Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Signing An Incorrect Scorecard - Should Rule Be Modernized?


Note: This thread is 2268 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted
7 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

It sucks getting old and having your memory go.  Now that my memory has been jogged, I remember that the committee's opinion on the penalty changed only after Tiger (honestly) said that he was trying to get a better yardage, or something similar.  Only for players this good would a yard or two make that much of a difference.   Because the committee had the opportunity to review this before Tiger signed his card, and chose not to do anything about it at that time, the DQ was deemed inappropriate.  I think I questioned that choice at the time, but in hindsight it seems reasonable.

OT, but that's only relevant if you believe the "Committee" met and decided anything.

But let's get back to the topic. @Braivo changed his mind. @Golfingdad, what objections do you continue to have to the current, already significantly softer rule?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

Only for players this good would a yard or two make that much of a difference.

Dave, this is a really good point that gets lost in the "gained no advantage" argument. I'm just as likely to duff, hook, or skull from about any yardage so from my (and most other players) perspective, these infractions seem trivial. It pays to remember that on the tour, these guys and gals are good. What's trivial for the weekend golfer has a real impact on the tour level players.

I go by Pat or Patrick. Been called a lot worse so I don't mind either.
Driver - Cobra Fly Z + Stiff cut to 33" with CP2 Jumbo Wrap Grip
3 Hybrid - Cobra Fly Z + 19o Lamkin Crossline Oversize
4-6 Cobra F7 ONElength Lamkin Crossline Oversize

7-GW Cobra F7 Lamkin Crossline Oversize
52, 56, and 60 Wilson Harmonized Lamkin Crossline Oversize
Putter - Testing several at the moment

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

This was slightly off topic when I posted in the Lexi thread, so I'm putting my opinion in the proper one:

I've never understood more what a brilliant rule signing for an incorrect scorecard is until this Lexi situation. That rule is basically in place to enforce that the players read and know the rules of golf. It's there to tell you that you can't blame ignorance over a penalty. It's shocking how many tour pros don't understand that THEY are the referee, and that the rules officials available to them are only there to assist them in making the correct ruling. I hope they never give in to public pressure and change that rule, and frankly, I get now why disqualification was once the norm for this rules breach. 

  • Upvote 2

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
5 minutes ago, 406pat said:

Dave, this is a really good point that gets lost in the "gained no advantage" argument. I'm just as likely to duff, hook, or skull from about any yardage so from my (and most other players) perspective, these infractions seem trivial. It pays to remember that on the tour, these guys and gals are good. What's trivial for the weekend golfer has a real impact on the tour level players.

Let's stick to the topic, please.

2 minutes ago, JetFan1983 said:

I've never understood more what a brilliant rule signing for an incorrect scorecard is until this Lexi situation. That rule is basically in place to enforce that the players read and know the rules of golf. It's there to tell you that you can't blame ignorance over a penalty. It's shocking how many tour pros don't understand that THEY are the referee, and that the rules officials available to them are only there to assist them in making the correct ruling. I hope they never give in to public pressure and change that rule, and frankly, I get now why disqualification was once the norm for this rules breach. 

Pretty much, yes, this.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, iacas said:

That won't work, and your premise is completely off.

Why not and how so?


  • Administrator
Posted
4 hours ago, Wadess said:

Why not and how so?

Go ahead and try. Your rules would be the easiest thing in the world to pick apart.

This isn't the topic for that, though.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 hours ago, Wadess said:

Why not and how so?

 

1 hour ago, iacas said:

Go ahead and try. Your rules would be the easiest thing in the world to pick apart.

@Wadess, please start a new thread and do exactly as @iacas suggests.

 I think that it would be a great exercise and help demonstrate why the Rules are, and must be, as complex as they appear to be to those who don't fully understand the Principles upon which they're built.

:beer:

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

http://www.golfchannel.com/video/proposed-rule-may-have-changed-lexis-ana-outcome/

Starting around 3:00, listen. Thomas Pagel points out that she would have been DQed a few years ago. Unlikely to change, if you listen to what he's saying.

Then John Cook makes a fool of himself, but we'll ignore that… ;-)

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
8 minutes ago, iacas said:

http://www.golfchannel.com/video/proposed-rule-may-have-changed-lexis-ana-outcome/

Starting around 3:00, listen. Thomas Pagel points out that she would have been DQed a few years ago. Unlikely to change, if you listen to what he's saying.

Then John Cook makes a fool of himself, but we'll ignore that… ;-)

Interesting also that Paget says that the "reasonable judgement" change definitely could apply to evaluation of this type of situation.  

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
32 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

Interesting also that Paget says that the "reasonable judgement" change definitely could apply to evaluation of this type of situation.  

And we can comment on that in that topic. :-)

I suspect he'd have not found her judgment reasonable.

  • Upvote 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

iacas - I think this had been touched on but not addressed specifically (I have read all 4 pages but I may have missed it) and if so I apologize. You stated this in your Post #4.

"I like the one we have now: the close of competition. It has a nice blend of the practical (when we hand the trophy over we don't want to have a Steve Harvey moment) with allowing for the actions of everyone through the full 72 holes to affect the final score, because it is a 72-hole competition, not four separate 18-hole competitions."

So why not have the players sign the "official card" at the end of the 72nd hole. Until that card is signed, if penalty strokes are applied then it is no different than being notified of a penalty before you sign the card at the end of the round under the current rules. They will still need to sign cards at the end of each round but that is to attests the score of their competitors.

I understand that it removes the onus on the players to be vigilant in that in removes the risk of the two stroke penalty for rounds 1 to 3 should an infraction be discover subsequent to the end of the round.

I do not think such a rule would work as the DQ option would also not be in play given that there is essentially no penalty for signing an incorrect scorecard.

 

I am sure this has been discussed and there is no obvious solution but .....

- Brain fart in marking and replacing the ball on 18th hole of day 3 goes unnoticed. Discovered in day 4 and leads to 4 stroke penalty.

- Brain fart in marking and replacing the ball on 18th hole of day 4 goes unnoticed. Discovered one day after the tournament. No penalty. Final score remains unchanged.

- Obviously there is a high likelihood that a different winner would emerge between the two scenarios.

 

Probability an infraction occurring on day and noted on a second day during an event other than a Professional Tour tournament extremely low. I would suggest almost zero given it is unlikely that there would be video evidence for rules committee to refer back to in order to make definitive ruling.

Probability that this will occur in a Professional Tour tournament in the future ........ pretty high.

 

BTW - I think the Lexi case had the correct result. No excuses for making a mistake like that she is a professional and she would gone thru the process of marking a ball millions of times before. If they believe so strongly in having the exact pre shot routine why not for marking and replacing a ball.

Edited by ay33660

  • Administrator
Posted
24 minutes ago, ay33660 said:

So why not have the players sign the "official card" at the end of the 72nd hole.

Players sign the scorecard for many reasons. First, you don't keep the same card with you for all four rounds. Your playing partners change. A stipulated round is 18 holes (while a stipulated competition can be adjusted after a round has begun, a stipulated round cannot be adjusted after the competition has begun). What if a player finishes the second round in the morning… do they have to stick around if they're near the cut line to sign their "36-hole" scorecard?

It's practical the way it is now.

Your solution raises more problems than the one it "solves" - and the one it "solves" is only a "problem" because people are trying to find ways to excuse Lexi.

How about we all remember that as little as two years ago it would have been a DQ. That's how seriously the rules-makers deem this stuff to be.

24 minutes ago, ay33660 said:

I do not think such a rule would work as the DQ option would also not be in play given that there is essentially no penalty for signing an incorrect scorecard.

Yep.

24 minutes ago, ay33660 said:

- Brain fart in marking and replacing the ball on 18th hole of day 3 goes unnoticed. Discovered in day 4 and leads to 4 stroke penalty.

- Brain fart in marking and replacing the ball on 18th hole of day 4 goes unnoticed. Discovered one day after the tournament. No penalty. Final score remains unchanged.

- Obviously there is a high likelihood that a different winner would emerge between the two scenarios.

You've gotta set a limit somewhere. Where it's set now is, IMO, practical.

And you can still be DQed if you knowingly violated a rule. Even decades later. There's no time limit on that.

24 minutes ago, ay33660 said:

Probability an infraction occurring on day and noted on a second day during an event other than a Professional Tour tournament extremely low. I would suggest almost zero given it is unlikely that there would be video evidence for rules committee to refer back to in order to make definitive ruling.

A player could do something, go home, look it up, and realize it was a penalty. Or mention it in a post-round conversation with a buddy, who tells him it was a penalty. Not everything has to be a "video evidence email-in" situation.

The rules are there for every level of play.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

this is a great discussion. i was shocked at first that the majority opinion here seems to be the opposite of what i've heard talking to friends who don't golf but are sports fans, or non-sports fans in general (most of them would say "why would you penalize her twice for the same infraction?" etc.) at first i agreed with them (and thus my initial shock visiting this thread) but some good points were made here that have me thinking. specifically about penalties being severe enough to offset any potential advantaged gained (i think @iacas said something like that). i have a background in competitive Magic: The Gathering tournaments and i've seen first hand the penalties in that game become more lenient over time to cater towards providing a welcoming environment for casual competitors (gotta sell more cards!) at the increased risk of not punishing adequately those who intentionally violate the rules. 

a few thoughts i've had reading the conversation:

when should the penalty have been assessed? is it as soon as she replaced the ball in the incorrect position (ie. if she realized her mistake and corrected it before putting, is there a penalty)? as soon as she plays her shot from the incorrect position? 

and if there is an additionally penalty for not assessing a penalty on yourself (the incorrect scorecard penalty), why is there no further penalty if it is caught after it should have been assessed but before the end of the round (ie. the replays catch it and its corrected before the player signs the incorrect scorecard)? a nefarious player could have a possible penalty, fail to assess it on themselves, then wait to see by the end of the round if the TV cameras caught it, freerolling the possibility of it going missed completely. (maybe there is a penalty for this i just don't know about it)


  • Administrator
Posted
19 minutes ago, CeciliaJupe said:

when should the penalty have been assessed? is it as soon as she replaced the ball in the incorrect position (ie. if she realized her mistake and corrected it before putting, is there a penalty)? as soon as she plays her shot from the incorrect position? 

The penalty was for playing from a wrong place. She could have re-marked and put the ball back. It basically would have been the same as when you move your mark to the side for a fellow competitor.

19 minutes ago, CeciliaJupe said:

and if there is an additionally penalty for not assessing a penalty on yourself (the incorrect scorecard penalty), why is there no further penalty if it is caught after it should have been assessed but before the end of the round (ie. the replays catch it and its corrected before the player signs the incorrect scorecard)?

Because the player incurs the penalty when they incur the penalty, but… they don't officially record or report their score until they hand their scorecard in.

19 minutes ago, CeciliaJupe said:

a nefarious player could have a possible penalty, fail to assess it on themselves, then wait to see by the end of the round if the TV cameras caught it, freerolling the possibility of it going missed completely. (maybe there is a penalty for this i just don't know about it)

If you knowingly breach the rules and are caught the penalty is DQ, even if it's discovered decades after the close of the competition.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 4/4/2017 at 0:47 PM, rehmwa said:

that's the best one ever - the rule can't be changed because the rule is the rule......?  (???unless there is a rule that allows one to change a rule......but what if one wants to change the rule that allows one to change a rule,  then what)

I see what he said that "the rules are the rules are the rules" as being a totally accurate assessment.  The rules at the time of the competition are the rules until a change is made by the enforcing entity.  After that, the new rule is the rule.   That is the only way that it can possibly work.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
48 minutes ago, Fourputt said:

I see what he said that "the rules are the rules are the rules" as being a totally accurate assessment.  The rules at the time of the competition are the rules until a change is made by the enforcing entity.  After that, the new rule is the rule.   That is the only way that it can possibly work.

agreed - and in a thread that talks about proposals to change the rules, it's really pointless

(one assumes a change isn't retroactive)

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Rulesman said:

Knee jerk reaction.

Just wait for the unintended consequences that will follow when a rule is changed as a result of a single, unique circumstance.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2268 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.