Advertisement
Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
rkim291968

Who will represent the US Olympic team in golf?

19 posts in this topic

I think US can field 4 players each for men & women's competition based on info below.  Who do you think will bubble up to make the team, come July 11, 2016?

Qualification

Qualification will be based on world ranking as of July 11, 2016, with a total of 60 players qualifying in each of the men's and women's events. The top 15 players of each gender will qualify, with a limit of four golfers per country that can qualify this way.The remaining 45 spots will go the highest-ranked players from countries that do not already have two golfers qualified.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

I couldn't pick a favorite this early. Lately it seems like anybody can win on the PGA tour. Americans that were hot last year are struggling this year. The up and comers are getting better and the old guard seems fixated on abbreviated schedules with their crosshairs on majors. Some of the noobs the press gushes about one week miss the cut by 10 strokes the next. Not sure I could even pick a Ryder Cup team at this point.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It is way too early to make a prediction and I'm not sure about the other 3 guys, but I would be very surprised if Jordan Spieth wasn't on this squad.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL - we are 856 days from the OWGR date ... That's a long time ...

But, its fun to project and look back to this post in 2+ years ...

I'm going with:

Dustin Johnson

Patrick Reed

Jordan Spieth

& somebody we've never heard of before ...

Just throwing it out there ...

Rob

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My sure bet is Jordan Spieth.  For the other 3, I don't know.   Even Tiger can fall in ranking (or even retire).

For women, Lewis is a sure bet IMO.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Is there any reason why amateurs would not be eligible for the team? Olympic sport always used to be this way.

On the other hand, could any pros fit the Olympics around their tour schedule anyway? The Open is close to that date - I would think most top pros would want to play in that rather than an Olympic format.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there any reason why amateurs would not be eligible for the team? Olympic sport always used to be this way.

On the other hand, could any pros fit the Olympics around their tour schedule anyway? The Open is close to that date - I would think most top pros would want to play in that rather than an Olympic format.

Per the Olympic qualification rule, if an amateur is ranked high enough, he/she is qualified.   For men, that will be very difficult.  For women, it is possible as Lydia Ko and other amateur players have proven.   She was ranked in top 10 in the world as an amateur although she turned pro since then.

Based on what I hear so far, almost every player will die for a chance to represent their country in the Olympics.   There are 4 grand slam events per year.  Olympic happens once every 4 years, and making it to the team will be a rare feat in itself.   It was the same for Tennis when pros were allowed to compete in the Olympics.  Top tennis pros represent their countries, and were very emotional about their participation.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Is there any reason why amateurs would not be eligible for the team? Olympic sport always used to be this way.

On the other hand, could any pros fit the Olympics around their tour schedule anyway? The Open is close to that date - I would think most top pros would want to play in that rather than an Olympic format.

They'll rearrange the schedule that year to fit it in.

The quality of the field will be poor though, as it stands now 65 of the top 100 in the World wouldn't be there, that's assuming that there is maximum representation from GB & I - 2 Englishmen & Welshmen for GB∋, 2 Irishmen (Rory & G-mac) and 2 for Scotland (assuming independence) - this could be 3 instead of 6 - Rory & GMac pick UK & no Scottish independence.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought Olympics were going to be separate from the pros, that's disappointing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I thought Olympics were going to be separate from the pros, that's disappointing.

I agree. They should apply the amateur rule in the strictest sense in this scenario. No Tiger, no Furyk, no McIlroy...all amateur up and comers. Of course, I'm Canadian so I have  a vested interest in limiting the US' ability to run away with it...

Some how I don't think DeLaet, Weir and Ames are gonna get'er done... :-(

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't think there's any realistic prospect that Scotland are going to vote for independence. The opinion polls suggest they won't, and I speak to Scots on a daily basis (admittedly from the more conservative leaning golf community) and am yet to encounter anyone who wants independence (or admits it). Come to think of it, the greater advocacy I've heard for Scottish independence tends to come from South East England!

Rory has a bit of an issue though, as I understand it as he's qualified for either team. If he plays for GB one community will turn on him, if he plays for Ireland, the other will

Last I knew he was veering towards the pragmatic decision and not taking part in a tournament which is hardly that important to him, and which could have ramifications beyond if he's seen endorse one country/ religion/ or political philosophy over the other.

I would imagine Poulter would fancy sunning himself in Rio though and he'd be an obvious candidate.

Personally I'm of the view that Olympics should be the pinnacle of achievement in the respective sport that it plays, as it is for track and field and a few other events. If the sport concerned has a higher accolade available to it, then I'm far from convinced the Olympics should host it as a professional sport. So I would include golf, tennis, and football in the list of sports that shouldn't be rostered.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with all your points! I'm from Northern Ireland & it's as somewhere that no matter the decision taken, someone feels put out. I had to add mile when I read your c.f. comment about Mr Poulter! The Olympics should be the pinnacle of that sport - it clearly isn't with golf so shouldn't be rostered. I'd be keen to know the IOC's reasoning for including it.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Patrick Reed, because as a self-proclaimed top 5 player in the world today he will continue his dominance of the PGA tour and rise to take the #1 ranking. (PS - did you know he went 6-0 in NCAA match play)

just follow @patrickreedsego on twitter for more interesting "facts"

Okay - really it is about 750 days too early to tell; but best guess would be

Spieth

DJ

Webb

Walker

and

Creamer

Thompson

Kerr

Pressel

another question is how many of the top 20 or 30 in the OWGR/Rolex will not qualify for the Olympics?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For women, I like Korda & Wie's chances.   Lewis is my sure candidate.

Tiger?   Only if he stays healthy.   Seems like his body has been breaking down over the years (knee, now back).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Is there any reason why amateurs would not be eligible for the team? Olympic sport always used to be this way.

On the other hand, could any pros fit the Olympics around their tour schedule anyway? The Open is close to that date - I would think most top pros would want to play in that rather than an Olympic format.

The schedules are out. The Open is July 10-17 2016, and the Olympics are August 5-21. The exact dates for golf have not been listed. It will be a good summer with the US Open in June, Open in July, and Olympics in August.

I agree with everyone else, its too early to tell. That said, my picks would be:

Tiger - I think he will find a way. This is an event that even he would like to play (my perception). It was like Kobe in basketball - even with age and injury this is an event that guys just want to play.

DJ

Other two unknown, possibly Spieth, but other than him I think the other two could really be anyone at this point.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The schedules are out. The Open is July 10-17 2016, and the Olympics are August 5-21. The exact dates for golf have not been listed. It will be a good summer with the US Open in June, Open in July, and Olympics in August.

I agree with everyone else, its too early to tell. That said, my picks would be:

Tiger - I think he will find a way. This is an event that even he would like to play (my perception). It was like Kobe in basketball - even with age and injury this is an event that guys just want to play.

DJ

Other two unknown, possibly Spieth, but other than him I think the other two could really be anyone at this point.

And they're cramming the PGA Championship into that tiny window between the British Open and the Olympics.  It is going to be a very busy 5 weeks for the guys on the Olympic teams. :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Is there any reason why amateurs would not be eligible for the team? Olympic sport always used to be this way.

On the other hand, could any pros fit the Olympics around their tour schedule anyway? The Open is close to that date - I would think most top pros would want to play in that rather than an Olympic format.

The takeover of Olympic hockey by the pros is why I no longer watch it. The problem in the days of Olympic "amateur hockey" was that the Soviet Army team, which played in the Olympics, was for all practical purposes a pro team.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • He started off playing the first hole exactly how he should: fairway, 20-footer for birdie to the fat side of the green, tap-in par.
    • @iacas-Tho it is nice to be able to take your time and type out what you mean to say this is one of the downsides to a forum too-You have to respond to a whole bunch of crap and a person can get all of their thoughts out uninterrupted. If you were been sitting in a room with @natureboy and he started drawing that entirely stupid picture with the lines you could have cut him off and spared all of us the pain of having to watch him so badly miss the point. I bet @natureboy is still going to look at the response-And I bet he is still not going to see where he went wrong. But that is because he is just that way and he is unable to see how stupid his own posts are and how little they actually deal with golf swings. His stick drawing is exactly why you asked for a video-Even though he posted it after you asked. His errors and flaws and stupid thoughts would have been even more evident if he had actually tried to make a vid.
    • Or… golf is hard, and he got hot for awhile. Wouldn't be the first flash in the pan. We'll have to wait to see what the true version is. He could be quiet for ten years and then win a few majors.
    • That makes a great third bullet point. Or a first bullet point, bumping my two down.
    • This photo and the text above illustrate pretty well exactly why I and the entire moderation team is now done with you. The image fails on two levels: The center image is not representative of an actual good golf swing. The right hip is closer to the right foot in the center image, yet you maintain that it's farther away. Whether the second thing is done intentionally or accidentally I don't know. I don't care to know. But it's very representative of how you argue, and why you're now going to be prevented from arguing. You pervert arguments to the point where we're no longer discussing the golf swing. You get basic facts or concepts wrong (like when arguing about course rating, misunderstanding the radius vs. diameter in faulting the rating process for higher handicappers). You focus on some small thing - which often isn't even something anyone else has said - and lose sight of the forest or the big picture. You're not here to help golfers. You're here to "win" an argument, a goal that as yet is unmet, and you have to post absolute crap like the above to try to do it. I had a bit of free time this morning. So I responded to your last post in some detail. It, as one would expect, contains a number of typical @natureboy traits: cherry picking a photo while ignoring the concept, failure to understand basic points, perversion of the statements of others, putting words in the mouths of others, use of vague words like "a lot" (often in combination with the "putting words in the mouths of others), and hyper-focus on some small largely negligible point. Nobody else should waste their time to read the below, or open the spoiler and read that. It will not shed light on anything, it will not help you with your golf swing, and you will not glean any useful information. It exists simply as my last effort at illustrating to @natureboy a small part of the reason why we're tired of him… even though as I post it I know with certainty it too will fail. I gave you twenty warning points last night. It was made clear to you what you had to do, and you failed to do so, flaunting the requirement in several posts. The entire moderation team - @mvmac, @RandallT, @boogielicious, @jamo, @billchao, @nevets88, @mchepp, others - and myself have simply gotten sick and tired of your entire persona here. You're constantly and never-endingly arguing stuff to the point where you bastardize things so much you're no longer even talking about the golf swing, and you fail to comprehend or respond to what's written to you in response. You have two real choices once your current suspension is over: You can ignore these warnings, continue to be a belligerent arguer, and receive a final 50-point warning that will result in your permanent ban. You can avoid behaving in the manner that infuriates the entire moderation team. That will likely mean limiting the topics in which you post quite a bit, because though you fancy yourself to be capable of discussing the golf swing from a theoretical perspective, you've proven that you are not. Now, I want to be very clear about something. You're not being warned or "handled" because you disagree. You're being handled here because you contribute nothing positive. You're belligerent. You don't help people. You don't demonstrate anything. You pervert and distort topics in order to make a point that often has little or nothing to do with how people actually play golf. You're on a mission to "win" an argument, not to further the understanding. You speak as if you know and fail to ask questions, despite the holes in your logic and posts being constantly exposed as gaping. You quite often fail to read what's written, take a beat, and try to understand it. P.S. This requirement is anything but arbitrary. The list of reasons are long, the surface of which was only scratched in this post. Arbitrary would have been to say something like "to continue posting here you must dress up in a purple outfit and post a photo of yourself diving from a diving board into a pool of jello." Asking you to post a video illustrating your point is the opposite of arbitrary.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Catcher20
      Catcher20
      (27 years old)
    2. JD15
      JD15
      (52 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon