Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

First time at a private course


Note: This thread is 5579 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I played my first ever round at a private course yesterday. This course is not really fancy - more of a golf club than a country club. Based on the pretty similar distance, slope and handicap rating, I was expecting basically a nicer version of the municipal course I play on all the time.

It was, but I didn't realize how much nicer a golf course could be. We're talking:

1. Actual different tee boxes for the different tees. And 5 sets instead of 3.

2. Level tee boxes!

3. The greens had been aerated this year and were consistent from one to the next

4. The rough was a consistent length - at the muni this time of year, some parts of the rough are as hard as a cart path.

5. The fairways were really nice - no weeds, bare spots, dirt clumps, etc.

6. Trees! Big ones - everywhere.

7. More interesting and attractive holes (elevated tees, doglegs, etc)

8. Actual sand in the bunkers

And then, of course, the other stuff that I was expecting - like a grass range, nice chipping and putting area and less crowded course.


I honestly had no idea there was such a big difference. I thought a country club was like a "private muni".

Of course, this doesn't mean I don't love the muni - always have, always will.


Any Muni Regulars ever hit a private course once in a while? What do you think? How does your local muni stack up?

Posted
I2. Level tee boxes!

i have no idea what that even means....

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
you'd be surprised how nice some of those super expensive country/golf clubs can be. which honestly makes it easier to play good golf. i'm a big proponent of flat teeboxes.

Posted
i have no idea what that even means....

Flat Ground.

WITB:

  • Driver: Titleist TSR3 8.0 A3, Badazz 60g S
  • Hybrid: Cobra Baffler 17*
  • Irons: T200 P-4
  • Wedges: Callaway X Forged 48*,56*,60*
  • Putter: Ping Anser Milled 
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
there is a local course in Zionsville called Wolf Run that is ridiculously private. I think its one of those courses where you have a $50k initiation fee, and like $500/month in membership fees (though given this economy, it might be much lower..this was back in like 2000 when I remember hearing this).

Anyways, very tough golf course too...one of their Par 3's is 260 yards, all carry from the tips. Back when the PGA Championship was held at nearby Crooked Stick (the one John Daly won), several of the players like Nick Faldo, etc.. got a chance to play at Wolf Run. Nick was quoted as saying holes 12-15 I believe are 4 of the hardest consecutive holes he has ever played.

anywho...found out last night I know someone who is a member there and he wants to take me out to play. SAWEET! :)

I played there 2 times in the early 2000's, so looking forward to going back.

Posted
you'd be surprised how nice some of those super expensive country/golf clubs can be. which honestly makes it easier to play good golf. i'm a big proponent of flat teeboxes.

Yea, I think some people take for granted the quality of courses the pros play, and how it affects their game/score.

You hear Tiger and such complain about "bumpy" greens at a Major Championship..but I am sure bumpy to them is pristine to the average person or our local golf course. The fairway quality isn't fluffy, so they get consistent lies (for the most part) which aids in them making consistent contact more often, because the greens are often high quality, they can control their spin better on them. I am not taking anything away from their quality..they are DAMN GOOD at what they do, but a high quality golf course which perfectly mowed fairways and greens helps a player score a bit better :)

Posted
my parents used to be a part of a very nice private course. 6 digit initiation fee + high monthly fees, etc. I golfed it extensively during my high school years so I was spoiled. not until I started golfing muni's and cheap courses around here did I realize how nice premier private courses are. The consistency in greens being a huge one. Divots are repaired on fairways and tee boxes thoroughly, the layout is just much more fun, basically agreed with everything the OP said.

DST Tour 9.5 Diamana Whiteboard
909F3 15* 3 FW stock Aldila Voodoo
909F3 18* 5 FW stock Aldila Voodoo
'09 X-Forged 3-PW Project-X 6.0 Flighted
CG15 56* X-Tour 60* Abaco


Posted
The moral of this story is that you get what you pay for. Every golf course is subsidized by the people who play it (although some munis can be occassionally subsidized by the taxpayer). That means all the expenses of the club are covered by the players/membership. The higher those expenses, say due to the course spending more money on upkeep and course improvements, the higher the rate you pay to play there. The revenue stream of private courses are met by the membership through their monthly dues, intial initiation fees, and assesments the membership usually vote on and agree to pay. Public courses have to rely upon the fees charged when you play, so that usually means those type course won't have the disposable income available to maintain the course at a higher standard. Unfortunately this means we can't have our cake (resonably low greens fees) and eat it too (tour quality conditioning).

Nike Vapor Speed driver 12* stock regular shaft
Nike Machspeed 4W 17*, 7W 21* stock stiff shafts
Ping i10 irons 4-9, PW, UW, SW, LW AWT stiff flex
Titleist SC Kombi 35"; Srixon Z Star XV tour yellow

Clicgear 3.0; Sun Mountain Four 5


Posted
And lets be honest some of the public courses are pretty reasonable when you consider what you pay for a round v's what you pay at a poncy country club. I'd prefer to spend my money on a few rounds, a nice meal and a few beers on a decent municipal course than splash out on 9 holes at a 'posh' course. Although i do admit I like to go on golfing holidays in Europe where i've played a few of the private courses which are beautiful. I played a public course in Vancouver, Canada - don't know where exactly and it was stunning.

Posted
The first time I played Firestone South my brother spent the entire round trying to find a weed or a leaf on the ground. I don't know how big their grounds crew is but that course is picture perfect.

Having said that, my favorite private club that I've played is Avalon Lakes in Warren, Ohio. I loved the layout, the clubhouse, the staff etc...

My equipment:

Driver - Callaway FT3 Fusion (9 degree)
3 Wood - Orlimar Tri-Metal (9 degree)
Hybrids - Bobby Jones (17, 21 & 25 degree)

Irons - KZG XCB 5 - PW

Wedges - Warrior (52 & 56 degree)

Putter - STX Envision

Ball of choice - Callaway TOUR i(s)


  • Moderator
Posted
I played a public course in Vancouver, Canada - don't know where exactly and it was stunning.

Furry Creek?

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
This is why I love Michigan, it's so natural for big tree'd golf courses. Although they do become a bitch after a while.

2013 Goal:

 

Single digit handicap


Posted
I was an employee at Carolina CC in Raleigh, NC about ten years ago, and I got to play it twice. It is a very, VERY nice course. I played some of my nicest shots ever there. That is the only private course I have ever played.

I have also played some very well maintained munis. Chenango Valley State Park used to be a great course. It may still be, I haven't played it in eons.
I recently played a 9-hole executive course in Kirkwood NY (River Run 2). That is a very well maintained course, just too short!

Then there is the tract I normally play. They are making great headway, and turning it back into a nice course, but they have a long way to go.

In the bag
Driver: Tour Burner 10.5*
Fairway: Launcher 2009 17*
Irons: X-18r 4-SW
Gap Wedge: CG15 52*Wedge: X Tour 60*Putter: Crimson 550Ball: E5


Posted
James River CC in Newport News is really nice (I think the dues are $30k/yr, ridiculous) - the only reason I get to set foot out there is I know some of the guys that work there.

On the other end of the spectrum, there's a 'country club' in Rio Rancho, NM (I think it's called Chamisa Hills now, used to be called Rio Rancho Golf and Country Club) that was in worse shape than most of the public courses in Albuquerque. I don't know how the members didn't revolt against the people that maintained that place.

Posted
My local muni courses absolutely suck. Terrible fairways, rocky rough, hard pack sand ect ect ect. They also cost about the same. I pay 27 for 9 with a cart at my local muni, but pay 29 for 9 with cart at my local semi private/public home course thats 100x better. For that kind of money, I would rather support a local guy that enjoys and takes care of his establishment then the useless next city over big city govt establishment.

09 Burner driver
3-pw Dci 962 irons
54-11 gw
Backstryke 2 Ball putter


Posted
My local muni courses absolutely suck. Terrible fairways, rocky rough, hard pack sand ect ect ect. They also cost about the same. I pay 27 for 9 with a cart at my local muni, but pay 29 for 9 with cart at my local semi private/public home course thats 100x better. For that kind of money, I would rather support a local guy that enjoys and takes care of his establishment then the useless next city over big city govt establishment.

I've been playing a mom-and-pop owned golf course for the past few weeks and I really like the idea that I'm supporting local business. Plus, it's only $23 for 18 holes which is a steal IMO, especially when I play at 7am and there is no one else there until ~9:30.

Sticks: Burner SF 9.5, 15, 19 | MX-300 4-GW | CG15 56.14, 60.12 | BS Tour #9
Accessories: Tour 360 4.0 | Revolution Stand Bag | GolfShot iPhone App
Last Round: 82 (70)


Posted
you'd be surprised how nice some of those super expensive country/golf clubs can be. which honestly makes it easier to play good golf. i'm a big proponent of flat teeboxes.

True and some clubs with caddie service will help the score too.

Once you get pampered with these quality and you go back to play at Muni TADA ! you wish you throw away the score card !
What I Play:
913D3 9.5°Diamana Kai'li 70 Stiff  "C3" | 910F 15°, Diamana Kai'li 80 Stiff "D2" | 910H 19°,  Diamana Kai'li for Titleist 85 Hybrid Stiff | Titleist 714 AP2 4 to P Aerotech Steelfiber i110 S | SM4 Vokey 50.12, 54.14 & SM5 60.11K| 34" Edel Umpqua + 40g Counter Weight
 

Posted
This is why I love Michigan, it's so natural for big tree'd golf courses. Although they do become a bitch after a while.

Agreed. I used to live and St Joseph, Michigan and regularly played a CC converted to a semi private. The course was built in the 20's and had the largest most difficult and beautiful trees I've ever seen on a course. I love those old courses like that.

What's in my bag:
Driver: taylormade.gifBurner 09 Stiff 9.5*
Fairway Woods: adams.gifRPM Low Profile 3 & 5
Irons: mizuno.gifMP 57 - 3-PW Project X 5.5
Wedges: wilson.gifREG. 588 54* &cleveland.gif 60*Putter: ping.gifAnserBall: titleist.gifProV1x Home Course: Forest Ridge Golf Club


Note: This thread is 5579 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.