Jump to content
IGNORED

The Dan Plan - 10,000 Hours to Become a Pro Golfer (Dan McLaughlin)


Jonnydanger81
Note: This thread is 2557 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

About time somebody shined some light on him, way to go @Pretzel . Looks to me Dan is running out of steam to continue his schedule, He only averaged 100 hours a month this past summer, I get the feeling he is losing more and more interest in working on his game and instead would rather just play casual rounds, this was posted also by someone who actually met with Dan. If he keeps going at this rate it's going to be sometime late 2017 by the time he finishes.

Rich C.

Driver Titleist 915 D3  9.5*
3 Wood TM RBZ stage 2 tour  14.5*
2 Hybrid Cobra baffler 17*
4Hybrid Adams 23*
Irons Adams CB2's 5-GW
Wedges 54* and 58* Titleist vokey
Putter Scotty Cameron square back 2014
Ball Srixon Zstar optic yellow
bushnell V2 slope edition

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator

So that makes @flopster , @Pretzel and me from here who have posted to his blog or FB page. I wonder who else from here did?

I dunno what it is about this thread. I really don't want to spend so much time in it, but as it was said in The Godfather:

Just when I thought I was out...they pull me back in...

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

About time somebody shined some light on him, way to go @Pretzel. Looks to me Dan is running out of steam to continue his schedule, He only averaged 100 hours a month this past summer, I get the feeling he is losing more and more interest in working on his game and instead would rather just play casual rounds, this was posted also by someone who actually met with Dan. If he keeps going at this rate it's going to be sometime late 2017 by the time he finishes.

Well, the hope is that he is now good enough to know just how hard this game really is to play. In addition to this, maybe he will start to respect all the thousands of people who are capable of shooting in the mid-60s who are all trying to attain his boasted goal.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Well, the hope is that he is now good enough to know just how hard this game really is to play. In addition to this, maybe he will start to respect all the thousands of people who are capable of shooting in the mid-60s who are all trying to attain his boasted goal.


Do you think it is disrespectful for someone to verbalize a goal that others are trying to reach? Honest question. No wrong answer.

I am trying to analyze why people feel so strong about the Dan Plan.

Some people may be familiar with Gary Vaynerchuk. He is very vocal about his goal to buy the NY Jets. That obviously is a ridiculous goal. He would need to be in the top 1/2% of the wealthiest people in the world. However, it is the goal that drives him. I am fascinated but I never thought of it as disrespectful to those that are laboring closer to the goal than he is.

Again, no wrong answer just trying to understand the thought process.

Respectfully,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Do you think it is disrespectful for someone to verbalize a goal that others are trying to reach? Honest question. No wrong answer.

I am trying to analyze why people feel so strong about the Dan Plan.

Some people may be familiar with Gary Vaynerchuk. He is very vocal about his goal to buy the NY Jets. That obviously is a ridiculous goal. He would need to be in the top 1/2% of the wealthiest people in the world. However, it is the goal that drives him. I am fascinated but I never thought of it as disrespectful to those that are laboring closer to the goal than he is.

Again, no wrong answer just trying to understand the thought process.

I didn't exactly state that he was being disrespectful.

I simply wondered if he now knows how hard this game is, and that he has possibly found new respect for the people who are much further along than him.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Do you think it is disrespectful for someone to verbalize a goal that others are trying to reach? Honest question. No wrong answer.

I am trying to analyze why people feel so strong about the Dan Plan.

Would you humour a person who had never played guitar saying he was going to join the Rolling Stones? An ADULT, that is? And wanted you to fund his quest?

It's because of his awkward combination of arrogance and ignorance.

He has a complete lack of respect and admiration for what may be in many cases a genetic advantage, or sheer hard work, guts and determination in others.

He doesn't know what a PGATour pro does. He has clearly never actually seen or LOOKED at how they strike the ball.

The theory he is following has been misinterpreted.

He is dishonest about his scoring.

He has a nauseating, almost evangelical smugness.

All the evidence shows that he is going nowhere, yet here he is travelling around the world having TV producers and naive golfers thinking that here is an ordinary guy who has followed a plan and will become a PGATour pro.

As I have said a million times, he would not be in a any club's top 50 players.

And....he wants your money.

That's why I feel so strongly about him.

Ignorant people who don't know golf will point at him and believe that he got to "Tour level" because they don't understand the big picture.

He sets a bad example.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Do you think it is disrespectful for someone to verbalize a goal that others are trying to reach? Honest question. No wrong answer. I am trying to analyze why people feel so strong about the Dan Plan. Some people may be familiar with Gary Vaynerchuk. He is very vocal about his goal to buy the NY Jets. That obviously is a ridiculous goal. He would need to be in the top 1/2% of the wealthiest people in the world. However, it is the goal that drives him. I am fascinated but I never thought of it as disrespectful to those that are laboring closer to the goal than he is. Again, no wrong answer just trying to understand the thought process.

I feel that, at least at the start, he trivialized the amount of effort it takes to make it as a professional golfer. He seemed fairly happy go lucky about the affair and was confident that he would make it without a doubt despite the mountains of evidence to the contrary that can be found in mini tours across the country. Now that he gets into it though he is starting to realize the amount of work it takes, and even just how hard it can sometimes be to be honest in your self assessment of current abilities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Do you think it is disrespectful for someone to verbalize a goal that others are trying to reach? Honest question. No wrong answer.

I am trying to analyze why people feel so strong about the Dan Plan.

Some people may be familiar with Gary Vaynerchuk. He is very vocal about his goal to buy the NY Jets. That obviously is a ridiculous goal. He would need to be in the top 1/2% of the wealthiest people in the world. However, it is the goal that drives him. I am fascinated but I never thought of it as disrespectful to those that are laboring closer to the goal than he is.

Again, no wrong answer just trying to understand the thought process.


No it's not wrong, only the way you verbalize it would be, Dan's complete naiveness at the start was accepted as that by most, I think what started turning more people off was his self promotion tactics and later the inconsistency in his posting raised many eyebrows (handicap vs anticap made little sense) and then his tournament scores really exposed his ability at a much lower level than he wanted anyone to see. Someone even who met personally with him said he's "stubborn" and will not stick with anything that doesn't give positive results immediately, that part alone proves he does not have what it takes since he doesn't have the mental fortitude to stick with something that may not be his idea and further proves he wants all the credit if he would actually succeed.

Rich C.

Driver Titleist 915 D3  9.5*
3 Wood TM RBZ stage 2 tour  14.5*
2 Hybrid Cobra baffler 17*
4Hybrid Adams 23*
Irons Adams CB2's 5-GW
Wedges 54* and 58* Titleist vokey
Putter Scotty Cameron square back 2014
Ball Srixon Zstar optic yellow
bushnell V2 slope edition

Link to comment
Share on other sites


No it's not wrong, only the way you verbalize it would be, Dan's complete naiveness at the start was accepted as that by most, I think what started turning more people off was his self promotion tactics and later the inconsistency in his posting raised many eyebrows (handicap vs anticap made little sense) and then his tournament scores really exposed his ability at a much lower level than he wanted anyone to see. Someone even who met personally with him said he's "stubborn" and will not stick with anything that doesn't give positive results immediately, that part alone proves he does not have what it takes since he doesn't have the mental fortitude to stick with something that may not be his idea and further proves he wants all the credit if he would actually succeed.

Interesting observation. I didn't really catch this one.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lihu

Well, the hope is that he is now good enough to know just how hard this game really is to play. In addition to this, maybe he will start to respect all the thousands of people who are capable of shooting in the mid-60s who are all trying to attain his boasted goal.

Do you think it is disrespectful for someone to verbalize a goal that others are trying to reach? Honest question. No wrong answer.

I am trying to analyze why people feel so strong about the Dan Plan. Some people may be familiar with Gary Vaynerchuk. He is very vocal about his goal to buy the NY Jets. That obviously is a ridiculous goal. He would need to be in the top 1/2% of the wealthiest people in the world. However, it is the goal that drives him. I am fascinated but I never thought of it as disrespectful to those that are laboring closer to the goal than he is.

Again, no wrong answer just trying to understand the thought process.

It's complicated. In his case, by saying what he did, in a nutshell, whether intentionally or unintentionally and whether out of naivete or lack of knowledge and experience, the read between the lines of his stated goal is "I can do this in a shorter amount of time with less talent." Many have barely qualified for the tour with more innate talent and way more hours devoted. See Mike Weir's story. The Dan Plan's statement trivializes the difficulty of those who made it and those who didn't but were so close, like a margin of $50-$100 of earnings close.

And one of the things he said, was something like, I don't see what's tangible that makes a pro golfer so special. That's a very loose paraphrase, but basically he can't see the set of skills, whatever that is, that makes someone a PGA Tour player, so there's really nothing special about them. Even though I can't see or elucidate exactly what makes someone a success on the tour, I damn well know they have something.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Do you think it is disrespectful for someone to verbalize a goal that others are trying to reach? Honest question. No wrong answer.

I am trying to analyze why people feel so strong about the Dan Plan.

Some people may be familiar with Gary Vaynerchuk. He is very vocal about his goal to buy the NY Jets. That obviously is a ridiculous goal. He would need to be in the top 1/2% of the wealthiest people in the world. However, it is the goal that drives him. I am fascinated but I never thought of it as disrespectful to those that are laboring closer to the goal than he is.

Again, no wrong answer just trying to understand the thought process.

I don't know Dan but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt that he had good intentions when he started this journey.  He clearly underestimated the natural ability and effort required to be a PGA Tour pro which we attribute to ignorance.  At this point it's become a bit of a circus side show.  He's desperate for money and sponsorship and seems willing to do just about anything to get some attention and funding.

I, like many, question the legitimacy of his handicap given his tournament performance and this is where people are losing patience with him.  At some point he's got to back up all the words he writes in his blog with performance on the course and with the exception of unsubstantiated scores on his own, he hasn't shown us anything that indicates he's close to on track with his stated goal.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So, I spent a few minutes looking into Michael Neff. Seems like a pretty high technology club fitter.

Here's his website. http://www.michaelneffgolf.com/

Some information about him: http://theaposition.com/jeffwallach/golf/equipment/2388/i-am-the-taylormade-golf-poster-child

I wonder what he might have to say about their session?

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't know Dan but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt that he had good intentions when he started this journey.  He clearly underestimated the natural ability and effort required to be a PGA Tour pro which we attribute to ignorance.  At this point it's become a bit of a circus side show.  He's desperate for money and sponsorship and seems willing to do just about anything to get some attention and funding. I, like many, question the legitimacy of his handicap given his tournament performance and this is where people are losing patience with him.  At some point he's got to back up all the words he writes in his blog with performance on the course and with the exception of unsubstantiated scores on his own, he hasn't shown us anything that indicates he's close to on track with his stated goal.

It's not, at least to me, necessarily that he's not on track for his goal (I didn't expect him to be with his lofty goal), it's just that he has the outward appearance of not realizing how far off track he is from the goal and he goes off on seemingly unrelated tangents sometimes. If you want to play on tour as your goal, great, but you better bust your balls trying if you want to come close. That means you can't just go out and play a daily round with a one hour warm-up "practice" session. You need to identify weaknesses and develop a plan to address them. You need to be out there on the course and practice area implementing that plan, and you can't skimp on the time it will take. He quit his day job for this, so why doesn't he treat this like his job and put I'm up to eight hours a day either on the course or in the gym? I'm sorry if I come across as harsh here, but Dan wants this to be his job (professional golfer is his goal, remember?). Right now he just treats it as though it were an interesting hobby.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It's not, at least to me, necessarily that he's not on track for his goal (I didn't expect him to be with his lofty goal), it's just that he has the outward appearance of not realizing how far off track he is from the goal and he goes off on seemingly unrelated tangents sometimes.

If you want to play on tour as your goal, great, but you better bust your balls trying if you want to come close. That means you can't just go out and play a daily round with a one hour warm-up "practice" session. You need to identify weaknesses and develop a plan to address them. You need to be out there on the course and practice area implementing that plan, and you can't skimp on the time it will take. He quit his day job for this, so why doesn't he treat this like his job and put I'm up to eight hours a day either on the course or in the gym?

I'm sorry if I come across as harsh here, but Dan wants this to be his job (professional golfer is his goal, remember?). Right now he just treats it as though it were an interesting hobby.

Not just any job.

Engineers in the consumer world spend 10-12 hours a day to solve our problems. Usually, this is never enough time. We do it because we are wired for success. Sometimes we unwind for a few minutes here and there to recharge or let ideas float around for a while (or programs/logic to compile/synthesize), but it takes a lot of time conscious and sub-conscious to make things happen.

Even though I am a relative newbie and with what little success I have made in golf, I can see that golf takes the same amount of effort as any engineering project. The only difference is you get to experiment with your own physical motions. That's cool.

Dan would need to have the engineering mentality, rather than the marketing mentality to succeed. When an engineer comes across a problem he will want to work at it for as long as it takes. Does the engineer shun or avoid outside help to "take all the credit"? Heck, no. We get every little tidbit of information we can to help us to get to the end goal.

The harder the problem the harder we work at it to solve it, kind of like golfers wanting to improve.

This is why I made many connections to his marketing background, and why I think golfers are very much like engineers.

They think and do.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
[quote name="newtogolf" url="/t/45853/the-dan-plan-10-000-hours-to-become-a-pro-golfer/1860#post_1067736"]I don't know Dan but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt that he had good intentions when he started this journey.  He clearly underestimated the natural ability and effort required to be a PGA Tour pro which we attribute to ignorance.  At this point it's become a bit of a circus side show.  He's desperate for money and sponsorship and seems willing to do just about anything to get some attention and funding. I, like many, question the legitimacy of his handicap given his tournament performance and this is where people are losing patience with him.  At some point he's got to back up all the words he writes in his blog with performance on the course and with the exception of unsubstantiated scores on his own, he hasn't shown us anything that indicates he's close to on track with his stated goal.

It's not, at least to me, necessarily that he's not on track for his goal (I didn't expect him to be with his lofty goal), it's just that he has the outward appearance of not realizing how far off track he is from the goal and he goes off on seemingly unrelated tangents sometimes. If you want to play on tour as your goal, great, but you better bust your balls trying if you want to come close. That means you can't just go out and play a daily round with a one hour warm-up "practice" session. You need to identify weaknesses and develop a plan to address them. You need to be out there on the course and practice area implementing that plan, and you can't skimp on the time it will take. He quit his day job for this, so why doesn't he treat this like his job and put I'm up to eight hours a day either on the course or in the gym? I'm sorry if I come across as harsh here, but Dan wants this to be his job (professional golfer is his goal, remember?). Right now he just treats it as though it were an interesting hobby.[/quote] I may be wrong but he looks the same physically compared to when he started. He should have more muscle mass.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I may be wrong but he looks the same physically compared to when he started. He should have more muscle mass.

He doesn't take it seriously. If I were in his shoes, I'd look like Rory right now.

Ryan M
 
The Internet Adjustment Formula:
IAD = ( [ADD] * .96 + [EPS] * [1/.12] ) / (1.15)
 
IAD = Internet Adjusted Distance (in yards)
ADD = Actual Driver Distance (in yards)
EPS = E-Penis Size (in inches)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It's simply ball speed/clubhead speed.

The less delivered loft (and the more centered the hit), the more smash factor you can get. Thin the crap out of a 9-iron and you can get 1.53 sometimes.

PGA Tour players have higher smash factors than most AND higher spin rates than most because… they swing the club faster than most.

It's 65/20/15. :)

I don't give that a lot of weight. Most people learn putting by experience. It only really keeps growing.

Most people in their 30s don't improve their ball striking because they have families and jobs and are spending less time playing golf.

I support the idea of teaching juniors to smash the ball first. What good is it to have a great short game if you're trying to chip in for seven?

Interesting, I thought the upper limit on smash factor was 1.5. Can't someone with a lower swing speed have a higher smash factor than someone who swing much faster, but with poorer contact?

My thought on smash factor / 'strike efficiency' was that if you have perfect centered contact with identical clubs and swing speeds at impact then the ball hit with more spin has to have less of the club's momentum transferred into ball speed. So higher spin for center contact is less ball speed & smash factor for a given swing speed with the same club. Conservation of momentum, no?

I was thinking of really little kids starting with shorter shots...keeping it basic / not getting very technical with full swing mechanics because their bodies will change a lot as they grow. Tiger, Rory, & Nicklaus all started learning to whomp the ball first then refine directing it, so history seems to agree with you. Plus it's fun...if they aren't over-straining their bodies in the process.

If you don't have a good short game...it could be a 9, but I get your point. Just playing a lot for kids will probably work most of the shots.

Kevin

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
[QUOTE name="nevets88" url="/t/45853/the-dan-plan-10-000-hours-to-become-a-pro-golfer/1854#post_1067787"] I may be wrong but he looks the same physically compared to when he started. He should have more muscle mass.[/QUOTE] He doesn't take it seriously. If I were in his shoes, I'd look like Rory right now.

Yeah, you don't need to spend lots of $ on a health club. A simple setup, a bench, some bars and free weights will do. Even half a Rory would help. I think if I were the public eye, that would be more than enough incentive for me not to look bad.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2557 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • And pull their mouth away when they hit stronger notes. Mics can only take so much sound pressure. Every mic is different too. As I stated above, there are many variables to account for to even remotely have a chance to use sound to measure velocity. It would have to be in an extremely controlled environment with calibrated sound and metering devices. In addition, the swing must be absolutely repeatable as would the contact.  There is no possible way to use the dB meter on my iPhone to accomplish this. It’s not rational to think you could. It’s not even that good at measuring the sound level of my amps accurately. Even reorienting it by 45 degrees changes the level.
    • I know there are a lot of people on the site with science and engineering backgrounds here so @p1n9183 is getting a lot of questions about how this theory would even work, but I’m going to ask the obvious one here… why? Like what is the purpose if you already have a speed radar, even if such a thing as you proposed was feasible?
    • It might be at some distances, but none are realistic. For example, if I put a microphone 2.5m away from a sound source and another 3.5m away, the fall-off there is only about 3 (2.98 I think), but your sound would have to be incredibly loud. A microphone that picks up an 80 dB sound at 1 millimeter will only pick up about 12 dB at 2.5 meters (and it's still only 20 dB at 1m from an 80 dB sound source). I also don't think swinging a club generates a very loud sound, and sounds that can injure your hearing require 85 dB or so. In other words… You need to generate (at the source) an ear-injuring level of sound with your club, and if the microphone is as little as one foot away, that 85 dB is already down to ~43.5 dB. It's almost half of what it was. Swing 14" away with the same 85 dB swing instead of 12" and the same swing will read 42 dB. Sound attenuation is subject to similar laws like light fall-off because it radiates, so it diminishes in the inverse square: I have also talked to some sound engineers, and they've laughed and said that unless you were controlling EVERY aspect of this, including: temperature distance of max clubhead speed from the microphone angle (both axes) to the microphone clubface orientation (a face open or closed will change the frequency) location of the max clubhead speed (reaching peak speed at the same exact place) everything in the vicinity, including the shoes and clothes you're wearing, the surface you're on, etc. ideally with all of them producing virtually no noise even when moving. You'd have to control all of those to within very small margins. Even just the doppler effect is going to dramatically change your input. No. No, you need to realize how wrong you've gotten all of this. See above about the doppler effect. Unless you're a swing robot, you're not going to generate the max speed at the same exact location every time. Tell me, @p1n9183, why do you think recording artists (singers) put their mouths so damn close to the microphone?
    • Digging deeper... you can use the frequency of the woosh also.  It is possible to measure the speed of an object using the noise it generates when passing through a decibel reader,  but with some limitations and considerations. The method relies on the relationship between the frequency of the sound emitted by the moving object and its speed.  When an object moves at a constant speed, it generates sound with a characteristic frequency, known as the "Doppler frequency." The frequency of the sound emitted by the object can be related to its speed using the formula: f = (v / c) * f0 where: - f: frequency of the emitted sound - v: object speed - 😄 speed of sound (approximately 343 m/s in air at standard temperature and pressure) - f0: frequency of the sound emitted when the object is at rest Having "C" been constant, and "f0" been unknown but equal for both swings you only need to compare the frequency of  each swing to know how much faster or slower is a swing over the other.  
    • As I told you before, the sound attenuation is 3 db at 1 meter (38").  At 7" (your example) is a wooping 1 db less, for an 80db 7 iron is under 1% error. I know for sure that my PRGR is not that accurate, even my skytrak isn't that accurate. For a FREE unit seams to be promising if you can't afford a speed meter.   Again, you are swinging in the same spot, over and over again in the same session. Phone position is the same , background sound is the same, environment is the same. The only difference is the peak sound you produce when you whoosh the club.     You need to do a lot better to discharge an idea.     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...