Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Is it better to play fast or play by the rules?


Note: This thread is 4569 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Is it better to play fast or play by the rules?

    • Play Fast
      21
    • Play by the Rules
      16


Recommended Posts

Posted

Alright, I feel like this thread has been in the making after reading many of "problems" of golf discussed on this forum.  For most people we can play plenty fast and within the rules, but most of the complaints are about people who would probably have no interest in joining a golf forum in the first place.  For the average golfer do you think it is more important to play the rules to a T or play at an acceptable pace.

I personally think that speed is more important.  Most golfers won't end up playing major tournaments so the fact that the play perfectly by the rules doesn't really matter.  However, if we start to lose the rules, the game as we know it may start to deteriorate.  Anyone else care to weigh in on the subject.


Posted

Depends on the rule.

If I think I might not find a ball after a shot (usually off the tee), I'll hit a provisional, but sometimes, you just get to where you think your ball is, and it's gone.  In that case, I don't do the 'stroke AND distance' thing and walk back and hit another. I just give myself a penalty and take a drop (and the distance).


Posted
Originally Posted by Roblar

Depends on the rule.

If I think I might not find a ball after a shot (usually off the tee), I'll hit a provisional, but sometimes, you just get to where you think your ball is, and it's gone.  In that case, I don't do the 'stroke AND distance' thing and walk back and hit another. I just give myself a penalty and take a drop (and the distance).

this^^  The other day, after making a 7 when my tee ball embedded in the rough on 1, I couldn't find the tee ball I skied towards the middle of the fairway on 2.  I just went ahead and dropped another ball and played as if I was hitting 4.

It depends on the course, but sometimes I will hit a "provisional" if I am not sure if my ball is in a yellow water hazard and it would mean having to walk back around the hazard if I didn't find it.

Curious about what others do about short putts?  I like to hole out but some players I play with think it is pretty strange if I mark a 1 footer because I would be standing in their line if I finish.


Posted

The two aren't exclusive. I do both... play fast and by the rules.

  • Upvote 1

Tristan Hilton

My Equipment: 
Titleist TSR2 Driver (Fujikura Pro 2.0 TS; 10.5°) · PXG 0211 FWs (Diamana S+ 60; 15° and 21°) · PXG 0211 Hybrid (MMT 80; 22°) · Edel SMS Irons (SteelFiber i95; 5-GW) · Edel SMS Pro Wedges (SteelFiber i110; 56°, 60°) · Edel Classic Blade Putter (32") · Maxfli Tour Ball · Pinned Prism Rangefinder · SuperStroke Grips · Flightscope Mevo · TRUE Linkswear Shoes · Vessel Player V Pro 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by tristanhilton85

The two aren't exclusive. I do both... play fast and by the rules.

Your overall speed of play might be fast, but there have to be times where the rules slow you down like an unexpected lost ball.


Posted
Originally Posted by France46

Your overall speed of play might be fast, but there have to be times where the rules slow you down like an unexpected lost ball.

Kind of rare to have an unexpected lost ball... if there is even a chance that I think it won't be found, I play a provisional... I honestly can't remember the last time I had to go back to where my last ball was played because the ball was all of a sudden lost.

People act like it's one or the other and it simply isn't. Both can be done and you don't even need to be that good of a golfer to do it... you just have to have a little common sense.

I'll agree that slow play is a problem but people playing by the rules isn't even in the top ten reasons why the game is slow. If you really want to speed the game up there are a number of things you can do before saying that the rules should be bent. I'd even say that the majority of slow players aren't playing by the rules as it is.

Tristan Hilton

My Equipment: 
Titleist TSR2 Driver (Fujikura Pro 2.0 TS; 10.5°) · PXG 0211 FWs (Diamana S+ 60; 15° and 21°) · PXG 0211 Hybrid (MMT 80; 22°) · Edel SMS Irons (SteelFiber i95; 5-GW) · Edel SMS Pro Wedges (SteelFiber i110; 56°, 60°) · Edel Classic Blade Putter (32") · Maxfli Tour Ball · Pinned Prism Rangefinder · SuperStroke Grips · Flightscope Mevo · TRUE Linkswear Shoes · Vessel Player V Pro 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by tristanhilton85

Kind of rare to have an unexpected lost ball... if there is even a chance that I think it won't be found, I play a provisional... I honestly can't remember the last time I had to go back to where my last ball was played because the ball was all of a sudden lost.

It looks like you play in the Desert, so maybe that is different, but it has been a very wet spring here in France.

Off the top of my head I can think of 6 causes of unexpected lost balls- wet turf, animal holes, blind fairways with uneven bounces, moderate rough where the ball sits down, leaves, and players from another hole playing or picking up your ball.  I tend to average about 4 provisional balls a round, but if I hit one every time there was the slightest chance a ball wouldn't be found, there might be some courses where I might hit 10.

After having a ball embed on 1 and disappear in the fairway on 2 how often would you hit a provisional after that?  And how long do you look for a provisional when you find your original (like I did on #10 that day)?


Posted

Recreational golfers can play by whatever rules they want as long as they keep their pace of play appropriate.  I could care less what rules they bend as long as it's not a tournament or being submitted for HC.  But I do think it's important at some time that they actually know what the rules are so they might realistically know how they really score.  It's pretty obvious when a guy claims to be a 3 but when you play with him it's obvious he's really a 10 without mulligans, stroke and distance and all putts in the cup.  Sometimes they are heartbroken to learn the real rules and other times they will be angry and deny the rules to stroke their ego and claim good scores.

If I'm playing with a 4 some of mediocre golfers I will encourage guys to take a drop to keep things moving.  Who cares if they shoot 97 or 98.  Its mostly about having fun.  No point trying to hack it out of thick grass for 5 strokes, take a drop even if it's not within 2 clubs....again, who really cares.

There are dozens of sports where people participate at a recreational level but don't follow the strict rules of the sport.


Posted

To be clear, I think slow play is usually caused by many other things besides the rules like players not being ready when it is their turn to play, being inefficient, lacking skill, strictly playing honors off the tee, taking a long time to analyze wind/breaks/etc, long pre-shot routines, etc.

However, if more golfers followed all the rules without improving on any of the above, then I think there would be even slower play.  Just imagine if every guy shooting 90+ followed all the rules and holed every putt on every hole!


Posted
Originally Posted by tristanhilton85

Kind of rare to have an unexpected lost ball.

Must not be any blind fairways and high rough where you play. On some of the dunes courses you can hit what you think is a perfect shot and hit a provisional just to be certain and never find either one of them. Plenty of times the shot would be fine if you only knew where it was but you are not even sure which dune it might have cleared or not cleared, or whether it ran through the fairway into the rough on the other side of the dogleg.

It's the biggest handicap that we deal with that the pros get help on (with spotters). If it weren't for the guys marking the balls in the rough the pace of play at Merion would have come to a screeching halt.


  • Administrator
Posted

Yes.

TRUE or TRUE evaluates to TRUE.

So both.

This is not an xor question.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Well first off all i'm a guy who hits a professional ball pretty fast,

i'll give the advice always. Hit a pro so you can speed up.

Only bad thing is, if you hit the prof well, you don't take that much time searching

for the first one.

So i'm more a by the rules kinda guy. But however if it happens, only when on a non Q round i would except

but the next shot will be the 4th

Dirver: Mizuno JPX 825 9,5 Fujikura Orochi Red Eye Stiff 65 g.
3 wood: Mizuno JPX 825 14 Fujikura Orochi Red Eye Stiff 75 g.
Hybrid: Mizuno JPX 825 18 Fujikura Orochi Red Eye Stiff 85 g. 
Irons: Mizuno MP 59 3 / PW KBS Tour stiff shaft ( Golf Pride Niion )
Wedges: Taylormade ATV Wedges 52 and 58 ( Golf Pride Niion )
putter: Taylormade ghost series 770 35 inch ( Super Stroke slim 3.0 )
Balls: Taylormade TP 5


Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

Yes.

TRUE or TRUE evaluates to TRUE.

So both.

This is not an xor question.

This was going to be my answer as well.  Also depends on definition of fast.  I have no desire to race through a round for the sake of finishing quicker.  I don't have an issue with a 4 ball round taking 4 - 4.5 hours if everyone is moving and there's not a backup at the tee boxes.

I play by the rules and make sure my group keeps up with the group in front of us, that's my definition of fast.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
The two aren't exclusive. I do both... play fast and by the rules.

This. Anyone who says anything else is just making an excuse for either not playing by the rules or for their own slow play. Having said that, I couldn't care less if the guy in front of me plays by the rules . I only care that he keeps pace with the group ahead of him.....

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm all for playing fast but one of the things which adds time to rounds is putting out everything.  I don't really like to play with guys who knock your ball back to you when you are left with a putt longer than the length of the "putter grip"...grip...not the entire putter.  Personally, I prefer to putt everything out.  Yes, I know it takes a bit longer but when people give you 2foot, 3foot putts all day everyday and then you play in tournaments...you have to putt those out.  Just think it is a bad habit to get into.

Bag: Titleist
Driver: TM RBZ 9.5
Fairway metals: TM RBZ 3 wood
Hybrids: TM RBZ 3, 4 and 5
Irons: TM Burner 1.0 6 thru LW stiff steel shafts
Putter: Ping B60
Ball: TM Tour Preferred X or ProV1x
Check out littlejohngolfleague.com  A Greater Houston TX traveling golf league.


Posted

This question reminds me of one of those AT&T; commercials.  I see OP sitting with a bunch of kids in a semi-circle.  "Is it better to play golf FAST or by the rules?"

Every kid says LIGHTNING FAST!!! And OP rolls his eyes.


Posted
Originally Posted by TJBam

This question reminds me of one of those AT&T; commercials.  I see OP sitting with a bunch of kids in a semi-circle.  "Is it better to play golf FAST or by the rules?"

Every kid says LIGHTNING FAST!!! And OP rolls his eyes.

I LOL'd, I can see the new commercials now.  You should play golf like you've got a cheetah tied to your back!

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4569 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.