Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Rulesman

New flowchart re Smartphones for DMDs

40 posts in this topic

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Thanks.  The point that I think makes it all confusing is this:

Quote:
Does the device contain other applications or features that, if referenced at any time during a round, might assist the player in his play (e.g., anemometer, thermometer or club recommendation)?

I don't know of any phones with a thermometer built in, but my home screen displays the temperature through an app connected to the internet.  And every smart phone can access weather.com.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't know of any phones with a thermometer built in, but my home screen displays the temperature through an app connected to the internet.  And every smart phone can access weather.com.

Accessing weather information through internet is and has been allowed already.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

Originally Posted by dsc123

I don't know of any phones with a thermometer built in, but my home screen displays the temperature through an app connected to the internet.  And every smart phone can access weather.com.

Accessing weather information through internet is and has been allowed already.

Accessing general weather information is not the same as measuring wind speed and temperature on the course during the round.  The rules still require the player to use his best judgement in adjusting to changing environmental conditions at the precise moment and location when and where the stroke is being played.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I just think that if you're going to make a flow chart you've recognized that the rule is confusing and should clarify this additional point.  When it says you can't use a phone with a thermometer and most phones prominently display the temperature, which is derived from a thermometer (somewhere), it can be confusing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fourputt View Post

Accessing general weather information is not the same as measuring wind speed and temperature on the course during the round.  The rules still require the player to use his best judgement in adjusting to changing environmental conditions at the precise moment and location when and where the stroke is being played.

Showing weather station temperature on app on screen is not measuring. Perhaps user should know what temperature is been shown on the screen?

Dec 14-3/18

Quote:

Q: During a stipulated round, may a player access local weather information (e.g. wind, temperature, humidity) through an application or internet browser on a multi-functional device?

A: Yes. The prohibition in Rule 14-3 is only applicable to the specific act of gauging or measuring conditions that might affect a player's play (e.g. through use of an anemometer or a thermometer). When accessing weather reports provided by a weather station through an application or internet browser, the player is not actively measuring or gauging the conditions.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Note that most smart phones are capable of measuring slope with their accelerometers, and are IMO in violation because of THAT functionality (top right blue diamond box). Just because the DMD application doesn't show you the slope doesn't mean it can't - the hardware is there (similar to the Leupold GX-4i - it's illegal even without the bright yellow faceplate).

Also, many smart phones have thermometers, though they measure internal temperatures and not the ambient air temperature.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note that most smart phones are capable of measuring slope with their accelerometers (and such), and are in violation because of THAT functionality (top right blue diamond box) whether or not they have thermometers built in (many do, though they measure internal temperatures and not the ambient air temperature).

Why spirit level is then allowed in the bottom?

I am not saying USGA (and/or R&A;) are stupid but...

edit. Interesting response from USGA, in post number 233 http://www.golfwrx.com/forums/topic/933490-2014-2015-decisions-on-the-rules-of-golf-announcement-tomorrow/page__st__233

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is measuring.  I saw this for the first time this last Nor'easter.

.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Why spirit level is then allowed in the bottom?

edit. Interesting response from USGA, in post number 233 http://www.golfwrx.com/forums/topic/933490-2014-2015-decisions-on-the-rules-of-golf-announcement-tomorrow/page__st__233

I could be wrong there, then. But if I'm wrong, the USGA/R&A; are guilty of being VERY unclear about this kind of thing.

If the Leupold GX-4i is illegal because it can measure slope when a bright yellow face plate is attached only, it doesn't make sense to me that iPhones which can measure slope with built-in and non-removable apps. Because even if you could remove the software, the hardware is still capable of measuring the slope - something the GX-4i cannot do without the faceplate.

P.S. I don't use my iPhone as a DMD. I have a laser that only measures time ;-) , and that's all I use.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:

Originally Posted by luu5

Why spirit level is then allowed in the bottom?

edit. Interesting response from USGA, in post number 233 http://www.golfwrx.com/forums/topic/933490-2014-2015-decisions-on-the-rules-of-golf-announcement-tomorrow/page__st__233

I could be wrong there, then. But if I'm wrong, the USGA/R&A; are guilty of being VERY unclear about this kind of thing.

If the Leupold GX-4i is illegal because it can measure slope when a bright yellow face plate is attached only, it doesn't make sense to me that iPhones which can measure slope with built-in and non-removable apps. Because even if you could remove the software, the hardware is still capable of measuring the slope - something the GX-4i cannot do without the faceplate.

P.S. I don't use my iPhone as a DMD. I have a laser that only measures time , and that's all I use.

Interesting thought here too.  I often take my Canon 60D DSLR with me to the course when I play.  It is not a DMD, does not have a GPS feature, but it does have an electronc level built in for leveling the camera on a tripod.  It doesn't measure slope, just acts as a level, but I could probably figure out how to read approximate slope angles with practice.  I don't turn it on unless I am putting the camera on the tripod, which I never do on the golf course.  I wonder if that is getting into a gray area on this question?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Interesting thought here too.  I often take my Canon 60D DSLR with me to the course when I play.  It is not a DMD, does not have a GPS feature, but it does have an electronc level built in for leveling the camera on a tripod.  It doesn't measure slope, just acts as a level, but I could probably figure out how to read approximate slope angles with practice.  I don't turn it on unless I am putting the camera on the tripod, which I never do on the golf course.  I wonder if that is getting into a gray area on this question?

Gray in what way?  Obviously if you managed to make use of your camera to measure slope, you breach 14-3, but that has nothing to do with what other bits and pieces you can have on a DMD since your camera doesn't measure distance.  I don't see your point. :hmm:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I could be wrong there, then. But if I'm wrong, the USGA/R&A; are guilty of being VERY unclear about this kind of thing.

If the Leupold GX-4i is illegal because it can measure slope when a bright yellow face plate is attached only, it doesn't make sense to me that iPhones which can measure slope with built-in and non-removable apps. Because even if you could remove the software, the hardware is still capable of measuring the slope - something the GX-4i cannot do without the faceplate.

P.S. I don't use my iPhone as a DMD. I have a laser that only measures time , and that's all I use.

I agree that the wording in that particular blue box is somewhat misleading. IMO it should say 'measuring conditions and providing information...'. Nobody is interested what a device is doing internally if there is no output. This is also what the RB's mean, the device has to be capable of providing the information it measures, not just being able to measure something.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that the wording in that particular blue box is somewhat misleading. IMO it should say 'measuring conditions and providing information...'. Nobody is interested what a device is doing internally if there is no output. This is also what the RB's mean, the device has to be capable of providing the information it measures, not just being able to measure something.

That's still not clear. The Leupold GX-4i cannot "output" the information if the yellow faceplate is not attached. It's relatively easy to argue that the faceplate does more to hinder the GX-4i than "not launching the app" using built-in hardware on an iPhone.

In other words, if the GX-4i is illegal, then iPhones and any device capable of measuring the forbidden things should be illegal as well.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't know of any phones with a thermometer built in,

They are wisely planning for the future. Temperature, altitude, humidity, are all very soon going to be a part of your phone.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

That's still not clear. The Leupold GX-4i cannot "output" the information if the yellow faceplate is not attached. It's relatively easy to argue that the faceplate does more to hinder the GX-4i than "not launching the app" using built-in hardware on an iPhone.

In other words, if the GX-4i is illegal, then iPhones and any device capable of measuring the forbidden things should be illegal as well.

But doesn't the question 'is the device capable of' provide the answer? A GX-4i without that yellow plate is not capable of measuring and providing the player any forbidden information, right?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But doesn't the question 'is the device capable of' provide the answer? A GX-4i without that yellow plate is not capable of measuring and providing the player any forbidden information, right?

No. Because even though "without the yellow plate" it can't even MEASURE the slope, and definitely does not display it, it's still illegal as a DMD.

After going to the left in the flow chart (to the DMD side of things), it immediately has to answer "YES" to the thing, despite the fact that you can neuter it by putting the silver faceplate on, rendering it illegal.

Yet an iPhone gets to answer "no" to the second question (or first, depending on how you look at it) and go down in the NO direction instead of left in the YES direction just because the GPS app doesn't display illegal information like slope.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I just discovered (you'll see why tomorrow or Thursday) that the new Gx-4i 2 is actually approved for use under the rules with the chrome face plate.

In the Gx-4 and 4i the yellow faceplate simply completed a circuit or something that allowed the range finder to display the slope it was measuring. So it wasn't truly "disabled" (though I would argue it was more disabled than simply not enabling it via software like you can on a smart phone).

In the Gx-4i 2 the actual hardware that measures it is in the yellow piece, so the USGA saw fit to rule that the chrome face plate does not have the hardware.

It's kind of like saying a battery is legal for a GPS, but if there's an add-on device that measures windspeed, you can't attach it and use it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • This is a fundamental that is that ruins so many golf swings before they start. Let's look at why. Bending at the waist is physically easier - it takes less work from your legs to bend over and your body naturally avoids work.  The big problem is that you are out of balance by the time you reach the top of your backswing and worse... Your upper body weight is not over your legs which means a ground up swing is dead. Through your transition your weight needs to be firmly planted over your loaded legs so 1) you can linger in your transition in balance until your forward weight shift happens and 2) So that your lower legs are in a position of leverage to get your weight moving and to have enough spring to keep pushing until your weight has made it all the way to your left foot.  So, if you don't love your swing check for this setup flaw. So, many people who swing over the top don't realize they had no chance way back from their setup. 
    • Good topic. I voted breaking 80 is harder. Obviously the two are connected but if push came to shove I think more golfers could learn how to avoid making doubles than be taught or acquire the skills to break 80. Breaking 80 for many golfers would mean significantly raising the level of their games, while not making a double is more about avoiding the big miss and game planning/course management. More specific to the OP's question relating to a golfers that shoots in the low 80's and is trying to break through, it could be one or other, most likely a combo of both. For myself, like @The Recreational Golfer I've had more rounds in the 70's than double bogey free rounds so could you say it's "easier" for me to shoot in the 70's than avoid making a double? Yes and no, depends on how you look at it. Even though I messed up on one or two individual holes I had to play fairly solid golf the other 16/17 holes to break 80, IMO that's more difficult than avoiding making a double. Even on a round where I didn't make a double I had to perform at a consistent level for 18 holes to break 80. If you told me I had to play 10 rounds where I had to break 80 and 10 rounds where I couldn't make a double, I think the latter would be easier for me. 
    • Good to hear. An observation for you... When you start getting your lower body into it guess what?  You start doing work!  And that takes fitness.  Some people have an illusion of an effortless golf swing. But in reality, it's effortless for your wrists but more work for your legs and core.  So, keep is mind as you go from hitter to swinger your fitness, core, and lower body strength demands go up. 
    • I'll answer your question with another question: If you drop the 3H, what would you hit for a 215 yard shot, or even a 210 or 205 yard shot? Are you comfortable gripping down on your 4-wood to cut distance off of it by that much? I personally don't see much issue with keeping the 3H in the bag since it isn't actually hurting anything. You say the other alternative is to drop the 4-wood, but why do you feel that you must drop anything at all? It's okay to have a 10 yard gap. If it really concerns you, though, I would think that the best way to go would be to swap from a 4-wood to a 3-wood. This would increase the gap between your 3H and the next longer club without affecting the gap between the 3 and 4 hybrid, which seems to be a number you like better for a gap. I'm just a little confused why you'd drop down to 13 clubs if the hybrid isn't costing you strokes. I know I find hybrids easier to hit than a wood that I'm trying to hit shorter than usual. I absolutely hate to hit a 3/4 3-wood to cover the cap between a full 3-wood and my 3-iron, but the number for a 3/4 3-wood is such a rare distance that I'd much rather have consistent gaps up through a 3-iron than a big jump from a 4i to a 3H. In my case a 3H would hurt my game, but it doesn't seem like yours is doing you any harm and could be protecting you from an awkward 4 wood shot.
    • This might not be the most helpful for balls and gloves (though I do see golf ball deals pop up at least once a week), but golfwrx's classified section is a great place to get deals on a lot of stuff. I got my AD-DI shaft there for $130, along with my KBS shafts from 3-LW for another $150 for the set. The AD-DI was used for a week (didn't have a mark) and the KBS shafts clearly only ever had a grip installed on the 7-iron. Good deals there, at least from what I've found, but mostly on clubs and shafts (though they do have golf balls in their classifieds every so often).  The nice part about that is they also have a WTB forum, where you post what you want and people come to you. That's actually what I did for the iron shafts. I posted about what I wanted and I had about 7 responses to choose from within 24 hours, so it's pretty active. For golf balls other than ProV1's that would be your best bet for finding them.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

  • Blog Entries