Jump to content
IGNORED

Let's fix the President's Cup


chriskzoo
Note: This thread is 3802 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
The only part of the Presidents Cup I don't like is that it can end in a tie. Other than that, I enjoy the format.

That's the Ryder Cup. The Presidents Cup finished in a tie once, and it was only after Tiger and Ernie Els played several holes and it got too dark to continue.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There is nothing wrong with the President's Cup, other than it is not the Ryder Cup.

This is true, and for this reason it will probably* always be second fiddle to the RC. *Of course, a few things it has that the Ryder Cup does not are Ernie Els, Adam Scott, Schwartzel, etc, etc, AND the potential for a juggernaut International team as golf continues to grow in popularity in places like China, Korea, and South America. The excitement comes from drama, which comes from the competitiveness of the teams. If there were a stretch of a few years where US dominated Europe in the RC while at the same time, the international team won a few Pres Cups, I think we'd have a bit of a paradigm shift. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The excitement comes from drama, which comes from the competitiveness of the teams. If there were a stretch of a few years where US dominated Europe in the RC while at the same time, the international team won a few Pres Cups, I think we'd have a bit of a paradigm shift. :)

I read an article a couple of months ago saying The Ryder Cup wasn't the tournament it is today until Europe became competitive and won a couple of times (early 80's?).  The matches weren't really even close until Europe tied in 1969.  Even when Europe started winning the matches were still close.

As a Canadian regarding the Presidents Cup, I really only watched the matches when Mike Weir was playing.

Els and Goosen were 2 of my favourites but I still really only watched during the couple of years Mike played.

I like the Ryder Cup for the drama not really caring which side won. There's no drama in the PC.................yet?

Paul

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I do like the idea of PGA / LPGA Tour participants playing together on the same team in the Presidents Cup.  Adding the ladies to the mix would eliminate the advantage the U.S. men have currently.

If it doesn't fit the intended format of the Presidents Cup maybe create a new "Cup" for such an event, but it sounds fun.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

I do like the idea of PGA / LPGA Tour participants playing together on the same team in the Presidents Cup.  Adding the ladies to the mix would eliminate the advantage the U.S. men have currently.

Adding women will only make it worse. There's nothing wrong with it now.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There's nothing wrong with it now.

Other than the Internationals invariably getting their asses handed to them. :-(

Stretch.

"In the process of trial and error, our failed attempts are meant to destroy arrogance and provoke humility." -- Master Jin Kwon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Other than the Internationals invariably getting their asses handed to them. :-(

So yeah, nothing wrong. :-P

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Funny how we supposedly need to fix the Presidents' Cup because the U.S. has been dominating but you dont see anyone saying we need to fix the Ryder Cup, where the Euros have been dominating.  Clearly the Euros are just being a bunch of crybabies.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Other than the Internationals invariably getting their asses handed to them.

Then they should play better.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The only part of the Presidents Cup I don't like is that it can end in a tie. Other than that, I enjoy the format.

Maybe this deserves a thread of its own, but ...

Why?  Not just the PC and Foursum Golf, but why the general antipathy to any sporting event ending in a tie?  It seems to be a disease of the times.  In the history of sport, most sports have accepted ties at some point.  They may be common (soccer) or rare (dead heats in horse racing) but they've always been there.  That is, until the last generation or so, when tie-breaking has become a mania such that the playing of a sport itself has been abandoned to shootouts, sudden-deaths, one-on-one confrontations for what's supposed to be a team sport.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Maybe this deserves a thread of its own, but ...

Why?  Not just the PC and Foursum Golf, but why the general antipathy to any sporting event ending in a tie?  It seems to be a disease of the times.  In the history of sport, most sports have accepted ties at some point.  They may be common (soccer) or rare (dead heats in horse racing) but they've always been there.  That is, until the last generation or so, when tie-breaking has become a mania such that the playing of a sport itself has been abandoned to shootouts, sudden-deaths, one-on-one confrontations for what's supposed to be a team sport.

Well the saying "A tie is like kissing your sister" has been around at least since around 1950. In football it usually implied that somebody didn't have stones enough to go for the win.

Of course I like George Brett's twist on it. "If a tie is like kissing your sister losing is like kissing your grandmother with her teeth out."

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Well the saying "A tie is like kissing your sister" has been around at least since around 1950. In football it usually implied that somebody didn't have stones enough to go for the win.

Of course I like George Brett's twist on it. "If a tie is like kissing your sister losing is like kissing your grandmother with her teeth out."

Yes, the sister-kissing line implies ties are a mixed bag.  Of course they are.  Losses are not.  They're just bad.

But it's not enough to quote slogans.

Interesting you'd mention football.  I'm thinking in particular of college football.  Remember what it was like before overtime (1996, I think)?  Remember what "having stones enough to go for the win" meant?

Yes, the two-point conversion to win or lose.  Those games didn't end in ties, but the addition of overtime has made them a distant memory.  Now everyone kicks the one-point conversion and heads for overtime.

I always thought that was the most exciting moment in CFB.  My watching of that sport was cut ten-fold when overtime came in.  It wasn't just the do-or-die  conversions but the other late-game decisions that hinged on whether to settle for a tie or go for the win:  when in the red zone and three points down, do you throw to the end zone or run the ball in front of the goal posts?  In a tie game, do you risk a turnover near your own goal line trying to get into scoring position or run out the clock and take the tie?

Those decisions are no more.  Now it's play safe and hope to win in overtime, if there's any risk at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Yes, the sister-kissing line implies ties are a mixed bag.  Of course they are.  Losses are not.  They're just bad.

But it's not enough to quote slogans.

Interesting you'd mention football.  I'm thinking in particular of college football.  Remember what it was like before overtime (1996, I think)?  Remember what "having stones enough to go for the win" meant?

Yes, the two-point conversion to win or lose.  Those games didn't end in ties, but the addition of overtime has made them a distant memory.  Now everyone kicks the one-point conversion and heads for overtime.

I always thought that was the most exciting moment in CFB.  My watching of that sport was cut ten-fold when overtime came in.  It wasn't just the do-or-die  conversions but the other late-game decisions that hinged on whether to settle for a tie or go for the win:  when in the red zone and three points down, do you throw to the end zone or run the ball in front of the goal posts?  In a tie game, do you risk a turnover near your own goal line trying to get into scoring position or run out the clock and take the tie?

Those decisions are no more.  Now it's play safe and hope to win in overtime, if there's any risk at all.

Hmmm. Well if you don't like slogans I'll just answer your question without them. Most people don't like ties. Never did and never will. Nothing new.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I think the mentality here is you do something to win, anything less is losing.  No one goes out and says alright, let's tie this guy, team, match.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3802 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Two things I bring up when it comes to this discussion. One is if you have let's say two towns next to each other, one has a population of 10,000 people and the other has a population of 1,000 people. Let's also say that they never play golf against each other. Only among themselves. In the first town, you have one guy who has won 15 events, then a couple of guys who won 6, a couple who won four and a bunch of people who won three, two and one events. In the second town, you have one guy who won 18 events, then a guy who won 11, a guy who won 9, a guy who won 8, a couple who won 7, a couple who won 3-5 and then a few 2s and a few 1s. Who's the best golfer? It's possible it's the guy who won 18, but it's pretty unlikely. Far more likely to be the guy who won 15 in the much bigger town.  In the same way, I view the fact that there is more parity in the 1990 and onwards world than there was in the pre 1990 world as a plus for Tiger. It's much harder to stand out if the fields are deeper, stronger, better. If there are a handful of players who win all of them, that tends to suggest weakness to me, not strength. The other thing is Ed White. Harvey Penick talked about him in one of his books. Ridiculously good at the game, but no one ever heard of him, because he got a job and didn't play professionally. There was no money in it and he needed security, so he took a job that paid him steadily. No clue how many people there are out there like him, but if he was around today, he'd be playing pro golf for sure. If he had played professionally, Penick sure seemed to think he'd have been one of the best of all time. Fred Haas played him in a college match and got stuffed. 40 years later he walked into Penick's shop and saw Ed White's picture on the wall and, after a full career playing pro golf, he said that Ed White was the best player he ever saw. Those 40 years would presumably have included at least some of Jack. I can see why people might say Jack is the GOAT. I don't agree, but I can at least understand why they say it. IMO there is no argument you can make for anyone other than Tiger to be the BOAT though. At least not yet.
    • A good option is to play the Par 3 courses. after playing an 18 -hole round. The Par 3 courses have 18 holes, we usually played only 9 holes after playing 36 holes on each of the trips we had. You may want to check out Grand National while you're in the middle of Alabama. I enjoyed Oxmoor Valley and Ross Bridge courses which are a short drive north.
    • In August, I am playing the World Am in Myrtle Beach. I do not know which courses yet, but should be a blast. Aside from that, those are the only golf trip plans, unless I play while on vacation in Destin in June.
    • Even on a perfect center hit I was receiving at most 1.48 smash factor. 10 days ago on the warming up for a round my Driver made a weird sound, I checked the bottom and it was cracked. Don't know for how long it was cracked but at least this time the crack was easy visible. Maybe it was already cracked before but with a more subtle crack?.. don't know. I'm waiting for TaylorMade to approve the warranty and send me a new head. I was using the Stealth Plus, I will take the opportunity and upgrade it to the Qi10 LS paying the difference.  On Sunday with my old Titleist 915 and softer balls I was reaching 1.5, even 1.51 on center hits. Test didn't went well. Only gained 2..3 miles, not worth pursuing. Figured out that with a ball and with a target, my path was way to in to out with this new idea, so in order to move the club in the correct path I needed to slow down to redirect the club on the downswing or aim more to the right, close the face a play a big hook.. not possible. I already play a big draw with Driver, more curvature is unplayable. Yesterday at home, with no ball messed around with a more neutral path, even swinging a little out to in. It felt a lot more in sync with the body. With a big in to out path it feels like my hands are working right, away from the body, when the body is working to rotate to the left. With the path to the left is was easier to apply force thru the hitting zone.  As always tested 10 swings with my current swing (A), and 10 with this little out to in path(B).  The difference was huge, like 12 miles faster with swing (B). I knew something wasn't right. The fact was that the PRGR was aligned more in line with the (B) path so it of course was giving higher speeds. I proceeded to align it with the (A) path and tested again 5 more swings each. Again (B) was faster but only by 5 miles. (Made a tiny experiment moving the PRGR to a more extreme in to out path and the swings register 25/30% slower for both swings, so it wasn't reading properly at that angle) Finally I moved the PRGR in the middle of both paths, and this time (B) won by 9 miles. Off course, this was without a ball and a target so.. I will be hitting the range tomorrow to see the real difference.            
    • Wordle 1,032 3/6 ⬜🟨⬜🟨⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 😲
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...