Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4265 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. AP2 PW or Vokey for the new iron set? You decide!

    • Vokey wedge
      1
    • AP2 wedge
      6
    • Other
      0


Recommended Posts

Posted

I am looking at change irons ......again :loco: Hopefully for the last time for a long while. My question is: Do I get the PW consistent with the set or go with a Vokey instead.

Please show your work (or tell me your reasoning) for the choice.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I can't "decide" for you, but I've always preferred the PW as part of the set.

The PW is a full swing club and as part of the set, it's purpose designed to fit as the next club after the 9-iron.  Looks the same at address, and has the offset, bounce, and shaft that best fit the remainder of the set.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I was not sure if it mattered since I transitioned into the Vokeys anyway. I was thinking a 2 degree weaker loft and the swing weight is a D3 vs the AP's D2.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Hmmm. Interesting. I apologize for hacking into this thread, yet, I have the same concern with a gap wedge, regardless of manufacturer. Part of the iron set or an actual wedge?


Posted
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valleygolfer View Post

I am looking at change irons ......again :loco: Hopefully for the last time for a long while. My question is: Do I get the PW consistent with the set or go with a Vokey instead.

Please show your work (or tell me your reasoning) for the choice.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alohaed View Post

Hmmm. Interesting. I apologize for hacking into this thread, yet, I have the same concern with a gap wedge, regardless of manufacturer. Part of the iron set or an actual wedge?

I currently own both the PW and GW (well, "U" actually) that are part of the i20 iron set, rather than wedge "style" but I think if I had to do it over again, I'd get wedges for both of them.  So if I was using Titleist, I'd have AP2 4I through 9I, and then Vokey P, G, S, and L.

Somewhere on this site somebody (I think it was @iacas **) gave a good explanation as to why they do it that way that resonated with me.  Basically, when you look down at a wedge, it looks like a "scoring" club, so why not have all of the wedges look like that?

** I found one place I read it ... a review Tristan wrote on Scor wedges.  He said:

Quote:

Before I start talking about the performance of these clubs, there are a few things that you have to understand about Scor. First off, where many manufacturers are now including a gap wedge in their sets, Scor is going the other way and saying that not only should you have a traditional gap, sand, and lob wedge but also replace the PW, 9 iron, and maybe even 8 iron with one of their clubs. The thinking behind this is that the majority of shots played with those short irons are much more like wedge shots than regular iron shots and so those clubs should blend in well together.

Anyways, that reasoning makes sense to me, so when it's time for new clubs, I'll probably get wedges all the same, and start the iron set at the 9 iron.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Too lazy to look up Titleist specs but with modern lofts I more or less consider my PW to be a 9i so I match it to my iron set. Before I messed around with my wedge lofts I had to carry two GW's, 4 wedges total beyond the PW to account for the strong lofts. When I went to gaps of 5* and made my most lofted wedge 58* I was able to free up space and bring another long club in. FWIW I used different shafts in my irons and wedges so that was a factor.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I currently own both the PW and GW (well, "U" actually) that are part of the i20 iron set, rather than wedge "style" but I think if I had to do it over again, I'd get wedges for both of them.  So if I was using Titleist, I'd have AP2 4I through 9I, and then Vokey P, G, S, and L. Somewhere on this site somebody (I think it was @iacas **) gave a good explanation as to why they do it that way that resonated with me. Basically, when you look down at a wedge, it looks like a "scoring" club, so why not have all of the wedges look like that? ** I found one place I read it ... a review Tristan wrote on Scor wedges.  He said: Anyways, that reasoning makes sense to me, so when it's time for new clubs, I'll probably get wedges all the same, and start the iron set at the 9 iron.

Ah, but remember, we're not aiming at the pin unless we're inside of 100 yards, right? ;-) Even a short-hitting old guy like me seldom hits PW inside of 100 yards unless an unusual situation calls for it.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Ah, but remember, we're not aiming at the pin unless we're inside of 100 yards, right?

Even a short-hitting old guy like me seldom hits PW inside of 100 yards unless an unusual situation calls for it.

Right.  I don't mean to say that I'm aiming at the pin on all shots with wedges, just that perhaps I'd be more confident that I'd nail my target (whatever that may be) with a club that looked like a wedge than with a club that looked like an iron.

Also, just is totally just in theory.  I've never had a gap wedge or pitching wedge that didn't match my iron set, so I really have no idea if it would even matter at all.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Funny, I was thinking that today. I have started hitting my Vokey 52 SM4 as far as my 714mb PW, which is 47 degrees. (110-120 yds) My wish however is that I can take the PW out of my bag and install a third (draw) driver. I don't want a 48 degree vokey that I clock out further than my 9-iron, but I like the play of the Vokeys... so I'll ditch the PW


Posted
Right.  I don't mean to say that I'm aiming at the pin on all shots with wedges, just that perhaps I'd be more confident that I'd nail my target (whatever that may be) with a club that looked like a wedge than with a club that looked like an iron.

Also, just is totally just in theory.  I've never had a gap wedge or pitching wedge that didn't match my iron set, so I really have no idea if it would even matter at all.

I suspect for some the problem would be design related, the lack of forgiveness for full swing shots of a blade style wedge compared to their iron set if they are playing CB's or some type of GI club.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I am veering towards the vokey. I love the wedges and want a higher loft than the pw offered. Although I can have it bent...

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I am veering towards the vokey. I love the wedges and want a higher loft than the pw offered. Although I can have it bent...

One consideration is the AP2 will have the shaft that the rest of the irons have.  The Vokey will have the wedge shaft.  The carry distance may be affected by this.  So the equal loft Vokey may be a bit shorter than the AP2 PW depending on your iron shaft.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
One consideration is the AP2 will have the shaft that the rest of the irons have.  The Vokey will have the wedge shaft.  The carry distance may be affected by this.  So the equal loft Vokey may be a bit shorter than the AP2 PW depending on your iron shaft.

I ordered my vokeys with the same shafts as my full set.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Right.  I don't mean to say that I'm aiming at the pin on all shots with wedges, just that perhaps I'd be more confident that I'd nail my target (whatever that may be) with a club that looked like a wedge than with a club that looked like an iron.

Also, just is totally just in theory.  I've never had a gap wedge or pitching wedge that didn't match my iron set, so I really have no idea if it would even matter at all.

Let me slightly change the wording in the OP's original post and ask the same question.....

I am looking at change irons ......again :loco: .   Hopefully for the last time for a long while. My question is: Do use the club from the set that I would expect to hit about 125 yards, or throw it out and replace it with a club of another make and model completely?

For some reason, just because it says "PW" on it instead of a number, some like to think that it's an entirely different animal.  What if it just said "10" on it?

Don't misunderstand......I love my wedges.  I have a custom Scratch and 2 new SM5's in the bag, but that's primarily because my irons didn't offer a GW.  Had they, I would have played it.  If in doing so I found that I didn't like it for some odd reason, then I'd look to switch.  But without having a reason not to like one club out of a set you otherwise like, it strikes me as a little silly to assume that another completely different club will suit you better.

Just my .02 worth.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Let me slightly change the wording in the OP's original post and ask the same question.....

I am looking at change irons ......again.   Hopefully for the last time for a long while. My question is: Do use the club from the set that I would expect to hit about 125 yards, or throw it out and replace it with a club of another make and model completely?

For some reason, just because it says "PW" on it instead of a number, some like to think that it's an entirely different animal.  What if it just said "10" on it?

Don't misunderstand......I love my wedges.  I have a custom Scratch and 2 new SM5's in the bag, but that's primarily because my irons didn't offer a GW.  Had they, I would have played it.  If in doing so I found that I didn't like it for some odd reason, then I'd look to switch.  But without having a reason not to like one club out of a set you otherwise like, it strikes me as a little silly to assume that another completely different club will suit you better.

Just my .02 worth.

All psychological, but I can't stand CB on my wedges. I dunno why but I'm much more confident with MB wedge. OTOH, I don't consider a PW to even be a wedge, I certainly never hit it like a wedge and tend to lean more towards the 10 iron viewpoint when it comes to the PW. For me, it's a full swing club not a finesse club.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

All psychological, but I can't stand CB on my wedges. I dunno why but I'm much more confident with MB wedge. OTOH, I don't consider a PW to even be a wedge, I certainly never hit it like a wedge and tend to lean more towards the 10 iron viewpoint when it comes to the PW. For me, it's a full swing club not a finesse club.

Exactly......

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Let me slightly change the wording in the OP's original post and ask the same question.....

I am looking at change irons ......again.   Hopefully for the last time for a long while. My question is: Do use the club from the set that I would expect to hit about 125 yards, or throw it out and replace it with a club of another make and model completely?

For some reason, just because it says "PW" on it instead of a number, some like to think that it's an entirely different animal.  What if it just said "10" on it?

Don't misunderstand......I love my wedges.  I have a custom Scratch and 2 new SM5's in the bag, but that's primarily because my irons didn't offer a GW.  Had they, I would have played it.  If in doing so I found that I didn't like it for some odd reason, then I'd look to switch.  But without having a reason not to like one club out of a set you otherwise like, it strikes me as a little silly to assume that another completely different club will suit you better.

Just my .02 worth.

That's a pretty solid .02. ;)  Just remember, though, that he's not talking exactly about "another completely different club," but rather a wedge that will match his other two or three that he already has.

In this day and age, isn't it kind of arbitrary where the transition is made from irons to wedges?  The pitching wedge and sand wedge got their names from their jobs, but those aren't really their only jobs anymore, are they?  I use my SW all of the time (OK, 90% of the time) around the greens, but I also use it for full shots as well.  My GW can only be used for full shots simply because I can't look down at it and think "finesse."  If I had a wedge style GW (and the same is true for a PW) I could still use it for full swings, just like I already do the SW, but maybe I could also be comfortable around the greens with it.

That is my .02. ;-)

For me, it's a full swing club not a finesse club.

And I think that it could be both.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
That's a pretty solid .02. ;)  Just remember, though, that he's not talking exactly about "another completely different club," but rather a wedge that will match his other two or three that he already has.

In this day and age, isn't it kind of arbitrary where the transition is made from irons to wedges?  The pitching wedge and sand wedge got their names from their jobs, but those aren't really their only jobs anymore, are they?  I use my SW all of the time (OK, 90% of the time) around the greens, but I also use it for full shots as well.  My GW can only be used for full shots simply because I can't look down at it and think "finesse."  If I had a wedge style GW (and the same is true for a PW) I could still use it for full swings, just like I already do the SW, but maybe I could also be comfortable around the greens with it.

That is my .02.

And I think that it could be both.

That is just it. My PW is used dually as a scoring club and full swing club. Since I have been playing the Mizunos the PW tends to go way farther than my Pings with my choked down shots. I was thinking of dropping the loft down with a SM5 to dial in a 115-120 yard shot because it seems like I use my PW for more choked down scoring shots than full swing shots. Of course I may just need to practice with the distance too instead of using the SM5. It is almost a buy both scenario and then decide which one I like better.

I think it is all how you perceive the club.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4265 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.