Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3928 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Tee boxes.

Uneven, wore out tee boxes on par 3's make the green look further away to me.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I like a well managed course. Divot friendly fairways, and greens with a consistent roll.  After that, a decent practice area. Third on my list would be a well run 19th hole. I suppose there is a 4th item, and that would be affordable green fees. Right now I am about 15 minutes from a course that meets those 4 items.

The one item I don't usually find when traveling, are practice greens, that do not play the same as the 18 hole greens.

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

When selecting a course to play for a certain round, condition actually doesn't come into play much simply because there is a certain "minimum" course condition that I'll play at...has to be relatively well-kept, or I won't even consider playing it regardless of anything else.

So, condition ends up being sort of a binary thing.

I'd put the other factors in the following general order of importance:

1.) Pace of play

2.) Distance from my house

3.) Layout / design

4.) Walkability

Regarding condition of specific parts of the course, I think greens are also the most important, followed by bunkers (surprised not many people mentioned this), then fairways, then tee boxes.

- John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
For me, it's the course design.  If the layout is boring, it doesn't matter what condition it's in.  I have enjoyed well designed courses by top name architects, even when the conditions are not quite perfect.  If the conditions are maintained as well, then it is truly a delight.

I agree, I want an interesting, challenging layout that forces me to think hard and potentially be creative with my shots. I'm happy if the course has that and half decent greens and would take that any day over a beautifully kept course that is just an up and down, with no interest. I'm not a golf snob who is outraged if there is a divot on the tee box!


Posted

Player friendliness.  By that I mean I prefer a course where every errant shot isn't punished by dropping a new ball.  A course should lean toward letting the player stay as closely as possible to the principle of playing the ball as it lies.

A course can do that and still not be a pushover.  Those lies off the planned track can be penal in themselves, but not to the point of always forcing the player drop out of trouble in order to continue play.  This can be done by nothing more complex than strategically placed trees and bunkers.  You don't need 6" rough or 30 miles of water hazards for a course to reward good shots and punish poor ones.

I play golf to play my ball, not hit, search, drop, then do it all over again.

(This suggestion (or rant if you prefer) comes in the wake of my round today on a course which is 100% target golf.  Miss and you dig out another ball.  It was the least enjoyable 18 holes of the 153 that I played in the last 6 days.)

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
For me, its simple; nice greens, nice fairways, decent greens, and good pace of play. Good pace of play is an endangered species in the dfw area these days.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I would say generally speaking greens. It all comes down to greens, no only for putting but chips and pitches.

Up here in the northeast, right now many cheaper courses, and even a couple expensive ones, are suffering badly from severely burned out fairways, like hitting off a dirt driveway, which is a pet peeve of mine. However that is environmental, so with all other things equal, greens of course.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

well its sad to say, but yes you can get away with alot of other bad areas if the greens are good.

If the greens are bad and everything else is super awesome amazing!!!  Then it wont matter that everything else is good... the last thing the golfer remembers is the 18th green.


Note: This thread is 3928 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 10 (10 Jun 26) - Played in the midweek shootout at my home course - on aerated and sanded greens - day of trying to figure tempo to get the best roll on the greens.  Approach game was decently solid as was shots off the tee.  
    • Ok, I'm trying to find a feel to hit a consistent ball flight (irons).  My current predicament.  1. I try to do the arms down stuff better, with the club feeling like it is way behind me more. It's just a cluster of results. Most of the time, I can't get any speed on the swing. If I get my arms down faster, I just throw them out.  2. I focus all my attention on turning better. Pushing off with my left leg and getting my right side through better. On the DTL view, this doesn't produce anywhere close where the hands and club should be. The result is usually ball first contact, lower ball flight, more centered contact.  At this point, I am going with option 2. Stop thinking about what the hands do. Just make a shorter backswing, keep it wide, turn through. Somehow, the club head finds the ball. My focus is so much on just making sure I turn, it's like, "Oh, that contact was better.... Oh, that bell flight looks playable." If not, I will just be practicing my entire summer.       
    • Nope, they spent too much money. They are in over 28 million on the football roster and related NIL compensation at this point. Boosters associated with any Texas college football team has HUGE sway. The AD is between a rock and a hard place. They put a lot of money into Sorsby, at the chance of winning a NC this year. If you move on, you basically wasted a lot.  This is why Ohio State wants 3 QB's they feel can start. That is why the backups the past 5 years at some point transfer. Texas Tech has no backup near the quality of Sorsby. If they move on, they are screwed for 2026. 
    • Maybe there's something I still don't understand about the situation. Wouldn't Texas Tech do itself a favor to move on from Sorsby at this point?      
    • Day 281 6-10 Full swing, fast, getting low point ahead of "towel".  Working on flow during this seems to help. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.