Jump to content
IGNORED

Why do people revere Ben Hogan so?


Shorty
Note: This thread is 3573 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I admire him for quantifying the swing mechanics. Quantifying and analog motion is difficult and he nailed it. I am reading Hogan's book and will start Stack and Tilt next week because of Eric's review.

Current Bag
Ogio Synchro cart
'07 Burner Driver, 3 Fairway, and Rescue 5
Early Titelist Cavities
200 56, Spin milled 60 , Rossa  Suzuka

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 4 years later...
  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Why do people who try and emulate Hogan's swing, feel the need to all of the sudden wear cab driver hats and pull their pants up past their navels? lol....

Curious to see what any of the TST pros have to say about this guy trying to teach the "golf swing."

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Good question.

I think the answer lies in the people who revere him, and not in the man himself.  By all accounts, Hogan was a decent and honest and didn't give off much in the way of warm and fuzzies.  He grew up hard and as a result he was a hard man.  It's interesting how golf has these pairing of the champion with the common touch, and the one with the more austere personality--Hogan and Byron Nelson, Jack and Arnie, Tiger and Phil, head and heart.  At least, those are the public personas.

It is a little weird how Hogan accolytes refer to him as 'Mr.' Hogan.  But then people who've never met the guy refer to Eldrick Woods as Tiger, even though Mr. Woods wouldn't know them from Adam.  And that's Adam as in Adam and Eve, not Adam Scott.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Good question.

It is a little weird how Hogan accolytes refer to him as 'Mr.' Hogan.  But then people who've never met the guy refer to Eldrick Woods as Tiger, even though Mr. Woods wouldn't know them from Adam.  And that's Adam as in Adam and Eve, not Adam Scott.

I think it is related to the era Hogan played in and that given his personality he preferred to be called "Mr. Hogan" by non-friends, especially those his junior.  Today there's a lot less formality, so it's unlikely that you'll hear any golfer referred to as "Mr." but given Tiger's unique name it was almost a given he'd be referred to by it.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think it is simple.  He overcame tremendous challenges and became the best of his time and, arguably, all time.

And he played at a time when fans did not think the stars were personal friends of theirs and judged athletes by their accomplishments, not their personalities.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

IMHO Ben Hogan was the greatest golfer of all-time, and it's not even close.  In his prime he was every bit as dominant at Tiger, against unbelievably tough competition in Snead and Nelson, and later Palmer and Nicklaus, without being born with the physical talents of a Woods, Nicklaus, Snead or Nelson.  Became the greatest golfer of all-time by sheer force of will, and relentless determination.  Then at the height of career he is nearly killed in a bus crash, spent 59 days in the hospital recovering, and was told he might never walk again.  Again, through sheer force of will, he manages to not only walk again, but is able to return to his previous golfing form in spite of his crippled legs.  In 1953, on legs so bad he could barely walk, he won all three of the majors he played in (The Masters, US Open, and British Open) and 5 of the six tournaments in total he played that year.  He was unable to play the PGA Championship that year because it was held at the same time as the British Open.

He was socially awkward, and an extreme introvert, but he was never rude and always a classy guy.  He was so focused on his own game that one time his playing partner got a hole-in-one, and when they finished playing the hole Hogan asked him "What did you score?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


From everything I have seen/heard first hand, Ben was absolutely the greatest ball striker of all time and for that, he should be remembered and revered. As for any personality shortcomings that he may have had, I more than give him a pass on those considering his difficult (to say the least) childhood and the incredible adversity he overcame in his career. Oh, and tossing himself over his wife in the bus accident in an effort to protect her doesn't hurt his legacy either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

In his prime he was every bit as dominant at Tiger

No he wasn't.

Apologies for the brevity, but it's a very very busy day for me. I don't believe you can demonstrate that he was dominant at all. Furthermore, the strength of field was incredibly weak in Hogan's day and age. Weaker than in Nicklaus's age, and much, much weaker than in Tiger's day and age (modern times).

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

No he wasn't.

No, he wasn't. But we'll see if Tiger comes back from a much less severe injury with anywhere near the second career Ben had- my guess would be that he won't.

Either way, apples and oranges trying to compare the two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
No, he wasn't. But we'll see if Tiger comes back from a much less severe injury with anywhere near the second career Ben had- my guess would be that he won't.

Pretty irrelevant. Ben wasn't 37 or whatever, and Tiger already won on a broken leg.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Pretty irrelevant. Ben wasn't 37 or whatever, and Tiger already won on a broken leg.

Ben was six months shy of 37 at the time. And the accident was so bad that most doctors thought he may never walk again. Not to mention the fact that he was left with permanent circulatory issues that made playing a round of golf extremtly painful. But you're right, Tiger's 2008 stress fracture win was much more impressive...

Like I said, Ben wasn't more dominant than Tiger or whatever career adjective/label people want to throw out there, but his comeback from that accident far surpasses anything Tiger (or most any other athlete) has ever done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


No he wasn't.

Apologies for the brevity, but it's a very very busy day for me. I don't believe you can demonstrate that he was dominant at all. Furthermore, the strength of field was incredibly weak in Hogan's day and age. Weaker than in Nicklaus's age, and much, much weaker than in Tiger's day and age (modern times).

It's certainly debatable to say he was better than Tiger, but not dominant at all? It's hard to say that even Tiger had a more dominant run than Hogan from 1946-1953. And Tiger is the only other guy in the history of golf in that discussion. Jack has more career accompishments, but accumulated over a longer period of time. His peak wasn't as high.

Even comparing career stats:

Tiger Woods: 312 PGA events, 79 wins (25.3%), 127 top 3 finishes (40.1%).
Ben Hogan: 292 PGA events, 64 wins (21.9%), 139 top 3 finishes (47.6%).

But you have to also consider, Hogan had only one tour win by age 27, missed three years because he served in WWII from ages 30-32, didn't win his first major until just after his 34th birthday, and then had the auto accident at age 36.

You can make the strength of field argument, but I'm not sure how it applies to the top guys like this. Sure, there's more people playing golf today, but that doesn't mean that the very best are better.  Otherwise, you could say there's lots more people today than there were in 1500, so today's best artists must be better than Raphel, Michaelangelo, and DaVinci. And there's more people playing electric guitar than there were in the 1960s, so today's best electric guitarists must be better than Jimmy Hendrix, Eric Clapton, and Jimmy Page.

I don't think it works that way. It is very hard to compare across different eras, and different people will have different opinions based on the criteria they choose, but Hogan at least is somewhere in the discussion, as one of the top 5 all time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


To answer the original question, there are a handful of other guys who might have been as good golfers or had as nice a swing, but Hogan

1. was a top 5 golfer all time

2. wrote one of the top golf instruction books all time

3. and made some of the best golf clubs as well

4. it's a matter of opinion, but also had one of the nicest looking swings.

No one else did all four (or even 3) of those things. And the fact that he wasn't especially likeable, should tell you that when his contemporaries rave about how good he was, and how influential, it isn't because they really want to say something nice about a buddy.  And yet you have quotes like:

Gary Player: " in my opinion, Ben Hogan was the greatest player in the history of golf " and "Nobody has come close to hitting the ball like him– the quality of the strike, and the swing. "

Jack Nicklaus: (asked if Tiger was the best ball striker he's ever seen): " No, no -- Ben Hogan, easily. "

Tom Weiskopf: "Every time I'd play with him [Ben Hogan], I could play pretty well—I felt like I was a caddie. I felt like I shouldn't even be out there. He played that much better than anybody else, in my mind, in my estimation, of the players that I ever saw play the game. "

And Lee Trevino dedicated his own book to Hogan, " A great golfer who unknowingly influenced me to consistently fade the ball", because he had been inspired to learn to hit a fade just by watching Hogan on a driving range hitting practice balls.

So certainly he's not the only guy to emulate or admire or respect, but if you want to learn about the golf swing, Hogan still isn't a bad place to start. Of course there's lots of things that have been learned since the 1950s as well, so what Hogan says shouldn't be treated as gospel, either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
You can make the strength of field argument, but I'm not sure how it applies to the top guys like this. Sure, there's more people playing golf today, but that doesn't mean that the very best are better.  Otherwise, you could say there's lots more people today than there were in 1500, so today's best artists must be better than Raphel, Michaelangelo, and DaVinci. And there's more people playing electric guitar than there were in the 1960s, so today's best electric guitarists must be better than Jimmy Hendrix, Eric Clapton, and Jimmy Page.

I think you're looking at it from the wrong angle. It's not that today's top pros are better than the top pros of yesteryear, but that today's mediocre pros are better than the mediocre pros of yesteryear. That's why Tiger is the most dominant, not because he is better than Hogan heads up (we will never know), but because he dominates a field of players who are, collectively, better than their predecessors.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I respect Hogan for his dedication to practice and overcoming his car crash. I don't respect him as a person however (assuming these examples are true). Faldo once told the story on air about how he wanted to win the US Open even though he already had won a couple majors. So he visited Hogan at his office in Texas and got a meeting. He asked Hogan what he should do to achieve his goal. Hogan simply asked what clubs Faldo was playing (Wilson) and Hogan said get out of my office. I heard a former US Amatuer champion tell when he was playing a practice round at The Masters (Amatuer champs get invites). This guy was on the first tee getting ready to hit (he was paired with another little known golfer). Hogan comes up, puts a tee in the ground, tees off and goes on down the fairway not saying a word.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I respect Hogan for his dedication to practice and overcoming his car crash. I don't respect him as a person however (assuming these examples are true). Faldo once told the story on air about how he wanted to win the US Open even though he already had won a couple majors. So he visited Hogan at his office in Texas and got a meeting. He asked Hogan what he should do to achieve his goal. Hogan simply asked what clubs Faldo was playing (Wilson) and Hogan said get out of my office. I heard a former US Amatuer champion tell when he was playing a practice round at The Masters (Amatuer champs get invites). This guy was on the first tee getting ready to hit (he was paired with another little known golfer). Hogan comes up, puts a tee in the ground, tees off and goes on down the fairway not saying a word.

I've heard that story as well, you have to remember that the pro's in Hogan's time made significantly less money winning tournaments than the pro's do today.  Hogan had his own line of clubs, he was personally invested in seeing his line of clubs succeed to put food on his families table, so while he may have not handled Faldo diplomatically he was protecting his own interests.

Read some books on Hogan, read how he grew up, worked from a very early age, witnessed his father commit suicide, served his country during the prime of his career and almost sacrificed his life to save his wife in a horrible car accident with a bus and then say you don't respect him as a person.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

IMHO Ben Hogan was the greatest golfer of all-time, and it's not even close.

Bizarre how one could hold such an "opinion".

You're suggesting that Woods or Nicklaus, to name two, are "not even close".

On what grounds? By what standards?

I would suggest that one might be making an argument to say that Hogan may well be up in the top 5 of all time, but to say he is unquestionably at the top of the tree is not a sustainable argument. It's simply wrong. And that is not a matter of opinion.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Bizarre how one could hold such an "opinion".

You're suggesting that Woods or Nicklaus, to name two, are "not even close".

On what grounds? By what standards?

I would suggest that one might be making an argument to say that Hogan may well be up in the top 5 of all time, but to say he is unquestionably at the top of the tree is not a sustainable argument. It's simply wrong. And that is not a matter of opinion.


everyone, you included, are entitled to their own opinion. IMHO all three were the greatest and there is no comparison between the three.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3573 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Welcome to TST @Camjr.   We're glad you've joined.  
    • Angle is not a factor. I hit the ball 100’ high. Par is net birdie. My CH is 16. The rough between the bunkers is like 10’ wide though. That’s not something you’re going to try to hit on purpose. Most of the area to the left of that is fescue/native vegetation and I’m pretty sure there isn’t a flat lie in any of it. It’s the second hole.
    • Hello all.  I'm about to be 57 yrs old, started playing when I was 16, and have quit and restarted the game more times than I can count.  I had started playing a weekly round with a friend, and finally made the jump to Senior A shafted Tour Edge clubs.  Instantly gained 10 yds with an easier swing (why didn't I make that jump sooner???).  Glad to be a part of the group. Cheers all,
    • I think I like this hole.  It is a clear "Risk-Reward" choice.  Since most of the shots in your cone cleared the bunkers I would say they are a minor risk and not a big issue.  Playing the aggressive line may give you 70ish yards in from what looks to be playable rough while conservative play is 120ish from fairway.  I know you said 70 vs 120 is minor for you but how does the approach angle in impact your results?  I figure both strategies are playing for Birdie since holing out from either is mostly luck. Looking at your proximity hole I think it says @ 50 feet when hitting from the fairway from 100-150 and 40 feet if hitting 50-100 from the rough.  Neither of those is an easy birdie putt.   I like the approach angle from the rough between the bunkers & the adjacent tees over the angle from @ 120 in the fairway but I really do not like the idea of hitting onto the adjacent tee boxes and that may impact my confidence with making the shot.  Also, too far left may be a worse approach angle then from the fairway short of the bunkers. For me this may come down to how confident do I feel when I reach that tee box.  If I am stroking it well off the tee leading up to the hole I would try for over the bunkers and the better angle in but if I am struggling that day I would likely opt for the fairway to take more bad stuff out of play.
    • Wordle 1,035 2/6 🟨🟨🟨⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...