Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3213 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm curious about something and soliciting opinions here from those who've gotten a club fitting with this technology. I am due to get a fitting for a driver/woods next week. It's at the big golf supershop/course for this region. In getting the fitting I have the option of them using the Trackman for about an extra $100. Seems steep to me. Or, I can just use the fitter's expertise and eyeballs. What are your opinions on this? Thanks...

Custom fit RBZ irons. Taylormade RBZ driver. Some crappy old high-bounce Macgregor wedge and an even older Mizuno 5 wood. Haven't settled on a ball yet - still looking. Decades of football, weightlifting and boxing came together to create the world's worst golfer. I'm slowly correcting that now. 


  • Administrator
Posted

It's indoors?

It's a ripoff, to charge $100 for that, but if it's indoors it's also bullcrap if they don't use it.

How much is this fitting costing you?

Even outdoors, if they have a fitting and a Trackman is available, I don't understand not using it. There are plenty of things you can't "see" well enough to get a good fitting. $100 on top of the fitting fee is a ripoff regardless, IMO.

  • Upvote 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, HitAndGiggle said:

In getting the fitting I have the option of them using the Trackman for about an extra $100. Seems steep to me. Or, I can just use the fitter's expertise and eyeballs. What are your opinions on this? Thanks...

I agree it is a rip off. There is no accurate way to fit a golfer to a golf club with out the us of a good launch monitor. Charging $100 extra for the use one is a rip off. 

  • Upvote 1

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I must be lucky, around here from time to time (maybe every couple of months) a manufacturer sponsers a fitting with Trackman and it's free.  And I'm not being helped by a random store employee, it has been a trained in fitting employee from Callaway.

I've done it a couple of times, didn't buy the clubs on the spot, mulled it over for a while.  I take my own clubs and do a side by side test with the Trackman.  The drawback is you only get test clubs from a single manufacturer.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

My teacher (different course) today said to get fitted for a driver with the use of trackman is a good idea. 

Custom fit RBZ irons. Taylormade RBZ driver. Some crappy old high-bounce Macgregor wedge and an even older Mizuno 5 wood. Haven't settled on a ball yet - still looking. Decades of football, weightlifting and boxing came together to create the world's worst golfer. I'm slowly correcting that now. 


Posted

@HitAndGiggle I've never had to pay for a fitting, and have had a several over the years.  All but one included launch monitors during the process, and the one that didn't was at an outdoor range/club shop.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yeah, that's BS charging u extra for Trackman.  Go look in Golf Digest top 100 fitters and find someone near u.  Getting fit by some box store...God knows what your getting...unless you know the guy, that's different.

 

Trackman isn't good inside.  I know it needs alot if room to be accurate but it's still poor.  GC2 indoors is good.  Trackman outside would be fine.

 

But seriously, don't get fit at Kmart...I mean Dicks or something.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
31 minutes ago, Typhoon92 said:

Yeah, that's BS charging u extra for Trackman.  Go look in Golf Digest top 100 fitters and find someone near u.  Getting fit by some box store...God knows what your getting...unless you know the guy, that's different.

 

Trackman isn't good inside.  I know it needs alot if room to be accurate but it's still poor.  GC2 indoors is good.  Trackman outside would be fine.

 

But seriously, don't get fit at Kmart...I mean Dicks or something.

Yeah, that's funny. After my lesson today I sat in the clubhouse with my boy having lunch while flipping through a Golf Digest with that list of top 100 fitters and where I'm going is on the list - Haggin Oaks. Great place to shop. got my putter and bag there over the past year. Their range has the auto-tee-up machines and my boy loves them. The range it lit and open all night in the warmer months - making it a great place to meet fellow beer-drinking golf geeks - haha. 

Custom fit RBZ irons. Taylormade RBZ driver. Some crappy old high-bounce Macgregor wedge and an even older Mizuno 5 wood. Haven't settled on a ball yet - still looking. Decades of football, weightlifting and boxing came together to create the world's worst golfer. I'm slowly correcting that now. 


Posted

Had my fitting today. Ended up sticking with my RBZ driver. Very interesting process. 

Custom fit RBZ irons. Taylormade RBZ driver. Some crappy old high-bounce Macgregor wedge and an even older Mizuno 5 wood. Haven't settled on a ball yet - still looking. Decades of football, weightlifting and boxing came together to create the world's worst golfer. I'm slowly correcting that now. 


Posted
5 minutes ago, HitAndGiggle said:

Had my fitting today. Ended up sticking with my RBZ driver. Very interesting process. 

Do tell.   How was your experience?

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

To buy a Trackman is a bit pricey I understand. There is a guy here in San Diego who claims he was the first to own one and would take it to Mission Bay and charge people something like $200 for a half hour as I recall.  He would get a little defensive if anyone questioned his expertise. I can not say, as I do not know hardly anything about them, but in reading articles and posts from other instructors who use Trackman, I would question the San Diego guy's expertise as he seemed to differ somewhat from what others were saying.  I really do not know. I believe he said he paid over $10,000 but that would have been several years ago.  Then there is Joe Mayo at TPC in Las Vegas, whose moniker is "Trackman Maestro".

"James"

:titleist: 913 D3 with Aldila RIP Phenom 60 4,2 Regular Shaft,  :touredge: Exotics XCG-7 Beta 3W with Matrix Red Tie Shaft:touredge: Exotics EX8 19 deg Hybrid w UST Mamiya Recoil F3 Shaft:touredge: Exotics EX9 28 deg Hybrid w UST Mamiya Recoil F3  shaft, / Bobby Jones Black 22 deg Hybrid:touredge: Exotics EXi 6 -PW  w UST Mamiya Recoil F2 Shaft, SW (56),GW (52),LW (60):touredge:  TGS),/ ODDYSEE Metal-X #7 customized putter (400G, cut down Mid Belly)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, dennyjones said:

Do tell.   How was your experience?

They will email me the numbers and I'll certainly go over that a little here once I get them. I must have hit 400 drives with that thing today. Most drives I've ever hit in a day, for sure. A few interesting details from the session: If I remember correctly, I fly my driver in a range of 210 to 240, this with range balls. I actually didn't have an idea of how far I hit the club as I recently changed my swing and, given our weather out here, I've not been able to play on the course. I've pretty much eliminated the slice that haunted me the first 15 years I played, by my better shots are a high baby slice. My average drive seems to end up about 10 yards left of where I'm aiming - the blob of data is an ellipse that's short center to long-left. I need to continue to work more on my swing. I'm tending to hit down on the ball with some outside-in path. Just recently my coach started having me tee it higher and I need to get more comfortable with that. My driver shots have very low spin, with many under 2000 rpm. So, if I can get the launch up more that will be nice. I don't remember many of the specific numbers but the smash factor, which was up around 1.5. Will go over the numbers here when I get them and I'll welcome suggestions on them. I'm sure the fitter is "encouraged" by management to sell product. And, she did run me through many clubs. The Sub Zero was a little low. The Epic heads looked a little small to my eye. The new Ping was probably the longest club I hit today, and the XR16 performed very well, too. We tried many different shafts. Anything not stiff and/or with stiff tip curved left - and felt a little wobbly.

In the end, my choice was to keep my driver, which was in the top couple I hit for me, or spend at least a few hundred $ to gain an average 5 or 6 yards. It's clear the most improvement will come from me improving my swing. My current RBZ driver that's a few years old is a dang good driver. 

Edited by HitAndGiggle

Custom fit RBZ irons. Taylormade RBZ driver. Some crappy old high-bounce Macgregor wedge and an even older Mizuno 5 wood. Haven't settled on a ball yet - still looking. Decades of football, weightlifting and boxing came together to create the world's worst golfer. I'm slowly correcting that now. 


Posted

I had an RBZ Tour for a couple years before it cracked.  Loved the way it set up and performed.

Good move sticking with it for now.  Maybe after the swing changes settle in you can try another fitting.  FWIW, I didn't find the Epic anything earth shattering.  I picked up the m1 and M2 that I got fitted for AND saved money.

The only people raving about the Epic and SZ are the forum testers who will never utter a bad word when testing a club anyway... I know some average Joes that are dumping theirs.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

IMO, you should never get fitted without a good simulator system (Trackman, Flightscope, GC2, etc).  Also, I am not a believer in getting fitted in an indoor sim. I know most places do it and there are some really good fitters who do it that way only.  Again, JMO, you cannot see the actual ball flight in an indoor sim setting and hitting off a mat is easier to do.  Much prefer being fitted at a range and hitting off of the grass to get the most accurate results.  

Speaking of the RBZ, friend of mine who hits the ball a mile and accurately still plays with that driver.  Won't change until it breaks.  Was and still is a great driver from TM.

Agree on the Epic.  Some will disagree, but I remember hearing about this revolutionary technology (Jailbreak) back in the fall and its frankly more marketing hype.  Have tried out the new M1, M2, Epic and others and frankly the performance is nothing earth shattering compared to last year's models.  No doubt, great drivers and if you have to money to spend then by all means get one, but if your current driver is performing well then I do not see any reason to get a new one.

  • Upvote 1

Posted
On ‎2‎/‎25‎/‎2017 at 2:04 PM, Typhoon92 said:

I had an RBZ Tour for a couple years before it cracked.  Loved the way it set up and performed.

Good move sticking with it for now.  Maybe after the swing changes settle in you can try another fitting.  FWIW, I didn't find the Epic anything earth shattering.  I picked up the m1 and M2 that I got fitted for AND saved money.

The only people raving about the Epic and SZ are the forum testers who will never utter a bad word when testing a club anyway... I know some average Joes that are dumping theirs.

Yeah, the new Taylormade models I swung felt pretty nice and performed very well.

Custom fit RBZ irons. Taylormade RBZ driver. Some crappy old high-bounce Macgregor wedge and an even older Mizuno 5 wood. Haven't settled on a ball yet - still looking. Decades of football, weightlifting and boxing came together to create the world's worst golfer. I'm slowly correcting that now. 


Posted
On 2/28/2017 at 6:10 PM, HitAndGiggle said:

Yeah, the new Taylormade models I swung felt pretty nice and performed very well.

Actually, save some money and get last year's M2...I got fitted for that.  It's better than this years.  Last year's M1 I have as well and love it...on the M1 I hear this years is more forgiving but that is about the only positive I've heard about the 2017.

 

Last year..save money!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

the fitting place where i got fitted last week, if your wanting to use their trackman and not buy any clubs. it's like 100-200 just to use it. if you end up buying clubs from them then fitting is free. if they are not using a trackman, gc2 know what your average yardage is because the simulators that aren't trackman or gc2 will give you a extra 20-30ys. my brother went to dicks just to hit some new irons and he said with the one length cobra irons he was hitting a 5i 236y and he said he hit a stinger with the driver and he said his carry was like 300+ he laughed and told the guy the simulator has to be off but the guy said no its very accurate, which we know it's not at all. if i was you, id get fitted outside off the grass so you can get the real data like you would be if your playing on a course. if it's not a trackman or gc2 id make sure your not getting extra 30y that you know isn't true data

WITB:
Taylormade M2 - 10.5º 
Taylormade M2 - 3w 15º
Callaway - Apex CF16 9i-3i
Vokey - 46º F Grind
Taylormade MG - 54º, 60º   
Scotty Cameron - Newport M1  - 4.5º
Taylormade - TP5X #7
 


Note: This thread is 3213 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.