Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4347 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Originally Posted by colin007

I'm sorry but I have to wholeheartedly disagree with that statement.

Even the guy in the video is using a tee and it seems anything but "barely adequate"


  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I use a tee, and when I'm done you can't even tell there was a ball mark. Tees are fine...

Ryan M
 
The Internet Adjustment Formula:
IAD = ( [ADD] * .96 + [EPS] * [1/.12] ) / (1.15)
 
IAD = Internet Adjusted Distance (in yards)
ADD = Actual Driver Distance (in yards)
EPS = E-Penis Size (in inches)
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I'll argue all day long that a tee is hardly adequate. I've been fixing ball marks with a tee for decades and they are as adequate as it gets.  In fact I'll argue that it's the best tool to use.  The tool companies will disagree because it's basically a free divot repair tool and they are in business to sell their own tools. I've tested most tools.  Now they are even making tool that resemble tee's. Callaway has one out.  They only have one prong instead of the old standart two. The one prong looks like a skinny tee but the problem with those is that they are too skinny. The two prong tool is good to fix marks the wrong way by sticking and pulling up but I don't find them as effective to fix the correct way. In fact I have found they actually do more damage to the green especially compared to a tee.

It's user error of you can't figure out how to do a better job with the repair tool than with a tee. It took they guy in the video 3x as long as it should have.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by colin007

It's user error of you can't figure out how to do a better job with the repair tool than with a tee. It took they guy in the video 3x as long as it should have.

Definitely quicker to use a repair tool, but that doesn't make a tee inadequate. I spend most of the time near the green just standing around waiting anyway.

Ryan M
 
The Internet Adjustment Formula:
IAD = ( [ADD] * .96 + [EPS] * [1/.12] ) / (1.15)
 
IAD = Internet Adjusted Distance (in yards)
ADD = Actual Driver Distance (in yards)
EPS = E-Penis Size (in inches)
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by colin007

It's user error of you can't figure out how to do a better job with the repair tool than with a tee. It took they guy in the video 3x as long as it should have.

It took 3x as long because it was a demonstration video.  Tees are fine for repairing ball marks.


Posted

I also use a tee.  A divot repair tool is just one more thing to carry in your pocket.


Posted
http://thesandtrap.com/t/63814/best-divot-repair-tool

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
The majority of yall already know the proper way to do this, as you probably hit a lot more greens than I do.  But this is a mild rant. I have seen a lot of people stick their divot tool into the green and pull up aggressively, using it as a lever to "lift up" the part of the green that has been depressed by the ball.  This results in the roots of the grass breaking and is the improper way to fix a ball mark.  Days later you are left with a golf ball size brown mark on the green due to improper ball mark repair.  The sound of the roots breaking from across the green makes me cringe. Incorrect: prying up grass that is depressed and breaking roots. Correct: entering at an angle scrunching gross towards ball mark, and patting down. In case I haven't worded it nicely here is the correct way to do it:

I wouldn't guess that a majority of folks on this sight are even doing it correctly, let alone the masses of non-avid golfers who simply play once a month... I've been playing for almost 20 years and learned this last year when Breed did a demo on TGC. It's something so simple, but so rarely known. Maybe I'll suggest our head pro include a video like the one you posted in his next monthly email. I'd love to see fewer uneven, brown spots on our greens...


Posted

I'll never fault someone for fixing a ball mark incorrectly. If they're a playing parter, I'll show them the correct way, but so many people just leave huge divots and ball marks without caring, that if someone is at least trying, it's hard to fault them.

Ryan M
 
The Internet Adjustment Formula:
IAD = ( [ADD] * .96 + [EPS] * [1/.12] ) / (1.15)
 
IAD = Internet Adjusted Distance (in yards)
ADD = Actual Driver Distance (in yards)
EPS = E-Penis Size (in inches)
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 5 months later...
Posted

People's thoughts on this type of tool: (Whoops, sorry for the giant pic)

I've never used one like this, and in fact, I don't know that I'd ever even seen one like this.  But I was playing a club that was giving them away so I figured that they must prefer these, so I gave it a shot.  I was apparently not doing it right because it seemed like I was doing more harm than good some of the times.  I reverted back to my trusty 2 pronged ones after a few holes.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I am not sure how you would use that either.

Anyone???

-Matt-

"does it still count as a hit fairway if it is the next one over"

DRIVER-Callaway FTiz__3 WOOD-Nike SQ Dymo 15__HYBRIDS-3,4,5 Adams__IRONS-6-PW Adams__WEDGES-50,55,60 Wilson Harmonized__PUTTER-Odyssey Dual Force Rossie II

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

OK, thanks.  By his language, it sounds like it's not necessarily better than other tools used properly, but better because the other tools are so often used improperly.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

OK, thanks.  By his language, it sounds like it's not necessarily better than other tools used properly, but better because the other tools are so often used improperly.

I would agree. It looks like the main difference from a design standpoint is the shorter, sharper prongs and the little surface below the thumb that pressed the ground down. But as you said, a traditional tool is still fine when used correctly.

Tyler Martin

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
I am not sure how you would use that either.

Anyone???

It does say "Just Push!" right on the tool! :D

OK, thanks.  By his language, it sounds like it's not necessarily better than other tools used properly, but better because the other tools are so often used improperly.

Yeah, that's basically it.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4347 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Never practiced golf when I was young and the only lesson ever taken was a driver lesson. I feel like I'm improving every year. However, the numbers don't support my feeling about improving. I usually drop to 12-13 during the summer while playing the familiar courses around home and then go on golf trips in the fall to new courses and increase to end the year between 15-17. Been a similar story for a number of years now but hey, it's the best thing there is in life so not too bothered but reaching 9.9 is the objective every year. Maybe a few lessons and practice could help me achieve it since I pretty much have no idea what I'm doing, just playing and never practice.
    • I am semi-loyal. Usually buy four dozen of one ball and only play that until out and then determine whether to continue or try another one. Since starting my semi-loyal path to success, I've been playing the below, not in order: ProV1 ProV1x ProV1x left dash AVX Bridgestone BXS Srixon Z-star XV I am not sure if it has helped anything, but it gives a bit of confidence knowing that it at least is not the ball (while using the same one) that gives different results so one thing less to mind about I guess. On the level that I am, not sure whether it makes much difference but will continue since I have to play something so might as well go with the same ball for a number of rounds. Edit: favorite is probably the BXS followed by ProV1/Srixon Z-star XV. Haven't got any numbers to back it up but just by feel.  
    • Will not do it by myself, going to the pro shop I usually use after Cristmas for input and actually doing the changes, if any, but wanted to get some thoughts on whether this was worthwhile out of curiosity. 
    • In terms of ball striking, not really. Ball striking being how good you are at hitting the center of the clubface with the swing path you want and the loft you want to present at impact.  In terms of getting better launch conditions for the current swing you have, it is debatable.  It depends on how you swing and what your current launch conditions are at. These are fine tuning mechanisms not significant changes. They might not even be the correct fine tuning you need. I would go spend the $100 to $150 dollars in getting a club fitting over potentially wasting money on changes that ChatGPT gave you.  New grips are important. Yes, it can affect swing weight, but it is personal preference. Swing weight is just one component.  Overall weight effects the feel. The type of golf shaft effects the feel of the club in the swing. Swing weight effects the feel. You can add so much extra weight to get the swing weight correct and it will feel completely different because the total weight went up. Imagine swinging a 5lb stick versus a 15lb stick. They could be balanced the same (swing weight), but one will take substantially more effort to move.  I would almost say swing weight is an old school way of fitting clubs. Now, with launch monitors, you could just fit the golfer. You could have two golfers with the same swing speed that want completely different swing weight. It is just personal preference. You can only tell that by swinging a golf club.     
    • Thanks for the comments. I fully understand that these changes won't make any big difference compared to getting a flawless swing but looking to give myself the best chance of success at where I am and hopefully lessons will improve the swing along the way. Can these changes make minor improvements to ball striking and misses then that's fine. From what I understood about changing the grips, which is to avoid them slipping in warm and humid conditions, is that it will affect the swing weight since midsize are heavier than regular and so therefore adding weight to the club head would be required to avoid a change of feel in the club compared to before? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.