Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
anthony

Why would one want a lower ball flight?

35 posts in this topic

I read threads here and other places around the web that discuss wanting a shaft that produces a lower ball flight and I can't help but wonder why. With a driver or fairway wood, I could see how a lower boring flight would be more desirable. Also, if you're loosing distance due to a higher flight, I could understand that as well. Although, that would most likely be a swing issue though, no? Otherwise, wouldn't you want the highest flight you could get into a green?

I speaking about ideal conditions here, a lower flight is obviously desired when it's windy.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Well I would think the answer is primarily distance.  I think Hogan mentions how the best players turn a 5-iron into a 4-iron because they get lower trajectory, while bad players turn a 5-iron into a 7-iron.

Obviously higher flight is better for sticking greens but in that case a good player can simply go down to a wedge or any other lower club to get added loft.  However in many cases distance is what is desired so a more penetrating trajectory gives that.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you hit it too high, you want a lower ball flight. If you hit it too low, you want a higher ball flight. Coming in high is nice for holding greens, but going too high will hurt your distance. There are people struggling with hitting it too low and people struggling with hitting it too high. Shafts and clubheads are means you can use to manipulate the ball flight.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

That's a really good question. I've often heard the expression "low, penetrating shot" and wondered (other than the obvious) what that meant.

It seems as though when I hit a 5 iron cleanly - one where I can hardly tell I hit the ball - the flight is always high and the ball seems to continue to climb. I just don't get that feeling or distance from lower trajectory shots. So unless I'm trying to shoot under branches, I don't try to hit low. Keep in mind, I obviously have a great deal to learn about the game.

For me, the hybrid and fairway woods are different. Depending on where the club head makes contact, a clean shot from say my 5 wood off the turf can result in either a higher or lower trajectory, both of which feel good and travel about the same distance. The lower shot rolls more while the higher shot carries more. If there's a difference in distance, it isn't noticeable to me.

As far as the driver, the longest shot I've ever made was of relatively low trajectory but that shot was an anomaly.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Couple reasons why guys hit it too high.  Flipping it resulting in high weak shots or for whatever reason, spinning the ball too much.  Guys that spin the ball too much tend to have higher swing speeds, the initial launch might be ok but the ball keeps ballooning.  I don't think anyone should ever want to hit it low consistently, unless they live in Scotland or something.  Hitting it high, effectively, should be more preferable over hitting it low.

Originally Posted by anthony

With a driver or fairway wood, I could see how a lower boring flight would be more desirable.

Go to the range of a tour event, see how "boring" they hit their woods.  Most people would be surprised how high they hit it.  Easier to get distance through the air than on the ground.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by anthony

I read threads here and other places around the web that discuss wanting a shaft that produces a lower ball flight and I can't help but wonder why. With a driver or fairway wood, I could see how a lower boring flight would be more desirable. Also, if you're loosing distance due to a higher flight, I could understand that as well. Although, that would most likely be a swing issue though, no? Otherwise, wouldn't you want the highest flight you could get into a green?

I speaking about ideal conditions here, a lower flight is obviously desired when it's windy.


the first sentence...."threads here and other places around the web"........a lot of crap is said on the net, yes there is times when a lower ball flight is optimum, but its not the be all and end all.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's all about finding optimal. If your ballflight is so high that you're losing distance, you'll want to bring it down a bit.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm a perfect example of a golfer who, at times, prefers a low trajectory shot.

I'm not a heavy hitter. there are many occasions, e.g. second shots on par 5's or long par 4's, when I just want to advance the ball as much as possible on a relatively flat fairway. All that extra roll from a low shot can be quite beneficial, especially if it's rolling towards the green.

Also, wind hasn't been mentioned much (though one person made the Scotland reference). I've seen what wind can do to drives, and blow them off the fairway is most certainly one of the potential consequences. If I'm playing on a blustery day, I definitely tee up a little lower, and hope for the best...

Well, I guess I'm always hoping for the best :).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hitting too high or too low is mostly a technical problem. changing clubs and shafts is finding the wrong fix I beleive. might as well search technical progress.

also many beleive it's really cool to say they hit it so hard they need a lower ball flight

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems to me there's less room for error ... a low to medium ball flight would have to be more accurate than a high ball flight.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a Nickent Evolver driver with a Grafalloy ProLaunch Red shaft that hits it lower and a UST ProforceV2HL shaft for when I want to hit it high and get more carry.  If I'm playing on a windy day or on an dry course where I think that roll is more important than carry the Pro Launch is great.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After hitting a lot of thin shots today, I have to re-think my opinion that lower-trajectory iron shots don't have the same distance as my normal higher-trajectory ones. I hit a few that carried over the green when I was at the distance where a well-struck high shot wouldn't have.

For many of the reasons listed in the above posts, I still prefer the predicability of my normal high shot even if it isn't the maximum distance that I'm capable of hitting.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If your hitting a low shot and the ball is not staying on the green due to lack of backspin, then you probably need a higher ball flight. If you hit a more boring, low trajectory and the ball holds the green with spin, than no need to change. Depends on the low shot for me. I've had a towering high 7 iron land soft and not back up, and have a low boring 7 iron back up 5-10 feet on the green. The spin difference was absurd. This is because i flip at the ball and when i don't and actually swing good, the ball comes off much lower, and with a lot more spin.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by JonMA1

After hitting a lot of thin shots today, I have to re-think my opinion that lower-trajectory iron shots don't have the same distance as my normal higher-trajectory ones. I hit a few that carried over the green when I was at the distance where a well-struck high shot wouldn't have.

Not sure if you're joking, but the lower trajectory shots this thread is talking about are more of the solid strike, lower ball flight shots.  A thinned shot is a miss hit.  At least that's what I've been assuming lol

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by mvmac

Not sure if you're joking, but the lower trajectory shots this thread is talking about are more of the solid strike, lower ball flight shots.  A thinned shot is a miss hit.  At least that's what I've been assuming lol

Thin- ier. POW.

TMAG should come out with a modified tour striker that only hits worm burners for the extra-ier yardage!

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by mvmac

Not sure if you're joking, but the lower trajectory shots this thread is talking about are more of the solid strike, lower ball flight shots.  A thinned shot is a miss hit.  At least that's what I've been assuming lol

Sorry about my mis-use of terminology. I meant when I don't hit what I consider my normal high-flight shot. Whether it's thin, or I haven't hit it at the correct angle of attack, or it's too far back in my stance, whatever is the cause or term. The low shots I hit today had plenty of power, they just resulted in a longer, less predictable distance.

As far as putting backspin on the ball, that's a bit advanced for me at this stage of my game (but it's cool to watch the good players do that). I'm just happy to have my iron shots land softly on the green without rolling through and at a distance that is predictable. That's why I prefer the high shots. I guess that was my point. The only time I try to purposely hit a low shot is to keep it under branches.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

mini has (had?  it's been a while) a wicked flip and wants a lower ball flight.  Less spin would be nice, too.  Or maybe the same spin with the lower ball flight.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As others have said, optimizing distance is key and this is the only time you would really have a legitimate cause for concern in ball flight.

I prefer my high, soft-landing shots. I  generate a lot of backspin and 90% of the greens that I hit are a result of my ball coming to rest with the ball coming to rest several inches to two feet behind the ball mark (backspin). The other 10% would be in the event I catch it a little thin or a pitch or punch is required where my ball will still land softly and roll out only several inches.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • He started off playing the first hole exactly how he should: fairway, 20-footer for birdie to the fat side of the green, tap-in par.
    • @iacas-Tho it is nice to be able to take your time and type out what you mean to say this is one of the downsides to a forum too-You have to respond to a whole bunch of crap and a person can get all of their thoughts out uninterrupted. If you were been sitting in a room with @natureboy and he started drawing that entirely stupid picture with the lines you could have cut him off and spared all of us the pain of having to watch him so badly miss the point. I bet @natureboy is still going to look at the response-And I bet he is still not going to see where he went wrong. But that is because he is just that way and he is unable to see how stupid his own posts are and how little they actually deal with golf swings. His stick drawing is exactly why you asked for a video-Even though he posted it after you asked. His errors and flaws and stupid thoughts would have been even more evident if he had actually tried to make a vid.
    • Or… golf is hard, and he got hot for awhile. Wouldn't be the first flash in the pan. We'll have to wait to see what the true version is. He could be quiet for ten years and then win a few majors.
    • That makes a great third bullet point. Or a first bullet point, bumping my two down.
    • This photo and the text above illustrate pretty well exactly why I and the entire moderation team is now done with you. The image fails on two levels: The center image is not representative of an actual good golf swing. The right hip is closer to the right foot in the center image, yet you maintain that it's farther away. Whether the second thing is done intentionally or accidentally I don't know. I don't care to know. But it's very representative of how you argue, and why you're now going to be prevented from arguing. You pervert arguments to the point where we're no longer discussing the golf swing. You get basic facts or concepts wrong (like when arguing about course rating, misunderstanding the radius vs. diameter in faulting the rating process for higher handicappers). You focus on some small thing - which often isn't even something anyone else has said - and lose sight of the forest or the big picture. You're not here to help golfers. You're here to "win" an argument, a goal that as yet is unmet, and you have to post absolute crap like the above to try to do it. I had a bit of free time this morning. So I responded to your last post in some detail. It, as one would expect, contains a number of typical @natureboy traits: cherry picking a photo while ignoring the concept, failure to understand basic points, perversion of the statements of others, putting words in the mouths of others, use of vague words like "a lot" (often in combination with the "putting words in the mouths of others), and hyper-focus on some small largely negligible point. Nobody else should waste their time to read the below, or open the spoiler and read that. It will not shed light on anything, it will not help you with your golf swing, and you will not glean any useful information. It exists simply as my last effort at illustrating to @natureboy a small part of the reason why we're tired of him… even though as I post it I know with certainty it too will fail. I gave you twenty warning points last night. It was made clear to you what you had to do, and you failed to do so, flaunting the requirement in several posts. The entire moderation team - @mvmac, @RandallT, @boogielicious, @jamo, @billchao, @nevets88, @mchepp, others - and myself have simply gotten sick and tired of your entire persona here. You're constantly and never-endingly arguing stuff to the point where you bastardize things so much you're no longer even talking about the golf swing, and you fail to comprehend or respond to what's written to you in response. You have two real choices once your current suspension is over: You can ignore these warnings, continue to be a belligerent arguer, and receive a final 50-point warning that will result in your permanent ban. You can avoid behaving in the manner that infuriates the entire moderation team. That will likely mean limiting the topics in which you post quite a bit, because though you fancy yourself to be capable of discussing the golf swing from a theoretical perspective, you've proven that you are not. Now, I want to be very clear about something. You're not being warned or "handled" because you disagree. You're being handled here because you contribute nothing positive. You're belligerent. You don't help people. You don't demonstrate anything. You pervert and distort topics in order to make a point that often has little or nothing to do with how people actually play golf. You're on a mission to "win" an argument, not to further the understanding. You speak as if you know and fail to ask questions, despite the holes in your logic and posts being constantly exposed as gaping. You quite often fail to read what's written, take a beat, and try to understand it. P.S. This requirement is anything but arbitrary. The list of reasons are long, the surface of which was only scratched in this post. Arbitrary would have been to say something like "to continue posting here you must dress up in a purple outfit and post a photo of yourself diving from a diving board into a pool of jello." Asking you to post a video illustrating your point is the opposite of arbitrary.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Catcher20
      Catcher20
      (27 years old)
    2. JD15
      JD15
      (52 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon