Jump to content
IGNORED

Tiger's Slam - A Grand Achievement?


iacas
Note: This thread is 3048 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

13 members have voted

  1. 1. Was Tiger's Slam (winning all four major championships in a row) a "grand slam"?

    • Yes
      60
    • No
      50


Recommended Posts

Ask him. Otherwise who cares? You are losing.

A) I didn't know there was a winning or losing. B) Considering the entire golfing and sports world considers Tigers accomplishment just the "Tiger Slam" and not the "Grand Slam of Golf", I'm not sure I'm losing anything. It's strange, I watch and read quite a bit of sports news and reporting, and I haven't heard anyone change the definition of the Grand Slam to include what Tiger did to include it. There are a handful of guys on this board who have an opinion, and that's great, that's what we are here for. But your opinion isn't going to change the definition or the record books.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

A) I didn't know there was a winning or losing.

The poll. [quote name="MyrtleBeachGolf" url="/t/83344/tigers-slam-a-grand-achievement/36#post_1171914"]B) Considering the entire golfing and sports world considers Tigers accomplishment just the "Tiger Slam" and not the "Grand Slam of Golf", I'm not sure I'm losing anything.[/quote] Not true. See @mvmac post above.

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I voted "No" because I  feel they all have to be done in the same calendar year.  The reason they call it the "Tiger Slam" is because most don't consider it true a "Grand Slam".  It's still an amazing achievement and as close as one can get to a Grand Slam, but if someone wins all 4 in the same calendar year I believe it's even a greater accomplishment.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I voted "No" because I  feel they all have to be done in the same calendar year.  The reason they call it the "Tiger Slam" is because most don't consider it true a "Grand Slam".  It's still an amazing achievement and as close as one can get to a Grand Slam, but if someone wins all 4 in the same calendar year I believe it's even a greater accomplishment.

How is winning four over four or five months greater than winning four over eight months? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Slam_(golf) [QUOTE]The Grand Slam in men's golf is an unofficial concept, having changed over time. In the modern era, the Grand Slam is generally considered to be winning all four of golf's major championships in the same calendar year.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE]Tiger Woods has come closest to meeting the modern definition of golf's Grand Slam by holding all four modern major championships simultaneously — the U.S. Open, The Open Championship and the PGA Championship in 2000 and the 2001 Masters — although not in the same calendar year. This has been referred to as a Consecutive Grand Slam or, after the only player to achieve it, a Tiger Slam.[2] In fact, even before Woods accomplished this, there was much debate over the definition of "Grand Slam." Fred Couples said, "I don't know how I can put it more simply . . . if he wins all four, it's a Slam." As noted above, however, because there is no official definition, there is no definitive answer. [/QUOTE] http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=93613 [QUOTE]"To win four consecutive majors, if you look at my career, I don't think I have ever accomplished anything this great," Woods said Sunday after finishing the Masters at 16-under-par 272. That put him two strokes ahead of David Duval and three strokes ahead of Phil Mickelson, for his 27th PGA Tour victory. "I think it's a slam," PGA Tour Commissioner Tim Finchem said Sunday, warding off any dispute about whether what Woods has done deserves the highest praise. "It's a different kind of slam than we grew up with, but different is OK." Sportswriters have tried to come up with other words for it — a Tiger Slam, a Straight Slam. Forget it. Arguments about whether what Woods has done is a true Grand Slam — something no one in golf has achieved, with the possible exception of Bobby Jones, who won the four biggest tournaments of his era in 1931 — are beside the point.[/QUOTE]

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

How is winning four over four or five months greater than winning four over eight months?

Because it doesn't account for the grind of the season.  A guy who does it in four or five months has to be playing his top golf consistently over that period, despite nicks and minor injuries.  Tiger had a few months to practice, rest and heal before he won the Masters in 2001

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Oddly I feel it was a made up name by the press to start with ... they labeled it several things back in the day ... I believe if Bobby had won them on the same time frame as Tiger, it would have been label a grand slam then ... Conversely if Bobby won the same events he won in todays game, it would not be a slam. I consider it a grand slam, since in my opinion there is not a big deal made around a "golf season" However, I am also good with a Tiger Slam, a title that will last many many years to come. My opinion, and 88 cents will get you a Gatorade at my local Walmart ...

Ken Proud member of the iSuk Golf Association ... Sponsored by roofing companies across the US, Canada, and the UK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Because it doesn't account for the grind of the season.  A guy who does it in four or five months has to be playing his top golf consistently over that period, despite nicks and minor injuries.  Tiger had a few months to practice, rest and heal before he won the Masters in 2001

So did everyone else. Tiger had eight months to consider the weight of what he was trying to do too. And for his hot streak to end. Longer streaks are tougher than shorter streaks.

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:

Originally Posted by MyrtleBeachGolf

By definition, you must win all 4 in the same calendar year. If the PGA Tour doesn't consider the Tiger Slam an official Grand Slam, then neither do I.

I disagree that that's the "definition."

I define it as "winning all four majors in a row." The "calendar year" is an arbitrary, pointless thing.

Consider the definition of "career grand slam," which clearly doesn't have a silly limit like that. That just requires that you win four, in any order you want, over any period of time. Heck… Tiger won the "career grand slam" in four consecutive events!

I agree, particularly in view of the fact that both major tour seasons don't even observe the calendar year.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So did everyone else. Tiger had eight months to consider the weight of what he was trying to do too. And for his hot streak to end.

Longer streaks are tougher than shorter streaks.

In 2000 they had more of an off season, he might have had more time to consider the weight of what he was trying to do but he went into the Majors healthy and fresh.  You're also discounting the mental fatigue of having to perform at an elite level over 4-5 months and the huge pressure of having won 3 legs and going for the 4th in the same season.

The streak is 4 wins in Majors tournaments, there's nothing about the added time to rest and prepare that adds difficulty to the task imo.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The streak is 4 wins in Majors tournaments, there's nothing about the added time to rest and prepare that adds difficulty to the task imo.

I do not agree. It is tougher for an NFL or NHL or NBA team to be a dynasty than it is to win a single championship. It is almost always tougher to maintain a high level of play for a longer period of time.

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I do not agree. It is tougher for an NFL or NHL or NBA team to be a dynasty than it is to win a single championship. It is almost always tougher to maintain a high level of play for a longer period of time.

We don't have to agree, but the fact that neither Tiger nor anyone else could do it in the same calendar year would seem to indicate it's more difficult, no?

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

We don't have to agree, but the fact that neither Tiger nor anyone else could do it in the same calendar year would seem to indicate it's more difficult, no?

No.-Small sample sizes. Like...... one sample. If you are going to win four in a row there is a 25% chance you will win them in the calendar year. Probability is not difficulty.

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil McGleno

So did everyone else. Tiger had eight months to consider the weight of what he was trying to do too. And for his hot streak to end.

Longer streaks are tougher than shorter streaks.

In 2000 they had more of an off season, he might have had more time to consider the weight of what he was trying to do but he went into the Majors healthy and fresh.  You're also discounting the mental fatigue of having to perform at an elite level over 4-5 months and the huge pressure of having won 3 legs and going for the 4th in the same season.

The streak is 4 wins in Majors tournaments, there's nothing about the added time to rest and prepare that adds difficulty to the task imo.

Irrelevant.  The season still started in early January, and the Masters came 3 months later.  Plenty of time to pickup a few nicks and let the pressure build, especially if the player fails to perform well in in one or more of those events.  The time spent sitting and thinking in the off season is not really a good thing.  With the sort of schedule Tiger has almost always played, the start of the season is mostly meaningless too - he's going to be effectively coming off the same number of recent tournaments because that's how he schedules his participation.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Irrelevant.  The season still started in early January, and the Masters came 3 months later.  Plenty of time to pickup a few nicks and let the pressure build, especially if the player fails to perform well in in one or more of those events.  The time spent sitting and thinking in the off season is not really a good thing.  With the sort of schedule Tiger has almost always played, the start of the season is mostly meaningless too - he's going to be effectively coming off the same number of recent tournaments because that's how he schedules his participation.

That's the great thing about polls, we can all have our own opinions and defend them.

I'm a huge Tiger fan so this has nothing to do with taking anything away from his accomplishments, I just think if Spieth can win 4 majors in the same season it's a greater accomplishment and will be something no other professional golfer has ever accomplished.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't understand why you guys feel the need to change the definition of what it is. It's quite clear that completing the Grand Slam is winning all 4 majors in the same calendar year. Everyone knows this. It's a truth. If it wasn't fact, this wouldn't even be a debate. The only reason this is even a question is because every one knows the grand slam must be completed in the same season, and it's well known it hasn't been done.

It's not my definition. It's the definition. You are free to disagree with it. But it's not going to make it so. No matter what you "feel" the record books aren't going to start considering the Tiger Slam a Grand Slam. They even had to name it something different because it wasn't a Grand Slam.

**Edit** to clarify that I do believe what Tiger Accomplished was amazing. And may have been more difficult than doing it in the same calendar year.

Because there are many of his fans who wish to accord every possible accolade to him, justly or otherwise.  In my opinion.

I voted no.  It didn't happen within the same calendar year, it's not a Grand Slam.  If a batter in baseball finished off one season strong and started the next season equally strong, they wouldn't award him the batting title for the previous year based upon his performance across two seasons.  If the Green Bay Packers won their last six games in the process of a 6-10 season, then started off the next season with 7 straight wins enroute to a 7-9 season, they wouldn't qualify for the playoffs as being 13-0.  No matter how much of a Packers fan you are, they were still 6-10 one season and 7-9 the next.

Oh, and a "Tiger Slam" sounds like a cheap breakfast at Denny's. :-D

Mac

WITB:
Driver: Ping G30 (12*)
FW:  Ping K15 (3W, 5W)
Hybrids: Ping K15 (3H, 5H)
Irons: Ping K15 (6-UW)

Wedges: Cleveland 588 RTX CB (54*, 58*)

Putter: Ping Scottsdale w/ SS Slim 3.0

Ball: Bridgestone e6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Because there are many of his fans who wish to accord every possible accolade to him, justly or otherwise.  In my opinion. I voted no.  It didn't happen within the same calendar year, it's not a Grand Slam.  If a batter in baseball finished off one season strong and started the next season equally strong, they wouldn't award him the batting title for the previous year based upon his performance across two seasons.  If the Green Bay Packers won their last six games in the process of a 6-10 season, then started off the next season with 7 straight wins enroute to a 7-9 season, they wouldn't qualify for the playoffs as being 13-0.  No matter how much of a Packers fan you are, they were still 6-10 one season and 7-9 the next. Oh, and a "Tiger Slam" sounds like a cheap breakfast at Denny's.  :-D

Your baseball analogy is a good one - but not for the reason you think. Things like batting titles or golden gloves, which are defined CLEARLY, and actually involve trophies given out at the end of the season obviously cannot carry over. But other things, such as hitting streaks, can and do carry over multiple seasons. Also consider this: imagine if somebody lost the Masters one year and the PGA the following year, but won all 6 in a row between those two. That would be CLEARLY a more impressive feat than randomly winning 4 in the calendar year, but I feel like many would still say "sorry, not a grand slam" as if it's somehow less impressive. Probably the same people that would consider a cycle in baseball more impressive than a homer, a triple and two doubles just because somebody came up with a catchy name and definition for it. The idea that anybody cares much about this either way is silly, but more silly is anybody that somehow thinks Tigers is less impressive because He had to file two separate tax returns for his winnings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golfingdad View Post
Your baseball analogy is a good one - but not for the reason you think. Things like batting titles or golden gloves, which are defined CLEARLY , and actually involve trophies given out at the end of the season obviously cannot carry over. But other things, such as hitting streaks, can and do carry over multiple seasons...

Then it logically follows that if the Grand Slam isn't clearly defined, whether he accomplished it or not is 100% a matter of opinion.  If the world of professional golf and the media want to discuss a Grand Slam, there should be a clear definition of exactly what a "Grand Slam" is.  Otherwise, it's about as nebulous as discussing the sound of one hand clapping.  In baseball, a Grand Slam is a home run with the bases loaded - it's real simple, you either accomplished it or you didn't.

Quote:
...The idea that anybody cares much about this either way is silly, but more silly is anybody that somehow thinks Tigers is less impressive because He had to file
two separate tax returns for his winnings.

I think many of his fans care a great deal about it because they're eager to add another jewel to his crown - especially now that it's becoming increasingly apparent that he'll never again stand a chance of accomplishing it.  Whether it's more or less impressive - I think the 13-0 run across two seasons by the Packers that I postulated in the first post is pretty impressive, but not as impressive as a 13-3 season and a Super Bowl victory at the end of it. :-)

Mac

WITB:
Driver: Ping G30 (12*)
FW:  Ping K15 (3W, 5W)
Hybrids: Ping K15 (3H, 5H)
Irons: Ping K15 (6-UW)

Wedges: Cleveland 588 RTX CB (54*, 58*)

Putter: Ping Scottsdale w/ SS Slim 3.0

Ball: Bridgestone e6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Then it logically follows that if the Grand Slam isn't clearly defined, whether he accomplished it or not is 100% a matter of opinion.

Right, which is why we can have a thread discussing it ;-)

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3048 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Did LIV pros cross ‘etiquette’ line at Masters? 3-time major winner has thought Did LIV Golf pros cross an “etiquette” line last month at the Masters? Three-time major winner Padraig Harrington has a thought. I do not mind cursing. I rather see some emotion on the course and honest reactions to bad shots or what not. I didn't catch it being a TON of cursing in this Masters. It was not noticeable. 
    • I had to think about this topic for a while. I don't tend to remember specific details about my putts, but a few do stand out in my mind so I guess they're worth noting. I don't know that I'd call them my favorite but it's close enough. #18 at Spooky Brook Might be the hardest 4' putt I've ever had. Pin was back right and I hit my third shot just to the right of it. The green slopes fairly severely back to front. I read the green but I knew the putt anyway as I've seen it before. I told the guys I was playing with that the putt was it was going to break almost 3' and if it doesn't go in I'd have a longer coming back up for par than I was looking at. It went in. #12 at Quail Brook I'm not even sure how to describe this green properly. It's not quite a two-tiered green, but the back and front are separated by a ridge that goes across the middle of it, with the green sloping harder off the front than the back. You can generally putt from the front to a back hole location but good luck keeping the ball on the green if you putt from back to front. On this particular day, I was looking at the latter. I had to putt up into the apron due to how the ball was going to break and that helped slow the ball down enough to hit the hole at the perfect speed. One of the rare birdies I've seen on that hole. #2 at Hyatt Hills Short par 5. This makes the list because it's the first eagle putt I've ever made, which funny enough happened the day after the first eagle I've ever made. I've made two eagles in all my life and they came on back to back days. I wasn't even planning on playing golf - it was a Monday - but I was doing some work at the place I used to work at when I was younger and catching up with some of the guys I've known for years. They were going out to play in the afternoon and had a spot available. I used to see these guys every day for years but we've never played together, so I said I'm in. I hit a really good approach shot into slope that separated the two tiers on the green and spun the ball closer to the hole. Had roughly 8' left to the hole, a downhill right to left breaker. One of the guys said, "You've got to make this, I've never seen an eagle before," and I said, "I've never made an eagle putt before." And then I made it. #17 at Stoneleigh @GolfLug's post reminded me of my own heroics on #17 a couple of years ago. The hole was back left, in the bottom tier. I hit my approach short of the green and flubbed my chip so it stayed on the top tier. I read how the putt was going to break after the ramp (is that what you call it?), then read my putt up to that point. It needed to basically die at that point because if it hit the slope with any kind of speed, it would long past the hole and possibly off the green. I hit the putt perfectly and holed the 40-footer center cup. #6 at Meadow at Neshanic Valley, #15 in the Round This was during the stroke play qualifier of my tournament. It might be a little bit of recency bias and I hit some really good long putts in the four rounds I played, but this 7-footer was my favorite putt of the entire tournament. The hole was cut on the top of a ridge. I hit my tee shot short right but hit a pretty good chip just long and below the hole. Play had backed up at this point, with the ladies waiting on the tee while we were finishing up. I hit the putt just a hair on the high side and it curled around the hole, fell back a couple of inches and stopped on lip. We all looked at it incredulously, "How does that not fall in?" Before I took my first step towards the hole, the ball must have thought the same thing and decided to drop.
    • I don't remember a ton of putts, but I've thought about this a bit and came up with 2 good ones. #5 at Mid-South: 2017 Newport Cup I remember the putt pretty well, but the surrounding details are a little hazy. I believe this was in my singles match against @cipher, and it was a hole he was stroking on. I had hit a mediocre approach to the front of the green and had what must have been a 50 foot putt to a back pin. If I remember correctly, @cipher was pretty close for an easy par at worst. I had @mvmac help me out with a read, which ended up being a great read by him. Hit the putt and jarred it for birdie. It was perfect speed, too, would have been an easy 2 putt if it hadn't gone in. I think we ended up tying for the hole. But I rarely make putts that long, and doing it to steal half a hole was really nice. #3 Fox Hollow (Links): 2023 Match Play This was on the third extra hole of a scratch match against a legitimate 0 handicapper. We had tied after 18 holes and traded pars on the first two extra holes. On the third extra hole, he had about 30 feet for birdie; I had about 25. We were on pretty much the exact same line. He missed his putt just on the low side, and I conceded the par. I felt good over this putt - I knew the break well and just needed good speed. I hit a great (not perfect) putt, and BAM, back of the cup for the victory on the 21st hole. I will say that the speed wasn't great, as it would have been a few feet past if it didn't hit the cup. But I wanted to give the ball a chance and take a bit of break out of it. I went on to win the match play tournament, which is my only tournament victory in a scratch event.
    • there will be lots of changes.  i mean, look at newey past, each team fell off a cliff when he moved on i think max is the magic bullet   if red bull loses him then whee are they going for drivers?   lots of young talent but he is a proven winner and i’m sure top engineers love to work with him  
    • I too, like @GolfLug, remember great wedge, iron shots, or my missed putts, more than my made putts. My most memorable recently, would be: #17 Old Course St. Andrews (last year) I had been putting awful all day (I started 3 putt, 4 putt, 3 putt, 3 putt), but found a putting stroke on the back 9 and was 1 under on the back going into 16 and of course I 3-putted it for a bogey. Got to 17 and my playing partner just hit it into the hotel, so I went a little more left and decided to not try and hit it over the hotel.  And as soon as my ball was in the air, I heard one of the other caddies do the chicken noise.  LOL My shot was a little more left than I wanted, about 185 yards, I hit a 6-iron and it was drawing right at the flag.  The pin was just to the right of he bunker and towards the front of the green. My ball hit short (and just missed going into said bunker) and stopped about 15 feet left of the hole. Had a little left to right break and as soon as I hit it, I knew it was in.  Birdie on the road hole, looked at the caddie and said not bad for a Chicken.  Parred 18 (missed 10 foot birdie putt) for a 35 on the back 9 at the Old Course. #18 Springfield G&CC Last year while playing in our season long match play event, my partner and I get the 18th hole needing to win the match to move on into the knockout round.  We are tied going into 18.  A tie and we lose on overall points by .5.  Our teaching pro is on the other team (very good golfer), so we were pretty sure we needed a birdie to have a chance to win the match, I hit on of the best drives I hit all day and had about 135 yards to the pin, but it was in a place where you didn't really want to be long.  So I hit a PW and it landed just short of the flag but released about 12 feet past the hole, so have a devilish putt coming back down the hill.  Our competitors were away and the pro missed his birdie putt by inches, I thought it was in when he hit it.  So after reading the putt, which probably had a 2 cup left to right break, I made the putt to win the match.   #15 Springfield G&CC A few years back, was playing in the first round of the Club Championship (against the previous years runner-up) and my putter was balky all day.  Got to the 15 hole, 2nd Par 5 on back, and was 3-down with 4 to play.  We both hit good drives, both hit good second shots and we both hit decent 3rd shots.  I was about 15 feet and he was just a hair longer.  He missed his putt, I had another slider putt down the hill, with about a foot of right to left break and made the putt.  I birded the next hole, to go 1 down, but not a memorable putt as I only needed a bogey to beat him on that hole, he had all kinds of issues going on.  Lost on 17, as he birdied it, right after I missed mine to lose 2&1.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...