Jump to content
IGNORED

Nuclear Fusion the Solution to Climate Change?


iacas
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
211011_r39139web.jpg?mbid=social_retweet

Amid an escalating crisis, the power source offers a dream—or a pipe dream—of limitless clean energy.

A good article, worth your time if you're at all interested in science. We could power the earth for 30 million years if we could figure this out.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instructor Development, 5 Simple Keys®/Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins • Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 • "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 • Penn-State Behrend Head Coach • • • • • • • • • • :aimpoint: :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | 5SK.com | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

"If you converted a baseball into pure energy, you could power New York City for about two weeks."

That is a very interesting article.   Thanks for sharing.   One could only imagine the possibilities!

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

A good baby step would be to renormalize our relationship with fission nuclear energy. A lot has changed since Three Mile Island.

The comment about smaller (reactors) possibly being better than bigger resonated with me too. With all this vehicle electrification happening we need a more resilient, redundant grid as well.

-Chris Brooks

I've blogged about my wanderings since 2003. I love roaming throughout the USA looking for remote public golf courses to play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
3 hours ago, Chris Brooks said:

A good baby step would be to renormalize our relationship with fission nuclear energy. A lot has changed since Three Mile Island.

As I understand it, the biggest environmental concern with nuclear fission isn’t the possibility of meltdown, it’s the damage it does to the surrounding area due to cooling the reactors.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
3 hours ago, Chris Brooks said:

A good baby step would be to renormalize our relationship with fission nuclear energy. A lot has changed since Three Mile Island.

Possibly, but fission and fusion are quite different besides being literal opposites.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instructor Development, 5 Simple Keys®/Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins • Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 • "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 • Penn-State Behrend Head Coach • • • • • • • • • • :aimpoint: :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | 5SK.com | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

9 hours ago, Chris Brooks said:

A good baby step would be to renormalize our relationship with fission nuclear energy. A lot has changed since Three Mile Island.

I think Chernobyl had a bigger impact on the negative PR than Three Mile Island. Even though Chernobyl was built almost nothing like the way it's done here in the US, those that were Anti-Nuclear Power were able to point to it and say "See, I told you so!" 

5 hours ago, billchao said:

As I understand it, the biggest environmental concern with nuclear fission isn’t the possibility of meltdown, it’s the damage it does to the surrounding area due to cooling the reactors.

I remember as a grade school kid in the 70's, we got a chance to visit The Zion Nuclear Plant in Illinois. Oddly, at that time they talked about how "great" the cooling towers were for the environment. The water used to cool the towers is separate from the actual reaction and the wild life benefited from the warmer water being put back into Lake Michigan. 

I'm sure we've learned a lot since then. Warmer water probably doesn't always equal "better for the wildlife".

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

6 hours ago, iacas said:

Possibly, but fission and fusion are quite different besides being literal opposites.

As an engineer I know that (and I know that you know that) but the public groups fusion and fission into the same category. We’ve been decommissioning and de-investing in that category since the 1980s. It really is primarily a policy issue these days. 

My son’s father-in-law was an initial reviewer and helped fund the book under discussion in this article:

1280px-Tihange_Nuclear_Power_Station_%28

Nuclear is expensive, but it should be cheap

 

  • Informative 1

-Chris Brooks

I've blogged about my wanderings since 2003. I love roaming throughout the USA looking for remote public golf courses to play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

13 hours ago, Chris Brooks said:

A lot has changed since Three Mile Island.

3-mile island was overblown. 

Its sad that we do not have more nuclear power as our baseline power source. 

With how our energy markets work, and with how predominant natural gas has become, even if we had nuclear power the profit margins would be slim if natural gas still came on like it did over the past 15-20 years.  We still had nuclear power plants running from the 1970's. They are being shut down because they can not compete with natural gas right now. The only option for nuclear, is to require (by law) that a certain % of the usage in the regulator region (where I live it's PJM) must come from nuclear power. This would be a regulated rate of return that would cover maintenance, and some sort of profit level for the generation company. The remaining load would then be bid on a deregulated market. This is were, if you live in a state like Ohio, you can go and change your energy or gas (heating) supplier and lock in lower rates. 

The issue right now with Natural Gas as the primary, and really could be said, only fuel source for many people, is there is no redundancy in generation. You have Texas, where they didn't weatherize their gas pipelines (makes sense based on probability of the storm they got), you have the fuel lines to the generation plants freeze up. You have way to many people out of power than there should be if we had a diversified fuel source for our power generation. 

Off my energy generation platform 😛 

Good article about Fusion. I hope to see the day it becomes reality. 

Maybe we need to rebrand it off the word Nuclear. Maybe just starting calling it Fusion. Or Matter Fusion Energy Source. If Nuclear is a hot word 😉

 

"A good conversation is not designed to win the argument. It is designed to enjoy the exchange."

Matt "Dough", P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver: :callaway: GBB Epic,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: :srixon: (4-PW)
Wedges:
:edel: Trapper (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :bushnell: Tour V2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Fusion power was a big topic went I was in college in 78-82. We had a good program going in the US, but the Federal government switched funding focus from fusion research. It’s sad because it would solve a ton of issues. 

My problem with nuclear fission plants is not the science or engineering, it’s the accountants. Too many issues arise because of short cuts sadly.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision -MEVO+

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

29 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

Fusion power was a big topic went I was in college in 78-82. We had a good program going in the US, but the Federal government switched funding focus from fusion research. It’s sad because it would solve a ton of issues. 

My problem with nuclear fission plants is not the science or engineering, it’s the accountants. Too many issues arise because of short cuts sadly.

But,  ‘The China Syndrome’

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
13 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

But,  ‘The China Syndrome’

Terrible movie!😜

  • Funny 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision -MEVO+

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I could be wrong, but I’d put money on you needing to address the wedges as well.
    • More than a few, lol. Score at the end of my round, pre-editing, was 64, and after editing it was 82. Plus there were also a bunch of tee shots that were automatically added, so I'm guessing I missed between 25-30 tags total. I'm sure I'll get used to it though once I am unaccustomed to the automatic tagging watch. I'm also so used to the watch that I kept checking my wrist out of habit. I like the device a lot. My only minor complaints are: I didn't like taking it on/off the clip on my belt to use as a distance measuring device (at least in winter when my layers cover my belt, so I am going to see about attaching the clip to my bag or push cart somehow. The vibration is subtle, but once I got a sense of the frequency/duration of it I could tell when the tag was successful. It is small, but I only fumbled and dropped it once.
    • Wordle 533 6/6* ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟩 ⬜🟨🟨⬜🟩 🟩⬜⬜🟩🟩 🟩⬜⬜🟩🟩 🟩⬜🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • I stand just far enough away from the net that I’m not going to hit the frame in the follow through with the club. The ball shouldn’t ricochet back towards you with that net. The bigger problem is the wind likes to knock it down.
    • I will never stand within six feet of the net. Took a hard ricochet standing too close few years ago. Ball hit me on the nose bridge squarely making me pass out for a minute. Just saying...

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...