Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted (edited)

2024 (source):

PGA_Tour_average 2024_yards.jpg

LPGA_Tour_average 2024_yards.jpg

2022 Data:

large.pga_tour_lpga_tour_launch_data.jpg

Here's some extra info from FlightScope:

large.average_player_launch_data.jpglarge.smash_factor_guidelines.jpg

pga_tour_lpga_tour_launch_data.jpg

This is the old topic:

Edited by iacas
Added 2024 Data
  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Informative 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
11 hours ago, GameImproveGolf said:

Thank you for this data update Erik!  Tony

Sure, it's FlightScope's data as you can see. I'm grateful to them for the update.

Support them and get a great device by looking at getting yourself a Mevo+.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I like the optimal ball flight chart. I will use it to compare my MEVO Plus data.

  • Upvote 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
4 hours ago, boogielicious said:

I like the optimal ball flight chart. I will use it to compare my MEVO Plus data.

Yes. Precisely. Even if it's the second chart on the page… 😉

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 years later...
Posted

It blows my mind that the launch angle with 5 wood is the lowest. Quite amazing. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
24 minutes ago, Ty_Webb said:

It blows my mind that the launch angle with 5 wood is the lowest. Quite amazing. 

Yeah, also kinda nuts that their entire bag fits in less than 16° launch.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Peak height under 100ft with driver always surprises me as well.

Driver: :titleist:  GT3
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood
Irons: :titleist: U505 (3)  :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   :titleist: SM9 54/58  
Putter: :tmade: Spider X

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
44 minutes ago, klineka said:

Peak height under 100ft with driver always surprises me as well.

Yeah, but you typically see the good players and the Rory/Jason Day/etc. types who hit it 130 or something. 😄 

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think those yardages are going to be destroyed in a few years (unless ball rollback happens). Boys from 15 to 20 are bombers now. I followed the leaders of an am tournament last year. All of them were hitting 7 iron from 180 and AVERAGING 290, 290 and 310 Driver distance on a no roll day at sea level. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
19 hours ago, iacas said:

Yeah, also kinda nuts that their entire bag fits in less than 16° launch.

Right? That 25* launch with a PW - let's say it's 45* loft (probably more for a fair few of them) and they're averaging -5* attack angle. To get a 25* launch with -5* attack angle, you need a dynamic loft of about 30-32* I think - so 13-15* of shaft lean. I guess that's not crazy. I don't know what an average shaft lean with a wedge would be for a PGA Tour player.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I read somewhere that average shaft lean for pros were around 10 degrees, of course more with wedges than with woods.  

23 hours ago, Ty_Webb said:

I think - so 13-15* of shaft lean. I guess that's not crazy. I don't know what an average shaft lean with a wedge would be for a PGA Tour player.

Sounds about right. 

For a 3 wood (15° loft) , if the launch is 10° and the AoA is -2°, the dynamic loft should be around 12°/13°, giving us just 3°/2° of deloft

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
1 hour ago, p1n9183 said:

I read somewhere that average shaft lean for pros were around 10 degrees, of course more with wedges than with woods.  

Sounds about right. 

For a 3 wood (15° loft) , if the launch is 10° and the AoA is -2°, the dynamic loft should be around 12°/13°, giving us just 3°/2° of deloft

Y'all are gonna have a hard time doing all of this math… because the % contribution from the path and the face angle changes at different swing speeds and spin lofts, the shaft is not a straight line (and the clubhead is typically in lead deflection at impact)… etc.

Lotta stuff going on.

Also, 6° is one minute on a clock.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I vaguely recall that shaft lean is about 11° but can’t seem to remember where I learned that.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
On 4/4/2024 at 12:39 PM, p1n9183 said:

I think those yardages are going to be destroyed in a few years (unless ball rollback happens). Boys from 15 to 20 are bombers now. I followed the leaders of an am tournament last year. All of them were hitting 7 iron from 180 and AVERAGING 290, 290 and 310 Driver distance on a no roll day at sea level. 

I was actually watching a high school kid that works for my club fitter hitting 320-330 total on the Trackman consistently.

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 4/5/2024 at 3:18 PM, iacas said:

Y'all are gonna have a hard time doing all of this math… because the % contribution from the path and the face angle changes at different swing speeds and spin lofts, the shaft is not a straight line (and the clubhead is typically in lead deflection at impact)… etc.

Lotta stuff going on.

Also, 6° is one minute on a clock.

No doubt - that's why I gave a range. I think it's about 87/13 with driver face angle. I saw something today saying putter is about 93/7. Not sure that's quite right, but it was from someone who ought to know. The more glancing the blow though I think the higher the impact of the path vs face angle. So much else in it though - contact quality, spin, ball quality, all sorts. Not trivial at all.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
1 hour ago, Ty_Webb said:

No doubt - that's why I gave a range. I think it's about 87/13 with driver face angle. I saw something today saying putter is about 93/7. Not sure that's quite right, but it was from someone who ought to know. The more glancing the blow though I think the higher the impact of the path vs face angle. So much else in it though - contact quality, spin, ball quality, all sorts. Not trivial at all.

It can be 95/5 with a putter, and can get to almost 60/40 with some low spinning wedges, but typically is 70% or so with the PW or something. Can be 90/10 with the driver, even.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Administrator
Posted

Added 2024 data from Trackman. It's in the first post.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.