Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2986 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

These are the ugliest putters ever made.

We don't use a revealer on course so the balance is a gimmick.

The best putter is a simple blade.

Why have one club that has no torque?  IMO the basic sense of the club should be same through the bag.  I couldn't imagine trying to learn a new technique for putter alone since it spins like a balanced prop.

I agree the physics of it are diff from other putters and golf clubs.  I view that as a negative that would hurt feel.

 


Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

 

The best putter is a simple blade.

 

I believe Karsten Solheim would disagree with that statement. 

Edited by JPitts

Posted

@JPitts

so?  Is he God?

The entire putter industry is based on marketing alone.

PGA pros have pulled used putters out of some Podunk shop discount rack and won majors.

Putter design is a fugazi


Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

Putter design is a fugazi

An ethical rock band inspired by the Clash?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugazi

Edited by Lihu

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

@JPitts

so?  Is he God?

The entire putter industry is based on marketing alone.

PGA pros have pulled used putters out of some Podunk shop discount rack and won majors.

Putter design is a fugazi

Nope,  only 1 God. But he is/ was kind of relevent in the putter industry. 


Posted
3 minutes ago, JPitts said:

Nope,  only 1 God. But he is/ was kind of relevent in the putter industry. 

You were more entertaining when you were on topic....

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Here is the study I read that led me to Directed Force. Sorry,  it's long.  

Mississippi State study on Directed Force Lie Angle Balancing (LAB) vs Odyssey V Line


 HOW DOES A PUTTER’S CENTER OF MASS AFFECT MUSCLE ACTIVATION OF THE FOREARMS DURING THE PUTTING STROKE.
 

 
 
The Neuromechanics Lab at Mississippi State University in the Department of Kinesiology took a different approach to analyzing putters. Our mission was to see how putters affected the golfer during the putting stroke.   Two different putters were selected, Odyssey V-Line and the Reno from Directed Force Putters. We measured EEG (electroencephalography, brain activity) and EMG (electromyography, muscle activity) of a PGA Professional and researcher using both putters, with the Odyssey being his current putter.  Five practice putts from each putter was used during the warm up to familiarize the speed of the putting surface.  Static baselines were established for both EEG and EMG.  EMG electrodes were placed on the pronators and supinators of both arms, to establish how much work was being placed on the muscular system to control the putter.
 
Here are the results:  EEG alpha waves showed more activity in the Reno putter compared to the current player’s putter (Odyssey).  Generally, the higher the alpha waves indicate the more conscious thinking is occurring which may impact performance.  Due to the player’s familiarity with his putter, the alpha waves were more synchronized and the player wasn’t thinking about the putter, which is good if you want to make putts.  A reason why the player was thinking more may be due to the lack of familiarity to a “new” putter.  It looks and feels different than his current putter and with only 5 practice attempts, there is more conscious awareness prior to the stroke.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Odyssey Putter

Directed Force Putter
However, the EMG showed a surprising result, even though the player was not familiar with the putter to establish a repeatable motor pattern (habit), EMG showed less muscle activation during the stroke compared to the player’s personal putter.  This means that the player using a Directed Force putter is using less muscular effort to keep the putter square to the intended target at impact.  This may allow the player to develop a better sense of distance control through an increase in proprioception.  The higher muscle activation with the face-balanced putter is required to apply torque to the putter to keep it from rotating open during the swing.  This additional muscular effort now must be applied to each stroke throughout the round and may not be dependable during stressful situations.  The player may over relax and lighten their grip pressure in attempt to calm down which may result in a change in their muscle activation pattern allowing the putter to rotate slightly due to its center of mass position right before impact resulting in a missed putt.  Or the player may over rotate the putter in attempt not miss it right 
Sample of a single putt made with both an Odyssey compared to the Directed Force Putter.
(right handed golfer).  In both situations, the player is working harder to maintain control of the face without regards to distance control.  Generally, this additional muscle activation could lead to an increase in missed putts.  
 
 
Future studies will need to dig deeper into the variables involved with putting that may affect outcome and changes in motor control and learning.
(Tony Luczak was the subject during the test)
 
2016, Tony Luczak, Research Elevated Performance Systems, LLC, All Rights Reserved.

  • Upvote 2

Posted

The point is, it's a putter. Some will like, some won't. I was trying to relax the growing tension and hostility in this thread. By the way, the Reno 2.1 DF Putter is now laser sighted and uses stainless steel screws - major changes ... lol. Maybe it's more like mine.

DF Sightline.jpg

  • Like 1

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 minutes ago, JPitts said:

Generally, the higher the alpha waves indicate the more conscious thinking is occurring which may impact performance.

It's been quite some time since I studied brain waves (regarding EEG studies), I'm a physician. However, I do believe IIRC that Alpha waves are more a measure of a relaxed state and tend to be higher in pattern with a relaxed subject with eyes closed. Once the subject is brought to attention, eyes opened..the Alpha waves diminish. So, I'm not seeing how measuring alpha waves during putting has any usefulness at all.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
30 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

These are the ugliest putters ever made.

We don't use a revealer on course so the balance is a gimmick.

The best putter is a simple blade.

Why have one club that has no torque?  IMO the basic sense of the club should be same through the bag.  I couldn't imagine trying to learn a new technique for putter alone since it spins like a balanced prop.

I agree the physics of it are diff from other putters and golf clubs.  I view that as a negative that would hurt feel.

 

Regardless of the science, a putter has to look good to me. Not sure I could use a DF putter. I like the looks of the Edel putters. If I ever try a custom putter it would probably be an Edel, but the closest fitter is about two hours away.


Posted
8 minutes ago, caniac6 said:

Regardless of the science, a putter has to look good to me. Not sure I could use a DF putter. I like the looks of the Edel putters. If I ever try a custom putter it would probably be an Edel, but the closest fitter is about two hours away.

I can agree with you there.  I love the science,  the looks,  well I got past them.  Thats why i stared I'd love to see this Tec in a smaller stainless steel head. 


Posted

That thing looks like an overweight goldfish trying to swim away from the ball!

But,  science wise I am sure that all those radii and conflicting lines are counterproductive to good aiming.

There are at least two studies I have seen that showed results indicating that these strange putter heads make it more difficult for people to aim right.


Posted
2 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

 

There are at least two studies I have seen that showed results indicating that these strange putter heads make it more difficult for people to aim right.

That's why its easier to aim left.  (J/K)


  • Administrator
Posted
Just now, Jack Watson said:

There are at least two studies I have seen that showed results indicating that these strange putter heads make it more difficult for people to aim right.

In my experience, aim isn't really a scientific thing, more of a personal thing. Some people aim mallets with a number of lines on them well, some aim a simple Bullseye best.

What's missing in this whole discussion is that if you can't aim this putter - and ample experience says the majority won't be able to, regardless of the few changes you can make to the lines, colors, etc. - then the putter is a complete non-starter. Never mind the junk science and lousy one-person, horribly written un-Google-able studies.

People overlooked @Phil McGleno's post earlier about putting with a wedge. That'll give you some clue about how minimal the torques are in a putter (even an 8802-style putter) given the speed with which we move our putters in the initial takeaway and the change of direction.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

That thing looks like an overweight goldfish trying to swim away from the ball!

But,  science wise I am sure that all those radii and conflicting lines are counterproductive to good aiming.

There are at least two studies I have seen that showed results indicating that these strange putter heads make it more difficult for people to aim right.

Wrong, Jack, it looks like a garden hoe. People see it and say "WTF?" I just spin the head like Linda Blair in "The Exorcist" and they say "Ooooh, it spins without hanging up? What does that mean?" I say, "I have no effin' idea, but it's cool to have all that aluminum spin like a SeeMore FGP in your hands."

And Jack, you are wrong again as to aim, at least my aim. You are 2 for 2! Congrats as to your wrongness.

I would not have purchased it if I was not able to aim it where I thought I was aiming. I've used Edels for 9 years, so I know the importance of aim and design, and that it is unique to everyone. I made an adjustment to the T Line to make it shorter, and the more I use it, the easier it is to aim for me.

And when I use the DF, my eyes don't go all over the putter, they stay at the ball. I don't notice the garden hoe aspect. in fact, the back of the putter is a built-in training aid and the carved portion in back is where you can pick up the ball from the green.

Everyone's mileage will vary. But there are enough rave reviews elsewhere to know that some small portion of the golfing public has success with these putters.

Admittedly, it's not for most people, it may not be for me. I need time on the course with it. My instructor wanted to see it, especially after being on a forum where several instructors had discussions with the inventor, and the instructors were not impressed. I told my guy that Presse is not the most personable marketer - lol. My instructor did not care for it, but that doesn't matter. I just want it to help me make putts in less strokes.

Edited by Mr. Desmond
  • Upvote 1

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Fairway wood, driver, iron, wedge, lots of clubs you can putt with.

1 hour ago, Jack Watson said:

The best putter is a simple blade.

The best putter is the one you can aim true and is the right weight for you to control distance easily. Whether that's a blade, a mallet, or some other configuration is up to the individual.

  • Thumbs Up 2

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 minutes ago, billchao said:

Fairway wood, driver, iron, wedge, lots of clubs you can putt with.

The best putter is the one you can aim true and is the right weight for you to control distance easily. Whether that's a blade, a mallet, or some other configuration is up to the individual.

Well, interesting enough it's not entirely up to the individual. It also must be conforming to USGA standards. So I guess they're kinda saying, 'Look...putt with whatever you want, but stay in these regulations or...well...you just suck at putting.' lol.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
22 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

Well, interesting enough it's not entirely up to the individual. It also must be conforming to USGA standards. So I guess they're kinda saying, 'Look...putt with whatever you want, but stay in these regulations or...well...you just suck at putting.' lol.

I wasn't referring to non-conforming clubs. What I was trying to say is, what shape the putter happens to be depends on how each individual aims. Not everyone is suited to a blade so a generalization like the one @Jack Watson made is inaccurate.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2986 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.