Jump to content
Note: This thread is 4986 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Is 250yd carry enough to compete?

Callaway FT-9 Tour 8.5* IMIX
Taylormade R9 3-wood 18* (neutral Position)
Callaway Fusion 3-PW, AW, SW, LW
Nike Method 002

Titleist DT Carry whenever possible

Last few rounds been playing Srixon Soft Feel 2-piece


Yes, there are tour pros who only average about 250 carry.  Being 20 yards shorter than average means you better be  a good middle long iron player and have a top notch short game.


1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


Super good middle, long iron player....

It is hard to believe that there will be guys in the future that are short hitters with the equipment and length of the courses now.  It seems to be that there is more of a premium for distance off the tee than there is for control; even with the new grooves.

I cannot think of a younger player that is that short as of now.  There may be one, but their name does not stick out in my head.


Guys like Mark Wilson are proof that you don't need to hit it big to compete.  His average is 279, carry is likely in the 240-250 neighborhood.

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 




Originally Posted by delav

Guys like Mark Wilson are proof that you don't need to hit it big to compete.  His average is 279, carry is likely in the 240-250 neighborhood.


Good Point!



Originally Posted by MikeLowry5

It seems to be that there is more of a premium for distance off the tee than there is for control; even with the new grooves.



That's what it seems like.  I'd still rather be 270 in the fairway than 330 in the pine needles :)

Callaway FT-9 Tour 8.5* IMIX
Taylormade R9 3-wood 18* (neutral Position)
Callaway Fusion 3-PW, AW, SW, LW
Nike Method 002

Titleist DT Carry whenever possible

Last few rounds been playing Srixon Soft Feel 2-piece




Originally Posted by itching4scratch

That's what it seems like.  I'd still rather be 270 in the fairway than 330 in the pine needles :)


It completely depends on the length of the hole and the thickness of the pine needles!!

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill


What about 330yds in the rough with a clear shot and a lob wedge to the green?  That's what guys like Bubba Watson and Dustin Johnson are looking at on 400yds+ par 4's.  The equipment and design of the courses (seems as if one is dictated by the other) seems to be swallowing up the shorter hitters.

Keep in mind that these guys missing the fairway still have clear shots out of the rough more times than not.  Now my 330yd drive, its in the pine trees, which also sit 100' below the elevated tee box I needed to bomb it 330 :)


The average number of yards per measured drive. These drives are measured on two holes per round. Care is taken to select two holes which face in opposite directions to counteract the effect of wind. Drives are measured to the point at which they come to rest regardless of whether they are in the fairway or not.




Originally Posted by allin

Yes, there are tour pros who only average about 250 carry.  Being 20 yards shorter than average means you better be  a good middle long iron player and have a top notch short game.


Not any more.  The last (192nd) position on the PGA Tour was Mike Weir at 268.

And the last (138th) position last year on the Nationwide tour was 271.

250 barely gets you in the top 80 on the Champions tour nowadays.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by turtleback

Not any more.  The last (192nd) position on the PGA Tour was Mike Weir at 268.

And the last (138th) position last year on the Nationwide tour was 271.

250 barely gets you in the top 80 on the Champions tour nowadays.

250 carry probably equates to 270-275 total distance, with the fairways cut as close as they are on tour.


IMO, unless you only want to win no-name tournaments or play on the Nationwide Tour then 250 yards isnt enough.  Nowdays, to compete you NEED to be hitting your drives 300 yards.

  • Upvote 1

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S




Originally Posted by Harmonious

250 carry probably equates to 270-275 total distance, with the fairways cut as close as they are on tour.


Which simply isn't going to cut it, especially when it's wet! Minimum is to carry it 275 yards if you wish to compete i.e. make enough money to live on.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill


Dustin Johnson carries his 3i about 250!

That being said...I think you can still compete if you carry 250.  I wouldn't think you'd be in the top of the group...unless your iron play and shortgame were among the best!

Titleist 910D3 - 9.5°- Ahina Stiff
Taylormade Burner 2.0 3Wood - Proforce V2 Stiff

Taylormade Burner 5W - Proforce V2 Stiff
910D 21° 3h - Ahina Stiff

Titleist 712 AP2 - KBS Tour
Titleist Vokey - 52* & 56*

Odyssey White Hot #1 XG

X's or B330's


This seems to be true.  I can carry it about 250, and a 7000 yard course starts feeling awfully long.  It seems everything the pros play is 7200-7700.

Originally Posted by TitleistWI

IMO, unless you only want to win no-name tournaments or play on the Nationwide Tour then 250 yards isnt enough.  Nowdays, to compete you NEED to be hitting your drives 300 yards.




you don't need 300 to compete, thats just idiotic.... Maybe 285-290 total driving, not carry would get you competing.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The PGA Tour average is 285 yards. You can certainly "make a living" hitting it shorter than that.

Have you looked at the size of PGA Tour purses lately?

 - Joel

TM M3 10.5 | TM M3 17 | Adams A12 3-4 hybrid | Mizuno JPX 919 Tour 5-PW

Vokey 50/54/60 | Odyssey Stroke Lab 7s | Bridgestone Tour B XS

Home Courses - Willow Run & Bakker Crossing

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

IMO, unless you only want to win no-name tournaments or play on the Nationwide Tour then 250 yards isnt enough.  Nowdays, to compete you NEED to be hitting your drives 300 yards.

Do you seriously think that there are players on the Nationwide Tour hitting it less than 250? If there were, they would not have a hope in hell. In fact, there are more 300+ hitters on the Nationwide Tour than the PGA Tour. 2006 was the only year in the last decade when this wasn't the case. The linked article explains why, but the idea of being able to compete on the Nationwide Tour as a sub 250 yard hitter is ludicrous. http://www.pgatour.com/2010/h/10/13/dell-insider-nationwide/index.html

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


You could easily survive not being a long hitter on the tour, but the rest of your game had better be pretty damn sharp! The thing that kept guys like Corey Pavin and Jeff Sluman around is their complete game. Yeah they hit it nowhere off the tee, but their iron / wedge / short game / putting were extremely good.

Remember when Tiger was dominating the tour? He was bombing the ball AND hitting close AND making the putts. You put all three of those together and you usually end up in good position. If you're sub-par on one part of your game, the other parts better compensate for it.

Driver: R11s 9 with a Fubuki Tour 63 X-Stiff
Fairway Wood: R11s 15.5 with Miyazaki Kusala Black 83 X-Stiff

Hybrid: taylormade.gif 4 with Fubuki 515 X-Stiff
Irons: titleist.gif Forged 660 3-PW with Dynamic Gold X-100

Wedges: callaway.gif CC Jaws 52 and 58 Degree
Putter: ping.gif In Anser 2


Note: This thread is 4986 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 307 - Mirror swings, focusing on rotation. That seems to take pressure off my lead hip. 
    • With a lot of help from @iacas, I was able to take a great trip down to Pinehurst this past week. Took advantage of having a day off because of Veteran's Day and spent 4 days in the Pinehurst area. @iacas, @Hardspoon, @GolfLug, and @NCGolfer joined me for at least 1 round on the trip. I got in 2 courses in Pinehurst proper - Southern Pines and Pine Needles - and then the Duke golf course in Durham and Tobacco Road. All of the courses were new to me, and I really liked all of them. I am going to add more to this later when I have some time, but I wanted to post a quick recap/thoughts for each course. Duke Golf Club I really enjoyed this course. It's a big ballpark that goes up and down a couple of hills. The front 9 starts off going straight downhill, with 1 and 2 being similar dogleg left, downhill par 4s. You make your way to the bottom of the hill with a par 3 that plays over a lake, and then you creep up slowly. The best hole on the front is the 7, the first par 5. It's a dogleg right goes downhill to a small green protected by a creek and bunkers. If you can get your ball to the fairway, you should have a chance at going for the green in 2. That shot was probably the most memorable one I had on this course. You then crest the hill again with the tee shot on 9, which is a par 5 that goes down the hill and then the green is back on top of the hill by the clubhouse.  The back only goes up and down the hill once, so it's slightly more tame than the front. I really liked 11, which is another par 5. The tee shot plays down the hill, and if you hit a good one, you could have a mid iron into your hand with your second shot. The green is huge, but protected by a creek that runs in front of it. The closing stretch of holes are pretty good. 16 is a short par 4 playing straight up hill. Distance control with a wedge is really important. 17 is slightly uphill, but the trick is navigating the uneven lies in the fairway. 18 is fairly straightforward but a stout par 4 to end the round. The only negative is that there were a lot of holes with forced carries to the green. 4, 7, 11, 12, and 13 all had ponds or creeks fronting the green. Most of those required hefty carries.  Bottom line, I liked the course and the setting. I would be happy to play here regularly. Pine Needles I loved this course. The setting reminded me a lot of #2, and it feels like a mini #2 with a lot of small, turtleback-type greens. The opening 5 holes were outstanding. 1 was a really cool par 5 that was no gimme. The green was pretty wild. 2 was a long, downhill par 4. 3 was one of my favorite par 3s that we played - over a lake with bunkers framing the green. 4 was a short uphill par 4 that I really liked. 5 was an excellent but tough par 3, sitting on a shelf well above the tee. It's a great opening stretch. And again, the feel and look of the place is unique to the Pinehurst area. It feels like something you wouldn't find anywhere else. Other highlights - the green site on 9 was really cool. There is a big run off area to the right of the green that you want to avoid. It reminded me a bit of the second hole at Sand Valley - you don't want to be right of that green either. 12 was a great hole. You can't see the green from the tee, as the tee shot plays over a hill. When you see the green, it looks tiny, with a huge runoff and bunkers to the left of the green. The fairway is pretty wide, so the trick is accuracy with your approach shot. 18 was an extremely cool finishing hole. You can't really see the fairway off the tee, but it turns out to be fairly generous when you get there. And then the green site is fantastic - sitting at the bottom of the hill, but still requiring precision to be on it. I really want to get back and play this course again. There are a few shots that I want to try again (the drive on 10, the approach on 12, the drive on 18). And I just really loved the look and feel of the place. A great course and a fun day of golf. Southern Pines I thought this was the best course of the 4 I played. It's wider than Pine Needles, and the greens are bigger. But the greens are much more undulating. The land here is truly excellent. There is a ton of land movement, and seemingly every hole has elevation changes you have to navigate. I really like both par 5s on the front. If you hit good drives on both, you will get a big kick down the fairway. If you don't, you're going to be faced with a long 2nd shot just to have a wedge in. 2 plays down the hill with the tee shot and then back up the hill with the approach. You have to be careful about club selection and distance control there. 7 was a good, fairly long par 3 with a green perched on a ledge. 11 was a driveable par 4 with a wild green. 15 was really cool as well - the tee shot is downhill, but then the green is back uphill. This is a course I would love to play everyday. It's a thinking man's course, because you have to be really careful with all the elevations changes there. You constantly have to play and commit to a club longer or shorter than the distance. And I don't really think there are any bad holes. Only negative is that a few holes are a bit repetitive - 4, 16, and 18 are all shorter par 4s where you're hitting an uphill approach wedge or short iron. This is a very minor nit, though. One of the best courses I've played. I'd have to think about where exactly to rank it, but easily within the top 10. Possibly cracking the top 5. I will play this again next time I'm in Pinehurst. Tobacco Road I had a blast at this course. It is unique and pretty wild. You start out with these massive dune-like hills pinching in on your tee shot on 1. And then the entire round feels like you're going around these massive dunes. There are a lot of interesting shots here. You have long carries over bunkers, blind tee shots, shots into tiny greens, shots into huge greens, carries over deep bunkers, downhill shots, uphill shots, you name it. The setting is incredible. It is a huge course, and the fairways and greens tend to be very generous. I want to write more about individual holes later. But I really liked 7, 9, 10, and 16. I want to play a couple of the par 3s again with different hole locations and/or different tee boxes. 6 and 17, in particular, could play like wildly different holes with a different hole location (for 17) or coming from a different tee box (for 6).  While I had a lot of fun seeing this course, I do feel like a smart golfer could get bored here. To me, it was fairly obvious that Strantz was trying to bait you into trying a bunch of hard shots. On 11, for example, if you hit a good drive to the right side of the fairway, you could have a shot at the green in 2. But the green is over a massive bunker that has to be 40 feet below the green. And the green is narrow, essentially facing perpendicular to you. The only chance you really have is to hit a perfect shot. The alternative is an easy lay up to a wide fairway, leaving you with a wedge at the perfect angle. Maybe I try going for it with a 7 iron or something shorter, but that's about it. I felt similar on 5 - the direct line to the green is not that far and the green is driveable, But if you miss, you're going to have a 40ish yard bunker shot or a lost ball. Meanwhile, if you play to the right, you have a massive fairway and you'll likely be left with a wedge in your hand. I think it would be fun to play with 2 balls on some of these holes and try the shots. If you are a LSW disciple, though, you are not going to try the crazy risky shots Strantz is trying to bait you into. In the end, I really enjoyed this course. But I think it's below PN or SP. It's still awesome, and it was fun to see and play. I would come back here, but it's a lower priority than other Pinehurst courses. Well, that ended up being longer than I was anticipating. I may add some more thoughts about specific holes later, but this is a good starting point. I do want to think more about course ratings out of 10 for these, too. More to come...
    • Day 123: did a stack session.
    • Day 48 - 2024-11-17 A little work before Junior Elite. Left thumb and the compensating left wrist are better; still not great.
    • I watched a re-release of The Fifth Element.  I am going to give this movie a tap in Eagle. It's a wells shot movie. The actors are great. The story is interesting, and the setting is fascinating. For it being just over 2 hours, the pacing is phenomenal. I really enjoyed watching this sci-fi classic. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...