Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  On 10/14/2021 at 1:00 AM, ChetlovesMer said:

Life is a series or trade offs. You choose what you like/need. 

Expand  

Trade offs work for me, I like hybrids for the mid and long irons but blade-ish for 9 and wedges. Because I can't work all what I call dinky shots with hybrids, back in the day I used all blades...


  On 10/13/2021 at 5:09 PM, Darkfrog said:

I don't necessarily believe the part about straighter - that has to do with face and path.

I was fitted for my irons, and I don't have any issues with launch conditions, and any bad launch conditions are a swing problem, not a club problem.

Expand  

I disagree entirely, the hollow head is more forgiving of open/closed hits. You hit a path (intentional or not) that would result in a hook/draw/fade/slice and it goes straight(er) than it would with a cavity back and far straighter than it would with a blade.

Shots hit out of the bottom go higher, fats aren't punished as much, thins don't hurt (hollow club head)

That is the very nature of the hollow head, lower and further back COG etc be it these "irons", a hybrid or a modern driver.

If it wasn't the case why would people say they're harder/impossible to shape shots with?

I agree if you swing on a perfect path, with the face at the angle you intend every time, and hit ball just before turf every time you won't benefit one bit from these clubs.

 

 

  On 10/15/2021 at 8:16 AM, Colins69 said:

Trade offs work for me, I like hybrids for the mid and long irons but blade-ish for 9 and wedges. Because I can't work all what I call dinky shots with hybrids, back in the day I used all blades...

Expand  

This is true, they are easy to chip with (massive sole), but it's a bit like the Tiger 3 wood bump and run putt from the fringe, they jump of the face if you catch it perfect and it's very hard to get a feel for that. And somewhat alien if you've spent years using normal irons around the green.

 

 


  On 10/18/2021 at 6:56 PM, Fontyyy said:

I disagree entirely, the hollow head is more forgiving of open/closed hits. You hit a path (intentional or not) that would result in a hook/draw/fade/slice and it goes straight(er) than it would with a cavity back and far straighter than it would with a blade.

Shots hit out of the bottom go higher, fats aren't punished as much, thins don't hurt (hollow club head)

That is the very nature of the hollow head, lower and further back COG etc be it these "irons", a hybrid or a modern driver.

If it wasn't the case why would people say they're harder/impossible to shape shots with?

I agree if you swing on a perfect path, with the face at the angle you intend every time, and hit ball just before turf every time you won't benefit one bit from these clubs.

Expand  

You still haven't shown any evidence of what you are claiming.

-Peter

  • :titleist: TSR2
  • :callaway: Paradym, 4W
  • :pxg: GEN4 0317X, Hybrid
  • :srixon: ZX 3-iron, ZX5 4-AW
  • :cleveland:  RTX Zipcore 54 & 58
  • L.A.B. Golf Directed Force 2.1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  On 10/18/2021 at 7:15 PM, Darkfrog said:

You still haven't shown any evidence of what you are claiming.

Expand  

Ok, Newer HB Turbo Vs CBX

881177838_IMG_20211018_203301_2122.thumb.jpg.9fa36ef8048a10c41ec5281c0f590b90.jpg

4 shots with each, 3 times tighter dispersion, longer and tighter on distance and height, higher, steeper decent.

Look at swing 4 (with the hybrid iron) 15 mph of club head speed missing, same launch angle, lower height, same distance.

Now look at 8 (with the CBX), total disaster, barely got airborne, 30 yards missing.

From here

 

 

  • Like 1

  On 10/18/2021 at 6:56 PM, Fontyyy said:

You hit a path (intentional or not) that would result in a hook/draw/fade/slice and it goes straight(er) than it would with a cavity back and far straighter than it would with a blade.

Expand  

This isn't necessarily true.

  On 10/18/2021 at 7:46 PM, Fontyyy said:

Ok, Newer HB Turbo Vs CBX

881177838_IMG_20211018_203301_2122.thumb.jpg.9fa36ef8048a10c41ec5281c0f590b90.jpg

4 shots with each, 3 times tighter dispersion, longer and tighter on distance and height, higher, steeper decent.

Look at swing 4 (with the hybrid iron) 15 mph of club head speed missing, same launch angle, lower height, same distance.

Now look at 8 (with the CBX), total disaster, barely got airborne, 30 yards missing.

From here

 

 

Expand  

Look, I don't think anyone is disputing that many players, myself included, can benefit from a hybrid replace some or even many of the long irons. 

What I think most people are saying... I know I am. Is that there is very little benefit to a hybrid style iron in the short irons. This is because loft is your friend. You don't need a hybrid when you have loft. What I (and many others) are also saying is you give up a ton of distance control and the ability to hit different shots when you go with a hybrid style iron. You are stuck with a one-trick pony. 

ONCE AGAIN--- THAT's FINE! If that is what you want. But most people don't want that. That's why the industry sells tons of hybrids to replace long irons, but they sell very few hybrids to replace short irons. 

You asked the question. Many people have answered it. It's pretty straight forward really. 

ONE MORE TIME - If you like hybrid like short irons then play them. Nobody's stopping you. If you are asking why others don't do that, Read any of the above posts. 

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  On 10/18/2021 at 7:46 PM, Fontyyy said:

Ok, Newer HB Turbo Vs CBX

881177838_IMG_20211018_203301_2122.thumb.jpg.9fa36ef8048a10c41ec5281c0f590b90.jpg

4 shots with each, 3 times tighter dispersion, longer and tighter on distance and height, higher, steeper decent.

Look at swing 4 (with the hybrid iron) 15 mph of club head speed missing, same launch angle, lower height, same distance.

Now look at 8 (with the CBX), total disaster, barely got airborne, 30 yards missing.

From here

 

 

Expand  

I'm not saying that hybrid irons don't work better for you. But that is a really small sample size to draw meaningful conclusions from (1 golfer, 4 swings each club).

To prove hybrid irons go straighter, show me a data set with enough inputs to be significant, and with identical club metrics; club head speed, path, AoA, and strike location (i.e., distance from center face contact) and then show me the dispersion and if there is any meaningful difference between the two. And even if there is, it is still up to the player to determine if they want to give up the versatility of regular irons for the amount of help they might get from hybrid irons.

-Peter

  • :titleist: TSR2
  • :callaway: Paradym, 4W
  • :pxg: GEN4 0317X, Hybrid
  • :srixon: ZX 3-iron, ZX5 4-AW
  • :cleveland:  RTX Zipcore 54 & 58
  • L.A.B. Golf Directed Force 2.1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  On 10/18/2021 at 7:46 PM, Fontyyy said:

Look at swing 4 (with the hybrid iron) 15 mph of club head speed missing, same launch angle, lower height, same distance.

Expand  

This is EXACTLY why everyone doesn't play them. Some players like to hit irons different distances in different situations. If you get the same distance no matter how you swing it, that's NOT a good thing for a lot of players! 

If you like them, play them. They are NOT for everyone. 

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)
  On 10/13/2021 at 3:32 PM, Fontyyy said:

I'm going to guess here that most of us do not shoot par or less.

And we take all the help we can get with driver, fairway woods (and I'll include long hybrids and rescue clubs in there, 'cause that is where they belong).

So why not irons? Why do we shy away from real help? How many of us have even tried an "ultra game improvement" 7, 8 or 9 iron?

 

The insperation for this post was me buying some old Cleveland HiBores, the originals from 15+ years ago. Which TBF, in general, 99+% of the time return a better result than a brand new set of Cleveland CBX's.

For every given swing path from full on duff, fat or thin to slight miss-hit the ball goes higher, longer and straighter. Why, oh why, do we not want this help?

Expand  

I'm with you! Love the XLI, HB3's and now XL Halo irons. They are very forgiving and pretty much eliminate any embarrassing shots. The only draw back is the previous gens were clunky in the 9-W and they lacked distance on those clubs. I think they have addressed this issue in the XL halo irons. 

 

Edited by Sandhills Golfe

  • Administrator
  On 10/18/2021 at 6:56 PM, Fontyyy said:

I disagree entirely, the hollow head is more forgiving of open/closed hits. You hit a path (intentional or not) that would result in a hook/draw/fade/slice and it goes straight(er) than it would with a cavity back and far straighter than it would with a blade.

Expand  

That's not necessarily true, no. The ball knows the clubface angle, the CG/MOI, and a few other things. That's about it.

Hybrid irons are tougher to control distances accurately. They're difficult to hit low intentionally.

The numbers in your chart vary across the board. And your math is bad: the one has a distribution from -39 to 13, that's 52. The other has a distribution from -23 to 19, and that's 42 yards. That's not 3x smaller. Nor does it make any sense: if one of the clubs hit one -50, -50, 50, 50 the average would be zero, but the distribution pattern would be 100 yards wide.

  • Like 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...

they may not be for everyone, but for me, they are excellent.  On a whim I purchased a 7h from Monark Golf.  It cost $43 for the club.  The club is a TaylorMade R11 clone (they even call it Tour Model).  It completely changed my game from 130-150 yards.  Much more accurate for reasons noted above. 

But, from 110-120 I still struggled sometimes, so I purchased the a 9h head only for $19.99, used my propane torch to pop off a 9i iron, and epoxied the 9h to the existing shaft, ferrule, and grip.  So, I repurposed my 9i for $20 I got another hybrid.  Same result. No fear from 110 - 150.  

I've thought about a hybrid PW and G, but as others have mentioned, the loft on those clubs is so high, the irons are just as easy to hit.  And, I only use them from inside 100, so I'm likely going to hit the  green anyway (well, most of the time).  And, there is a certain satisfaction in hitting an iron pure vs. a hybrid.  

But, for high handicappers like me, I would definitely say it is worth testing out.  And for $19.99, you can try one head and pop it on an old club, just to see how you like it.  

 


I've got high swing speed and hybrid mid irons would balloon for me and have very inconsistent distance (versus my irons).

In general, you're right that many people could probably use more forgiving clubs in different parts of their bag. But on this forum many people are pretty serious (even if not good 😆) golfers who've been fit for their clubs and hit the irons in their bag better than equivalent hybrids they've tried.

  • Like 1

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 months later...

The hybrid sets are most suited for older folks like me ha.  I don't have a set but have been looking them over.  If you are a young golfer with a low handicap then you want normal irons.  These are made for older golfers or high handicap golfers.


  • 1 year later...

I started golfing at 68 after a 40 year absence i started with ping 100s. my friend used cleveland halo hybrid irons i used a couple and bought some used some some cleveland launchers hybrid irons. i hit them straighter and higher than my pings and i never looked back


  On 10/13/2021 at 3:32 PM, Fontyyy said:

 

So why not irons? Why do we shy away from real help? How many of us have even tried an "ultra game improvement" 7, 8 or 9 iron

Expand  

Don’t we already do that in some ways? My Titleist irons run 4-P, then I’ve added 48, 54, 58 Vokeys.  So effectively, I’m using a different set of clubs for my short game 

Driver: :taylormade-small: Stealth2+

3W: :taylormade-small: Stealth2

4H: :taylormade-small: Stealth 2

Irons 4I-9I:  :titleist-small: T200

Wedges P, 48: :titleist-small: T200

Wedges 54, 58: :titleist-small: Vokey SM9

Putter:  :odyssey-small: O Works #1 Black


(edited)

I have tried them.  Played maybe 4 months this year with the Wilson version.  At first I really like the feel of everything except the SW and LW.  I found them to be worthless out of sand so I went back to my Taylormade wedges.  I would have thought I would have hit the other irons higher than my TMs.  Not true for me.  Maybe I was just having a bad couple of rounds but one week I struggled so bad with hitting shots of any height and felt I was giving up distance.  So, the Wilson's are in the club graveyard in my garage and the TMs are back in my bag plus I am playing better now. Good experiment for me that just did not work.

Forgot to add...with the Wilson's unless I hit with a vey weak grip, they were hooking machines.  

Edited by RickK

Bag: Titleist
Driver: TM RBZ 9.5
Fairway metals: TM RBZ 3 wood
Hybrids: TM RBZ 3, 4 and 5
Irons: TM Burner 1.0 6 thru LW stiff steel shafts
Putter: Ping B60
Ball: TM Tour Preferred X or ProV1x
Check out littlejohngolfleague.com  A Greater Houston TX traveling golf league.


Why not hybrid irons? Hey! I love having a bed to carry stuff but really prefer a car over a truck. Why not the an El Camino!? 
 

Because they’re hideous.

  • Like 1

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...
  On 10/13/2021 at 3:32 PM, Fontyyy said:

So why not irons? Why do we shy away from real help? How many of us have even tried an "ultra game improvement" 7, 8 or 9 iron? ...

For every given swing path from full on duff, fat or thin to slight miss-hit the ball goes higher, longer and straighter. Why, oh why, do we not want this help?

Expand  

Circa 2008 I was playing Ping Eye 2 clone irons (probably SGI in 6-category MPF system). Irons were shafted with Dynalite S300 shafts, higher launch cousin of traditional DG S300. One season, I started having trouble with inconsistent iron distances. 

I went through fittings, and tried out these UGI models: Ping G10, and Callaway Big Berthas. These are UGI models with high-launch shafts. Problem: Short irons and wedges all ballooned. {UGI head + high launch shaft} = too much help on launch.

I also tried out the Callaway X20 (SGI) and X20 Tour (GI) models. The base X20 had 106-gram Uniflex shaft (mid-launch), some 14 grams lighter than the clone set Dynalite S300s. Played the X20 model for two seasons, then upgraded to X20 Tours.

For the X20 Tours, I got more GIRs - as long as I was practicing and playing regularly. The base X20 irons got me close to green but I had more distance dispersion than with the X20 Tours.

Fastforward to 2018. I switch over to Tour Edge CB Pro Tungsten irons - hollow heads rated as GI. Shafts: KBS Tour 90. Good irons, but... the short irons and wedges were flying proportionally shorter than the 4i-6i. Solution: I put lead tape on shaft below the grips to ensure I got a full drop on the down swing.

Research on wedges and short irons suggests that for 8i and above, the launch help/hybrid head has diminishing returns. The high loft angle gets the ball up plenty well on shots with fairly decent contact. Check out the Edison wedge site for details.

And, to resolve three seasons of hit and miss, I got fitted and now play Mav MAX irons (see sig line) w/graphite shafts. On the line between GI and SGI (Hot List categories) - certainly not hybrid iron heads.

  On 10/13/2021 at 3:32 PM, Fontyyy said:

"ultra game improvement"

Why, oh why, do we not want this help?

Expand  

OK, level with us, @Fontyyy... Are you trying to convince us or yourself?

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure who said it first but I've seen it a lot. There's this "think box" vs "play box" theory. I've also seen it with a planning vs doing line on the ground. The idea is basically you stand away from the ball (a couple feet) and do your "think box". This is where you do your planning, your swing cues, your practice swings (if you believe in practice swings.) All of that is done in the "Think Box". Then you step into your "play box" address the ball and hit it. Sometimes it's done with a imaginary line on the ground. You do all of the think box stuff behind the line. Then once you cross the line you step up and hit it.  Here's Annika Sorenstam demonstrating the "Think box" and "Play box": So, Annika's time over the ball is really short. Because she did all of that other stuff not over the ball, but in her "Think box".  There are lots of variations on this theme. But I think you get the idea. 
    • I speak for myself. If I inventory my swing thoughts, swing tempo, optimum muscle tension and rehearse a swing before I take my address, then I pull the trigger reasonably quickly with usually acceptable results. Like a proper program download before deploying it. If I don't bother to by forgetting or just not caring, I am inclined to look for my cues while hovering over the ball after taking the address, while tension builds up and then I fire with a half ass program that is still buffering. I guess that's no better than rolling a dice. In other words, a good pre-shot routine does wonders. I am not advising folks to take 13 practice swings while the flowers wilt waiting for something to happen, but one or maybe two are reasonable and good for you. I am certain hitting half ass shitty shots and making double bogey takes longer than making a par.  My desire this year is to just that as I have not developed a habit taking a practice swing and as a result have tendency to freeze over the ball after address, that is counter productive for both time and result. I think that is what @saevel25 is talking about in the OP.      
    • Wordle 1,339 2/6 ⬜🟨🟩🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • I think there's a difference between taking time over the ball and taking time to play a shot, at least IMO. One thing I've noticed in a few guys I play with who take a long time over the ball to pull the trigger, is that their backswing is really fast and I think it makes it harder to have a smooth rhythmic down swing. It's almost like they take so long to swing that when they do they speed to catch up. Doesn't lead to good golf IMO.
    • Wordle 1,339 3/6 🟨🟨🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...