Jump to content
IGNORED

Questions For My Rules Seminar (2019)


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, iacas said:

I’m not even tops here for that. @Rulesman has a claim for sure. Then me maybe. Dave can have a podium spot. 🙂

Thanks for the complement, much appreciated. However I have now retired from active refereeing. But have been invited to do a couple of big amateur events later this year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Well it took 9 long days to get my results back, but I exceeded every expectation.  I got 92 of 100 right!

At the suggestion of @iacas, who obviously took note of my interests in the Rules, I signed up and took the USGA/PGA Rules Workshop this spring.  In contrast to previous years, when this was done as a

So I mentioned I'd post when I finished the test, and I'm finished.  Overall, I'm confident I got a large number of correct answers.  There were very few that I was really stumped over, maybe two or t

Posted Images

  • Moderator

So I mentioned I'd post when I finished the test, and I'm finished.  Overall, I'm confident I got a large number of correct answers.  There were very few that I was really stumped over, maybe two or three.  A large percentage I was certain of, and there were a few kind of in the middle.  

Overall impressions, the test administration went pretty smoothly.  I had read that the initial online proctoring firm was extremely difficult, the USGA changed firms and everything was as smooth as I could hope for.  The careful reading required for the 100 questions was a definite strain, I'm kind of brain-numb now, but a cold beer will help that.  I guess the last step is to wait for the results to be emailed.  Officially they said it will be within two weeks, I've read from other people that 4 or 5 days has been typical.  

So this is a bit of an endpoint to my Spring Rules of Golf adventure, starting with a DM from Erik, deciding to take the Workshop, watching all of the available instruction, ending with the exam today.  All in all, I've learned a ton, and the experience has only increased my interest in learning more.  Assuming my test results are good enough, I'll explore opportunities to officiate local events, maybe I'll enjoy that and continue.  I'm also likely to attend another Workshop, especially if they return to in-person sessions.

Anyway, thanks to anyone who's managed to read through this stuff, and thanks to @iacas for encouraging me to take this first step in formal rules education.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, DaveP043 said:

So I mentioned I'd post when I finished the test, and I'm finished.  Overall, I'm confident I got a large number of correct answers.  There were very few that I was really stumped over, maybe two or three.  A large percentage I was certain of, and there were a few kind of in the middle.  

Overall impressions, the test administration went pretty smoothly.  I had read that the initial online proctoring firm was extremely difficult, the USGA changed firms and everything was as smooth as I could hope for.  The careful reading required for the 100 questions was a definite strain, I'm kind of brain-numb now, but a cold beer will help that.  I guess the last step is to wait for the results to be emailed.  Officially they said it will be within two weeks, I've read from other people that 4 or 5 days has been typical.  

So this is a bit of an endpoint to my Spring Rules of Golf adventure, starting with a DM from Erik, deciding to take the Workshop, watching all of the available instruction, ending with the exam today.  All in all, I've learned a ton, and the experience has only increased my interest in learning more.  Assuming my test results are good enough, I'll explore opportunities to officiate local events, maybe I'll enjoy that and continue.  I'm also likely to attend another Workshop, especially if they return to in-person sessions.

Anyway, thanks to anyone who's managed to read through this stuff, and thanks to @iacas for encouraging me to take this first step in formal rules education.

It was fun watching you progress. I also think you have a good temperament to do work officiating. I do hope you take that step as I think you'd be pretty good at it.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...
9 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

Well it took 9 long days to get my results back, but I exceeded every expectation.  I got 92 of 100 right!:banana:

👍👍

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Moderator
20 hours ago, iacas said:

Congrats! Both on the score and properly using the Dancing Banana.

I have always loved the Dancing Banana, and I'm still feeling it today :banana:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, DaveP043 said:

I have always loved the Dancing Banana, and I'm still feeling it today :banana:

I want to see the live version when they put you on the broadcasts to explain the rules to the commentators. :dance:

  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Moderator

So one more update on Dave's Rules Journey, I got in touch with the local PGA Section, the Middle Atlantic PGA.  We've gone back and forth a little, and I'm now scheduled to "work" my first event as an official, a MAPGA Fourball on September 7.  I know that's nearly 2 months away, but I'm already a little excited.  They offered me a spot on July 26, but after being away for a week in WI, followed by a 36-hole stroke play tourny at home, I figured I'd better beg off and go to work (to get some rest).

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • Good for you, what course are you qualifying at?  Good luck.
    • Considering how many people he comes into contact with and how often he is flying, it is unfortunate but not a total surprise. You can catch Covid-19 again even with being vaccinated and previously infected. It just means that your infection is mild.
    • Or, he understands how it transfers, and he was only around his wife for two months. He didn't need to get tested… because in getting tested, maybe he would have gone out more than he did in isolating at home, perhaps? You are making a LOT of assumptions, as you often do, @Shorty. Cool it.
    • The Club at Lac La Belle - 6.5 I wasn't a big fan of this course. It was beautiful and well-maintained, but I found parts of it to be a little contrived. It's definitely a target golf course and for someone like me who is wild off the tee, it took all the fun of strategizing out of it because the risks were just too high. I did like that there was variety in the course layout with a good mix of short/long, right/left, uphill/downhill holes. I'm not sure I'd make a trip out to this one again if I'm ever back in the area for golf, but it's less than 10 minutes away from a delicious French bakery with the best croissants I have ever had, so that bumps up the score a little  I'd go back just for the croissants. The Sandbox - 7.0 This little 17 hole par 3 course was just fun. It gave you different looks and a variety of options for play. I really liked it and tried a bunch of different things I normally wouldn't have on a regular course. A 7.0 is probably the most I'd give to a par 3 course, though. Lawsonia Links - 7.5 I really enjoyed this course. Overall I found the layout to be good. There were plenty of places to miss, but you still needed to hit good golf shots to play well. I liked the way the mounds and bunkers were designed to play with the shape of the holes visually. There were really only a couple of holes I didn't like - 13 in particular, even though I made par both times using completely different strategies. It's just bordering on too many blind shots for me, though. I'd definitely play this course again if I have the chance. Mammoth Dunes - 8.5 This course was spectacular to look at - absolutely visually stunning. The pictures don't do it justice because they fail to capture the scale of everything. The place is massive. I'll echo what the others have wrote above: it's a journey. You feel like you're not going out to play a round of golf, but rather that you're going on an adventure while hitting a golf ball on the way. I understand now how some other reviews I've read or seen describe a feeling of getting lost, or losing your bearings for a bit. I wasn't thinking about routing. I had no idea where the clubhouse was. I didn't really care about any of it because I was out in this beautiful landscape. The golf itself for me was just there. I would be perfectly happy spending an afternoon just walking the course without playing it. And that's a bit of a detriment, because at the end of the day, it is a golf course. As a golf course, I found it didn't really matter much how you played it as long as you hit decent shots. There was certainly an ideal way to play the course well, and I hit some awful shots and paid the price for them, but plenty of just okay shots I got away with because of the layout. In the end that's fine. I don't need every course I play to be a grueling test of my skills.  I'd make a return trip and play this course again. Sand Valley - 9.0 This one is a golf course first and a spectacular view second. Where Mammoth Dunes focuses on the adventure, Sand Valley focuses on the golf. It's still visually stunning, but just not quite on the grand scale that Mammoth Dunes is. And Sand Valley does not let you forget for even one second that you're out there to do one thing: to play golf. I don't remember having a single shot out there that didn't require my undivided attention. The course absolutely punished you for missing your spots. But the flip side of that coin is that it was extremely rewarding to hit good shots there. An example is #8 mentioned above - I don't think I have ever felt so pleased to hit a GW to 35' before in my life, and I might never again. The course is a challenge in the best way. It makes you want to rise up to face it. I want to go back and battle it again. I shot my best score of the week with an 87 at Lawsonia, but it's the 94 the second time playing Sand Valley that I'm most proud of. Like Mammoth Dunes above, I'd make a return trip specifically to play this course again. Bonus Stuff The facilities at Sand Valley Golf Resort were top notch. The prices at the pro shop were fair. The food and drinks were also reasonably priced and delicious. The food truck at The Sandbox had the best food in the whole complex, IMO. Lac La Belle I felt was fancy but overpriced. I bought a polo at the pro shop at Sand Valley, but a similar shirt at Lac La Belle was like 50% more expensive. The golf carts had beautiful leather seats, but I absolutely hate geo-mapping on the GPS systems. I don't know how many times it slowed me down to tell me not to drive in the fescue even though I was driving parallel to it 20 yards away. Lawsonia had an older clubhouse and it certainly had a quaint feeling to it. That's not a bad thing. I did not look to see the prices they were charging for their merchandise.
    • Every YouTube video should start with a 10- to 45-minute diagnosis to make sure the video you're about to watch applies to you. There are a LOT of reasons why someone hits a slice. YouTube videos do not start with a 45-minute "disclaimer" because nobody would get through it. They just want to stop slicing, but if the video shows a fix for something that the student doesn't do, the video is less than worthless — it may actually cause more damage. Don't watch YouTube videos unless they're just working on some fundamental things, or you're very confident that what they're going to show you actually applies to you.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Armando Araujo
      Armando Araujo
      (46 years old)
    2. chris3putt
      chris3putt
      (54 years old)
    3. CrazyHorsePete
      CrazyHorsePete
      (34 years old)
    4. DHak20
      DHak20
      (44 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...