Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4241 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

More golf courses are closing every day. Many golf retailers describe their business as down by a third from 5 years ago. What can be done to grow golf and make it more fun and profitable for all in the sport?

I have thought about it and have a few ideas that might help:

1. Have 2 flags on every green and play to the closest one.

2. Allow the hand wedge- throwing the ball.(for beginners)

3. Mow the roughs to make play easier and speed up the game.

4. Reward fast play with a 2 shot reduction in score.

Just thinking. Any thoughts?


Posted

In my opinion one of the reasons I think golf has been struggling is that the economy made it hard for people to have the disposable income required to take it up and/or play. Golf is pretty expensive. Also, one of the reasons for the "explosion" of popularity of golf was due to the fame of Tiger, and now even that has calmed down.

  • Upvote 1

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think it's two fold, time and money, 5 or 6 hour rounds on a public course is not uncommon in my area, and $40 - $80 a round either (not to mention the price of equipment).  I think it's a question of reducing one or the other, changes are money won't go down, so a matter of reducing the time it takes to play.

Craig 

Yeah, wanna make 14 dollars the hard way?


Posted

Advertise it as a family sport. A family sport being not as competitive as other sports.

Many courses are already reacting in the Los Angeles greater area, by attracting more families. The successful ones charge a lot less for the kids, and of course, the parents go along with them. If it costs $60 for a family of 4 to ride out on a course for 4 hours, they will pay it. Families like to go out in the mid-late afternoons too, so they could readily go on twilight hours.

Families can play the game together. Make it less competitive for the family to enjoy. The game could be played scramble format with: kids vs.parents, moms vs. dads, sisters vs. brothers etc.

Kids like playing naturally, I think what turns off many of them are excessive rules and the distances of the courses.

I would never have thought that the par 3 and the 3000 yard executive courses would do well, but they are doing really well. The primary reason is that they cater to families.

  • Upvote 1

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The money seems to be a common problem. I was into competitive handgun shooting sports until the price of ammo skyrocketed! Golf seems reasonably priced compared to the shooting sports, even when you lose a golf ball or two!

I like the idea of promoting it as a family sport!

  • Upvote 1

Posted
Golf doing well in TX, probably due to the economy, which is due to the conservative government. So, to make golf more popular in some of the struggling regions of our fair land, vote conservative and unleash some of the trillions companies are sitting on.
  • Upvote 1

In my Bag: Driver: Titelist 913 D3 9.5 deg. 3W: TaylorMade RBZ 14.5 3H: TaylorMade RBZ 18.5 4I - SW: TaylorMade R7 TP LW: Titelist Vokey 60 Putter: Odyssey 2-Ball

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Golf doing well in TX, probably due to the economy, which is due to the conservative government.

So, to make golf more popular in some of the struggling regions of our fair land, vote conservative and unleash some of the trillions companies are sitting on.

This can go tangential... :-O

Golf if not dying.  It's just trying to adjust post Tiger era.  It will continue to grow but much slower speed than we have seen past decades.  Growth in golf has been insane just as Tiger's career has been so far.


Posted

One thing I have found in the last few weeks a lot of courses do not offer Jr rates until 12:00 or later. Or they don't offer at all on the weekends.

My son and I play every week so to play some what nice course is $48 on up per person. Compound this with lessons, range cards, balls it can add up.

I would assume a young family just cant afford this, and it seems some of the courses would rather not have kids play?

But Lihu I would agree that if a course offered more of a family value you may find more family's playing, I would think this would help grow the game.

Mike M.

Irons G30's 4-U.

Hybrid's Callaway X2Hot 3 and 4.

Vokey Wedges SM5 Tour Chrome, 54*, 58*.

Putter Greyhawk, G25 4 wood, G25 Driver.


Posted
In my opinion one of the reasons I think golf has been struggling is that the economy made it hard for people to have the disposable income required to take it up and/or play. Golf is pretty expensive. Also, one of the reasons for the "explosion" of popularity of golf was due to the fame of Tiger, and now even that has calmed down.

Explosion of watching golf not playing it. Golf participation levels since tiger turned pro have trended down? I'm not blaming this on him. But rather pointing a non truth. There was also a build up of courses anticipating growth....that the media hyped,but it never materialized.


Posted

Explosion of watching golf not playing it. Golf participation levels since tiger turned pro have trended down? I'm not blaming this on him. But rather pointing a non truth. There was also a build up of courses anticipating growth....that the media hyped,but it never materialized.

Wait, so there wasn't a large increase in players of golf when Tiger first came on the scene and gained widespread notoriety? Funny, because I was pretty sure a lot of parents got into golf as well as getting their kids into golf thinking it they may have the next phenom. I could have mistaken how much of an impact that was on the numbers of people golfing though. I know for a fact that there was a pretty large increase in kids taking up golf during that time in my area and parents along with them. Could have been something that didn't repeat everywhere though.

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I don't buy the "time" excuse for golf, or anything for that matter.  If something is important or worthwhile, you would make time for it.  Period.  Like I've said before I think it comes down to cost.  People eat a lot of garbage food like McDonalds because of cost, much of their entertainment is TV/movies because of cost, etc.  If golf was more affordable I think you'd see many more people playing it.


Posted

I think that golf has been declining for a bunch of reasons the biggest one being money.  Clubs are expensive, balls are expensive, a round of golf is very expensive and to top all of that off, golf is hard ! It is very easy to lose interest in the game quickly especially if you dont have the time and money to practice enough to make playing worth it.  A big way to make the game more popular would be for courses to reduce these costs by offering deals on tee times and in particular deals for kids to play with parents at a very low price--if it were to only cost an extra 10 bucks for a parent to bring their kid along instead of paying a full green fee for them it would give parents incentive to bring their kids golfing and get them interested in the game.  Also discounts on lessons or courses sponsoring "learn to golf days" where someone new to the game can pay a small amount ($5, $10 or $20 depending on the course) for a few hours of a group lesson to learn the basics of the game including full swing, short game, and course etiquette and then end the day with a free 9 holes or something.  programs like this might be able to get people who have had an interest in the game a little more actively involved since they wont have to invest too much money to give the game a try.

I also saw another very good idea at a course that i played this weekend.  The course had an extra set of what must have been "junior" tee markers on every hole which were in the fairway, never further than 100 yards from the green and some as close as 10 yards off the green.  The markers don't really cost the course anything, are a great place for someone who is just learning the game to start and they would still be able to maintain a decent pace of play since the kids (or novices to the game) that would use the tee would take forever to make it all the way down a 500 yard par 5

What's in the bag:
Taylormade R15 
Callaway X2Hot pro 3W
Callaway X2Hot pro 20* hybrid
Mizuno JPX900 Tour 4-PW
Cleveland RTX 2.0 50,54, and 58 degree wedges
Taylormade White Smoke putter


Posted

I don't buy the "time" excuse for golf, or anything for that matter.  If something is important or worthwhile, you would make time for it.  Period.  Like I've said before I think it comes down to cost.  People eat a lot of garbage food like McDonalds because of cost, much of their entertainment is TV/movies because of cost, etc.  If golf was more affordable I think you'd see many more people playing it.

I disagree. Time is an issue. For players like us (those that love golf to the point that we go on the internet to talk about it) it's not as big of an issue as our love for the game is strong enough that we are going to play regardless. However for somebody just getting into the game or players not as dedicated time is a big factor. On a good day, a round can take 4 hours and when you start talking about rounds that hit and exceed the 5 hour mark, it becomes not worth it for many. It's frustrating when you feel like you have to wait on every shot and there aren't a lot of people willing to pay $50 or more to be frustrated.

Tristan Hilton

My Equipment: 
Titleist TSR2 Driver (Fujikura Pro 2.0 TS; 10.5°) · PXG 0211 FWs (Diamana S+ 60; 15° and 21°) · PXG 0211 Hybrid (MMT 80; 22°) · Edel SMS Irons (SteelFiber i95; 5-GW) · Edel SMS Pro Wedges (SteelFiber i110; 56°, 60°) · Edel Classic Blade Putter (32") · Maxfli Tour Ball · Pinned Prism Rangefinder · SuperStroke Grips · Flightscope Mevo · TRUE Linkswear Shoes · Vessel Player V Pro 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I disagree. Time is an issue. For players like us (those that love golf to the point that we go on the internet to talk about it) it's not as big of an issue as our love for the game is strong enough that we are going to play regardless. However for somebody just getting into the game or players not as dedicated time is a big factor. On a good day, a round can take 4 hours and when you start talking about rounds that hit and exceed the 5 hour mark, it becomes not worth it for many. It's frustrating when you feel like you have to wait on every shot and there aren't a lot of people willing to pay $50 or more to be frustrated.

That's not what I mean.  I'm talking about the people who say they don't have time to do some thing that they apparently would like to do (implying their day has fewer hours in it than everyone else or something?).  It's mostly just a pet peeve of mine, I would prefer it if people would simply say they choose to spend their time on other things instead of saying they don't have time to do X thing (like golf)-- because that is the reality of what is going on.  If someone is a little bit interested in golf but not interested enough to spend 4 hours on a course, that's totally fine and I'm cool with that.. but just say so, don't throw some nonsense out there like you don't have time.  It's just a bogus, meaningless excuse that has come to annoy me over the years for some reason.

Anyway, carry on! :-P


  • Moderator
Posted

I am not seeing a down turn in MA.  Most of the courses I play are busy.  It has been tough to get on as a single.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Golf doing well in TX, probably due to the economy, which is due to the conservative government.

The second I saw these two words, I knew this thread was gonna take a different turn than it was intended to. It is okay to look at perhaps the declining popularity of golf and the lost revenue to courses, but I think that just comes with the times. Honestly coming from many people that I know, they enjoy watching and knowing about golf when the pros that they like are in contention. Especially fro my dad and my uncle, both lovers of golf, but now that Tiger has gone for surgery and hasn't played in months, they sort of stopped watching it. Like my dad always says, "I will watch final round golf, as long as Tiger is near the top of the leader board".

We must harness the crystiles.

:tmade: Nubbins B7 Putter

:tmade: r7 460 Graphite Driver


Note: This thread is 4241 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.