Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

100 yards in - which club to use?


Note: This thread is 3353 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I always admire the pros on tour using a 56 deg to hit a high shot from 100 yds and land it softly next to the flag (sometime with backspin).

However, i find it difficult to hit a full shot on a 56 degs and most of the time running the risk of duffing the shot. Instead, i had to use a PW or 9 iron hitting a 3/4 slow "feel" shot.

Is this due to my skill limitation or do most people do the same as well? Or i should go and spend more time practicing full 56 deg shot from 100 yds regardless of how many time i duff the shot?

Posted
It depends on the conditions.

I've hit anything from a SW-7i from 100 yards.

If you find a shot difficult and duff it often, why would you try force it?
Hit the PW or 9i, if you strike it well it's still going to stop up fast.

My Clubs
Driver - LV4 10* R flex
Wood - sam snead persimmon 2 wood (for windy days)
Hybrid burner tour launch 20* stiff flex.
Irons - Tour Mode 3i,4i stiffIrons - FP's 5-PW R-flexWedge - spin milled 54.14Wedge - spin milled 60.07Putter - Victoria Lowest round 2010: 79 (par 70)Latest rounds at...


Posted
I love my 56 for that shot, but it really depends on what you're most comfortable with...some days I hit my 56 great to 100yds [a full, hard swing should get me 105-108 with a 56] BUT, other days it's my 50 with a 3/4 swing. Bottom line, it's all about confidence. Whether it's your 56, 52, pw, 9, 8, 7, etc. it doesn't matter. Whatever get's you close, get's you close. If you want to hit your 56 close @ 100yds then practice that shot otherwise use the club that you can find a consistent swing with and use that. Again, I think golf is all about confidence so play the shots you're most confident in [whether it's from the fairway or into the green] and you'll make better scores. Good luck!!

Posted
I use everything from a 55* sw to a PW. Usually the stock shot for 100 is a GW at 50* for me.

Don't force a shorter club for more distance. That's not their intention & you run the risk of all kinds of mishits.

Either practice taking something off a longer club or look into another wedge to cover the gap. I'm guessing you have about 10* between your pw & sw.

Posted
knock-down pitching wedge until i get up by the green.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
i use 52 deg.
nothing worse than landing a 57 deg next to the pin and the ball backspins off the front of the green coming to rest on the fringe..

always give way to the Greenskeeper!!

in my bag:
whatever clubs i find left behind on the course... But the Ping Anser will never be beaten!!


BALL: only get off tractor for PRO v1's..... Now, which way to Q School???


Posted
If you master the bump and run with your pitching wedge/9 iron you can be deadly. I use a sand wedge to fly it to the green if there is trouble in front like bunkers or water.
In My cleveland.gif Executive Cart Bag:
Driver: taylormade.gifTour Burner 10.5* | cleveland.gifHiBore XLS Tour 9.5*
Woods: cleveland.gifLauncher Comp 3W | Hibore 2i Hybrid
Irons: mizuno.gifMP-60 3-PW | cleveland.gifCG4 Tour 3-PW | Wedges: cleveland.gifCG10 56* and 60*
Putter: odyssey.gifWhite Hot XG #9 | bushnell.gifPinseeker Medalist Rangefinder | First Coast Golf Courses

Posted
If you master the bump and run with your pitching wedge/9 iron you can be deadly. I use a sand wedge to fly it to the green if there is trouble in front like bunkers or water.

Bump and run from 100 yards out? With or without trouble in the front a bump and run isn't the right play from 100 yards out.

« Keith »


Posted
pretty much pw from 100 yards and in on all shots unless i have to hit a lower shot because of tree trouble then usually try to hit a punch shot with 6 iron as its the longest regular iron i have, hybrids arent very good for those kind of shots as they get the ball up too quickly. Ill just vary how hard I swing if its a shorter shot, I have a 56 deg wedge but i use it primarily just for shots out of the bunker as I just cant hit it a consistent distance on normal shots. I might hit it 125 yards one time and the next time hit it 50 yards just cant rely on it.

Driver-Taylormade Burner Ti 420 cc 10.5 deg reg flex
3 wood-orlimar rcx 14 deg
Hybrids-warrior golf 20 deg, 23 deg and 26 deg
6-pw-AFFINITY / ORLIMAR HT2 irons steel shafts, reg flex, 56 deg tour series wedge
Putter-Rife 2 Bar Hybrid Mallet...


Posted
Sounds odd coming from a 18-20 handi, but I actually rock a 54, 58, and a 60. Since I grew up on a few acres, these were clubs that I could always take out back and use practice full swings with without any danger of knocking golf balls off the property. As a result, I can't hit my fairway wood straight to save my life, my driver is a bit errant, and most of my irons are, at the best, a bit skittish.

Get me inside 110 though, and I've usually got only 2 or 3 strokes to go.

Ogio Nexos Black on Black

Taylormade TP R9 Superdeep, 9.5, Aldila RIP A70X

Bridgestone J38 15, Motore F1 75S

Mizuno Masters Tournament Blades

Mizuno MP-T10 60.08

Ping Anser 2i


Posted
knock-down pitching wedge until i get up by the green.

Yup. I rarely hit a SW other than a chip of 20 yds in. I love hitting the knock down PW. Comes in low, controllabe and stops


Posted
I always admire the pros on tour using a 56 deg to hit a high shot from 100 yds and land it softly next to the flag (sometime with backspin).

First of all, I wouldn't worry about what a pro does. He has crazy skills that most amateurs can only dream of. I very rarely use my 56° for full shots. I've just never been sufficiently consistent with it for that, and I don't worry about it. I much prefer using my 51° wedge from 100 in for most shots. I spend most of my practice time with that and I feel most comfortable with it. I have lots of friends who use the SW quite well for these shots, and that's fine. I still don't let it influence me in my game.

This is the key.... how much time do you spend practicing these shots? Touch shots require practice, and too many players only practice full shots on the range. Work on the feel shots and you may find that those 100 yard SW shots aren't even necessary (I couldn't hit a SW 100 yards anyway.... my 51° wedge goes 100 yards on a full out swing).

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Most 56º wedges are designed as sand wedges - bunker clubs - and usually have a lot of bounce. If your course has lush, fluffy grass in the fairway, a high bounce wedge will work. If you have shorter grass and harder soil, a high-bounce club can be troublesome: If you don't hit it really clean, the clubhead may bounce off the ground and cause you to miss the shot.

As for 100-yard shots, go with what works. Nothing wrong with a 3/4 swing. Several posters on here - including some low HDCPs - say they rarely hit a full wedge shot.

Who cares if you hit a 3/4 PW into green on a one-hopper, rather than rocketing a 56º that backs up 10 feet? Both get you in there for a one-putt. The scorecard doesn't care how you got your 4, nor will your scramble partners.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
From 100 and in, depends on the shot.

None elevated green with nothing to carry, like a bunker, i will take my PW and hit a knock down shot that takes a nice hope and rolls out slowly. Its a nice controll shot, i can do that for 100 and in.

Elevated greens, i will go to a sandwedge (56) degree, but i always try to take the ball as low as the shot dictates, its more control for me that way.

I never really use a lob wedge.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I use everything from a 55* sw to a PW. Usually the stock shot for 100 is a GW at 50* for me.

50* Gap wedge my new favorite. I never even use a 56* anymore unless I am actually in Sand I feel like anythign 100 and under I can do better with a GW. But I do sail some shots over the green.
 Driver:callaway.gifBig Bertha 460cc 10* Hybrids: adams.gif A7 3-4H  Irons: adams.gif A7 5i-PW
Wedges: cleveland.gifCG 12 50*, CG 14 56*, CG12 60* Putt Putt:odyssey.gif White ICE Tour Bronze 1 Putter

Posted
I mostly use a PW down to 75-80 yds using combinations of choking down and shorter swings. I don't like to hit a full shot with my other wedge although a full nuke with it is about 100-105, I don't know where it is going. I like to use it from about 75 in.

The point being, use what you are confident with and can control.

Don

In the bag:

Driver: PING 410 Plus 9 degrees, Alta CB55 S  Fairway: Callaway Rogue 3W PX Even Flow Blue 6.0; Hybrid: Titleist 818H1 21* PX Even Flow Blue 6.0;  Irons: Titleist 718 AP1 5-W2(53*) Shafts- TT AMT Red S300 ; Wedges Vokey SM8 56-10D Putter: Scotty Cameron 2016 Newport 2.5  Ball: Titleist AVX or 2021 ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Hitting a 56 or 60deg to me is one of the harder shots. It requires holding the lag and setting the angle absolutely perfectly or the results can be horrific. Most anyone can sweep at a 460cc driver and hit it decently simply because it doesn't take a very advanced understanding of the golf swing. On the plus side if we all take some extra time and learn how to properly hit the 70-100 yard pitch you will get a better understanding of the golf swing.

Note: This thread is 3353 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.