Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
  • entries
    57
  • comments
    772
  • views
    41,810

iacas

6,080 views

Game 1: PGA Tour Player Switcheroo
Imagine a game in which you pair two average PGA Tour players with two average 80s golfers.

  • Team A: the pro hits every shot that requires a Full Swing Motion (roughly every shot from 65+ yards), and the 80s golfer will play every short game shot and hit every putt.
  • Team B: the 80s golfer hits every Full Swing Motion shot, and the pro plays every short game shot and hits every putt.

On a typical 7000-yard golf course, what might you expect these teams to score? Which team would win?

Game 2: Personal Switcheroo
Imagine a game in which you play two golf balls.

  • Ball 1: You hit every full swing shot the way you normally hit them (righty if you're right-handed), and every short game shot/putt opposite handed (lefty if you're a righty).
  • Ball 2: You hit every full swing shot opposite handed, and every short game shot and putt normally.

With which ball will you end up shooting the lower score?

  • Like 2

17 Comments


Recommended Comments

  • Administrator
iacas

Posted

I got tired of finding this from LSW and quoting it (often to have it completely ignored), so I made it a blog post, and now can just refer to this.

Vinsk

Posted

Yep. Such a beautiful explanation that anyone should be able to get. I've used this many times and it seems to drive the point home pretty well.

dennyjones

Posted

I believe I've finally convinced my golfing 4 some of the importance of the long game.  in the past, it has always been "Drive for show, putt for dough".      They have finally realized that the longer drive, the better approach shot leaves a shorter putt and leads to better scores.

JonMA1

Posted

Quote

On a typical 7000-yard golf course, what might you expect these teams to score? Which team would win?

I think Team A wins on any length course. If you took their additional length out of the equation, their precision with the full swing would still be a huge advantage. Even I can two-putt from 15' most of the time.

My interpretation of this may be wrong, but improving one's full swing does not necessarily mean trying to squeeze more distance. To me, it means learning to hit a 3 wood as accurately as I currently hit a 4 iron. That's not to say I'd hope to be hitting greens regularly with those clubs, only that I need to be able to keep it in play.

Right now, the knowledge that I'm likely going to lose a ball by pulling a longer club prevents me from getting closer to the green with too many shots.

allenc

Posted

5 hours ago, JonMA1 said:

I think Team A wins on any length course. If you took their additional length out of the equation, their precision with the full swing would still be a huge advantage. Even I can two-putt from 15' most of the time.

I think team A could even do better on a shorter course.  After all, how many short game shots will you have to hit if the pro is playing from 6200 yards?

5 hours ago, JonMA1 said:

My interpretation of this may be wrong, but improving one's full swing does not necessarily mean trying to squeeze more distance. To me, it means learning to hit a 3 wood as accurately as I currently hit a 4 iron. That's not to say I'd hope to be hitting greens regularly with those clubs, only that I need to be able to keep it in play.

Right.  And as you improve you will certainly have more average distance even if your swing speed and max distance stays the same.  Perhaps you currently hit good drives 240, mediocre ones 210, and poor ones 180.  Improve your swing and those numbers may change to 240, 230, and 220.  You'll have the same results in a long drive contest, but your golf game will improve a lot.

  • Upvote 1
  • Moderator
nevets88

Posted

Maybe people are in denial of how not good their long game actually is.

  • Administrator
iacas

Posted

3 hours ago, Hardspoon said:

Or, instead of the full switcheroo, try only one half of the experiment and end up with a stupid conclusion:

http://www.golfwrx.com/463106/proof-that-short-shots-make-the-difference-try-this-test/

What a dumbass.

:doh:

It will be a lower score. It's also a bit contrived because by hitting the third shot on par fours… the guy may be dropping near a hazard and playing in from 168 yards or something.

More immediate gains can definitely be made in the short game. But the full swing has much larger gains to be made.

JonMA1

Posted

I want to see a golf pro salvage a par 5 after I've hit two tee shots in a row into the woods.

For the last few years I thought my poor putting was a glaring weakness (it was), but as I found out this year, the damage caused by poor putting is nothing compared to losing control of your driver.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Hardspoon

Posted

19 minutes ago, JonMA1 said:

I want to see a golf pro salvage a par 5 after I've hit two tee shots in a row into the woods.

This made me laugh.  I'm picturing you firing two tee shots into the woods, and doing a club/mic drop.  "Try to make par now, DJ!!!"

JonMA1

Posted

19 hours ago, Hardspoon said:

This made me laugh.  I'm picturing you firing two tee shots into the woods, and doing a club/mic drop.  "Try to make par now, DJ!!!"

Ha ha.

After losing 2 in a row off the tee I'd be dropping something... probably a few F-bombs.

  • Upvote 1
Shindig

Posted

20 hours ago, JonMA1 said:

I want to see a golf pro salvage a par 5 after I've hit two tee shots in a row into the woods.

For the last few years I thought my poor putting was a glaring weakness (it was), but as I found out this year, the damage caused by poor putting is nothing compared to losing control of your driver.

Or as paralyzing.  I've been pulling my driver the past ... month or so.  There are three tee shots on my home course where this is deadly as it significantly risks O.B..  I've debated hitting as low as hybrid off those tees (I haven't yet gone to that level).  A missed 3' putt probably doesn't cost you two strokes, or make you lose a partial in fear of it, and it almost definitely won't hit a passing car.

JonMA1

Posted

57 minutes ago, Shindig said:

A missed 3' putt probably doesn't cost you two strokes

Exactly.

Jerry in DC

Posted

I know this is basically rhetorical at this point and the point is proven, but just for some partial experimental evidence -- I did putt righty (I'm lefty) for a full round because I forgot my putter and it had little to no impact on my score. I did a claw/hockey-style stroke and it was just fine -- with zero practice ever.   I actually throw a righty putter in my bag once in a while just to mix things up now.  

alleztom

Posted

I would definitely have the pro laying up to 70 yards in almost all circumstances. All my money on team A all of the time. And short game is identified as a glaring weakness in my game.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Blog Entries

  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.