Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4432 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello,

I am a farrrrr way off of this milestone, but hey any tips would only help bring down my score a few strokes. Even more. But what are some tips on shooting scratch golf? And what truly sets normal scratch amateurs apart from pros? I know its the mental part, but what exactly?
Thanks so much and may god bless you all! ^_^

In My Bag..

 

Driver: Taylormade Superfast 9.5* Stiff Shaft
3 Wood: Taylormade Burner 2009 15* Stiff GraphiteShaft
5 Wood: Powerbilt Oversized 21* Stiff Steel Shaft
3-PW Irons: Cleveland 588 Forged MB Irons with Stiff Shaft
SW: Titleist Vokey Spin Milled 2009 56* wedge with 14* of bounce, Stiff Steel Shaft

LW: N/A yet
Putter: Taylormade Monte Carlo 7 -34" with Superstroke 3.0 Slim grip
Ball: Titleist NXT Tour


Posted

being pretty close to scratch I can only tell you what I do, I play or practice 5 days a week. I spend atleast 3-4 hours a week practicing my short game which is without a doubt the most important part of the game. When you're on the range dont just aim at target, practice hitting a draw, a fade, a knockdown to it. Learn how to hit every shot that you can add to your arsenal. Read golf publications, golf digest is a wealth of good information and insight from pro's playing below the scratch level. Find a good teaching pro, most good teaching pros are difficult to schedule with but are worth it. Be prepared to put $100+ into golf every week to get to scratch. Hope this helps.

  • Upvote 1

Posted

Have some talent and do everything well like driving, irons, putting, and chipping.  I hover around 0-1 depending on how much I play but, I only get out once week usually.

Driver: Titleist 915 D3
3 wood: 15 Callaway X Hot pro
Hybrids:  18 Callaway X Hot Pro
Irons: 4-GW Callaway Apex
project x 6.0
Wedges: 54 , 58 Callaway
Putter: 2 ball
Ball: Callaway Chrome

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by poser

Have some talent and do everything well like driving, irons, putting, and chipping.  I hover around 0-1 depending on how much I play but, I only get out once week usually.


that's the best advice you can give? Hit it good?


Posted
Originally Posted by voidofenigmas

When you're on the range dont just aim at target, practice hitting a draw, a fade, a knockdown to it. Learn how to hit every shot that you can add to your arsenal.

I disagree with this.  Once you are a scratch golfer or getting pretty close, by all means, learn how to hit all different kinds of shots to get even better.  But for now, it seems to me that you are better off perfecting one shot - whether it be draw or fade - that you can repeat consistently.

Originally Posted by voidofenigmas

Read golf publications, golf digest is a wealth of good information and insight from pro's playing below the scratch level.

I strongly disagree with this.  Sure, there is plenty of good info in those magazines, but there is just as much, if not more, bad info.  You throw it all into your head, and its going to confuse you, send you off in the wrong directions sometimes, and help you to make a mess of everything.

The other two things void mentioned, I do agree with ... take lessons from a good teacher and practice.  I have just started my own lessons as well hoping to get that handicap down.  (FYI, I'm using Evolvr and even though I've only been doing it for a couple of weeks, I really like the plan and philosophy so far)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Golfingdad

I disagree with this.  Once you are a scratch golfer or getting pretty close, by all means, learn how to hit all different kinds of shots to get even better.  But for now, it seems to me that you are better off perfecting one shot - whether it be draw or fade - that you can repeat consistently.

I strongly disagree with this.  Sure, there is plenty of good info in those magazines, but there is just as much, if not more, bad info.  You throw it all into your head, and its going to confuse you, send you off in the wrong directions sometimes, and help you to make a mess of everything.

The other two things void mentioned, I do agree with ... take lessons from a good teacher and practice.  I have just started my own lessons as well hoping to get that handicap down.  (FYI, I'm using Evolvr and even though I've only been doing it for a couple of weeks, I really like the plan and philosophy so far)


can not be right everytime, i'm purely speaking from my own perspective because being trained as a golf teacher and therefore can pick out bad information in golf digest. However disagreeing with my first statement I dont agree with, a good golf course, will call on you to hit a fade or a slice. If you know how to control your fade or slice, you can pick apart a golf course.


Posted
Originally Posted by voidofenigmas

can not be right everytime, i'm purely speaking from my own perspective because being trained as a golf teacher and therefore can pick out bad information in golf digest. However disagreeing with my first statement I dont agree with, a good golf course, will call on you to hit a fade or a slice. If you know how to control your fade or slice, you can pick apart a golf course.

You can pick out the bad information, but you are an expert ... I don't know that it is wise to recommend that to beginner/intermediates because the good info will get muddled by the bad info and you won't know which way is up.

And, I would hope you would disagree with me disagreeing with you, otherwise you'd be disagreeing with yourself. And no doubt that you are correct that you can pick apart a golf course if you can shape your shots at will.  What I am saying is that it seems like for a 15 handicap, that would be biting off more than he could chew at this time, and unnecessary.  Maybe when he gets down in the mid/low single digits, then he's shown he has a decent grasp on all aspects of the game and can control his ball... so now its time to up the ante and start working the ball in all directions??

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

spend most of your time working on your long game, if you hit more greens you don't need a short game. Short game is really simple, especially if you start learning were to leave your misses on holes, so you have simple chips. That motion is pretty simple to do once you learn it. Learn how to make less than 2 putts per hole over the whole round.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by voidofenigmas

that's the best advice you can give? Hit it good?


it's not rocket surgery....  What else you want me to tell him.  He is a 15 handicap and we have no idea what his game is like.  Yes do everything well and somethings better than others and you can be scratch....   Hell without seeing him swing or knowing his misses or how many greens he hits or how many putts he makes or how he chips or how he drives or how he blah blah blah... Thats about all I could come up with.

Sorry I never found a magical pill that helped me get there.  I did it in 2 years but, had a bad swing and chipped the ball very well. Had back surgery my 3rd year and now in my 5th year playing. I have a better swing now than I did in the past but, my short game lacks from practice so my good rounds are pretty boring.

Driver: Titleist 915 D3
3 wood: 15 Callaway X Hot pro
Hybrids:  18 Callaway X Hot Pro
Irons: 4-GW Callaway Apex
project x 6.0
Wedges: 54 , 58 Callaway
Putter: 2 ball
Ball: Callaway Chrome

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by saevel25

spend most of your time working on your long game, if you hit more greens you don't need a short game. Short game is really simple, especially if you start learning were to leave your misses on holes, so you have simple chips. That motion is pretty simple to do once you learn it. Learn how to make less than 2 putts per hole over the whole round.

http://thesandtrap.com/t/58816/65-25-10-practice-ratios-where-to-devote-your-practice-time


Posted
Originally Posted by Kapanda

http://thesandtrap.com/t/58816/65-25-10-practice-ratios-where-to-devote-your-practice-time

lol ya I wanted to post that myself


Posted

Technique, skill, confidence. Those are the factors in the golf equation. Of these, technique is the least important.  Technique is 'how you do it', skill is 'how well you do it', and confidence is 'your ability to use the skill and technique under any condition'. Consider chipping: many techniques offered by the pros and teachers but in fact it's not which technique but the skill and confidence which puts the ball close to the hole.  Two supreme examples: the goofy, agricultural swing of Lee Trevino, home  grown and  ridiculed by the 'peanut gallery'. Effective? Very certainly because Lee had marvelous skill and confidence.  Also, today we see Tiger Woods using his new technique as taught by Sean Foley. Is this technique better than before? Unknown, but Tiger's skill and confidence with this new technique does look good.  So for you, find a useful technique and hone that skill and gain the confidence. The golf books and digest offer lots of techniques which will tend to confuse the golfer who lacks confidence.


Posted
Originally Posted by joekelly

Technique, skill, confidence. Those are the factors in the golf equation. Of these, technique is the least important.  Technique is 'how you do it', skill is 'how well you do it', and confidence is 'your ability to use the skill and technique under any condition'. Consider chipping: many techniques offered by the pros and teachers but in fact it's not which technique but the skill and confidence which puts the ball close to the hole.  Two supreme examples: the goofy, agricultural swing of Lee Trevino, home  grown and  ridiculed by the 'peanut gallery'. Effective? Very certainly because Lee had marvelous skill and confidence.  Also, today we see Tiger Woods using his new technique as taught by Sean Foley. Is this technique better than before? Unknown, but Tiger's skill and confidence with this new technique does look good.  So for you, find a useful technique and hone that skill and gain the confidence. The golf books and digest offer lots of techniques which will tend to confuse the golfer who lacks confidence.

best post i've seen, awesome sir.


Posted

I practiced almost never and took my golf game with as little seriousness as possible with fun being the number one priority... And here I am.

Point is, everyone reaches their goals differently.


Posted
Originally Posted by saevel25

spend most of your time working on your long game, if you hit more greens you don't need a short game. Short game is really simple, especially if you start learning were to leave your misses on holes, so you have simple chips. That motion is pretty simple to do once you learn it. Learn how to make less than 2 putts per hole over the whole round.

Are you being serious? OP: This is someone who is either kidding or plain wrong. A PGA professional typically misses 6 greens in a round. Sometimes more sometimes less. That means there are typically 6 times they need to get up an down. If they don't have a good short game they won't play well. Look at Zach Johnson a couple weeks ago. He wasn't hitting the ball well on Saturday (I believe) but he still shot a decent round and was able to win because he has such a good short game. Plus if you develop a good short game you don't need to hit the green to make par. All you need to do is get it somewhere close and get up and down.

 913 D2 8.5* with V2 66g stiff shaft

 910F 14.25 with Diamana stiff shaft

 i20 17, 20, and 23 hybrid 

 AP2 712 5-PW with Dynamic Gold S300 shaft

 54 and 60

 D66

 Tournament Edition 1600

 

 


Posted

What you need to do is find your weakness and practice that to get down lower and to scratch. Beginners can easily shave strokes off their game by practicing their short game because it's easiest for them to learn (less 3 putts, no flubbed chips, etc), but I think the majority of the time, the long game is what gets a player to scratch.

I am currently at a 3, and to get down to scratch, I feel I really need to work on my long game (140-200 yards) to hit 1 or 2 more greens per round, and for all my approach shots to be more accurate and give me a better chance at birdie.

No shot shaping, no fancy trick shots. You can get to scratch by simply hitting fairways and greens consistently and accurately.


Posted
Originally Posted by saevel25

spend most of your time working on your long game, if you hit more greens you don't need a short game. Short game is really simple, especially if you start learning were to leave your misses on holes, so you have simple chips. That motion is pretty simple to do once you learn it. Learn how to make less than 2 putts per hole over the whole round.

I assume this is a joke


Posted

What do you need to do to be a scratch golfer???

Um, practice a lot and have some talent.  Lessons from a qualified teaching professional wouldn't hurt either.  Get your swing on tape and have it taped regularly so you can see your progress.  When you are hitting it poorly go back to the tapes of when you were hitting it well and see what you were doing differently.

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane 9.5*
3W:  Callaway GBB II 12.5*, 5W:  Callaway Diablo 18* Neutral
3H:  Callaway Razr X, 4H:  Callaway Razr X
5-PW:  Callaway X Tour
GW:  Callaway X Tour 54*, SW:  Callaway X Tour 58*
Putter:  Callaway ITrax, Scotty Cameron Studio Design 2, Ping Anser 4


Note: This thread is 4432 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.