Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3087 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Does this video make sense?  

18 members have voted

  1. 1. Ernest Jones video in first post, does it make sense?

    • No
      2
    • Yes
      11
    • This is so simplistic, how could people learn from it or advance by something so lacking in detail?
      4
    • This is how I play on course
      1
    • Thinking about my body works better
      0


Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted

I'm procrastinating, so the timing's good…

6 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

I have to admit,  imo me trying to use Nicklaus as someone who utilized Jones method in his prime was a mistake.

You've made a lot. Perhaps the biggest is that, in trying to promote Ernest Jones, you've now "educated" a bunch of people, and in turn, turned them OFF to Ernest Jones.

6 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

No idea why that is.

Feel ain't real.

6 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

I do think it is worth noting that Jack did look up to Bobby Jones as the man to beat in terms of records.  Bobby endorsed Ernest Jones's teachings back in the day.

I finally have a chance to use this GIF I've been saving!

large.sylvester_golfing_bunker.gif.e6623

6 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

I only remember being admonished when I started out as a young kid.  All I remember my grandfather telling me was no no!  That's a baseball swing!  And keep your head down!  And no no hit DOWN on the ball to make it go up!  No wonder golf seemed so difficult for me.

That's not an example of good, modern, non-Jones-style instruction.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
53 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

Afterwards,  they told me they wanted to go again because it was fun.

I only remember being admonished when I started out as a young kid.  All I remember my grandfather telling me was no no!  That's a baseball swing!  And keep your head down!  And no no hit DOWN on the ball to make it go up!  No wonder golf seemed so difficult for me.

Please don't take this the wrong way,  but what I got out of that story is that you're a better teacher than your grandfater and it's not because of the Ernest Jones method.

I can tell you exactly what would happen if I took my family out to the range and spent the entire time chiding them over what they were doing wrong. Glad you had a good time with yours.

  • Upvote 2

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I guess the bottom line for me on this topic is that I am not saying Jones idea is the answer or secret or magic or that it's all one needs.  Iacas is right it is really only ONE basic idea.

Modern science has proved that both internal and external focus are advantageous to learning depending on the situation.  Probably the ultimate form of instruction is a synthesis as Iacas alluded to several times in the thread.  

Imo from looking around online and reading what golf literature I have read the industry as a whole seems to be heavily slanted towards internal focus.  Just read Five Lessons or Leadbetter or just notice when you look around.  I wouldn't include 5sk in the junk that I see readily available promising quick results with magic tricks.  You can't really argue against 5sk.  One description I read from Leadbetter on hip motion in one of his books was truly ridiculous.  I would tell him to his face that what he wrote is one of the worst things I have ever seen.

I think Jones's writings are a good contrast to getting caught up in overthinking things.  I read some advice Iacas wrote to a very good player and it was almost verbatim to what Jones said in one case about making small good swings and building back up from there if things get way off track.

I am only one golfer,  and it's like anything,  what I have seen work is ultimately irrelevant to what will work for someone or even a majority of golfers.  I have no shame in admitting that.

One idea can only be repeated or explained so many times.  So I am not going to continue unless addressed directly as it seems my ability to try to explain what I have seen success with has run its course.  It's only one aspect.

I will say Jones one idea can't harm a golfer.  His writings are timeless and if you find yourself getting caught up in overthinking as many of us do (we are golfers after all) his words are refreshingly simple and positive.  

 


Posted

@iacas did not ALLUDE to that thing @Jack Watson-He came out and said it many many times.

  • Upvote 1

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
16 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

Imo from looking around online and reading what golf literature I have read the industry as a whole seems to be heavily slanted towards internal focus.

Kinda how it has to be. You can't just say "swing the clubhead" and have people feel they've gotten a good tip. All we can talk about is how the right elbow "should" work in public places to the general public. Even discussions here are often like that, because we're actually discussing generalized mechanics, NOT what any one student might need to do at that moment to feel a better golf swing, or achieve it, or do a drill, or picture something, or whatever.

2 minutes ago, Phil McGleno said:

@iacas did not ALLUDE to that thing @Jack Watson-He came out and said it many many times.

I feel that I did more than allude to it as well, yeah.

  • Upvote 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3087 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.