Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4687 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am a huge fan of the ProV1 ball.  But after reading all of the marketing/specs on the ProV1x it seems as though that is the superior ball.

Since Titleist is having a "buy 3 personalized boxes of prov1(x) get 1 box free" special I have been researching what benefits each provide extensively.  The amount of information on this site and other golf sites is remarkable, however a good amount of it is conflicting.

From what I gathered, it seemed as though ProV1 was the ball for someone who wants more spin and a softer feel.  The ProV1x was for the player who wants slightly less spin and possibly more distance.

The confusion came into play when I started researching the different shots for each ball.

  • Numerous people said that the ProV1x was longer than the ProV1.
  • Some people said that the ProV1x has greater short game spin with lower long game spin.  Meaning, that inside of a 7 iron, the ball will spin more, especially on half wedge shots with the ProV1x.

Are these true statements?

If so, they lead me to the question, if the ProV1x goes further, has less spin on shots where the typical golfer wants less spin (driver, 3w) and more spin where the typical golfer would want more spin (half wedge shots/irons), then why would anyone choose the V1 over the V1x?

I have played my best rounds with the ProV1, but it seems as though the "science" and marketing are pointing to the ProV1x being the better ball.

North Hills Country Club

 

      Anser Driver (9.5*)

      Anser 3W/5W (14*/18.5*)

      i20 Irons (4-PW)

  MP-T4 GW (50*)

  MP-T11 SW/LW (58*/64*)

        SS Newport 2.6 Putter

      ProV1x

 

"Lesson here 'Bey, you come at the king, you best not miss" - Omar Little


  • Administrator
Posted

They're almost identical outside of about 50 yards. The Pro V1 spins more on shorter shots.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

It depends on your game. What is your driver swing speed (or average non-internet drive), do you balloon the ball into the wind, do you hit it relatively straight or is side spin a factor, do you have problems holding the greens with your short irons, is feel important to you, etc. A little information could go a long way.

There is also the Titleist fitting tool...

http://www.titleist.com/golf-ball-fitting/app/

I play the V1 X because I need a little more forgiveness off the tee and can swing with enough speed to justify it. It also does not spin off the green or balloon into the wind. Around the greens I prefer the V1 because of the feel factor, especially off the putter. The guys that I play with are a mixed bunch playing both with the X just winning out. In the end, if you play better with the V1 then that is your ball.

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted

I also find the Pro V1x a little more firm/clicky with the putter.  I prefer the Pro V1, and heaven knows I could use any extra distance I might get off the tee by playing the x.

I'd really recommend trying a sleeve before committing....

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I always thought the V1x was a little more difficult for lower speed players to compress off the tee, therefore the V1 was the better overall choice for lower speed players since they produced lower spin with the lower swing speed (but did a higher loft driver increase spin? - only the launch monitor knows).

The V1x was a little firmer to compress and as a result, higher speed players produced lower spin off the tee with it.

At least, that is what I was led to believe all these long, long years...

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by David in FL

I also find the Pro V1x a little more firm/clicky with the putter.  I prefer the Pro V1, and heaven knows I could use any extra distance I might get off the tee by playing the x.

I agree with this.  For me, the Pro V1 is definitely softer and I like it much better in the short game area, but I think the X is a little longer (again, that's for me and my swing speed).  If I'm playing a Titleist ball, which I do very often, it's the Pro V1x.

WHAT'S IN MY BAG

Driver: TaylorMade RBZ 9.5 degree; 3-Wood: TaylorMade RBZ 15 degree; Hybrids: TaylorMade RBZ 19 degree; Irons: Titleist AP1; Wedges: Titleist Vokey Spin Milled 54/60; Putter: Scotty Cameron Studio Select Fastback; Ball: Callaway Hex Chrome+  Grips:  PURE Pro


Posted

You tricked me with your title!  ;)  It's not 3 for 1, its 4 for 3.

I always played one or the other (for no reason other than they were Titleist and that's what the cool people play) until I recently started branching out and experimenting.  I could never really tell the difference between the two.

FWIW, I currently playing Penta TP3, which I like but definitely have a lot less spin than either Titleist ball.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

I always thought the V1x was a little more difficult for lower speed players to compress off the tee, therefore the V1 was the better overall choice for lower speed players since they produced lower spin with the lower swing speed (but did a higher loft driver increase spin? - only the launch monitor knows).

The V1x was a little firmer to compress and as a result, higher speed players produced lower spin off the tee with it.

At least, that is what I was led to believe all these long, long years...

Same here. A rep told me the X works best with 100+ ss generally speaking, as there are always exceptions. I feel that at a shade over 100 I can compress it. If it is below 60 degrees out I will favor the V1. Now the Nike 20XI X is a different story.

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted

how come i cant find this deal online?  can someone link it please?  thank you*


  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

I always thought the V1x was a little more difficult for lower speed players to compress off the tee, therefore the V1 was the better overall choice for lower speed players since they produced lower spin with the lower swing speed (but did a higher loft driver increase spin? - only the launch monitor knows).

The V1x was a little firmer to compress and as a result, higher speed players produced lower spin off the tee with it.

At least, that is what I was led to believe all these long, long years...

Originally Posted by TourSpoon

Same here. A rep told me the X works best with 100+ ss generally speaking, as there are always exceptions. I feel that at a shade over 100 I can compress it. If it is below 60 degrees out I will favor the V1. Now the Nike 20XI X is a different story.

Here's the simple truth as it applies to virtually all golf balls ever made, ever, period.

A firmer golf ball will ALWAYS have a higher ball speed.

It will tend to launch a teeny tiny bit lower, and will tend to spin a little more (which may result in higher peak height despite the teeny tiny bit lower launch).

So a Pro V1x will always launch at a faster ball speed for the given impact conditions than a Pro V1.

It's simply a question of does the slightly added spin from a softer ball let the ball have a little more lift and thus carry a little farther?

That's how virtually all of these balls work - like the B330 line. Their "slower swing speed" balls spin more and thus carry a bit farther, but they will have a slower ball speed if they're a lower compression ball.

P.S. Balls don't "compress" much at all. They deform.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
how come i cant find this deal online?  can someone link it please?  thank you*

I had to order them through my club. Maybe a site like tgw or golfsmith can do it, but likely a local golf club can do it as well.

Michael

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I bought them last year when they had the same deal around spring. Was hoping they do that every spring.

Posted

looks like they just released it to the public today.  Got 10 emails in my junk folder from every golf site. :)


Posted

tgw.com has the deal right now. I think it comes out to like 3 dollars a ball and you get to customize it as well by putting a name on it.

Driver: :tmade: R11S (9 degree)
Woods: :tmade: R11 3 (15.5 degree) & 5 (19 degree)
Irons: :tmade: R11 4-AW
Wedges: :tmade: ATV 54 & 60 degree
Putter: :scotty_cameron: 2012 Newport 2
Ball: :titleist: ProV1
Rangefinder: :bushnell: Tour V2

 

 


  • Moderator
Posted

I've used both last years models but ended up with the ProV1 because I could get longer approach shots to stop better (like 6-8 irons).  I didn't notice much difference off the tee.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4687 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.