Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3853 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
We were talking about hockey last off-season in the way we're talking about football now, when several of the NHL's enforcers died of painkiller overdoses. By and large, though, hockey doesn't face the kind of scrutiny football does because contact is not a routine part of the game, and unnecessary hits are taken very seriously. In the Canadian cities, players could face criminal charges for blatant cheap shots; I don't think an NFL team would make the league's best player sit out for nearly a year after a concussion, either.

In my UnderArmour Links stand bag...

Driver: '07 Burner 9.5° (stiff graphite shaft)
Woods: SasQuatch 17° 4-Wood (stiff graphite shaft)
Hybrid: 4DX Ironwood 20° (stiff graphite shaft)Irons/Wedges: Apex Edge 3-PW, GW, SW (stiff shaft); Carnoustie 60° LWPutter: Rossa AGSI+ Corzina...


Posted
Originally Posted by Kapanda

Neither... rugby is also rough and violent, but it's not prone to concussions and wear and tear the same way high impact football is.

In my defence, I mentioned concussions specifically.

Part of that comes from the fact that, although seemingly similar, rugby and football are quite dissimilar.  By and large, everyone is moving in the same direction in rugby because of the lack of the forward pass.

Rugby is a violent sport.

Football is a collision sport.

If they really want to do something about concussions, the NFL, NCAA, etc. should simply outlaw the crossing pattern.  Make it illegal for a receiver lined up outside of the hash marks to run to the other side of the field.  Of course, that probably isn't going to happen.

:ping:

  • G400 - 9° /Alta CB 55 Stiff / G410-SFT - 16° /Project X 6.0S 85G / G410 - 20.5° /Tensei Orange 75S
  • G710 - 4 iron/SteelFiber i110cw Stiff • / i210 - 5 iron - UW / AWT 2.0 Stiff
  • Glide SS - 54° / CFS Wedge / Glide 2.0 SS - 58°/10 / KBS 120S / Hoofer - Black

:scotty_cameron: - Select Squareback / 35"  -  :titleist: - Pro V1 / White  -  :clicgear: - 3.5+ / White

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
If they really want to do something about concussions, the NFL, NCAA, etc. should simply outlaw the crossing pattern.  Make it illegal for a receiver lined up outside of the hash marks to run to the other side of the field.  Of course, that probably isn't going to happen.

Is the concussion rate among wide receivers really high enough that that would make an impact?

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The NFL is balancing greed against the spirit of the game.  The owners and Goodell want to add more games to the regular season.  In order to get the union and players to approve this, they need to address the injury and concussion issue.  Basically Goodell is willing to change the rules to reduce violent hits as long as he gets the extra games he wants.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Kapanda

sorry, meant to say that I mentioned wear and tear specifically

Yeah that was the part that I was referring to. It's nonsensical.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
Originally Posted by Chilli Dipper

We were talking about hockey last off-season in the way we're talking about football now, when several of the NHL's enforcers died of painkiller overdoses. By and large, though, hockey doesn't face the kind of scrutiny football does because contact is not a routine part of the game, and unnecessary hits are taken very seriously. In the Canadian cities, players could face criminal charges for blatant cheap shots; I don't think an NFL team would make the league's best player sit out for nearly a year after a concussion, either.

The NHL doesn't make players (e.g Sidney Crosby, Marc Savard, etc) sit out any more than it was the NFL that made Peyton Manning sit out an entire season or Steve Young retire.

Anyway, although it's not the sole purpose of the sport, to say contact isn't a routine part of hockey tells me we're watching and/or played a different type of hockey. I thought contact was inevitable on pretty much every shift. Some players are less involved, but most of the high end players I know play through injuries, and have suffered documented concussions during their career. The point which is being made by researchers now is its the repeated undocumented concussions that are the problem. It's why linemen, boxers, hockey enforcers etc are most at risk.

For the record, I'm not sure how MMA ever got sanctioned.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
Originally Posted by jamo

Is the concussion rate among wide receivers really high enough that that would make an impact?

That type of rule would fundamentally alter the sport so much that it would be almost unrecognizable in a few short years.

However, I don't think it would eliminate a significant portion of concussions.  The post pattern is still in play, as well as the slant, which can result in plenty of violent collisions that result in concussions.  Football doesn't necessarily have concussions as a result of the types of plays as much as it is a result of the very small windows in each portion of the field and the speed of the game.  A slot receiver running a squirrel out (seemingly harmless route) against a cover 2 corner sitting outside has a higher likelihood of getting his bell rung than does a WR running a crossing pattern against 1 or 0 coverage.

Brandon

The Fastest Flip in the West


Posted
Originally Posted by newtogolf

The NFL is balancing greed against the spirit of the game.  The owners and Goodell want to add more games to the regular season.  In order to get the union and players to approve this, they need to address the injury and concussion issue.  Basically Goodell is willing to change the rules to reduce violent hits as long as he gets the extra games he wants.

Which sort of seems like it would be a wash, no?  Let's change the rules so we have less violent hits per game, but then add more games so we can make sure that all the players still get their fair share of violent hits for the whole season.

Originally Posted by bplewis24

That type of rule would fundamentally alter the sport so much that it would be almost unrecognizable in a few short years.

However, I don't think it would eliminate a significant portion of concussions.  The post pattern is still in play, as well as the slant, which can result in plenty of violent collisions that result in concussions.  Football doesn't necessarily have concussions as a result of the types of plays as much as it is a result of the very small windows in each portion of the field and the speed of the game.  A slot receiver running a squirrel out (seemingly harmless route) against a cover 2 corner sitting outside has a higher likelihood of getting his bell rung than does a WR running a crossing pattern against 1 or 0 coverage.

Brandon

Agreed.  And the play after play pounding the interior players take is just as dangerous long term as those occasional violent hits on receivers coming across the middle.

This is the fine line they walk.  How can they address the concussion and injury issue properly and yet still avoid having to alter the game to the point where its not football anymore?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by sean_miller

For the record, I'm not sure how MMA ever got sanctioned.

I second that.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by sean_miller

Yeah that was the part that I was referring to. It's nonsensical.

more wear and tear = harder to play more games.

ergo,

less wear and tear = easier to play more games


Posted
Originally Posted by jamo

Is the concussion rate among wide receivers really high enough that that would make an impact?

Concussions by “general” Position

  • QB = 11
  • RB = 12
  • TE = 15
  • WR = 28
  • OL = 15
    • Offense = 81 (48.5%)
  • DL = 17
  • LB = 25
  • DB = 44
    • Defense = 86 (51.5%)

:ping:

  • G400 - 9° /Alta CB 55 Stiff / G410-SFT - 16° /Project X 6.0S 85G / G410 - 20.5° /Tensei Orange 75S
  • G710 - 4 iron/SteelFiber i110cw Stiff • / i210 - 5 iron - UW / AWT 2.0 Stiff
  • Glide SS - 54° / CFS Wedge / Glide 2.0 SS - 58°/10 / KBS 120S / Hoofer - Black

:scotty_cameron: - Select Squareback / 35"  -  :titleist: - Pro V1 / White  -  :clicgear: - 3.5+ / White

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by bwdial

Concussions by “general” Position

QB = 11

RB = 12

TE = 15

WR = 28

OL = 15

Offense = 81 (48.5%)

DL = 17

LB = 25

DB = 44

Defense = 86 (51.5%)

I'm surprised the WRs concussions aren't higher.  Seem to always see really nasty hits across the middle.

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane 9.5*
3W:  Callaway GBB II 12.5*, 5W:  Callaway Diablo 18* Neutral
3H:  Callaway Razr X, 4H:  Callaway Razr X
5-PW:  Callaway X Tour
GW:  Callaway X Tour 54*, SW:  Callaway X Tour 58*
Putter:  Callaway ITrax, Scotty Cameron Studio Design 2, Ping Anser 4


Posted

Those figures were taken off of a blog, so take them with a grain of salt.  I have no doubt that they are reasonably accurate.

:ping:

  • G400 - 9° /Alta CB 55 Stiff / G410-SFT - 16° /Project X 6.0S 85G / G410 - 20.5° /Tensei Orange 75S
  • G710 - 4 iron/SteelFiber i110cw Stiff • / i210 - 5 iron - UW / AWT 2.0 Stiff
  • Glide SS - 54° / CFS Wedge / Glide 2.0 SS - 58°/10 / KBS 120S / Hoofer - Black

:scotty_cameron: - Select Squareback / 35"  -  :titleist: - Pro V1 / White  -  :clicgear: - 3.5+ / White

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Mr3Wiggle

I'm surprised the WRs concussions aren't higher.  Seem to always see really nasty hits across the middle.

Their hits are also more high profile, and offensive players are protected more within the rule book.  Just goes to show how out of touch the league commissioner is with actual health & safety concerns.  I'll bet not many folks would have imagined defensive players are concussed at a rate higher than offensive players.

Assuming those numbers are accurate, I believe it supports my theory that improper tackling technique (specifically, allowing the facemask to point towards the ground during a tackle attempt) is a big culprit in concussion-related collisions...at least the ones that can be avoided.

Brandon

The Fastest Flip in the West


Posted

I think those figures are very off.

All the talk is on linemen's brains mainly. Receivers receive big hits, but it's every once in a blue moon.


Posted
Originally Posted by bplewis24

Their hits are also more high profile, and offensive players are protected more within the rule book.  Just goes to show how out of touch the league commissioner is with actual health & safety concerns.  I'll bet not many folks would have imagined defensive players are concussed at a rate higher than offensive players.

Assuming those numbers are accurate, I believe it supports my theory that improper tackling technique (specifically, allowing the facemask to point towards the ground during a tackle attempt) is a big culprit in concussion-related collisions...at least the ones that can be avoided.

Brandon

Actually, now that I think about it, it makes perfect sense that the defensive players concussion rates are higher.  The defensive backs are the ones that are initiating the tackles with their helmets. To give the WRs concussions they have to hit helmet to helmet (yes, a lot of concussinos are caused by the ground too), but to give themselves a concussion, they can hit anything.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Kapanda

I think those figures are very off.

All the talk is on linemen's brains mainly. Receivers receive big hits, but it's every once in a blue moon.

The numbers are probably right, but they are only reported concussions.  The obvious violent hits on the QB and WRs are hard to ignore, but I think there are probably a lot of concussions sustained in the interior that go unreported.  Also, I don't even think they need to technically get a concussion to get the long term damage.  The repeated "little" hits they give and receive play after play all add up too.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Golfingdad

The numbers are probably right, but they are only reported concussions.  The obvious violent hits on the QB and WRs are hard to ignore, but I think there are probably a lot of concussions sustained in the interior that go unreported.  Also, I don't even think they need to technically get a concussion to get the long term damage.  The repeated "little" hits they give and receive play after play all add up too.

True...


Note: This thread is 3853 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • The first post is here:   Do you have an overly long backswing that ruins sequencing and leads to poor shots? In nearly 20 years of teaching, I've found 5 common faults. You don't have to swing like Jon Rahm, but a shorter swing will probably help you #PlayBetter golf. Which is your fatal flaw? #1 - Trail Elbow Bend Average golfers ♥️ bending their trail elbows. It can feel powerful! Tour players bend their trail elbows MUCH less. A wider trail elbow creates a longer hand path and preserves structure. It also forces more chest turn; not everything longer is bad! Overly bending your trail elbow can wreak havoc on your swing. It pulls your arms across/beside your body. It requires more time to get the elbow bend "out," ruining your sequencing. The lead arm often bends and low point control is destroyed. The misconception is that it will create more speed, but that's often the opposite of what happens. Golfers often feel they swing "easier" but FASTER with wider trail elbows. Want to play better golf with a shorter backswing? Don't bend your elbow so much. #2 - Hip (Pelvis) Turn I see this all the time: a golfer's hips are only 5-10° open at impact, but he turns them back 60°+ in the backswing. Unless your father is The Flash, your hips are probably not getting 40° open at impact from there! That's more rotation than Rory! Golfers who over-rotate their pelvis often over-turn everything - trail thigh/knee, chest/shoulders, etc. They have more work to do in the same ~0.3 seconds as a Tour player who turns back ~40° and turns through to impact 40° or so. Want to shorten the pelvis turn a bit? Learn to internally rotate into the trail hip, externally rotate away from the lead hip, and do "less" with your knees (extending and flexing) in the backswing. Learn some separation between chest and pelvis. #3 - Rolled Inside and Lifted Up Amateurs love to send the club (and their arms) around them. You see the red golfer here all the time at your local range. The problem? Your arms mostly take the club UP, not around. Going around creates no height until you have to hoist the club up in the air because you're halfway through your backswing and the club is waist high and three feet behind your butt! 😄  Learn to use your arms properly. Arms = up/down, body = around. Most golfers learn how little their arms really have to do in the backswing. The picture here is all you've gotta do (but maybe with a properly sized club!). #4 - Wide Takeaway Width is good, no? Yes, if you're wide at the right time and in the right spots. Golfers seeking width often don't hinge the club much early in the backswing… forcing them to hinge it late. Hinging the club late puts a lot of momentum into the club, wrists, and elbow just before we need to make a hairpin turn in transition and go the other direction at the start of the downswing. When you're driving into a hairpin curve, you go into it slowly and accelerate out of it. Waiting to hinge is like coasting down the straightaway and accelerating into the hairpin. Your car ends up off the road, and your golf ball off the course. Give hinging at a faster rate (earlier) then coasting to the top a try. You'll be able to accelerate out of the hairpin without the momentum of the arms and club pulling in the wrong direction.   #5 - Sway and Tilt Some sway is good but sometimes I see a golfer who just… keeps… swaying… Their chest leans forward a bit for balance, resulting in a whole lotta lean. The green line below is the GEARS "virtual spine." Pros sway a bit, but stay ~90°. This sway often combines with the extra pelvis turn because this golfer is not putting ANY limits on what the "middle of them" (their pelvis) is doing in the backswing. These golfers spend a lot of energy just to get back to neutral! The best players begin pushing forward EARLY in the backswing. Often before the club gets much past their trail foot! Pushing forward (softly) first stops your backward sway and then begins to get your body moving toward the target. Push softly, but early!  
    • I  no longer spend the time and effort trying to sell something I no longer need. Instead, if the clubs are in good condition, I go to my local golf shop or even Dicks Sporting Goods. Trade the clubs in for store credit and pick up something I need, like a hat. Cause you always need another golf hat!
    • Day 205 3-10 Wider backswing, reconnecting arm in downswing/arching wrist through. Also worked on less pause at the top. Recorded and hit a few foam balls. 
    • I really enjoyed this episode with Nick from Callaway. I didn't know the problem with swing weight and female golfers, but it makes sense. I actually think swing weight might not matter that much. If everyone senses the club differently, then wouldn't it mean that people might feel swing weights differently? Swing weight is a way to classify how heavy a club feels during the swing. Yet for a 70-year-old golfer, a D0 might feel like a D4 for a 25-year-old golfer? I think stronger people would consider higher swing weights lighter. Maybe a C8 equals a D2 in terms of feel?   
    • Wordle 1,725 3/6 ⬜🟨⬜🟨⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.