Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5820 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
looking at the Leupold RX 600 vs the Bushnell Sport 600

tried the Bushnell out today and it was AWSESOME!
picked up the light stringer (about same size as a flag stick) from 100 yds no problemo - and quick too!

yes i know for hunting, but 1/2 the price of a "golf" one
really dont care about the options, w arc or slope etc..

just wanna point and shoot the rig at the flag stick etc..

can get the Bushnell for $165 on the bay or the Leupold for about $190, also on the bay
both brand new and shipped to me

from your experiences w these two brands in GENERAL (Bushnell vs Leupold - not the models exactly) which would you reccomend?

thanks for your help

enis
"My swing is homemade - but I have perfect flaws!" - Me

Posted
looking at the Leupold RX 600 vs the Bushnell Sport 600

All I can say is they both look solid. I like my Tour V2 (Bushnell) but it's a b**** when the flags are non-reflective and the pinseeker feature doesn't kick in.

Have you looked at Nikons?

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
Leupold?

I would never buy optics from them.

Bushnell make far better products for better prices.

VX Series in rifle scopes are especially bad.

I use bushnell for all my hunting scopes etc and stand by them.

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter


Posted
I have to agree about if the pins don't have reflectors on them. I just don't have steady enough hands to not have some type of pinseeker. I'm guessing from 130 to 150 in it won't be a big deal but outside 150 I think it would be a struggle to hit the pin. Good luck
Driver: i15, 3 wood: G10, Hybrid: Nickent 4dx, Irons: Ping s57, Wedges: Mizuno MPT 52, 56, 60, Putter: XG #9 

Posted
I don't know about the hunting models, but I was fortunate enough to win one of the Leupolds given away on this board last year and love it. I never have problems shooting the flag.
In my bag:

Driver: FT-5, 9° stiff
Wood: Big Bertha 3W/5W
Irons: X-20 TourWedges: X Tour 52°/56°Hybrids: Idea Pro 2/3/4Putter: Black Series #2Ball: NXT Extreme/NXT Tour
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Leupold?

Without trying to start something here, I would disagree about the Leupold statement. I have Leupold optics on all of my hunting rifles and would not switch to anything else for the price. I have both Bushnell and Leupold rangefinders. The Bushnell is a little older model and a little bulkier than my Leupold. I use the Bushnell for my golf and it works fine. I like the Leupold for hunting because of its size and some other options that would not do me any good on the course.

Just my .02.

Driver Hyper X 9*
3 Wood Tight Lies
Hybrids Hyper X 3 & 4
Irons 5 - 9, PW Mizuno JPX 800
Wedge 50, 54, 60 Vokey Spin Milled Putter Ping Anser Ball e7+


Posted
All I can say is they both look solid. I like my Tour V2 (Bushnell) but it's a b**** when the flags are non-reflective and the pinseeker feature doesn't kick in.

yes, very pricey

I have to agree about if the pins don't have reflectors on them. I just don't have steady enough hands to not have some type of pinseeker. I'm guessing from 130 to 150 in it won't be a big deal but outside 150 I think it would be a struggle to hit the pin. Good luck

reflectors on the pins....like actual reflectors? these help w laser finders?

outside 150 yds you figure trying to shoot the flag or pin will be tough w/out pinseeker?
"My swing is homemade - but I have perfect flaws!" - Me

Posted
yes, very pricey

London Drugs had Nikons for a similar price as Golf Town has for the Bushnell Tour V2. It was just a thought. Some courses have special reflectors on top of the flagstick - get the flag in the circle and yardage to the pin is a snap. Without those, you might have to shoot the front of the green, a bunker, or the mounds in the back and estimate. Or you could just pace the yardage old school. Personally, even if the course doesn't have have flagsticks that aid the pinseeker feature, knowing what club will reach the green and/or carry hazards is still really valuable.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
I was bored one day a few months ago so I went and walked around Bass Pro Shops. I eventually made my way around to the hunting optics and tried out all of the rangefinders since the guy wasn't very busy. I must have tried 10 or 12 different models of various brands. I picked out a few targets across the store and was within a yard or two on all of them. The main difference I could find in something that was $250 and something that was $1000 was the range, finer tuned crosshairs, and functions within the device. For the most part, the basic function of shooting a target and getting a yardage was pretty similar.

If you know you like the Bushnell then that would probably be the better choice. It would eliminate any second guessing on your part. I doubt you would find much of a difference in the lower end models so you may just want to save a few bucks and get what you know you have tried.

I will judge my rounds much more by the quality of my best shots than the acceptability of my worse ones.


Posted
Leupold?

I would strongly disagree with your comment. I have both Bushnell and Leopold hunting scopes on my rifles. I dont really want to get into the whole issue but, I would go with Leupold. As far as range finders are concerned there are some really nice Bushnell models out there.

Whats in the my bag,

taylormade.gifR9 TP taylormade.gifSuperfast 3 wood Rescue 19*  712 MB (3-P KBS T shaft)  

 SM4 52*,54*,60*   Pickemup 42" Belly Putter  titleist.gifPro V1x  adidas.gif 360 footwear


Posted
All I can say is they both look solid. I like my Tour V2 (Bushnell) but it's a b**** when the flags are non-reflective and the pinseeker feature doesn't kick in.

I find this to be a surprising comment.

I've never had a problem picking up a flag from up to 250 yards or more with my Tour V2. I've only played a couple of courses which have the reflectors (a nice plus by the way)... most do not, and I still find shooting the flag to be quick and easy. I've never known the Pinseeker to not work except when I deliberately turn it off.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Leupold?

I have to agree w/the dissent here. I own a custom firearms business and we go with quite a few of the higher end Leupold stuff from time to time but have NEVER used a Bushnell. For the small additional cost, the quality from the Leupold is leaps and bounds better than the Bushnell. FWIW, I have a Leupold range finder.

Yonex Ezone Type 380 | Tour Edge Exotics CB Pro | Miura 1957 Irons | Yururi Wedges | Scotty Cameron Super Rat | TaylorMade Penta


Posted
one thing i am concerned about, it if it doesnt work, i dont want to have to sell it again
if i buy local, pay a few more bux, i can return it......i wonder how it will work from 150 yds + out, w no pinseeker or bullseye??
"My swing is homemade - but I have perfect flaws!" - Me

Posted
I find this to be a surprising comment.

It's only happened on one course - I don't know what their flags were made of - maybe the same stuff they coated the stealth bombers with because it didn't pick up a thing all day. I used it today on another course without the reflectors and there was only one green where it picked up trees in the background - it was a 20 yard difference (80 versus 60) so I should have noticed. I got lucky with the lie - par - I digress.

one thing i am concerned about, it if it doesnt work, i dont want to have to sell it again

The Tour V2 is simple, reliable, and accurate up to 1 km (I think). It's idiot proof - being an idiot, I should know.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
I have owned the Leupold GX-1 for just over 1 year. Love it!! No problem firing at pins, the Pinhunter feature really works. I do use both hands to steady myself. My club installed the mirrors on the flag sticks a few months after I bought my Leupold, it didn't make any difference to my ability to get a reading. Limp flag or not, it makes no difference. Battery still shows full bars after 15 months of regular use. My only complaint is that the unit fits very tightly in its case. During a round, I don't bother with the case, simply put it in the lined valuables pocket of my golf bag.

Driver & FW: Ping G10 12* Driver & 17* 4W w UST Proforce V2 HL Reg
Hybrids: Adams A7 19* & 22* w UST Mamiya ProForce AXIVCore Reg
Irons: MP-60 5 - 9 w Nippon Shaft 950GH Reg
Wedges: Eidolon 48* 52* 56* 60* w SCoR Graphite Reg
Putter: Scotty Cameron Red X3


  • Moderator
Posted
Second to Dave1269's comment. I've the the GX-1 for a month and don't have issues at all other than the tight case. I usually hold the button down and get the front of the green, then the flag. Optics are nice and clear. For the hunting version, I would worry about the range. The GX-1 is good for a 350+ yards without prisms. If the hunting version is less, you may have issues on long shots in.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
ok, so the Leupold has 6x magnification vs 4x (bushnell sport 600)
it has scan mode, vs none (busnnell)
it will laser up to 400 (deer) and 600 reflective vs 200 (deer) 800 reflective (bushnell)

it is a few bucks more, but i like the scan mode on the Leupold vs none on the Bushnell and better magnification

outside 200yds im not too concerned
more inside 200 and par 3's

any more thoughts before i pull the trigger???

Price is $205 shipped BRAND NEW from the bay
I also am considering a BRAND NEW V2 from a dude on WRX, but after shipping and conversion, its almost $280....more than I want to spend i think

so.......whats ur idea?
"My swing is homemade - but I have perfect flaws!" - Me

Posted
ok, so the Leupold has 6x magnification vs 4x (bushnell sport 600)

spent the few extra bux and bought the Bushnell V2 for $240 USD shipped

figured spend a little more and buy once cant wait to try er out!
"My swing is homemade - but I have perfect flaws!" - Me

Note: This thread is 5820 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • To put into more context Shorter backswing helps me set up everything I need to do in the downswing. If the right arm beds 100+ degrees, it makes it nearly impossible.  Currently, I am not delivering the correct dynamic loft at impact. My vertical launch angle for a 6 iron is around 22 degrees. The PGA Tour average for a 6 iron is around 14 degrees. This is due to a few things. First, not getting open enough at impact. The more I can get my right side forward, the more the hands can get forward at impact. Currently my turn stalls. That goes into hip movement stuff. Second, I go into left wrist extension through impact. This adds loft. I need to go into left wrist flexion sooner and add a bit of wrist rolling over to square the face. This lowers the loft by shaft lean and closing the face. When I do my wrist stuff the VLA gets down to about 19 degrees. I still got a bit more to go.  We worked on some distance wedge stuff as well. More of a clock system. Position 1 is hands about waist height. Position 2 is between position 1 and 3. Position 3 is hands about shoulder height. Set up with weight on front foot. The backswing is a lot of torso pivot only feel. Speed in the downswing comes from torso pivot. Right side turns through, keeping and increasing pressure under the front foot. Don't slide the hips forward. It is more pivoting around the left leg. To help with smash factor and launch angle, add in a bit of wrist stuff and hitting the pitch like a draw shot. That is more something I need to work on.   
    • Amazingly, I found this thread while looking to see if others have answers to the same question.   My preferred putting drill is a variant of one from LSW.  For context, as I type this, my handicap is at 10.3, and in my total 2026 rounds, I am at -0.20 strokes gained putting vs a 20 handicap baseline, and I am just shy of losing a full two strokes putting to the 10 handicap baseline, all this despite yesterday's round being marginally better than the 5 handicap baseline (yay for high variance statistics).  I also didn't practice much putting on a real green in 2026 (or 2025) until about two weeks ago, other than pre-round warm-ups.  This is obviously something I need to work on.  I think I last actively practiced (as in, many days, regularly) putting, on a real green, actively in Spring/Summer 2022. Anyway, the double around the world:  pick a distance (I often use 4' or 6') and lay down 12 coins, face-up.  The "standard" version is to do this at 3' and have to make 12 in a row.  That's worth doing periodically.  I know some people do this at 4' or even 5', but with scratch players making 80% from 4', I worry that if I tried to do this at 4', I wouldn't finish by sundown, and I'd certainly just get frustrated.  But the version I enjoy is to have to make them all, twice, eventually.  Pick a starting point and putt from there.  If it is made, and the coin is heads-up, turn it over.  If it was tails-up, pick it up.  The coins are tracking how many times you've made it from that spot so far.   A good score from 4' is 37 total putts for a bogey golfer (65% make rate) and 30 for a scratch player (80% make rate).   At 6', a bogey golfer (39% make rate) should be happy with a 61, while a scratch player should aim to do better than 44.  To make counting easier, I remember (or otherwise mark) the first spot, and when I reach that, I count how many coins are still on the green and add them to my total.  I actually don't count the first two times around (since the count after two go-arounds will be 24, right before counting to start the third) and add 24 at the end.   ----- I also like the "Fall Line" drill from ESC.  I stopped doing it a while back because I couldn't distinguish my own failure from being bad at hitting a 6' putt.  Now that I think I can hit a 6' putt successfully, it's time to go back to that one. Lastly, there are two indoor drills I have enjoyed in the past and am getting back to.  One is the ruler drill from LSW.  The other is one that I was shown in another thread that involves basically seeing what it is like to line up square, something I could have been missing.  ----- Okay, lastly for real, before a round I will also try to figure speed for 12', 21', and 30' putts.  I find a flat (or flat enough) spot on the practice green and step off 4, 7, or 10 steps.  I aim to hit the ball that exact distance (with the 12', I prefer to hit just past it;  with the others, I aim to hit the exact distance).  I view this as similar to learning some partial clock positions (or similar) with wedges to use as a baseline for preparing a shot.  Amazingly, for all my overall putting woes, when SG is broken down by distance I'm usually doing quite well outside of 12'.  This is one of those reasons I'm glad to see SG:P broken down by distance -- it tells me where I need to focus to improve.  While a three-putt from 30' has the same effect on SG:P no matter why, there's a difference in what practice priority to make if that's because the first putt rests 8' from the cup (where Tour players are 50/50) versus if the first putt regularly cozies up within 3-4' but that resulting putt is missed.  I almost never work on speed like this outside of pre-round warm-up.
    • Wordle 1,773 4/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟩 🟨🟨⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,773 4/6* ⬜⬜🟨⬜🟩 🟨🟨⬜⬜🟩 ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,773 4/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜🟩 ⬜⬜🟨🟨🟩 🟨🟨⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.