Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3215 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I went to the PGA Superstore near my house and hit some balls with my driver on the practice simulators they have. I've always been skeptical about how accurate they are. I usually hit it farther than this during my rounds, but if these numbers are accurate, what should I do to get more distance with my driver. I feel like I should be able to hit it farther than this.

IMG_5600.JPG


Posted

http://flightscope.com/products/trajectory-optimizer/

I went here and plugged in your 167mph launch speed, because I was surprised they were only showing you 250-260yds with that kind of swing speed (127mph- yikes).

I found that with those general parameters of speed, launch angle and spin- that they were putting you at 280yds carry- so quite a discrepancy. Not sure if I'm just plugging in the numbers wrong.

But by tweaking the launch angle down and spin down, it appeared you could theoretically gain 15yds or so from that. 

Also, for that 127mph swing speed, it seems like a 167mph ball speed at launch might be a tad low. I think the long drivers shoot for a 1.5 smash factor, but yours calculates to quite a bit lower than that- in the 1.3 range.

Seems like their launch monitor might not be measuring either of those speeds correctly, as that 1.3 would be quite poor contact- from what I understand. Would you say you were hitting the balls center club face during this session?

Edit: Adding chart from http://blog.trackmangolf.com/smash-factor/Screen Shot 2017-02-07 at 6.40.26 AM.png

Something is not right, as your smash factor is off the chart low.

My Swing


Driver: :ping: G30, Irons: :tmade: Burner 2.0, Putter: :cleveland:, Balls: :snell:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

77 yards peak height sounds like a pop fly.

Could be you just aren't aiming/setting up correctly on the launch monitor. Regardless I wouldn't go about making changes based on an unsupervised session with a launch monitor.

If you are someone comfortable using lm's, and have someone knowledgeable assisting you, I think they are good tools to show people the positive/negative effects certain equipment have. Going beyond that enters the realm of instruction.

If you are serious about hitting the driver better/further, the answer is in practicing properly, and basically treating the content here like some sort of lost treasure on the art of a good golf swing.

TST Instructional Content

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 hours ago, Mattmccain15 said:

I went to the PGA Superstore near my house and hit some balls with my driver on the practice simulators they have. I've always been skeptical about how accurate they are. I usually hit it farther than this during my rounds, but if these numbers are accurate, what should I do to get more distance with my driver. I feel like I should be able to hit it farther than this.

IMG_5600.JPG

Seems like you're hitting too high on the face?

22.4 degree launch angle and 3141 rpm spin are kind of high too. Are you hitting down too much?

Try a lower tee, stiffer shaft, ascending AoA?

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The tee was pretty low so I could have been hitting down on the ball and high on the club face. I've never gotten fit for a driver but I have a stiff shaft in my current one so maybe stiffer wouldn't be a bad thing to look into!


Posted

Not a techie but yeah the swing speed and distance caught my eye and if the numbers are correct my first guess was swing related. But the good news is you say you are hitting it further on the course and you probably are. If you had access to this technology on a grass range you would have more clues. 


Posted
On 2/7/2017 at 1:54 PM, Mattmccain15 said:

The tee was pretty low so I could have been hitting down on the ball and high on the club face. I've never gotten fit for a driver but I have a stiff shaft in my current one so maybe stiffer wouldn't be a bad thing to look into!

I doubt it. A launch angle of 22 degree is abnormal for a driver. With your swing speed it should be down near 12-13. You would want to see around 2000-2200 rpm spin rates. 

To me these numbers speak of a bad ball flight monitor. They are just out of whack. At 22 degree launch, your spin loft should be high. 22 degrees of launch, is the launch angle for either a 9 iron or PW on the PGA Tour. 

I wouldn't trust that machine.

  • Upvote 1

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Or you hit a ballon with your driver or the machine is wrong. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

With a 127 mph swing speed, your ideal numbers should look like this:

Ball Speed = 189 mph

Backspin = 2000-2200 rpms

Launch Angle = 9.5-10.5*

Total Distance = 320-325 yds

It's hard to say if the launch monitor needs to be calibrated or maybe was on the wrong setting, or if it was a bad shot.  It's hard to launch a driver at 22* unless you hit it on the crown, which might have happened. That would explain why the spin rate is so high and the ball speed is so low, and of course the overall distance.  Keep in mind that launch monitors like this are calculating how far the ball would go, so it's using a formula.  This usually will be shorter than real-world golf shots because atmospheric conditions are not factored in, although there is still something up with this situation.

I quickly plugged your numbers into the Flight Scope trajectory optimizer and got different results than the LM you were on:

1.PNG.68d77111473e3ff9426a466422dfae2e.PNG

  • Upvote 1

Bridgestone j40 445 w/ Graphite Design AD DJ-7
Callaway Steelhead Plus 3 wood w/ RCH Pro Series 3.2
Adams Idea Pro hybrids (3 & 4) w/ Aldila VS Proto 
Bridgestone j33 CB (5-PW) w/ original Rifle 5.5
Bridgestone West Coast 52*, j40 satin 56* & 60* w/ DG S-300
Odyssey White Hot XG #9
Bridgestone B330-RX

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
19 minutes ago, 1badbadger said:

It's hard to say if the launch monitor needs to be calibrated or maybe was on the wrong setting, or if it was a bad shot.  It's hard to launch a driver at 22* unless you hit it on the crown, which might have happened.

That was my guess when I first glanced at the numbers. That's why I suggested a lower tee. It would also kind of explain the poor SF.

You really need something like a 5 shot average taking out the outlier shots.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
11 minutes ago, 1badbadger said:

With a 127 mph swing speed, your ideal numbers should look like this:

Ball Speed = 189 mph

Backspin = 2000-2200 rpms

Launch Angle = 9.5-10.5*

Total Distance = 320-325 yds

It's hard to say if the launch monitor needs to be calibrated or maybe was on the wrong setting, or if it was a bad shot.  It's hard to launch a driver at 22* unless you hit it on the crown, which might have happened. That would explain why the spin rate is so high and the ball speed is so low, and of course the overall distance.  Keep in mind that launch monitors like this are calculating how far the ball would go, so it's using a formula.  This usually will be shorter than real-world golf shots because atmospheric conditions are not factored in, although there is still something up with this situation.

I quickly plugged your numbers into the Flight Scope trajectory optimizer and got different results than the LM you were on:

1.PNG.68d77111473e3ff9426a466422dfae2e.PNG

I had always suspected some of these LMs need to be 'calibrated' when you get kooky numbers, but how do you calibrate an algorithm?

Would these numbers make sense if it was on an 8 iron setting (assuming ball speed and launch angles are calculated for measured club-head speed)

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 hours ago, GolfLug said:

I had always suspected some of these LMs need to be 'calibrated' when you get kooky numbers, but how do you calibrate an algorithm?

Would these numbers make sense if it was on an 8 iron setting (assuming ball speed and launch angles are calculated for measured club-head speed)

Well, there are a couple of possibilities.  If it's a simulator, it probably has different settings for things like wind or altitude or other features to make it seem more realistic.  If it's a launch monitor, depending on what type it is, sometimes certain components may need to be re-aligned.  Some companies use radar technology to capture launch data and some use a high speed camera, and if something is out of adjustment it could cause a false reading.

My gut tells me it was a mishit.  Like @Lihu mentioned, a series of shots will give you a better idea of what your launch conditions really look like, and get rid of mishits because that will skew your averages.

  • Upvote 1

Bridgestone j40 445 w/ Graphite Design AD DJ-7
Callaway Steelhead Plus 3 wood w/ RCH Pro Series 3.2
Adams Idea Pro hybrids (3 & 4) w/ Aldila VS Proto 
Bridgestone j33 CB (5-PW) w/ original Rifle 5.5
Bridgestone West Coast 52*, j40 satin 56* & 60* w/ DG S-300
Odyssey White Hot XG #9
Bridgestone B330-RX

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Thanks everyone for the replies. This was my highest swing speed, but my range was anywhere from 123-127. I went to dicks and hit some shots with the new epic and m2 drivers. My swing speed was down averaging anywhere from 119-124 but the launch and spin rates were back in the normal range and the distance was substantially farther. I'll definitely look into my swing a bit more and try to see what I need to do in order to get some better results!


Posted
50 minutes ago, Mattmccain15 said:

Thanks everyone for the replies. This was my highest swing speed, but my range was anywhere from 123-127. I went to dicks and hit some shots with the new epic and m2 drivers. My swing speed was down averaging anywhere from 119-124 but the launch and spin rates were back in the normal range and the distance was substantially farther. I'll definitely look into my swing a bit more and try to see what I need to do in order to get some better results!

Guessing not gross swing issues with those kinds of SS numbers!

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The first simulator didn't tell me a smash factor and I honestly don't remember what the other on said. The ball speed ranges were in the upper 160's to low 170's.


Posted
1 hour ago, Mattmccain15 said:

The first simulator didn't tell me a smash factor and I honestly don't remember what the other on said. The ball speed ranges were in the upper 160's to low 170's.

Oh I thought maybe you had data from prior sessions to compare with this. Sorry. 


Posted
On 2/7/2017 at 6:35 AM, RandallT said:

http://flightscope.com/products/trajectory-optimizer/

I went here and plugged in your 167mph launch speed, because I was surprised they were only showing you 250-260yds with that kind of swing speed (127mph- yikes).

I found that with those general parameters of speed, launch angle and spin- that they were putting you at 280yds carry- so quite a discrepancy. Not sure if I'm just plugging in the numbers wrong.

But by tweaking the launch angle down and spin down, it appeared you could theoretically gain 15yds or so from that. 

Also, for that 127mph swing speed, it seems like a 167mph ball speed at launch might be a tad low. I think the long drivers shoot for a 1.5 smash factor, but yours calculates to quite a bit lower than that- in the 1.3 range.

Seems like their launch monitor might not be measuring either of those speeds correctly, as that 1.3 would be quite poor contact- from what I understand. Would you say you were hitting the balls center club face during this session?

Edit: Adding chart from http://blog.trackmangolf.com/smash-factor/Screen Shot 2017-02-07 at 6.40.26 AM.png

Something is not right, as your smash factor is off the chart low.

That's kind of what I thought. His launch angle is quite high, and his RPM's are about 1K above what might be thought ideal. No doubt he has the clubhead speed to realize more distance. I also noticed that "Max Height" was listed at 77 yards! That's 231 feet! I know the pros hit their Drivers high, but not that high! Sounds like something is screwy with the equipment! Or he's hitting an 18 degree Driver!

I went to a place where the LM tried to tell me that I was hitting my 5 iron 195 yards! I know damn well that my Sunday best with that club is about 170! So I knew it was BS from the get go!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3215 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.