Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Should Pros Play by a Different Set of Rules?


Note: This thread is 4909 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Should Professional Golf Have Its Own Rules/Ruling body(s) That Are Different Than Amateurs?

    • Yes. It's really a different game than we play and should be recognized as such.
      12
    • No. I think pros and amateurs should play by the same rules.
      33


Recommended Posts

Posted
Watching The Golf Channel, the commentators brought up having a set of rules for the pros and a separate set for amateurs (they were discussing the long putter). Things that might be affected: - Long putters...any club, really - The ball - Number of clubs ...and the list goes on. I've always thought one of the beauties of golf is playing the same rules and, relatively, the same equipment as the pros. What do you think?

In The Bag: - Patience - Persistence - Perseverance - Platitudes


Posted

No way, one set of rules for everyone. Thats the way it should be.

If you are not competing, you can keep your square grooves and long putters, but if you want to play a tour, amateur or pro, then you need to be held to the same standards as the rest of the tours.

In the Ogio Kingpin bag:

Titleist 913 D2 9.5* w/ UST Mamiya ATTAS 3 80 w/ Harrison Shotmaker & Billy Bobs afternarket Hosel Adaptor (get this if you don't have it for your 913)
Wilson Staff Ci-11 4-GW (4I is out of the bag for a hybrid, PW and up were replaced by Edel Wedges)
TaylorMade RBZ 5 & 3 Fairway Woods

Cobra Baffler T-Rail 3 & 4 Hybrids

Edel Forged 48, 52, 56, 60, and 64* wedges (different wedges for different courses)

Seemore Si-4 Black Nickel Putter


Posted
I'm all for keeping the rules the same. Having the pros play different rules kind of defeats the purpose, as the entire point of the professional level is to exemplify the best and most awesome players of the game. The game itself should be the same for all of us, otherwise we're out there playing one game, the pros are out there playing a different one.

"Golf is an entire game built around making something that is naturally easy - putting a ball into a hole - as difficult as possible." - Scott Adams

Mid-priced ball reviews: Top Flight Gamer v2 | Bridgestone e5 ('10) | Titleist NXT Tour ('10) | Taylormade Burner TP LDP | Taylormade TP Black | Taylormade Burner Tour | Srixon Q-Star ('12)


Posted
Absolutely not. There may be some individual conditions of competition that vary, but the game should be played by a single set of rules.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Nah I think the one set of rules is not needed. Long putters, those should be removed across the board. I guess thats a different topic though.

:whistle:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

No, there is only one game...

One man one goal one mission,
One heart one soul just one solution,
One flash of light yeah one god one vision.

One flesh one bone,
one true religion,
One voice one hope,
Wowowowo gimme one vision.

dak4n6


Posted

One set of rules? No. But a slight variation of the rules for the professional level is custom for every sport. I'm not going to get into detail about it, but if you think about it you will understand.

  • Upvote 1

2013 Goal:

 

Single digit handicap


Posted
Originally Posted by Mattplusness

One set of rules? No. But a slight variation of the rules for the professional level is custom for every sport. I'm not going to get into detail about it, but if you think about it you will understand.


I'm thinking about it,  but I still don't understand.

I'm pretty sure the "Pro's" learned the game playing under the same rules as everyone else,  so why shouldn't they play by those same rules now?


Posted

Don't most sports leagues use one ball for everyone? I'd start there.

Often it's the same guys who say things like "the professionals play an entirely different game than we do" and "the great thing about golf is we all play the same game - from amateurs on a muni to the guys on the PGA Tour". Sure you do.

  • Upvote 1

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
Originally Posted by sean_miller

Don't most sports leagues use one ball for everyone? I'd start there.

Often it's the same guys who say things like "the professionals play an entirely different game than we do" and "the great thing about golf is we all play the same game - from amateurs on a muni to the guys on the PGA Tour". Sure you do.

Sean and I (and many others) have seen these types of threads before. I can tell you that if anyone thinks we play the same game as the pros do, then you should go out and play a round with an average or even aspiring tour pro. You will soon understand the wisdom in the statement above.

Go ahead, sick the SandTrap flamers on me now.

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted
Originally Posted by Mattplusness

One set of rules? No. But a slight variation of the rules for the professional level is custom for every sport. I'm not going to get into detail about it, but if you think about it you will understand.

I understand.

Hockey - check

Basketball - check

Football - check

Baseball - check

Golf - check

That's enough.

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted
Originally Posted by TourSpoon

Sean and I (and many others) have seen these types of threads before. I can tell you that if anyone thinks we play the same game as the pros do, then you should go out and play a round with an average or even aspiring tour pro. You will soon understand the wisdom in the statement above.

Go ahead, sick the SandTrap flamers on me now.

Wait, I thought this thread was about rules, not the level of play. When I play, esp in competition, I play by the same rules that the pros do. I have conforming equipment, I take drops properly (I had to use two provisional drives yesterday ), I count my penalty strokes, etc., etc.

dak4n6


Posted
Originally Posted by Mattplusness

One set of rules? No. But a slight variation of the rules for the professional level is custom for every sport. I'm not going to get into detail about it, but if you think about it you will understand.

Originally Posted by Fore Left

I'm thinking about it,  but I still don't understand.

I'm pretty sure the "Pro's" learned the game playing under the same rules as everyone else,  so why shouldn't they play by those same rules now?

It's very easy to understand.  The easiest comparison is probably baseball and metal vs. wooden bats.  Pros would just hit the ball too damn hard and too damn far to use metal bats so they have to scale back.  The other sports all get a little "harder" as you progress ... In football the goalposts get narrower at each level, in basketball the 3-point line moves back.  (Not sure about college hockey rules vs. pros but I'm sure there are variations)

But the thing is, golf kind of already has all of those things.  The pros all play from tees way further back than most of us amateurs.  The courses are the hardest in the world, and on top of that they are set up much differently when they come to town than when we are there.

So, esentially, they already do play by a different set of rules than the rest of us.  I don't see a need to change anything else.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Fore Left

I'm thinking about it,  but I still don't understand.

I'm pretty sure the "Pro's" learned the game playing under the same rules as everyone else,  so why shouldn't they play by those same rules now?

Basketball in grade school and high school don't have a shot clock. You also cannot press during certain points of the game at a young age. There is also no defensive 3 seconds in anything but the NBA.

Keep thinking, and more instances will come.

Originally Posted by sean_miller

Don't most sports leagues use one ball for everyone? I'd start there.

Often it's the same guys who say things like "the professionals play an entirely different game than we do" and "the great thing about golf is we all play the same game - from amateurs on a muni to the guys on the PGA Tour". Sure you do.

Basketball doesn't. Kids start with a 28.5" ball, then in high school they get a bigger ball at 30" while women stay with a 28.5".

2013 Goal:

 

Single digit handicap


Posted
Originally Posted by Mattplusness

Basketball doesn't. Kids start with a 28.5" ball, then in high school they get a bigger ball at 30" while women stay with a 28.5".

I think Sean might have meant something altogether different.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Golfingdad

It's very easy to understand.  The easiest comparison is probably baseball and metal vs. wooden bats.  Pros would just hit the ball too damn hard and too damn far to use metal bats so they have to scale back.  The other sports all get a little "harder" as you progress ... In football the goalposts get narrower at each level, in basketball the 3-point line moves back.  (Not sure about college hockey rules vs. pros but I'm sure there are variations)

But the thing is, golf kind of already has all of those things.  The pros all play from tees way further back than most of us amateurs.  The courses are the hardest in the world, and on top of that they are set up much differently when they come to town than when we are there.

So, esentially, they already do play by a different set of rules than the rest of us.  I don't see a need to change anything else.

Good point.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Football uses different balls at every level, but within each level the balls are uniform.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4909 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.