Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4582 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know as a golfer we all like to see how low of a handicap we can achieve. I know golfers that tend to mistake there adjusted handicap scores as there real scores for a round. As an example I play with a good golfer who is around a 10 handicap and he always tells me he likes when his handicap goes below 10 because then he only has to take a double bogey. When he gets to the double bogey situation he picks the ball up.

In a case of vanity handicaps run amuck we have a guy who plays his round and only writes down the holes he gets a par or better. Then he fills the blank holes with scores he feels he should have made. Meaning his logic is "I never 3 putt so that doesn't count or I never chili dip a shot so that doesn't count, etc..... The long story short he has managed a 5 handicap. Now here is where the story gets real comical. Every year he plays the club championship where the score cards are exchanged with other golfers. He has averaged between a 95 and 105 for every round. He is the laughing stock of the club. We call him the Blizzard of 78 because he usually never writes down more than a 78 on the handicap computer.


Posted

There's usually not a good payoff for reverse sandbagging. Ha ha!


Posted

These guys I refer to hate to play for money needless to say.  I guess it could be worse they could be sand baggers.


Posted

Oh interesting indeed. I hate the sandbaggers at work golf events and tournaments.

Now somebody just brags about his 5 handicap, that is really a 20 is just funny. I bet he smiles every time too. Let the poor bastard think he's good, it doesn't really hurt anybody except his ego.

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha 10.5* 

3WD:  Callaway Big Bertha 15* / X2 Hot H4 Hybrid
Irons:  Callaway Apex 4-PW Project X 5.5 shafts

Wedges: Callaway MackDaddy 2  52/58
Putter: Odyessey Metal X Milled 1


Posted
Originally Posted by club ho

In a case of vanity handicaps run amuck we have a guy who plays his round and only writes down the holes he gets a par or better. Then he fills the blank holes with scores he feels he should have made. Meaning his logic is "I never 3 putt so that doesn't count or I never chili dip a shot so that doesn't count, etc..... The long story short he has managed a 5 handicap. Now here is where the story gets real comical. Every year he plays the club championship where the score cards are exchanged with other golfers. He has averaged between a 95 and 105 for every round. He is the laughing stock of the club. We call him the Blizzard of 78 because he usually never writes down more than a 78 on the handicap computer.

Originally Posted by Motley01

Now somebody just brags about his 5 handicap, that is really a 20 is just funny. I bet he smiles every time too. Let the poor bastard think he's good, it doesn't really hurt anybody except his ego.

LOL, this is crazy.  I thought my dad and his 22 vanity cap - that I estimate should be about 28 or 29 - was bad.  Holy moly!

I did play with a guy last year that claimed to be a 7, but had a swing that was a lot more indicative of a 16 at least.  On one hole, I hopped into the driver seat and so I asked him what he got there and he said something like "well, without those 2 (tee balls astray) I got a 4" with the clear inference that he would like me to write a down a 4.  Okie dokie.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I never understood why people claim lower handicaps than they really are.  I rarely play for money - and when I do, it's for very small amounts straight-up (ie - no handicaps) - but there's a guy at work whose been telling me he is around a 10 handicap . . "Used to be a 4 but haven't played much recently . .yada yada".   Well, we played golf the other week and I could tell by his very first tee shot that he was closer to a 20 than a 10.

Sure enough - he ends up shooting a 90-something . .complaining after every shot about being rusty . . looking confused after bad shots, etc.  10 handicap.  Sure, man . .sure.


Posted
I never understood why people claim lower handicaps than they really are.  I rarely play for money - and when I do, it's for very small amounts straight-up (ie - no handicaps) - but there's a guy at work whose been telling me he is around a 10 handicap . . "Used to be a 4 but haven't played much recently . .yada yada".   Well, we played golf the other week and I could tell by his very first tee shot that he was closer to a 20 than a 10.  Sure enough - he ends up shooting a 90-something . .complaining after every shot about being rusty . . looking confused after bad shots, etc.  10 handicap.  Sure, man . .sure.

There is nothing terribly out of the ordinary about a 10 cap not breaking 90. Heck, I'm under 8 now (legitimately) and have shot over 90 2 or 3 times in the last year or so.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Golfingdad

There is nothing terribly out of the ordinary about a 10 cap not breaking 90. Heck, I'm under 8 now (legitimately) and have shot over 90 2 or 3 times in the last year or so.



I agree. There was a whole week, last month, that I couldn't get the ball in the air (mental block) that resulted in a couple of 100+ rounds that I hacked through and I have been shooting in the 80's consistently for the past 5 years.

- Brice

In my bag:

Driver: :callaway:Big Bertha Alpha (9.5d)

3 Wood: :callaway: X Hot (15d)

Irons: :ping:I-20 (4-PW)

Wedges: :callaway: Forged (50 & 54)

Putter: :ping: Cadence TR Anser 2 Counterbalance


Posted
Originally Posted by Golfingdad

There is nothing terribly out of the ordinary about a 10 cap not breaking 90. Heck, I'm under 8 now (legitimately) and have shot over 90 2 or 3 times in the last year or so.

I remember when I was an 8...........

I probably had a couple rounds in the 90s in my most recent 20 scores at all times.

What's in Paul's Bag:
- Callaway Big Bertha Alpha Driver
- Big Bertha Alpha 815 3-wood
- Callaway Razr Fit 5-wood
- Callaway Big Bertha 4-5 Rescue Clubs
-- Mizuno Mx-25 six iron-gap wedge
- Mizuno Mp-T4 56degree SW
- Mizuno Mp-T11 60degree SW
- Putter- Ping Cadence Ketsch


Posted
Originally Posted by Golfingdad

There is nothing terribly out of the ordinary about a 10 cap not breaking 90. Heck, I'm under 8 now (legitimately) and have shot over 90 2 or 3 times in the last year or so.

That's true - but if you play enough golf with enough different players . .you can tell a 10 capper from a 20 capper by the way they swing and approach the game.  I could tell by the first hole that this guy wasn't going to break 90.  The funniest thing was I could care less.  I didn't break 90, either - so far, never have.


Posted

I don't play with anyone enough to be able to guess what their handicap is based on a few rounds. The system allows for some bad golf to be played, the 10 lowest and .96 thing. I'd wager I only shoot my index on the number about 25% of the time. The rest of the scores vary as much as 8-12 strokes per 18 holes, either way but usually higher on the biggest variation.

I don't think visuals are much of a gauge either and some of it is opinion. Example would be I know some older women that swing odd but hit it short and straight on their way to better than bogey golf. Some of the senior men have similar odd looking swings but again they don't get into trouble and they putt well enough to overcome taking 3 shots to get to the green on most par 4's so they see par often enough to keep it somewhat low. Sometimes it's very obvious but sometimes not.

All I know is my index is legit and that's all I care about. But there are days when I score far worse than someone I am playing with that I suspect usually doesn't play that well. I can tell by their comments and mannerisms when it's a better than usual day. Not so much when it's going the other way because everyone has really bad days.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

My game is build upon driving and up-and-down. This means that when the driver is out of order I easily play a round of 95-100 strokes. Last week a 100+ round on thursday and next day 88 under heavy conditions.

I see a lot of high single handicappers who swing like they are 20-cappers. But they play a very consistant round and bring in no tripples and a rare double.

Originally Posted by AmazingWhacker

I didn't break 90, either - so far, never have.

Wow, that must hurt.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

We here have it the other way around most times. If i play a business competition or something like that.

It's always the same person winning. I now know why that is ( he is a member at the same club as i )

He reports a hdc off 21. at our local course he plays 12.

well with 9 shots more it's easy to win. Last time i asked him what he was playing off, he said 19. just told him to change that

and showed him my mobile with his hdc on it. ( we have a online scoring system at our course )

He posted a round off 98, maybe i scared him off a bit.

The opposite happens also we have a member at our man's league he's registered at hdc 6.8 and never ever comes close to this score

always in the mid to end 80's. Than he plays a q-card at an other course and posts a score off 72-73

i just hate people like that. If we play club championships i get paired with him almost every time, because we have the same playing hdc.

Just hate it, he has an awful swing and sometimes it brings my game down

Dirver: Mizuno JPX 825 9,5 Fujikura Orochi Red Eye Stiff 65 g.
3 wood: Mizuno JPX 825 14 Fujikura Orochi Red Eye Stiff 75 g.
Hybrid: Mizuno JPX 825 18 Fujikura Orochi Red Eye Stiff 85 g. 
Irons: Mizuno MP 59 3 / PW KBS Tour stiff shaft ( Golf Pride Niion )
Wedges: Taylormade ATV Wedges 52 and 58 ( Golf Pride Niion )
putter: Taylormade ghost series 770 35 inch ( Super Stroke slim 3.0 )
Balls: Taylormade TP 5


Posted
Originally Posted by AmazingWhacker

That's true - but if you play enough golf with enough different players . .you can tell a 10 capper from a 20 capper by the way they swing and approach the game.  I could tell by the first hole that this guy wasn't going to break 90.  The funniest thing was I could care less.  I didn't break 90, either - so far, never have.

I play with guys whose swing looks like they honed it chopping wood. However, they get the ball up and down 80% plus from around the green and they are mid to high single figure handicappers. I'd rather have a better short game than a prettier swing.


Posted

Question, which is slightly off-topic, but I need clarification.

I'm a 5. A legit 5. Watch me make one swing & you'll agree. But if I am playing a round for handicap purposes & I hack up a hole, say a triple, I can only post double-bogey on that hole if I'm turning the round in for my handicap, right?


Posted
Question, which is slightly off-topic, but I need clarification. I'm a 5. A legit 5. Watch me make one swing & you'll agree. But if I am playing a round for handicap purposes & I hack up a hole, say a triple, I can only post double-bogey on that hole if I'm turning the round in for my handicap, right?

Correct. It's worth noting that the ESC thresholds are based on course handicap , not handicap index, but that won't change your ESC at a 5. Something to consider for those whose index hovers around 10/20/30 though.....

  • Upvote 2

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by zipazoid

Question, which is slightly off-topic, but I need clarification.

I'm a 5. A legit 5. Watch me make one swing & you'll agree. But if I am playing a round for handicap purposes & I hack up a hole, say a triple, I can only post double-bogey on that hole if I'm turning the round in for my handicap, right?

Yes that is the Equitable Stroke Control. It prevents the blow-up holes from telling a different story than your true ability. From the USGA site:

"Equitable Stroke Control" (ESC) is the downward adjustment of individual hole scores for handicap purposes in order to make handicaps more representative of a player's potential ability. ESC sets a maximum number that a player can post on any hole depending on the player's Course Handicap . ESC is used only when a player's actual or most likely score exceeds the player's maximum number based on the table in Section 4-3 .

  • Upvote 1

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Note: This thread is 4582 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have a couple of trips planned, although golf was a secondary component in each.  In February we're going to visit some friends near Naples, so Mary Anne and I have added on a few days to stay and play at Streamsong.  Then In March we're going to Hawaii (again), and will almost certainly get in a few rounds there.
    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.