Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Getting to Scratch in 18 Months?


Note: This thread is 2182 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
19 hours ago, Bargolfer said:

As a scratch golfer I can tell you it is difficult and time consuming, but not improbable to go from a beginner to a scratch golfer in under 2 years. My advice is focus from the green and work backwards. First, putt, putt, putt!  Emphasis on lag putting which will lead to fewer 3 putts. Next, short game around the greens (important because you will be missing a lot of them). You see the pattern. Good luck!

You can have the best short game in the world, but without a very good full swing, you’ll struggle to get to single digits, let alone even approach scratch.

Welcome to the site!   :beer:

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
On 12/30/2019 at 4:34 PM, criley4way said:

Have you seen the Dan project?

This is possible but VERY difficult.

Did he ever make it to scratch? I thought towards the end he was low single digits but vanity capping. 

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Besides the couple of times I got to play with a pro (Gary Hallberg 18 holes, and Miguel Jimenez 1 hole), the best golfer I played with was a co-worker. I would say this guy was 30 years old at the and maybe 5'-10" and 150 pounds. This was the company golf outing in scramble format. I was probably a 10 to 12 HC at the time. This was before I got serious about the game. I had heard that this guy was good so my league partners we quick to sign him up to our foursome.

I had heard that he QB'd his high school football team and took them to the state title. I think he might have also been a BB and baseball star there as well. This was a small country school, but he came with a reputation. A lot of this I found out later after the round.

On the driving range he displayed a smooth swing and was cracking them out there real good. I assumed that he had played on the golf team in HS and had taken lessons, etc. He said he did not play in HS. This guy was now married and had small children. There was no way he was out playing all of the time and honing his game.

On the first tee he smacks one out a lot farther than I had ever been on this short par 5. We use his drive of course. I think we were line 180 and I have my 4i out. He takes a 7i and puts it on the small green.

The only other hole I remember clearly was hole 5, which is another par 5 that has a big pond in front of the green and is definitely a lay up situation for mortals. He hits a beautiful, effortless drive which has to be over 300 yards because we had about 200 yards to the pin. Now this is a public course that probably doesn't see as much water as some in late summer, so I am sure he got some roll out.

The green has a huge slope downward from a high at the back to a low at the front, which is protected by water. There are also trees blocking the right side of the green, which if you clipped a branch you would end up in the water. If you are long you would have an impossible chip that would roll through to the front and into the water.

This guy pulls out a 6i and puts it to with 5 or 6 feet and then putts it in. The putt must have broke a foot. This guy eagles the hardest hole on the course himself. For me at the time bogey is miraculous. Today I would be satisfied with a bogey and ecstatic  with a par on that hole as a 5.6 index.

Sorry for the long-winded post, but this was an eye opener for me as this was a guy that golfed less than most of us and could outplay most of us. It wasn't about technique, practice, equipment, etc. It was all about god-given athletic talent and ability. I am sure there is something about mental composure and being a competitor as he took a team to a state title. But I knew then and there that I probably would never be able to play as well as him no matter what I did or how hard I worked. He was a natural.

So to reinforce my point above, if you are a great athlete then scratch (or better) in 18 months (or less) is definitely possible.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 hours ago, billchao said:

Did he ever make it to scratch? I thought towards the end he was low single digits but vanity capping. 

I don’t think he ever got below a very questionable 5 or 6...

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
On 12/28/2019 at 6:52 PM, golflover123 said:

Hi everyone 

Start golf a little bit ago i have a lot of time to play golf how much would i have to practice short game,iron,driver etc.

i know Greg Norman did it in the time is it possible 

 

It is possible if you have the talent of Greg Norman.

It would be one of the greatest sporting achievements in the history if you did.

My guess is that you have never played with a scratch marker or seen a professional hit the ball in real life.

And....if you are honest about it you'll find that getting from 18 to 4 is easier than getting from 4 to scratch.

In other words............ no.

Edited by leftybutnotPM

Posted (edited)
On 12/31/2019 at 6:14 AM, Bonvivant said:

, there is no reason that you can't get low in that time frame. On top of that, it sounds like you are young so that helps as well

No reason? - what about the reason that it is the dream of every person who has even played the game, but may have been achieved a few times. Maybe once in every several million attempts.

Bottom line is that if it were possible for this player, he wouldn't be asking people who've never seen him play. He would already be shooting in the mid seventies consistently.

Unfortunately, a realistic but unachievable goal for most would be a genuine handicap of 10 in 18 months. Even that would be truly remarkable. It would usually involve plenty of practice and good instruction.

Usually, in this type of thread the person submits about 5 cards in certain conditions that amount to a handicap that is ridiculously low and then sit on that handicap but never play competition rounds and fool themselves into thinking they are nearly a scratch because they had a 78 on an easy course in easy conditions once, noting that Tiger Woods shot 74 at Bethpage Black in a hurricane - only 4 better than them.

Their maths says that Tger is a "scratch" (when he's probably a +11) and they are only four shots worse than him.

Edited by leftybutnotPM

Posted
20 minutes ago, leftybutnotPM said:

No reason? - what about the reason that it is the dream of every person who has even played the game, but may have been achieved a few times. Maybe once in every several million attempts.

Dreams are different than goals. It is logical fallacy to conflate the two. Sure I'd love to be scratch, and dream of it, but I wouldn't dare say that I am attempting to become a scratch golfer, and I would assume that you are the same, as are the vast majority that play this game that we love so much. It's one thing to dream of being a billionaire, it is a completely different thing to have the goal of becoming one, and a plan to make that goal a reality.

As far as the people that don't card all their rounds, they are only cheating themselves. If you play with them you will know exactly how they play. I once played with a kid that took any putt inside of 5 ft as a gimme. He claimed at the beginning of the round that he was scratch (or off 1 or 2 or something close), and even with the gimmes, he still shot like 8 over. Anyone that ever plays with him knows that he's just a liar/bragger, and they will treat him with whatever respect that they generally give to those types.

I don't know anyone that plays and thinks that they are only 4 shots worse than Tiger, even if they carry a true close to scratch handicap. You might get that same bragger from the last paragraph saying that crap, but no one takes them seriously. I would hope that someone that is coming to this forum looking for info and help wouldn't turn around and only post those great scores and then look for congratulations from us.

  • :titleist: 917 D2 9.5o EvenFlow blue shaft    :titleist: 917 F2 15o EvenFlow blue shaft    
  • :titleist: 818 H2 19o EvenFlow blue shaft 
  • :titleist: 712 AP2 4-PW
  • :vokey: 52/8o SM6 RAW    56/14o SM6 Chrome      60/4o SM6 Chrome
  • :ping: Anser Sigma G putter
  • :snell: MTB-Black Balls
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, leftybutnotPM said:

It is possible if you have the talent of Greg Norman.

It would be one of the greatest sporting achievements in the history if you did.

My guess is that you have never played with a scratch marker or seen a professional hit the ball in real life.

And....if you are honest about it you'll find that getting from 18 to 4 is easier than getting from 4 to scratch.

In other words............ no.

Man that is demoralizing. I am at a 4,3 (traveling HCP not home course) and would love to get to scratch in the next 2 years. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
1 hour ago, leftybutnotPM said:

Their maths says that Tger is a "scratch" (when he's probably a +11) and they are only four shots worse than him.

+11? Nah.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, iacas said:

Probably not, but Marc Leishman +8

For those US golfers, the 35s and 36s and 40s are STABLEFORD scores for 18 holes, not scores for 9. :-)

 

1903313953_ScreenShot2020-01-02at6_35_08am.thumb.png.50d9be3c4438fa33da30fcb34082fe51.png

2 hours ago, Bonvivant said:

 

I don't know anyone that plays and thinks that they are only 4 shots worse than Tiger, even if they carry a true close to scratch handicap. You might get that same bragger from the last paragraph saying that crap, but no one takes them seriously. I would hope that someone that is coming to this forum looking for info and help wouldn't turn around and only post those great scores and then look for congratulations from us.

People who set out to attain an unattainable goal, Like Dan Plan man are looking to fulfil their prophecies.

It isn't just vanity, it's the silly nature of the plan.

In these threads, rather than saying "I want to see how much improvement I can achieve in 18 months" it's always "scratch" or "pro" which proves they know zero about golf and less than zero about golf played at a high level.

 

Edited by leftybutnotPM

  • Administrator
Posted
22 minutes ago, leftybutnotPM said:

Probably not, but Marc Leishman +8

U.S. system, and now, WHS system, we're talking about. Not whatever y'all were doing in Australia before 2020.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
20 minutes ago, leftybutnotPM said:

People who set out to attain an unattainable goal, Like Dan Plan man are looking to fulfil their prophecies.

It isn't just vanity, it's the silly nature of the plan.

In these threads, rather than saying "I want to see how much improvement I can achieve in 18 months" it's always "scratch" or "pro" which proves they know zero about golf and less than zero about golf played at a high level.

 

Well he says he is hitting 500 balls a day, and is fairly fresh so bad habits can be more easily eliminated by a coach. If anyone has a shot at doing it, it's someone with this scenario. If I said I wanted to be scratch and only get to play 3 times a week, it would be a silly plan. This is not. If he gets to 2.x or something like that in 18 months, yes the plan has failed, but he would have come pretty dang close. Just because you don't think most people can do it, and just because he put a true goal out there, doesn't mean it's silly or stupid.

If you go out every year and say, "I want to see how much improvement I can have this year", you won't get very far, especially without a plan like the OP has. Setting a number is important.

  • :titleist: 917 D2 9.5o EvenFlow blue shaft    :titleist: 917 F2 15o EvenFlow blue shaft    
  • :titleist: 818 H2 19o EvenFlow blue shaft 
  • :titleist: 712 AP2 4-PW
  • :vokey: 52/8o SM6 RAW    56/14o SM6 Chrome      60/4o SM6 Chrome
  • :ping: Anser Sigma G putter
  • :snell: MTB-Black Balls
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 minutes ago, iacas said:

U.S. system, and now, WHS system, we're talking about. Not whatever y'all were doing in Australia before 2020.

Our system changed to the U.S. System in 2018, IIRC.


  • Administrator
Posted
2 minutes ago, leftybutnotPM said:

Our system changed to the U.S. System in 2018, IIRC.

You also seem to have quoted his course handicap. I'm talking about his index - which is the numbers with the decimals.

The four with the icon next to them are about +5.4.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Bonvivant said:

Well he says he is hitting 500 balls a day, and is fairly fresh so bad habits can be more easily eliminated by a coach. If anyone has a shot at doing it, it's someone with this scenario. If I said I wanted to be scratch and only get to play 3 times a week, it would be a silly plan. This is not. If he gets to 2.x or something like that in 18 months, yes the plan has failed, but he would have come pretty dang close. Just because you don't think most people can do it, and just because he put a true goal out there, doesn't mean it's silly or stupid.

If you go out every year and say, "I want to see how much improvement I can have this year", you won't get very far, especially without a plan like the OP has. Setting a number is important.

I stand my my comment. Why would you ask people who've never seen you play?

As for the comments saying "Anything is possible", well that makes as much sense as saying "Everything happens for a reason". It isn't and it doesn't. Next we'll have people saying that golf is "80% mental" or "It depends on how much you want it".

Hitting 500 shots a day is the same as hitting 1 shot a day if you're doing it incorrectly. Maybe worse.

This guy has never seen a super low handicap player and has never seen a playing professional in the flesh.

Go and look at all of the threads of this nature. It is littered with tales of a desire/promise of "domination  on the Mackenzie Tour" and always devolves into a search for different clubs, and scores in "tournies" in the 90s.

Ambition is great. But let's know what we are aiming for so we can be realistic.

AND I KNOW HE DOESN'T SAY HE WANTS TO BE A PGATour PRO.

10 minutes ago, iacas said:

You also seem to have quoted his course handicap. I'm talking about his index - which is the numbers with the decimals.

The four with the icon next to them are about +5.4.

True. As of today it's +5.6. Down from +6.8 a fortnight ago. :-)

 

I get your point. My point is pretty much that scratch (as you know) is shit.* 

 

* Tom Coyne

Anyone who hasn't should read Paper Tiger.

Edited by leftybutnotPM

Posted
2 minutes ago, leftybutnotPM said:

I stand my my comment. Why would you ask people who've never seen you play.

As for the comments saying "Anything is possible", well that makes as much sense as saying "Everything happens for a reason". It isn't and it doesn't. Next we'll have people saying that golf is "80% mental" or "It depends on how much you want it".

Hitting 500 shots a day is the same as hitting 1 shot a day if you're doing it incorrectly. Maybe worse.

This guy has never seen a super low handicap player and has never seen a playing professional in the flesh.

Go and look at all of the threads of this nature. It is littered with tales of a desire/promise of "domination  on the Mackenzie Tour" and always devolves into a search for different clubs, and scores in "tournies" in the 90s.

Ambition is great. But let's know what we are aiming for so we can realistic.

If you don't think that someone who has a coach and is hitting that many balls doesn't have a chance to get extremely good extremely fast then you must be a blast a parties. I would say that most scratch golfers don't hit that much/spend that much time playing, and being fresh and new means there is real potential for this to happen.

I haven't been on the forum that long and I have never seen another post like this. The OP hasn't said anything in a while, but I would love to hear updates from them as this progresses through the 18 months.

I know that golf is hard, but someone with that much time to put into the game, with someone to lead them has a chance of doing this. It's not a sure thing, maybe only 10% or possibly less, but its a far higher percentage than any other new golfer, or mid handicaper TBH.

  • :titleist: 917 D2 9.5o EvenFlow blue shaft    :titleist: 917 F2 15o EvenFlow blue shaft    
  • :titleist: 818 H2 19o EvenFlow blue shaft 
  • :titleist: 712 AP2 4-PW
  • :vokey: 52/8o SM6 RAW    56/14o SM6 Chrome      60/4o SM6 Chrome
  • :ping: Anser Sigma G putter
  • :snell: MTB-Black Balls
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Bonvivant said:

If you don't think that someone who has a coach and is hitting that many balls doesn't have a chance to get extremely good extremely fast then you must be a blast a parties.

This is not a joke forum is it? Does every post have to be affirming and positive?

OK - here's a joke for you:

My response to the OP is - "Sure. If only I had the time I think I could do it. K.J. Choi picked up golf later in life and Ian Poulter was a 4 handicap when he turned pro. Greg Norman never touched a golf club until he was 16. Anything is possible. I reckon you can do it if you really want it badly enough.  

Care to name anyone who's gone from beginner to scratch in 18 months? Apart from Greg Norman, of course. ;-)

 

Edited by leftybutnotPM

Note: This thread is 2182 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.