Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Waving up group on tee on par 4s or 5s


Note: This thread is 4651 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted

If you have good tree coverage to protect you from drives, do you think it's reasonable to let the group behind you hit their drives off the tee if the course is very backed up? I was just thinking about it - we do it for par 3s, why not other holes? It may not speed up play that much but might make it seem less slow.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
If your purpose is to let them play through, there's nothing wrong with that.....it can be especially quick on a par 5. I wouldn't do it just to let them hit up to you without playing through though. Nothing gained. You're just trading a wait in one place for another.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
waving up on par 3's was a plot... Probably started at private clubs under the guise of "speeding up play". It was really developed so your fellow club members could laugh at your abilities. Especially under the watchful eyes of your playing partners AND the folks on the green. It does NOTHING to speed up play- it should only be used if you are going to let them play through if there is nobody out in front of you.

Posted

If the group behind you is so close that by the time you get to your drives they're already on the box ready to go, I think the best bet is for your group to tee off and then wait on the tee to let them play through.

my get up and go musta got up and went..
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

i've been stuck in that position hundreds of times since the only time i can go out on the course is weekends. and David is definitely right its just replacing waiting spots


Posted

Agree with everyone else. Waving up, whether par 3, 4, or 5, can't possibly speed the pace of play. The duration of any given round is always going to be as long as it takes to get to the 18th green and putt out, and the only thing that depends on (assuming you're waiting on groups ahead of you, which is the case here), is the speed of the slowest group in front of you.

Bill


Posted
Originally Posted by nevets88

If you have good tree coverage to protect you from drives, do you think it's reasonable to let the group behind you hit their drives off the tee if the course is very backed up? I was just thinking about it - we do it for par 3s, why not other holes? It may not speed up play that much but might make it seem less slow.

Definitely not.  I even think that waving up on par 3's is illogical, but at least I understand the rationale behind it.  Your average golfers are pretty sucky, and so, by and large, nobody is hitting the green on long par 3s.  If you pause for a minute to let them hack their tee shots all over the place, then putt while they're searching for their balls, then hit your drives on the next hole while theyre waiting for the group behind them to hit tee shots, then get to and hit your second shots while theyre finishing up putting, then I get how it could, at least in theory, move things along.  (Of course, once you catch back up to the group in front of you then you are where you were going to be anyway, so nobody is actually playing faster.)

But if you are waiting in the fairway anyway, what's going to happen when they hit their drives up by you?  Nothing ... theyre just going to be waiting in the fairway next to you, and no time at all will be saved.  At least when you are waiting on a tee box you have benches and water fountains (sometimes) and you can play silly little chipping games to the tee markers with your friends and you are together.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by sacm3bill

Agree with everyone else. Waving up, whether par 3, 4, or 5, can't possibly speed the pace of play. The duration of any given round is always going to be as long as it takes to get to the 18th green and putt out, and the only thing that depends on (assuming you're waiting on groups ahead of you, which is the case here), is the speed of the slowest group in front of you.

I completely agree it does nothing to speed up play if the course is backed up.  If you are the slow group what does making you wait accomplish anyway.  If you are doing it the let the group behind you play through by all means go for it.

I think it also causes much more of a delay than just the time it takes for the players on the tee to hit their shots.  1: It takes time for everyone to mark their balls and move off the green.  2: It takes time to convey to the the group on the tee that you are waiving them up.  3: The group on the tee might not be ready to hit (I know on a par 3 that I don't have the club in my hand ready to hit until the group on the green is close to finished).  4: If I am the first to putt I usually have lined up and replaced my ball and gone though my thought process and I am ready to putt shortly after the last player in my group gets on the green.  If I wave someone up I have to go though the process all over again.  5: I don't like to have a ball or a ball mark close to my line when I putt, so if anyone that I waved up hits the green someone in my group has to fix a mark or mark someone's ball before playing.  I know these are short delays but they add up.

I also find it dangerous for no purpose.  I know that I sometimes can't see the ball and I have fine eyesight, sometimes you lose the ball if it is hit from 170 yards away, especially if you have a white sky or the sun is behind you.  What do you do if you hear fore?  Cover your head so if you do get hit hopefully you only have a painful bruise.

Another thing I find annoying about being waved up is sometimes it forces me to change my shot.  Sometimes people don't move far enough away to be safe.  An example would be when the pin is on the left with trouble around, some guy stands 1 pace off the right edge.  Where my usual shot would be center green or even right-center because if I miss I should end up with bogey at worst.  Instead I feel as if I have to go for the pin.

O.K. this has turned into a rant.  In case you can't tell I am not a fan of waving up.

R9 with 757 Speeder
mp 57 3-pw project x 6.0 flighted
Vokey* 56* 60*
Monza Corsa Putter


Posted

One of my courses used to do it on a long par 3 (200-220 yds) where players would hit from an elevated perch and have to walk down a meandering path - most of us were walkers on this course, so it took awhile to get to the green - so while the group ahead putted out, the group behind would be walking.  This was a hole where getting  GIR was somewhat difficult and required a lot of chipping/pitches as well as putting. Seemed to speed up play on this particular hole - but in general, don't think it's needed unless playing through.


Posted

I've never even considered waving somebody up unless I intend to let them play through.  If we're playing a foursome and a single or twosome overtakes us (and the course is open ahead of us), I'll always wave them up and let 'em through - but if we're holding our place on the course and it's backed up ahead of us, there's no sense in waving them up...it's just going to make the traffic jam worse.

In context with the OP - if we're on a par 4 or par 5 hole and intend to let a group play through, we'll hit to the green, mark our balls and then wave them up (just as you would on a par 3).

Mac

WITB:
Driver: Ping G30 (12*)
FW:  Ping K15 (3W, 5W)
Hybrids: Ping K15 (3H, 5H)
Irons: Ping K15 (6-UW)

Wedges: Cleveland 588 RTX CB (54*, 58*)

Putter: Ping Scottsdale w/ SS Slim 3.0

Ball: Bridgestone e6

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4651 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.