Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2893 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I surmise that the reason for significantly slower pace of play due to faster greens would be due to the need for more strokes from off the green because approach shots didn't hold the faster greens as often as the slower ones.

From what I can tell, though, the study didn't include this aspect in their stats.  They only considered time spent on the green.  To which I surmise a similar effect, in that approach shots that stayed on the faster greens were relatively speaking further from the hole than on slower greens, resulting in more time spent.

Ultimately, though, 7 mins per round difference?  I don't understand how that can be considered statistically significant over a 4-5 hr. round.

 

Ping G2 Driver; Titleist 906F2 5W; TM Rescue Mid 3H; Adams Idea Pro 4H; Titleist DTR 3-SW; Callaway Bobby Jones Putter; Ping Hoofer lite

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, wannabe said:

I surmise that the reason for significantly slower pace of play due to faster greens would be due to the need for more strokes from off the green because approach shots didn't hold the faster greens as often as the slower ones.

 

In my opinion, how receptive a green is is different than the green speed. You can have a soft green that is mowed short and the ball would stay on the green, but still leave you with fast putts. 

Driver: :titleist:  GT3
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood
Irons: :titleist: U505 (3)  :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   :titleist: SM9 54/58  
Putter: :tmade: Spider X

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Just now, klineka said:

In my opinion, how receptive a green is is different than the green speed. You can have a soft green that is mowed short and the ball would stay on the green, but still leave you with fast putts. 

Softness being equal, though, faster would tend toward less receptive.

Ping G2 Driver; Titleist 906F2 5W; TM Rescue Mid 3H; Adams Idea Pro 4H; Titleist DTR 3-SW; Callaway Bobby Jones Putter; Ping Hoofer lite

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
14 minutes ago, wannabe said:

Softness being equal, though, faster would tend toward less receptive.

Most golfers come up short, though, no? So maybe they're actually closer to the hole on these faster greens.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
24 minutes ago, iacas said:

Most golfers come up short, though, no? So maybe they're actually closer to the hole on these faster greens.

Maybe, but I’d wager that’s a stretch that more approaches end up closer to the pin on faster vs. slower greens.

Other variables:

Most pin position placements on fast v slow?

Most green tilts (toward/ away from fairway) on fast v slow?

Difficulty of approach shots on courses with fast v slow greens?

Ping G2 Driver; Titleist 906F2 5W; TM Rescue Mid 3H; Adams Idea Pro 4H; Titleist DTR 3-SW; Callaway Bobby Jones Putter; Ping Hoofer lite

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
17 minutes ago, wannabe said:

Maybe, but I’d wager that’s a stretch that more approaches end up closer to the pin on faster vs. slower greens.

My point was that I think it's a stretch that you're suggesting the opposite is true, too.

I'm not thinking that hard about this study. It's not a very well-done study.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 minutes ago, iacas said:

My point was that I think it's a stretch that you're suggesting the opposite is true, too.

I'm not thinking that hard about this study. It's not a very well-done study.

Ok.  Since you didn’t think about it too hard I’ll let you off the hook.  :-)

Ping G2 Driver; Titleist 906F2 5W; TM Rescue Mid 3H; Adams Idea Pro 4H; Titleist DTR 3-SW; Callaway Bobby Jones Putter; Ping Hoofer lite

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
17 hours ago, wannabe said:

Softness being equal, though, faster would tend toward less receptive.

Perhaps on undulating greens maybe, I cannot see how on a relatively flat green a difference of one or two feet will even be noticable. Its negligible at best.

Danny    In my :ping: Hoofer Tour golf bag on my :clicgear: 8.0 Cart

Driver:   :pxg: 0311 Gen 5  X-Stiff.                        Irons:  :callaway: 4-PW APEX TCB Irons 
3 Wood: :callaway: Mavrik SZ Rogue X-Stiff                            Nippon Pro Modus 130 X-Stiff
3 Hybrid: :callaway: Mavrik Pro KBS Tour Proto X   Wedges: :vokey:  50°, 54°, 60° 
Putter: :odyssey:  2-Ball Ten Arm Lock        Ball: :titleist: ProV 1

 

 

 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

As one who has had all sorts of trouble with spinning balls off false fronts, soft fast greens can go jump in a lake...

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Of course faster greens mean longer play, the more three putts the longer it takes. If the course is so crowded you 30 min's just to tee off who cares about saving 4.5 min..


Posted

While the stats may say otherwise, I'm not a total believer in stats!

I've been in foursomes on courses where the greens were extremely fast and tricky. Things slowed so much to a crawl on the greens that I was going crazy!

Let's face it, The guys were afraid of the greens, especially after blowing a few putts a mile by! So, they'd slow down even more, and just read the living crap out of them, meanwhile, not doing very much better!  And I'm not just pointing fingers at others, I've been there myself!

I finally arrived at a point where I just figured that I'd make my read, stroke the putt, and let the chips fall where they may. Oddly enough, this actually improved my putting. My original read was right much more often than it was wrong.

Over-reading leads to errors!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
10 hours ago, Buckeyebowman said:

Let's face it, The guys were afraid of the greens, especially after blowing a few putts a mile by! So, they'd slow down even more, and just read the living crap out of them, meanwhile, not doing very much better!  And I'm not just pointing fingers at others, I've been there myself!

I don't see this happening that often.

I've been on a course that routinely keeps their greens near 12-13. I've played a round many times there just as fast as any other course who runs their greens on at an 8-9. I've never seen a person slow down their putting routine on fast greens.

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 1/5/2018 at 10:18 AM, The Hook Meister said:

Of course faster greens mean longer play, the more three putts the longer it takes. If the course is so crowded you 30 min's just to tee off who cares about saving 4.5 min..

 

On 1/9/2018 at 6:11 PM, Buckeyebowman said:

While the stats may say otherwise, I'm not a total believer in stats!

I've been in foursomes on courses where the greens were extremely fast and tricky. Things slowed so much to a crawl on the greens that I was going crazy!

Let's face it, The guys were afraid of the greens, especially after blowing a few putts a mile by! So, they'd slow down even more, and just read the living crap out of them, meanwhile, not doing very much better!  And I'm not just pointing fingers at others, I've been there myself!

I finally arrived at a point where I just figured that I'd make my read, stroke the putt, and let the chips fall where they may. Oddly enough, this actually improved my putting. My original read was right much more often than it was wrong.

Over-reading leads to errors!

What the heck takes people so long to putt? You read it, setup and putt. I might rush one putt per round that I regret, but how the heck does it take a minute for each player to putt every single putt?

I've spent most of my round times just waiting for people to putt out on basically flat greens, and they walk around the ball and the hole use their clubs to eyeball it or Aimpoint for up to a minute per putt. One time, I hit the green off the tee and waited by my friends ball 40 yards away from the green as they inspected their putts then took 3 to 4 minutes to realize they were waiting for me to mark my ball which I finally did then they took another 5 minutes to putt while I was standing there on the fringe looking like an idiot with a fresh batch of golfers collecting near by buddy 40 yards away. I mean, come on, are they playing for $1000 skins on public courses? :hmm:

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2893 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,638 5/6* ⬜⬜🟨⬜🟨 🟨🟩⬜🟩⬜ ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,638 3/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • It may not have been block practice, though, is one of the main points here. You may have been serving and from the same place, but you were likely trying to do slightly different things. It seems that would only be blocked practice if you were trying to hit the same exact ball hit to you to the same exact place in the far court. I'm not sure that's as random as if the ball that you're given to hit is at different places, too, but again…
    • I played tennis in college. I thought block practice was great for serves because you were starting the point and  you could easily adjust where you wanted to place the ball based off the same motion. I equate those to tee balls. I despised block practice for groundstrokes once you reached a certain level and your fundamentals were good. To me, hitting a 100 crosscourt backhands in a row was silly because I would never do that in a match. I needed to randomize it by hitting some deep, some angled, all with different speeds and spins. I share that same thought about iron play. Because we seldom hit the same approach shots hole after hole, I prefer to practice irons randomly. 
    • Wordle 1,638 2/6* 🟨⬛🟨🟨🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.