Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4251 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Getting to scratch golf is probably the holy grail of amateur golf. So, it would be nice for everyone to truly understand what it takes to become one, and discuss what everyone's idea of what is a scratch golfer.

My original interpretation was that a scratch golfer can hit driver off the tee an average of 250 yards and make a 470 yard par 4 in two shots driver and 3W or something like that.

This perception has changed in the last few months as I started watching college level players and really good amateurs hit their PW in the 150 yard range, and consider themselves as scratch golfers.

What are your perceptions?

The widely accepted text definition is as follows:

According to the USGA, a scratch golfer is defined as "a player who can play to a Course Handicap of zero on any and all rated golf courses. A male scratch golfer, for rating purposes, can hit tee shots an average of 250 yards and can reach a 470-yard hole in two shots at sea level. A female scratch golfer, for rating purposes, can hit tee shots an average of 210 yards and can reach a 400-yard hole in two shots at sea level."

Breaking down the definition we have a few phrases:

"a player who can play to a Course Handicap of zero on any and all rated golf courses"

That does this mean? Is the rated golf course 72/113 or could it also be 74.1/145? or even higher? What does "all rated courses" really mean? Does it mean that for the hardest rate course a scratch can score 0 over par and on easier courses they score sub-par?

can hit tee shots an average of 250 yards

Does this mean that if they use an 7i on one and driver on another the average would be 250? This means that if you hit your driver 300 and you 7i 200, that would give you an average tee shot of 250?

reach a 470-yard hole in two shots at sea level .

With what? Driver/3W or Driver/PW?

I presume that the answers are similar for female scratch golfers.

A female scratch golfer, for rating purposes, can hit tee shots an average of 210 yards and can reach a 400-yard hole in two shots at sea level."

So, is my new perception of scratch distorted or was my old one underestimating the scratch golfer?

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Ignore the distance piece.  It's really not relevant and only affects those that are rating courses.

From our perspective, a scratch golfer is one who can play to a zero course handicap.  That doesn't mean they shoot par every time, but based on CR and slope will be below a .4 differential.......in simple terms, they'll average less than .5 strokes above the CR for any course they play.  There's a bit more to it than that, but that'll get you pretty darn close.

Most of us go one step further though and routinely define it as anyone carrying a "0" handicap index which is only calculated by the low 10 of your last 20 rounds.  That's not quite what the USGA means, but for most of us, that's where we're going to draw the line.

Regardless, an honest to God scratch golfer is stupid good, by most of our standards.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
For me when I think scratch golfer I think of someone that had potential of shooting par at any course he plays.. Doesn't mean that they have to as sometimes they'll score below par and sometimes over, but they hover around it all the time.. I hate to think that someone who has never shot even par in a pro course can be considered a scratch golfer no matter what the HC system says.. That's my opinion anyway, eventually I want to be able to play par golf, but not just be able to say that my HC is 0!

:adams: / :tmade: / :edel: / :aimpoint: / :ecco: / :bushnell: / :gamegolf: / 

Eyad

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

For me when I think scratch golfer I think of someone that had potential of shooting par at any course he plays.. Doesn't mean that they have to as sometimes they'll score below par and sometimes over, but they hover around it all the time.. I hate to think that someone who has never shot even par in a pro course can be considered a scratch golfer no matter what the HC system says.. That's my opinion anyway, eventually I want to be able to play par golf, but not just be able to say that my HC is 0!

Sure, but driving 280+ yards and hitting a PW into orbit would also be pretty impressive to the average golfer.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Most of us go one step further though and routinely define it as anyone carrying a "0" handicap index which is only calculated by the low 10 of your last 20 rounds.  That's not quite what the USGA means, but for most of us, that's where we're going to draw the line.

Regardless, an honest to God scratch golfer is stupid good, by most of our standards.

The last two paragraphs are what I think of as a scratch golfer.

Don

In the bag:

Driver: PING 410 Plus 9 degrees, Alta CB55 S  Fairway: Callaway Rogue 3W PX Even Flow Blue 6.0; Hybrid: Titleist 818H1 21* PX Even Flow Blue 6.0;  Irons: Titleist 718 AP1 5-W2(53*) Shafts- TT AMT Red S300 ; Wedges Vokey SM8 56-10D Putter: Scotty Cameron 2016 Newport 2.5  Ball: Titleist AVX or 2021 ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Sure, but driving 280+ yards and hitting a PW into orbit would also be pretty impressive to the average golfer.

I play with a good friend of mine who hits his driver 290+ very regularly and straight. He also hits his PW about 145-150.  I think the lowest he got down to was .8 or something just under 1.  He has only shot par on an 18 hole round 1 time and he wouldn't consider himself a scratch golfer.  It is really fun to watch him even though he has fallen off in the last year of 2 (he doesn't really play all that much anymore). Whats funny to me is he knows a guy he's played with a number of times thats a plus handicap and he said theres a huge difference between the two of them.  Shooting around par is just so difficult I respect the hell out of anyone that gets to that level.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Hey Abu.  You are H\cap 26 now, presumably a grown adult, live in a land with few golf courses and those probably very dear in cost, and expect one day to shoot par on any course?  Is that really you or the tooth fairy talking?

No disrespect of your dream intended but i don't think you can truly understand how steep is the climb to the top of the hill and how heavy is the bag you must carry.

I'm breaking my a** trying to move from H'cap 19 to 15. Unless some miracle occurs which can upset my life story of 50 years of golfing behaviour, i will be blessed and grateful if i reach my goal in my lifetime. Par?  I may as wish to win the lottery.


Posted

Scratch = damn good, less than 1% of all golfers and is not relative to how far they drive the ball but rather how many strokes it takes to hear that sound of ball rattling around in the cup.


Posted

Hey Abu.  You are H\cap 26 now, presumably a grown adult, live in a land with few golf courses and those probably very dear in cost, and expect one day to shoot par on any course?  Is that really you or the tooth fairy talking?

No disrespect of your dream intended but i don't think you can truly understand how steep is the climb to the top of the hill and how heavy is the bag you must carry.

I'm breaking my a** trying to move from H'cap 19 to 15. Unless some miracle occurs which can upset my life story of 50 years of golfing behaviour, i will be blessed and grateful if i reach my goal in my lifetime. Par?  I may as wish to win the lottery.

:)

yes, I am only 35 yo, so I hope there is plenty of time ahead.  Besides I was just talking about what I consider to be a scratch golfer in my opinion and how I hope to become one someday (nothing to do with the tooth fairy here)... I am taking the necessary steps to achieve my goals and I have ways to measure my progress as well.. I might not be accelerating the process, but that is because of other obligations and family and the fact that I didn't start golf when I was 7.

Anyway, none of this is here nor there, so I can hope and dream and I will enjoy the journey there as much as I will enjoy the result at the end!

:adams: / :tmade: / :edel: / :aimpoint: / :ecco: / :bushnell: / :gamegolf: / 

Eyad

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

To me a scratch golfer is just what the book says it is, minus the distance references. If you can shoot the course rating at any course on any given day, you are a scratch golfer in my eyes. I don't mean have the round of your life and shoot the course rating once, but do so consistently so that your handicap reflects it by being near zero. There is a significant disparity between me and a scratch golfer, and an even bigger disparity between a scratch golfer and a +2. The margins widen as you go lower. A good friend of mine is a pro that hovers between +2 and +3, and he's on a completely different level than me when it comes to golf. Several levels, actually.


Posted

To me a scratch golfer is just what the book says it is, minus the distance references. If you can shoot the course rating at any course on any given day, you are a scratch golfer in my eyes. I don't mean have the round of your life and shoot the course rating once, but do so consistently so that your handicap reflects it by being near zero. There is a significant disparity between me and a scratch golfer, and an even bigger disparity between a scratch golfer and a +2. The margins widen as you go lower. A good friend of mine is a pro that hovers between +2 and +3, and he's on a completely different level than me when it comes to golf. Several levels, actually.

What visible differences between you and your buddy are there?  It seems you are very accomplish already, then what separates his skills vs. yours?  Ball striking, short games within 100 yd, chipping, putting, different shot making, etc or all of above and beyond?   Is your pro friend in pga tour or web.com tour?  If not, does your friend say his skills are not up to the par to those guys?  I'm always curious about this topic.  I watch pga games on tv and I know they are good.  Just can't wrap my head around to fathom how good they are since I play with mostly weekend rough riders and tree huggers


Posted
Scratch = damn good, less than 1% of all golfers and is not relative to how far they drive the ball but rather how many strokes it takes to hear that sound of ball rattling around in the cup.

Yep. :beer:

To me a scratch golfer is just what the book says it is, minus the distance references. If you can shoot the course rating at any course on any given day, you are a scratch golfer in my eyes. I don't mean have the round of your life and shoot the course rating once, but do so consistently so that your handicap reflects it by being near zero. There is a significant disparity between me and a scratch golfer, and an even bigger disparity between a scratch golfer and a +2. The margins widen as you go lower. A good friend of mine is a pro that hovers between +2 and +3, and he's on a completely different level than me when it comes to golf. Several levels, actually.

Only half of the time (no matter what you do the other half) will get you there. :-D

Damn, playing really well half the time ought to be easy to do. :no::no::no::surrender:

And I thought for years and years (before I started playing golf) that "Par for the course" was borderline unacceptable.


Posted

What visible differences between you and your buddy are there?  It seems you are very accomplish already, then what separates his skills vs. yours?  Ball striking, short games within 100 yd, chipping, putting, different shot making, etc or all of above and beyond?   Is your pro friend in pga tour or web.com tour?  If not, does your friend say his skills are not up to the par to those guys?  I'm always curious about this topic.  I watch pga games on tv and I know they are good.  Just can't wrap my head around to fathom how good they are since I play with mostly weekend rough riders and tree huggers

Having played with three different .5 to +1 handicappers from my high school team over the last three years, the most notable difference for me at least is consistency and the ability to make birdies.

I make a lot of pars, not too many birdies, and a bogey every couple holes or so. This leaves me with my current handicap index of 4.8 (which hopefully will trend downwards). The people I played with never really fatted a shot and left it 10 feet short of the green. They'd hit it fat and it would be 15 feet short of where it was supposed to land (which is only 10 feet short of the green with a front pin). If they hit it thin the main difference would be it would fly just a little further (with the short irons) and have a bit less spin when it landed. The tee shots though had the biggest consistency difference. On a bad day for me I may only hit two fairways all day (it's the weak point of my game) and on a bad day they may only hit six fairways. On a really good day I might hit 10/14 fairways while they're hitting all 14.

The main difference comes down to the fact that their misses were usually still in a spot where they could have a decent shot to make par, if not still salvage a birdie if they made a long putt or chipped it in. That and the fact that they more frequently would make those long putts and chip it in. Just an all around better game with better misses I'd say was the big difference.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I moved from a scratch golfer, like 0 HC, to a +2.7 in a manner of 2 months.  No joke!  The biggest difference?  Taking your sweet a** time and concentrating, or what's between your ears.  Consistency is very important obviously but it's also playing to your strengths.  I talked in another thread about this, but if you know you can hit a certain shot to the green better than any other, use it as much as you can.  I love my PW and 52°, so I will try my best to be 130-150 or 90-110 out from the green.  If that's not possible anywhere under 180 is fine for me to hit the green.  But with the PW and 52 I can attack pins more and try to give more chances for birdie.  But, it's also true that you are aware of your misses and try to play accordingly on holes where it matters.

Philip Kohnken, PGA
Director of Instruction, Lake Padden GC, Bellingham, WA

Srixon/Cleveland Club Fitter; PGA Modern Coach; Certified in Dr Kwon’s Golf Biomechanics Levels 1 & 2; Certified in SAM Putting; Certified in TPI
 
Team :srixon:!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Scratch golfer = Something I will never be ...unless someone wants to pay off my mortgage, car loans, and cover my monthly bills.

- Shane

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Scratch golfer = Something I will never be ...unless someone wants to pay off my mortgage, car loans, and cover my monthly bills.


And even then, it is highly unlikely.

- Shane

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

don't understand why the distance component is in the definition.      I can get on in 2 on a par 4, 470 yd hole .... and I'm nowhere close to being considered a long hitter, and miles away from scratch.      Being scratch to means someone who just doesn't make mistakes, and when they do, recovers from them to salvage the hole.    They are ... PAR MACHINES

Furthermore ... to a scratch golfer, par is expected - every time, every hole.    For every bogie, they have to get a birdie to balance it out & be scratch - think about that for a reality check.

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4251 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.