Jump to content
IGNORED

1º diff between face and path on a driver creates 4% curve i.e 12 yards at 300.


Note: This thread is 4382 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator

This from the Tweet below:

1º diff between face and path on a driver creates 4% curve i.e 12 yards at 300. 1 dimple off centre strike does the same.

https://twitter.com/#!/JamesRidyard/status/198361768937013248

If the numbers are right, i t's a miracle I can drive the ball straight the number of times I do - not 300yds though :-)

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Modern technology greatly helps keep the ball from going that far off line.

 913 D2 8.5* with V2 66g stiff shaft

 910F 14.25 with Diamana stiff shaft

 i20 17, 20, and 23 hybrid 

 AP2 712 5-PW with Dynamic Gold S300 shaft

 54 and 60

 D66

 Tournament Edition 1600

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by xmanhockey7

Modern technology greatly helps keep the ball from going that far off line.

How?

Stretch.

"In the process of trial and error, our failed attempts are meant to destroy arrogance and provoke humility." -- Master Jin Kwon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

I've never really believed the bit about being off by a dimple and the errors it supposedly causes. I mean, either that's accurate or we're all a hell of a lot better than we give ourselves credit.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by iacas

I've never really believed the bit about being off by a dimple and the errors it supposedly causes. I mean, either that's accurate or we're all a hell of a lot better than we give ourselves credit.



I agree I hit it all over the face and pretty much not that far off line.

Driver: Titleist 915 D3
3 wood: 15 Callaway X Hot pro
Hybrids:  18 Callaway X Hot Pro
Irons: 4-GW Callaway Apex
project x 6.0
Wedges: 54 , 58 Callaway
Putter: 2 ball
Ball: Callaway Chrome

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by poser

I agree I hit it all over the face and pretty much not that far off line.

same here...but the 1 degree thing sounds more reasonable although I think this might depend on the type of golf ball played as I was under the impression that some balls spin more than others.

Using http://www.csgnetwork.com/righttricalc.html it seems like a swing path that is 1 degree In/Out with a club face square to the path will produce just more than a 5 yard push/pull at 300 yards.

I haven`t studied trackman data or the ball flight discussions in much detail, but based on the above, it sounds like you want to be about 2.3 degrees In/Out with the club 1 degree towards the target relative to the swing path to get the ball to go back to the target.  Does that sound right to any trackman experts out there?

:mizuno: MP-52 5-PW, :cobra: King Snake 4 i 
:tmade: R11 Driver, 3 W & 5 W, :vokey: 52, 56 & 60 wedges
:seemore: putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Using [URL=http://www.csgnetwork.com/righttricalc.html]http://www.csgnetwork.com/righttricalc.html[/URL] it seems like a swing path that is 1 degree In/Out with a club face square to the path will produce just more than a 5 yard push/pull at 300 yards.

That's assuming the ball flight is straight. If the face is open 1 degree to the swing path, some spin is also going to be created. Probably not enough to bridge the gap between 12* and 5* though. I think. :-P

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Screen shot 2012-05-07 at 9.01.39 AM.png

For gear effect, TrackMan says that a 1/2" miss with a driver will tilt the spin axis about 20% and the same miss with a 6 iron will tilt it about 7%.

So, put another way, for that 6 iron point on the curve -- if you were 3 degrees open to the path and hit it 1/2" toward the toe, you'd get a dead straight shot.

Stretch.

"In the process of trial and error, our failed attempts are meant to destroy arrogance and provoke humility." -- Master Jin Kwon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:

Originally Posted by MEfree View Post

Using http://www.csgnetwork.com/righttricalc.html it seems like a swing path that is 1 degree In/Out with a club face square to the path will produce just more than a 5 yard push/pull at 300 yards.
Originally Posted by jamo

That's assuming the ball flight is straight. If the face is open 1 degree to the swing path, some spin is also going to be created. Probably not enough to bridge the gap between 12* and 5* though.

I think.

Yes, I was assuming a straight pull or straight push.  I wasn`t trying to imply that these results should be the same as a with a straight path and 1 degree open/closed club face.

AM I CORRECT TO ASSUME THAT A CENTER HIT WITH A CLUB FACE SQUARE TO THE SWING PATH WILL PRODUCE A STRAIGHT PULL OR PUSH (OR IS THERE SOME OTHER FACTOR THAT TRACKMAN DISCOVERED)?

Based on the below, it looks like 1 degree open/closed (to the swing path, not target) is worth about the same as 1 degree in/out with a club of roughly 25 degrees.  With a driver (10 degrees loft) a 4% shot bend would produce 12 yards of draw/fade at 300 yards (assuming I`m understanding the term shot bend correctly) so this confirms the tweet in the OP.

Originally Posted by Stretch

For gear effect, TrackMan says that a 1/2" miss with a driver will tilt the spin axis about 20% and the same miss with a 6 iron will tilt it about 7%.

So, put another way, for that 6 iron point on the curve -- if you were 3 degrees open to the path and hit it 1/2" toward the toe, you'd get a dead straight shot.

:mizuno: MP-52 5-PW, :cobra: King Snake 4 i 
:tmade: R11 Driver, 3 W & 5 W, :vokey: 52, 56 & 60 wedges
:seemore: putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Quote:

Originally Posted by MEfree View Post
I haven`t studied trackman data or the ball flight discussions in much detail, but based on the above, it sounds like you want to be about 2.3 degrees In/Out with the club 1 degree towards the target relative to the swing path to get the ball to go back to the target.  Does that sound right to any trackman experts out there?
I think I should have said 3.3 degrees in/out as I forgot to subtract the 1 degree for the face not being square to the swing path.  I have read that the direction the face is pointed roughly 85% controls where the ball starts- for this calculation I am assuming that the ball starts exactly where the face is pointed (2.3 degrees off the target line and 1 degree off the swing path)

:mizuno: MP-52 5-PW, :cobra: King Snake 4 i 
:tmade: R11 Driver, 3 W & 5 W, :vokey: 52, 56 & 60 wedges
:seemore: putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by MEfree

Quote:

Originally Posted by MEfree

Using http://www.csgnetwork.com/righttricalc.html it seems like a swing path that is 1 degree In/Out with a club face square to the path will produce just more than a 5 yard push/pull at 300 yards.

Yes, I was assuming a straight pull or straight push.  I wasn`t trying to imply that these results should be the same as a with a straight path and 1 degree open/closed club face.

AM I CORRECT TO ASSUME THAT A CENTER HIT WITH A CLUB FACE SQUARE TO THE SWING PATH WILL PRODUCE A STRAIGHT PULL OR PUSH (OR IS THERE SOME OTHER FACTOR THAT TRACKMAN DISCOVERED)?

Based on the below, it looks like 1 degree open/closed (to the swing path, not target) is worth about the same as 1 degree in/out with a club of roughly 25 degrees.  With a driver (10 degrees loft) a 4% shot bend would produce 12 yards of draw/fade at 300 yards (assuming I`m understanding the term shot bend correctly) so this confirms the tweet in the OP.

Here is the numbers.

path.jpg

5 Simple Keys® Associate

"Golf is not a game of great shots. It's a game of the most accurate misses.

The people who win make the smallest mistakes." - Gene Littler

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by EverythingGolf

Here is the numbers.

Thanks, that seems consistent with what I was saying about a straight push/pull.  I tried google already, but is there somewhere on the web where I can plug in the numbers like you did?

Based on what has been posted above, I find it interesting that the same clubhead path and face angle is going to end up in different spots relative to the target depending on the loft of the club. i.e. a guy who always swings with a club head path 3.3 and face 2.3 to target is likely to see his driver end up fading back to the target but see his wedge start on the same line but fade less and stay almost 4 yards left

:mizuno: MP-52 5-PW, :cobra: King Snake 4 i 
:tmade: R11 Driver, 3 W & 5 W, :vokey: 52, 56 & 60 wedges
:seemore: putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4382 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • You’ve yet to propose anything else. And yet it was, and the rules tell you how to deal with it. Your question has been answered. The Committee can declare them GUR. I disagree with your assessment of common sense. 😀 And yet they didn’t really change this one. Looks like this is about wrapped up? “That Rule is So Unfair!” A Rules Geek’s Generalized Guide to Hot Takes and Overreactions | Rules Geeks I apologize for the length of this post. If I had more time I’d have written a shorter one. – Erik J...  
    • When you are penalized for hitting into the sand trap the penalty is having to hit it out of the sand, not out of three inches of water. A sand trap is not the same as a water hazard. A sand trap is not supposed to be under water. It is a unique condition caused  by weather and poor drainage. Most local leagues like ours allow the free drop in this type of situation, as long as there is no area in the bunker to legally drop. This is what I’m talking about, sometimes the official rules of golf don’t align with common sense. That’s why they are finally starting to change them. For example, when wind blows your ball off the green. That was a stupid rule. People being able to call the tv network to say they saw a players ball move. That was a stupid rule. I’m just saying, these are rules made up a long time ago, and it’s time to modernize them.
    • Consider it another way: normally, it's a two-stroke penalty to move your ball out of a bunker (unplayable). The ACC reduces it to just one.
    • No, hitting into a hazard that is supposed to be avoided and is designed to be penalizing is not the same as hitting it into the middle of the fairway.   You are penalized because you hit it into a hazard. Based on your logic let's say you hit it into a red staked penalty area and you could normally play it but it's in temporary casual water from rain. Would you expect a free drop from there too??
    • They could have declared it GUR, sure. It is. It's temporary water, and as I said before, an abnormal course condition (ACC). That's what rule 16 is about — ACCs. No, a bunker ≠ the middle of the fairway. You are penalized because you hit it into a bunker. As for the rest… let's stick to the topic. Yep.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...