it was a bad shot.  It's hard to launch a driver at 22* unless you hit it on the crown, which might have happened. That would explain why the spin rate is so high and the ball speed is so low, and of course the overall distance.  Keep in mind that launch monitors like this are calculating how far the ball would go, so it's using a formula.  This usually will be shorter than real-world golf shots because atmospheric conditions are not factored in, although there is still something up with this situation.

I quickly plugged your numbers into the Flight Scope trajectory optimizer and got different results than the LM you were on:

1.PNG.68d77111473e3ff9426a466422dfae2e.PNG

  • Upvote 1

Bridgestone j40 445 w/ Graphite Design AD DJ-7
Callaway Steelhead Plus 3 wood w/ RCH Pro Series 3.2
Adams Idea Pro hybrids (3 & 4) w/ Aldila VS Proto 
Bridgestone j33 CB (5-PW) w/ original Rifle 5.5
Bridgestone West Coast 52*, j40 satin 56* & 60* w/ DG S-300
Odyssey White Hot XG #9
Bridgestone B330-RX

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
19 minutes ago, 1badbadger said:

It's hard to say if the launch monitor needs to be calibrated or maybe was on the wrong setting, or if it was a bad shot.  It's hard to launch a driver at 22* unless you hit it on the crown, which might have happened.

That was my guess when I first glanced at the numbers. That's why I suggested a lower tee. It would also kind of explain the poor SF.

You really need something like a 5 shot average taking out the outlier shots.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
11 minutes ago, 1badbadger said:

With a 127 mph swing speed, your ideal numbers should look like this:

Ball Speed = 189 mph

Backspin = 2000-2200 rpms

Launch Angle = 9.5-10.5*

Total Distance = 320-325 yds

It's hard to say if the launch monitor needs to be calibrated or maybe was on the wrong setting, or if it was a bad shot.  It's hard to launch a driver at 22* unless you hit it on the crown, which might have happened. That would explain why the spin rate is so high and the ball speed is so low, and of course the overall distance.  Keep in mind that launch monitors like this are calculating how far the ball would go, so it's using a formula.  This usually will be shorter than real-world golf shots because atmospheric conditions are not factored in, although there is still something up with this situation.

I quickly plugged your numbers into the Flight Scope trajectory optimizer and got different results than the LM you were on:

1.PNG.68d77111473e3ff9426a466422dfae2e.PNG

I had always suspected some of these LMs need to be 'calibrated' when you get kooky numbers, but how do you calibrate an algorithm?

Would these numbers make sense if it was on an 8 iron setting (assuming ball speed and launch angles are calculated for measured club-head speed)

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 hours ago, GolfLug said:

I had always suspected some of these LMs need to be 'calibrated' when you get kooky numbers, but how do you calibrate an algorithm?

Would these numbers make sense if it was on an 8 iron setting (assuming ball speed and launch angles are calculated for measured club-head speed)

Well, there are a couple of possibilities.  If it's a simulator, it probably has different settings for things like wind or altitude or other features to make it seem more realistic.  If it's a launch monitor, depending on what type it is, sometimes certain components may need to be re-aligned.  Some companies use radar technology to capture launch data and some use a high speed camera, and if something is out of adjustment it could cause a false reading.

My gut tells me it was a mishit.  Like @Lihu mentioned, a series of shots will give you a better idea of what your launch conditions really look like, and get rid of mishits because that will skew your averages.

  • Upvote 1

Bridgestone j40 445 w/ Graphite Design AD DJ-7
Callaway Steelhead Plus 3 wood w/ RCH Pro Series 3.2
Adams Idea Pro hybrids (3 & 4) w/ Aldila VS Proto 
Bridgestone j33 CB (5-PW) w/ original Rifle 5.5
Bridgestone West Coast 52*, j40 satin 56* & 60* w/ DG S-300
Odyssey White Hot XG #9
Bridgestone B330-RX

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Thanks everyone for the replies. This was my highest swing speed, but my range was anywhere from 123-127. I went to dicks and hit some shots with the new epic and m2 drivers. My swing speed was down averaging anywhere from 119-124 but the launch and spin rates were back in the normal range and the distance was substantially farther. I'll definitely look into my swing a bit more and try to see what I need to do in order to get some better results!


Posted
50 minutes ago, Mattmccain15 said:

Thanks everyone for the replies. This was my highest swing speed, but my range was anywhere from 123-127. I went to dicks and hit some shots with the new epic and m2 drivers. My swing speed was down averaging anywhere from 119-124 but the launch and spin rates were back in the normal range and the distance was substantially farther. I'll definitely look into my swing a bit more and try to see what I need to do in order to get some better results!

Guessing not gross swing issues with those kinds of SS numbers!

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The first simulator didn't tell me a smash factor and I honestly don't remember what the other on said. The ball speed ranges were in the upper 160's to low 170's.


Posted
1 hour ago, Mattmccain15 said:

The first simulator didn't tell me a smash factor and I honestly don't remember what the other on said. The ball speed ranges were in the upper 160's to low 170's.

Oh I thought maybe you had data from prior sessions to compare with this. Sorry. 


Posted
On 2/7/2017 at 6:35 AM, RandallT said:

http://flightscope.com/products/trajectory-optimizer/

I went here and plugged in your 167mph launch speed, because I was surprised they were only showing you 250-260yds with that kind of swing speed (127mph- yikes).

I found that with those general parameters of speed, launch angle and spin- that they were putting you at 280yds carry- so quite a discrepancy. Not sure if I'm just plugging in the numbers wrong.

But by tweaking the launch angle down and spin down, it appeared you could theoretically gain 15yds or so from that. 

Also, for that 127mph swing speed, it seems like a 167mph ball speed at launch might be a tad low. I think the long drivers shoot for a 1.5 smash factor, but yours calculates to quite a bit lower than that- in the 1.3 range.

Seems like their launch monitor might not be measuring either of those speeds correctly, as that 1.3 would be quite poor contact- from what I understand. Would you say you were hitting the balls center club face during this session?

Edit: Adding chart from http://blog.trackmangolf.com/smash-factor/Screen Shot 2017-02-07 at 6.40.26 AM.png

Something is not right, as your smash factor is off the chart low.

That's kind of what I thought. His launch angle is quite high, and his RPM's are about 1K above what might be thought ideal. No doubt he has the clubhead speed to realize more distance. I also noticed that "Max Height" was listed at 77 yards! That's 231 feet! I know the pros hit their Drivers high, but not that high! Sounds like something is screwy with the equipment! Or he's hitting an 18 degree Driver!

I went to a place where the LM tried to tell me that I was hitting my 5 iron 195 yards! I know damn well that my Sunday best with that club is about 170! So I knew it was BS from the get go!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3235 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.