Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast!
IGNORED

Balls

21degreeloft
 Share
Note: This thread is 3958 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

saevel25 Incredible Member

saevel25

Posted
Posted

Yeah, the ProV1x well still spin notably more than an NXT or NXT Tour, the same as a B330-RX spinning more than an e6, or a Nike RZN Black spinning more than a RZN Red.

Notably more on wedge and half-wedge shots. Not notably more on driver shots. Just to clarify a bit.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: :titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

David in FL Incredible Member

David in FL

Posted
Posted
Notably more on wedge and half-wedge shots. Not notably more on driver shots. Just to clarify a bit.

At least for me, the ProV1x spins much more than Titleist's low spin distance balls with a full swing, both irons and woods. Less that the ProV1, for sure, but significantly more than the others.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw
Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1
1

saevel25 Incredible Member

saevel25

Posted
Posted

At least for me, the ProV1x spins much more than Titleist's low spin distance balls with a full swing, both irons and woods. Less that the ProV1, for sure, but significantly more than the others.

Yea that makes sense. Pro-V1x is suppose to spin slightly less than the Pro-V1. They both have Urethane covers, so you are not going to see much difference in half-wedge shots.

As for driver spin, you'd probably see a few hundred rpm less between the Pro-V line and the NXT line. As for half-wedge spin you should see nearly 1000+ rpm difference.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: :titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

turtleback Super Member

turtleback

Posted
Posted

Too expensive!

I had some top flight XL long a while back... Didn't like them one bit

OK, I was thrown a bit about the not cheap, but I see now what you meant  You don;t want to go down to those $8 a dozen balls (I agree with you on that).

I didn't like the Top Flite XL either.  Or any Top-flite ball.  Until the gamer.  That is why I made the point that this is not your father's top flite.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1

colin007 Incredible Member

colin007

Posted
Posted

Too expensive!

I had some top flight XL long a while back... Didn't like them one bit

dude, the TopFlite Gamers are NOTHING like the XL.  if you dont try them out then youre missing out on a great ball.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1

Tat14 Well Established Member

Tat14

Posted
Posted

Regarding the Gamer...

Looking at the TF site, it appears that only the Gamer Tour has a urethane cover.

Has anyone played the regular, Tour, and Soft versions? Any significant difference in long game spin? How about the drop & stop factor?

Gambling is illegal at Bushwood sir, and I never slice.   

           

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1

colin007 Incredible Member

colin007

Posted
Posted
I consider both the regular and the tour versions to be better than the Titleist NXT

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1

turtleback Super Member

turtleback

Posted
Posted

Regarding the Gamer...

Looking at the TF site, it appears that only the Gamer Tour has a urethane cover.

Has anyone played the regular, Tour, and Soft versions? Any significant difference in long game spin? How about the drop & stop factor?

I've played the regular, but not the Soft or Tour.  I plan on trying out the Tour and Soft versions when summer comes.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1

Tat14 Well Established Member

Tat14

Posted
Posted

In case anyone is interested, my delivery of 24 Chrome Soft did arrive yesterday, the 16th, coinciding with shelf availability.

Well done Callaway.

Gambling is illegal at Bushwood sir, and I never slice.   

           

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1

NJpatbee Great Member

NJpatbee

Posted
Posted

I have played all 3 of the Gamer offerings and can offer the following general comparisons based on my swing:

The Gamer is similar to the e6 or NXT Tour and a bit longer than both for my 90 mph driver SS.

The Gamer Soft is a 3 piece version of balls like the Supersoft but with a somewhat more solid feel than the 2014 Supersoft,  It is one of the best balls that no one is talking about and it did receive the Golf Digest gold award.

The Gamer Tour is a 3 piece Urethene ball that I would compare to the Chrome +.  Holds the green well with a good amount of spin, but did not stop like velcro for my swing which I prefer.  I played it a full season and for my swing I was a bit shorter than the Gamer,  Some have complained about the durability of the Gamer Tour urethene cover but I never had a problem (but I do not have pro level speed or spin with my wedges).  I also rarely make it through an 18 hole round with the same ball so I cannot comment on durability beyond 15-16 holes.

A real sleeper was the 2014 Maxfli U/3, a 3 piece urethene covered ball also.  I gave it a try and it became my regular ball last season due to the increase in distance I received - not sure why but I gained 10-15 yards off the tee and was a club longer for the rest of my clubs.  Trees and cart paths also did little to degrade the cover,

There are a lot of great choices to try and as golfers the ball OEMs are constantly fighting for market share - the introduction of the Chrome Soft was a clear response to the Chrome branding and the popularity of soft feeling golf balls.

Have fun and good luck finding the right ball for you!

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1

phread59 Member

phread59

Posted
Posted

NJ is spot on.  I have played the soft.  It felt great off irons and wedges.  Had decent stopping power.  Flew true and decent distance.  I'm also going to give the U3 a whirl this spring as well.  The whole Gamer series is the proverbial "Diamond in the rough".  Not trying them would be a great disservice to yourself.

Mark Shuman

Mark Shuman


vangator Great Member

vangator

Posted
Posted
I found a TM Rocketballz with a urethane cover. Haven't hit it yet but I bet it plays well. Not sure of the price either. I don't plan on switching.

Driver.......Ping K15 9.5* stiff 3 wood.....Ping K15 16* stiff 5 wood.....Ping K15 19* stiff 4 Hybrid...Cleveland Gliderail 23* stiff 5 - PW......Pinhawk SL GW...........Tommy Armour 52* SW...........Tommy Armour 56* LW...........Tommy Armour 60* FW...........Diamond Tour 68* Putter.......Golfsmith Dyna Mite Ball..........Volvik Vista iV Green Bag..........Bennington Quiet Organizer Shoes.... ..Crocs


Polynikes Member

Polynikes

Posted
Posted

I really like the Titleist Velocity, as requested it flies off the driver with low spin.

 ping.gif G30 Driver

 ping.gif K15 3 Wood

 ping.gif G25 Hybrid

 ping.gif i20 Irons 4-S

 ping.gifTour S Rustique 58 degree Wedge

 ping.gif Anser 2 TR Putter


Seniorhacker Established Member

Seniorhacker

Posted
Posted

I don't know about the Chrome+ but the Callaway Chrome has good distance off the driver and good playability around the green.


Derek02 Well Established Member

Derek02

Posted
Posted

This might help:

http://www.golfdigest.com/images/equipment/2014-05/eqsl32-hot-list-ball-spin-rate-chart.jpg

Driver:       Cobra AMP Cell - Blue

Fairway:    TM Rocketballz Stage 2  *17
Hybrids:    Callaway X2 Hot 19* and 22*
Irons:        Mizuno MX-23 5-PW
Wedges:   Cleveland 588  51*, 56*, 60*

Putter:      Scotty Cameron GoLo Customized

Ball:          Srixon Z Star (2013)


Derek02 Well Established Member

Derek02

Posted
Posted

This might help:

http://www.golfdigest.com/images/equipment/2014-05/eqsl32-hot-list-ball-spin-rate-chart.jpg

For what it's worth: I'm kind of a golf ball aficionado, and I like to try different balls (particularly inside 100 yards).  Historically, I have found that the wedge spin rates, relatively speaking, have not always matched up to Golf Digest's charts.  For example, the 2011 Z Star was located high up in the chart in terms of half wedge spin, but I found that it didn't spin all that much (everything else about it was great).  I think it had to do with the fact that the Z Stars have the thinnest covers in the premium market.  As a result, the wedge didn't grip the ball that well to impart a lot of spin.  I'm inclined to think that others (including pros) agreed with me since they subsequently put the new "spin skin" on the next generation of balls.  I really like the newest version of the Z Star (2013), but you might prefer the Z Star XV between the two.

Driver:       Cobra AMP Cell - Blue

Fairway:    TM Rocketballz Stage 2  *17
Hybrids:    Callaway X2 Hot 19* and 22*
Irons:        Mizuno MX-23 5-PW
Wedges:   Cleveland 588  51*, 56*, 60*

Putter:      Scotty Cameron GoLo Customized

Ball:          Srixon Z Star (2013)


  • 2 weeks later...
golfbarefoot Dedicated Member

golfbarefoot

Posted
Posted
For what it's worth: I'm kind of a golf ball aficionado , and I like to try different balls (particularly inside 100 yards).  Historically, I have found that the wedge spin rates, relatively speaking, have not always matched up to Golf Digest's charts.  For example, the 2011 Z Star was located high up in the chart in terms of half wedge spin, but I found that it didn't spin all that much (everything else about it was great).  I think it had to do with the fact that the Z Stars have the thinnest covers in the premium market.  As a result, the wedge didn't grip the ball that well to impart a lot of spin.  I'm inclined to think that others (including pros) agreed with me since they subsequently put the new "spin skin" on the next generation of balls.  I really like the newest version of the Z Star (2013), but you might prefer the Z Star XV between the two.

Interesting. Rank the top 5 golf ball products, in your opinion.


Note: This thread is 3958 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up

  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).

  • Posts

    • DeadMan
      "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge

      By DeadMan · Posted

      Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • xrayvizhen
      Differential vs Course Handicap

      By xrayvizhen · Posted

      I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • 5amZ
      "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge

      By 5amZ · Posted

      Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • WillieT
      "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge

      By WillieT · Posted

      Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • mdl
      Differential vs Course Handicap

      By mdl · Posted

      Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

  I accept