Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

To the extent that one can say that a major champion's golf swing stinks, I'm saying it here: the golf swings of Fred Couples, Ernie Els, and Louis Oosthuizen kinda stink.

And before I get a bunch of people saying a bunch of things… here is a brief list of things I am not saying in this post:

  • Their results stink.
  • They should have changed their swings and/or would have had more success with a different swing. (Though, interestingly, all three were regularly talked about as having underperformed in their careers.)
  • I (or anyone else I coach or know on a personal level) have a better swing.

What do these swings have in common? They're lauded as great swings. Why? Because they're smoooooooth. At real speed, we see the tempo and rhythm and flow and the way the swings "gather" at the top… and call them good because they're pleasing to watch.

A lot like this fella (originally from here, but since IG doesn't embed anymore…):

This guy got a lot of traction for a hot minute on how great his swing looked. But…

image.jpeg

🤮

If this guy likes what he's doing… more power to him. But if he wanted to get better at golf… I have some ideas. 😉 I just hope the butt of his grips are clean, because if not, he's gonna have streaks across his right pocket.

I named a few people up above. Major champions. All lauded over the years, but…  Let's take them one by one.

Ernie Els

Known far and wide as "The Big Easy," Ernie won 19 times on the PGA Tour including four majors. But, the way he uses his lower body always bugged me:

image.jpeg

Ernie's right knee almost surely increases its amount of flex, with a decent amount of pelvis movement toward the golf ball (really "early extension") during the backswing. I can't help but wonder if Ernie would have hit it much farther than he did (though Ernie wasn't a short hitter by any stretch of the definition, Tim Herron — a guy named "Lumpy" — outdrove Els in 1996) if he used his legs differently.

This unique knee action led to a bit of a "stuck" position on the downswing:

image.jpeg

I'd be really curious to see Ernie's GEARS numbers for hips and shoulders, as the latter appears to lag well behind the former. But he didn't get the nickname "The Big Easy" for no reason.

Louis Oosthuizen

Some long-time people will know where I'm about to go with this one. The one-time major champion (his only PGA Tour win) has been called a "sweet swinger," but does the same thing that draws the ire of recreational golfers across the globe:

image.jpeg

That's early extension, with Louis looking like | at impact. Though he wants to ride around on his tractor and maintain a farm, one has to hope he doesn't have any goats on the farm. 😳

Fred Couples

Fred's swing reminds me of a lot of 12 handicappers who don't understand why they keep fatting the ball and hitting across it.

image.jpeg

His swing starts with a minimal turn and a lot of elbow folding as he pulls the arms across his chest. Ultimately, he'll add a little turn at the end… as the right elbow works almost completely behind his shirt seam and away from the golf ball, ending up well "behind him:

image.jpeg

This is "stuck" — but to solve it, Fred will try to tuck his right elbow in, but being unable to do that completely or fast enough… he'll just instead add a bunch of right tilt to help the clubhead get down to the ground:

image.jpeg

That's to say little of the "fake strong" grip that's well up in his left palm, and which plays significantly weaker than it does.

I can't help but wonder if Fred's back issues could have been reduced without the need to turn in right side flexion as much as he did/does.


Again, I am not saying in this post:

  • Their results stink.
  • They should have changed their swings and/or would have had more success with a different swing. (Though, interestingly, all three were regularly talked about as having underperformed in their careers.)
  • I (or anyone else I coach or know on a personal level) have a better swing.

So, what am I saying? I'm saying two things, primarily, and I'm not even saying these apply in all cases:

Smoothness

A "smooth" tempo and rhythm will make any golf swing look better to a lot of people. Nick Price was a better golfer than Fred Couples, but few looked at Nick Price's swing with the reverence they reserved for Boom Boom.

Pros vs. Ams

Pros can get away with a lot of stuff because it's their job and they've likely always swung that way. That doesn't mean that a guy who plays or practices two times a week should be okay with these moves, because they're going to have a much harder time timing them or getting the peak performance out of them.

And I'll be clear about this, too: generally speaking, pros make simpler, easier golf swings than regular players. They often move their body parts less than an average golfer, with fewer compensations. Most good golfers don't trap their right elbow way behind themselves like Fred does. Most don't move their pelvis toward the golf ball during the backswings like Ernie or downswings as much as Louis.

Bad golfers do those and so many more things.

These golfers are the exceptions; not necessarily swings to study and mimic.

  • Informative 5

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

36 minutes ago, iacas said:

And I'll be clear about this, too: generally speaking, pros make simpler, easier golf swings than regular players. They often move their body parts less than an average golfer, with fewer compensations. Most good golfers don't trap their right elbow way behind themselves like Fred does. Most don't move their pelvis toward the golf ball during the backswings like Ernie or downswings as much as Louis.

Bad golfers do those and so many more things.

These golfers are the exceptions; not necessarily swings to study and mimic.

When you look at the great ball strikers, they were not categorized as smooth swingers. Nick Price was known for his irons play. Tiger, not a smooth swinger. Scheffler today has a very aggressive looking swing. Maybe Furyk, but his swing is so loopy, it kind of has to be. But he struggled with distance his entire career. 

I think smoothness is akin to being not as athletic as you can be because you are compensating for something in the swing. You need more time. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
14 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

When you look at the great ball strikers, they were not categorized as smooth swingers. Nick Price was known for his irons play. Tiger, not a smooth swinger. Scheffler today has a very aggressive looking swing. Maybe Furyk, but his swing is so loopy, it kind of has to be. But he struggled with distance his entire career. 

I think smoothness is akin to being not as athletic as you can be because you are compensating for something in the swing. You need more time. 

I don’t even think it’s about having more time but rather whether everything “gathers” at the top or something like that. Fred has said in “Playing Lessons with the Pros” that from the top he’s going as hard as he can.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

I’ve never looked too closely at Els’ swing, but I knew the issues with Oosthuizen and Couples. I hear people saying they want to swing more like Fred and I always think, “You kind of already do.”

  • Funny 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I remember watching Ernie Els at Wentworth in about 1991 or so. It was before he was much heard of I think, but his swing on TV looked like he was dinking it. Then watching him in person, the clubhead went from P6 to P8 (assuming that P7 is impact) faster than I could see it. At that point I hadn't seen much pro golf in the flesh and so the speed was pretty astounding to me at the time.

@iacas - I had a lesson on Saturday and my coach was telling me that my right arm hangs naturally with the eye of the elbow pointing pretty much straight inwards. One of his players (who's a lot younger and a lot better than me) his elbow is pointing out almost when he's hanging naturally. I get it across the line at the top and he was telling me that he can pretty much tell where someone's arm structure at the top is going to be based on the natural hang of the humerus. Bottom line is there's not really any point in picking a player and saying "I want to swing like him". Anatomically speaking, it's highly unlikely that you and they are working with the same tools, so you need to figure out what's right for you. 

That's not to say there isn't value in looking at pro's swings. There are certain things that almost all of them do and those would be good things to try to copy. Other things that virtually none of them do. Don't do that. And watching Freddie, Ernie and Louis is probably not a bad idea if you want to work on your rhythm and tempo. I wouldn't try to copy their swings though. 

I do remember getting into quite the argument with someone on another golf forum. He was a guy who considered Hogan's swing as basically a perfect template that we should all try to imitate. I pointed out that Hogan was 5'7" and I'm 6'3" and he spent 12 hours a day practising and I, well, I do not do that. I'm lucky to snag 12 hours in three months to practise. He would not listen to reason though.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
13 minutes ago, Ty_Webb said:

I had a lesson on Saturday and my coach was telling me that my right arm hangs naturally with the eye of the elbow pointing pretty much straight inwards. One of his players (who's a lot younger and a lot better than me) his elbow is pointing out almost when he's hanging naturally. I get it across the line at the top and he was telling me that he can pretty much tell where someone's arm structure at the top is going to be based on the natural hang of the humerus. Bottom line is there's not really any point in picking a player and saying "I want to swing like him". Anatomically speaking, it's highly unlikely that you and they are working with the same tools, so you need to figure out what's right for you.

It's too much for this discussion here… but… eh, I'll just say that I don't think the differences are often nearly as big as they can be made to seem.

But… that's not the topic here, so that's all I'll add to that.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

One thing I will add here.  Smooth swingers make it look effortless, which is why we revere them so much.  And a flawed swing with enough practice can be very effective.  Just look at Bubba Watson and Jim Furyk for example.  They are the anti-template of any modern swing coach but they are effective at hitting a stock shot and playing well.

But I do have to ask the question, is there such thing as a perfect swing for all body types or is it multiple swings dependent on your different body type.  I got coached in the mid to late 80's and have a reverse C finish and was able to swing relatively well with that despite my lack of practice and am now a single digit handicapper

What's in the bag

  • Taylor Made r5 dual Draw 9.5* (stiff)
  • Cobra Baffler 4H (stiff)
  • Taylor Made RAC OS 6-9,P,S (regular)
  • Golden Bear LD5.0 60* (regular)
  • Aidia Z-009 Putter
  • Inesis Soft 500 golf ball
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 hours ago, pganapathy said:

One thing I will add here.  Smooth swingers make it look effortless, which is why we revere them so much.  And a flawed swing with enough practice can be very effective.  Just look at Bubba Watson and Jim Furyk for example.  They are the anti-template of any modern swing coach but they are effective at hitting a stock shot and playing well.

But I do have to ask the question, is there such thing as a perfect swing for all body types or is it multiple swings dependent on your different body type.  I got coached in the mid to late 80's and have a reverse C finish and was able to swing relatively well with that despite my lack of practice and am now a single digit handicapper

If one absolutely has to have a model, Erik has an old thread on Robert Rock's swing.

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
5 hours ago, pganapathy said:

But I do have to ask the question, is there such thing as a perfect swing for all body types or is it multiple swings dependent on your different body type.  I got coached in the mid to late 80's and have a reverse C finish and was able to swing relatively well with that despite my lack of practice and am now a single digit handicapper

No model, but there is a fairly narrow range of things.

Which is how you can classify the outliers: they still exist and can still have success, and we don’t have alternate universes to test theories. 😀

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I recommend that all new golfers learn Moe's swing. 😀. His swing starts at 1.30. 

 

 :tmade: Stealth2 driver, 3 Fairway  :titleist: TSR 4 Hy. T-300 5-PW  :vokey: 52/56/60 SM9

:scotty_cameron: Newport Select 2 (2022 model) 

:snell: MTB Prime 3.0, :adidas: Tour360 22

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
2 hours ago, snapfade said:

I recommend that all new golfers learn Moe's swing. 😀. His swing starts at 1.30. 

 

I don’t.  There’s a lot more going on than most people think.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 2

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 2/12/2024 at 12:57 PM, iacas said:

These golfers are the exceptions; not necessarily swings to study and mimic.

I think you nailed it there.  I have heard these guys lauded for being smooth, yet it seems that the call has not been to "swing like Freddie or Louis or Ernie or even Moe (well Todd Graves hawks the Moe Single Plane swing).  Good question - would they have been better, i.e. more successful, if their "smooth" swing had been corrected?  Who knows, maybe this discussion is a reminder that just because is looks good means it is.    

 

Ping G400 SFT 10deg  R flex
Ping G410 3w R flex
Ping G400 3h and 4h R flex
Taylormade SLDR 5i thru PW graphite shaft R flex
Cleveland CBX wedges - 50, 54, 58 or 52, 58 (depending on my mood)
Odyssey Versa or White Steel #5
Srixon Q Star

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

6 hours ago, billchao said:

I don’t.  There’s a lot more going on than most people think.

Tongue-in-cheek post of course. It makes my back hurt watching him. 

On PGAT Radio this evening they were talking with Fred Funk and got on the conversation of Scottie Scheffler's unique swing. They brought up a good point concerning his putting. The point was he doesn't have to be a good putter, he hits the ball close enough to the hole he can get away with being an OK putter.  Could Scottie win more if he was a better putter? Again, who knows? His swing has taken him to number one in the world.

 :tmade: Stealth2 driver, 3 Fairway  :titleist: TSR 4 Hy. T-300 5-PW  :vokey: 52/56/60 SM9

:scotty_cameron: Newport Select 2 (2022 model) 

:snell: MTB Prime 3.0, :adidas: Tour360 22

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
20 minutes ago, snapfade said:

Could Scottie win more if he was a better putter? Again, who knows?

The answer is unquestionably yes.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

6 hours ago, snapfade said:

Could Scottie win more if he was a better putter? Again, who knows?

Any player would be better if any aspect of their game was improved.  Even Tiger and Phil would have won more if their driver was better.  Look at it like this.  ANY improvement in any area of their game means a player will shoot a lower score.  Even one stroke can be the difference between second and first 😉

What's in the bag

  • Taylor Made r5 dual Draw 9.5* (stiff)
  • Cobra Baffler 4H (stiff)
  • Taylor Made RAC OS 6-9,P,S (regular)
  • Golden Bear LD5.0 60* (regular)
  • Aidia Z-009 Putter
  • Inesis Soft 500 golf ball
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...