Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Tiger's Slam - A Grand Achievement?


Note: This thread is 3639 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

13 members have voted

  1. 1. Was Tiger's Slam (winning all four major championships in a row) a "grand slam"?

    • Yes
      60
    • No
      50


Recommended Posts

Posted

That's not really true... from what I've found, the International Tennis Federation says that winning four consecutive majors IS as Grand Slam regardless of if they are in the same calendar year or not.

According to the now-maligned Wiki, this is not quite the full story:

"The term Grand Slam also, and originally, refers to the achievement of winning all four major championships in a single calendar year within one of the five events: men's and women's singles; men's, women's, and mixed doubles. In doubles, one team may accomplish a Grand Slam playing together or one player may achieve it with different partners. The term "Grand Slam" without qualification refers to winning the four majors in a single calendar year.

Winning the four majors in consecutive tournaments but not in the same year is known as a Non-Calendar Year Grand Slam, while winning all four majors at any point during the course of a career is known as a Career Grand Slam.

In 1982 the International Tennis Federation (ITF) broadened the definition of the Grand Slam as meaning any four consecutive major victories, including the ones spanning two calendar years. As defined in the constitution of the ITF: "The Grand Slam titles are the championships of Australia, France, the United States of America and Wimbledon. Players who hold all four of these titles at the same time achieve the Grand Slam" . As this definition differs from the original definition of the Grand Slam as restricted to a single calendar year, there has been some controversy towards this redefinition in the tennis world. Subsequently, the ITF has distanced itself from the 1982 decision, reverting to the traditional calendar-year definition (when Martina Navratilova won the 1984 French Open to become the reigning champion of all four women's singles, the ITF awarded her $1 million Grand Slam bonus in recognition of her achievement. However subsequently, the ITF abandoned recognizing non-calendar year grand slams."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Slam_(tennis)#Non-calendar_year_Grand_Slam

There are lots of other sources showing tennis' ongoing ambivalence, such as:

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/tennis/nadal-this-will-be-my-only-shot-at-doing-the-grand-slam-2183008.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/tennis/serena-williams-i-dont-need-a-grand-slam-to-define-my-career/2015/06/24/0ec1f1b6-19c3-11e5-93b7-5eddc056ad8a_story.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/tennis/rafaelnadal/8248276/Rafael-Nadal-Grand-Slam-Australian-Open-is-just-the-beginning-says-Rod-Laver.html

  • Upvote 3

Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by tristanhilton85

...So, for you guys saying that it isn't a Grand Slam because that's what the definition says, answer this. If you were the ones writing the definition of "Grand Slam" what would it be? Would it include Tiger's achievement? If it has to be within the same season/calendar year, why?

If I was writing the definition, it would be exactly what the current definition is, as defined by the PGA - winning all four Majors in one season/calendar year.  It wouldn't include Woods' achievement because it's not (IMO) a Grand Slam.  It's a "Tiger Slam", for whatever that's worth.  My reasoning would be that it's the same as basically every other sport in the world - those types of titles are decided upon based upon one season of play, with clearly defined starting and ending points.  The FedEx Cup, tour cards, money winnings, etc. - those are all calculated based upon one "season" of golf, so why shouldn't the Grand Slam be the same?

Each of those accolades is a Tour endorsed seasonal achievement.  None of the majors is run by any Tour.  Applying seasonal attributes to them based on a Tour season is a purely arbitrary condition - and unnecessary and unwarranted.  As Erik said, if someone wants to offer a trophy or medal for the grand slam, then they can specify the conditions that apply.  I think any such trophy would collect a lot of dust before ever being awarded - a testimony to someones misplaced optimism. ;-)

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Each of those accolades is a Tour endorsed seasonal achievement.  None of the majors is run by any Tour.  Applying seasonal attributes to them based on a Tour season is a purely arbitrary condition - and unnecessary and unwarranted.  As Erik said, if someone wants to offer a trophy or medal for the grand slam, then they can specify the conditions that apply.  I think any such trophy would collect a lot of dust before ever being awarded - a testimony to someones misplaced optimism. ;-)

Well said ... I believe the opens are just that, opens ... you do not have to have a your card, be part of the of the Fed Ex cup, and anything tour related ... just survive the qualifying rounds prior to the event. Just don't see how can you tie the majors to an US tour season. Seems narrow minded to me.

Ken Proud member of the iSuk Golf Association ... Sponsored by roofing companies across the US, Canada, and the UK

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fourputt

Each of those accolades is a Tour endorsed seasonal achievement.  None of the majors is run by any Tour.  Applying seasonal attributes to them based on a Tour season is a purely arbitrary condition - and unnecessary and unwarranted.  As Erik said, if someone wants to offer a trophy or medal for the grand slam, then they can specify the conditions that apply.  I think any such trophy would collect a lot of dust before ever being awarded - a testimony to someones misplaced optimism.

Well said ... I believe the opens are just that, opens ... you do not have to have a your card, be part of the of the Fed Ex cup, and anything tour related ... just survive the qualifying rounds prior to the event.

Just don't see how can you tie the majors to an US tour season. Seems narrow minded to me.

Especially considering that there are several Tours to be considered, even if the PGA and European Tours may have more standing from our point of view.  That point of view isn't necessarily shared worldwide.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Does anyone even think this whole discussion would even exist if it was someone else other than tiger woods?

No, I don't.  I feel it's nothing more than an effort by his admirers to add another jewel to his crown, deserved or not.

Gary Player recently said "Golf needs a black champion", and that (discriminatory, IMO) line of thought is what leads to things like this.  Because of his race, many people feel the need to prop him up to the maximum extent possible.  His accomplishments speak for themselves whether you're a fan of his or not - he doesn't need false accolades piled on top of them (although I'm sure his ego doesn't mind it one bit).

Champions shouldn't need and don't deserve "affirmative action" because of somebody's white guilt.  Golf doesn't "need" a black champion anymore than the NFL "needs" an MVP Samoan quarterback, or NASCAR "needs" an Asian champion.  A champion is the person who performs best at his/her sport, and that is what it is. The NBA hasn't had a white MVP since 2006, yet I don't see anybody bleating that the NBA "needs a white champion".  As far as I can see, there's never been a Hispanic NBA MVP - where's the outcry over that?

Mac

WITB:
Driver: Ping G30 (12*)
FW:  Ping K15 (3W, 5W)
Hybrids: Ping K15 (3H, 5H)
Irons: Ping K15 (6-UW)

Wedges: Cleveland 588 RTX CB (54*, 58*)

Putter: Ping Scottsdale w/ SS Slim 3.0

Ball: Bridgestone e6

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
A discussion emerged as to whether or not Tiger completed a "Grand Slam." Although the title of the thread may have insinuated that with its use of the word "Grand" the actual question asks if it's a grand achievement. I'm not sure how anyone could possibly argue that winning 4 majors in a row isn't a grand achievement. Really? It's an amazing accomplishment just to win any tournament on the PGA tour. Personally I agree with Iacas regarding the Grand Slam topic. What Tiger did was fantastic and I bet it will be a long time before it's repeated.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

A discussion emerged as to whether or not Tiger completed a "Grand Slam." Although the title of the thread may have insinuated that with its use of the word "Grand" the actual question asks if it's a grand achievement. I'm not sure how anyone could possibly argue that winning 4 majors in a row isn't a grand achievement. Really? It's an amazing accomplishment just to win any tournament on the PGA tour. Personally I agree with Iacas regarding the Grand Slam topic. What Tiger did was fantastic and I bet it will be a long time before it's repeated.

That's the title, but did you actually read the OP?  Iacas' contention is that Woods completed the Grand Slam and that the calendar year is irrelevant and arbitrary.  That's where the entire discussion stems from.

Mac

WITB:
Driver: Ping G30 (12*)
FW:  Ping K15 (3W, 5W)
Hybrids: Ping K15 (3H, 5H)
Irons: Ping K15 (6-UW)

Wedges: Cleveland 588 RTX CB (54*, 58*)

Putter: Ping Scottsdale w/ SS Slim 3.0

Ball: Bridgestone e6

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Yes and I addressed that as well.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Does anyone even think this whole discussion would even exist if it was someone else other than tiger (hack) woods?


Yes

Hunter Bishop

"i was an aspirant once of becoming a flamenco guitarist, but i had an accident with my fingers"

My Bag

Titleist TSI3 | TaylorMade Sim 2 Max 3 Wood | 5 Wood | Edel 3-PW | 52° | 60° | Blade Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Does anyone even think this whole discussion would even exist if it was someone else other than tiger (hack) woods?

Yes

If Jack had done what Tiger did, there would be people making the same argument on Jacks behalf.  The name of the golfer shouldn't even be brought into the discussion, it's either a Grand Slam or it's not.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
Does anyone even think this whole discussion would even exist if it was someone else other than tiger (hack) woods?

Hack? You obviously mean GOAT. If Nicklaus had done this, the conversation would be the same.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

No, I don't.  I feel it's nothing more than an effort by his admirers to add another jewel to his crown, deserved or not.

As I've already said, it doesn't "add a jewel." The dude won four majors in a row whether you call it a "Grand Slam" or a "Tiger Slam" or a freaking "Kerbooble Janooey". Whatever you call it, he won four majors in a row (and 3 U.S. Ams in a row, and 14 or 17 majors…).

Gary Player recently said "Golf needs a black champion", and that (discriminatory, IMO) line of thought is what leads to things like this. Because of his race, many people feel the need to prop him up to the maximum extent possible.

Uhhhhh… no.

His accomplishments speak for themselves whether you're a fan of his or not - he doesn't need false accolades piled on top of them (although I'm sure his ego doesn't mind it one bit).

They're false accolades to you given your definition .

Champions shouldn't need and don't deserve "affirmative action" because of somebody's white guilt.  Golf doesn't "need" a black champion anymore than the NFL "needs" an MVP Samoan quarterback, or NASCAR "needs" an Asian champion.  A champion is the person who performs best at his/her sport, and that is what it is. The NBA hasn't had a white MVP since 2006, yet I don't see anybody bleating that the NBA "needs a white champion".  As far as I can see, there's never been a Hispanic NBA MVP - where's the outcry over that?

Race is not playing a role in this discussion (until you brought it up… and you've previously mentioned you don't like Tiger, so…???).

And now race ends its short time playing a role in this discussion, please.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
As I've already said, it doesn't "add a jewel." The dude won four majors in a row whether you call it a "Grand Slam" or a "Tiger Slam" or a freaking "Kerbooble Janooey". Whatever you call it, he won four majors in a row (and 3 U.S. Ams in a row, and 14 or 17 majors…). Uhhhhh… no.   They're false accolades to you given your definition .   Race is not playing a role in this discussion (until you brought it up… and you've previously mentioned you don't like Tiger, so…???). And now race ends its short time playing a role in this discussion, please.

Criminey....thank you Erik..

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
No, I don't.  I feel it's nothing more than an effort by his admirers to add another jewel to his crown, deserved or not. Gary Player recently said "Golf needs a black champion", and that (discriminatory, IMO) line of thought is what leads to things like this.  Because of his race, many people feel the need to prop him up to the maximum extent possible.  His accomplishments speak for themselves whether you're a fan of his or not - he doesn't need false accolades piled on top of them (although I'm sure his ego doesn't mind it one bit).  Champions shouldn't need and don't deserve "affirmative action" because of somebody's white guilt.  Golf doesn't "need" a black champion anymore than the NFL "needs" an MVP Samoan quarterback, or NASCAR "needs" an Asian champion.  A champion is the person who performs best at his/her sport, and that is what it is. The NBA hasn't had a white MVP since 2006, yet I don't see anybody bleating that the NBA "needs a white champion".  As far as I can see, there's never been a Hispanic NBA MVP - where's the outcry over that?

A tip: don't talk about shit you don't understand, like racial and sociological politics. It makes you look like a jerk. Also, I find it hilarious that you are so convinced this is a ploy to bolster Tiger's resumé; not to spoil it for you, but he doesn't need help in that department.

Hunter Bishop

"i was an aspirant once of becoming a flamenco guitarist, but i had an accident with my fingers"

My Bag

Titleist TSI3 | TaylorMade Sim 2 Max 3 Wood | 5 Wood | Edel 3-PW | 52° | 60° | Blade Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Hack? You obviously mean GOAT. If Nicklaus had done this, the conversation would be the same.

[quote name="Mac62" url="/t/83344/tigers-slam-a-grand-achievement/390#post_1174773"]No, I don't.  I feel it's nothing more than an effort by his admirers to add another jewel to his crown, deserved or not. Gary Player recently said "Golf needs a black champion", and that (discriminatory, IMO) line of thought is what leads to things like this.  Because of his race, many people feel the need to prop him up to the maximum extent possible.  His accomplishments speak for themselves whether you're a fan of his or not - he doesn't need false accolades piled on top of them (although I'm sure his ego doesn't mind it one bit). [/quote]Well hes a hack now and GOHE but not GOAT.


Posted

Probably not. The Tiger lovers need some "Great Tiger" stuff to talk about, and there just hasn't been any of that for quite some time. Tiger missed another cut, played horrible again, and wasn't even hardly discussed. He's playing so bad they don't even talk about that( his poor play) much anymore. It's got to be disheartening for his following, so they delve back into history for some Tiger love.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aflighter View Post

Does anyone even think this whole discussion would even exist if it was someone else other than tiger (hack) woods?

Probably not. The Tiger lovers need some "Great Tiger" stuff to talk about, and there just hasn't been any of that for quite some time. Tiger missed another cut, played horrible again, and wasn't even hardly discussed. He's playing so bad they don't even talk about that( his poor play) much anymore. It's got to be disheartening for his following, so they delve back into history for some Tiger love.

Or… the Jordan Spieth stuff brought up the topic of what a "Grand Slam" is to people. As the thread starter, I can tell you it was that.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3639 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Never practiced golf when I was young and the only lesson ever taken was a driver lesson. I feel like I'm improving every year. However, the numbers don't support my feeling about improving. I usually drop to 12-13 during the summer while playing the familiar courses around home and then go on golf trips in the fall to new courses and increase to end the year between 15-17. Been a similar story for a number of years now but hey, it's the best thing there is in life so not too bothered but reaching 9.9 is the objective every year. Maybe a few lessons and practice could help me achieve it since I pretty much have no idea what I'm doing, just playing and never practice.
    • I am semi-loyal. Usually buy four dozen of one ball and only play that until out and then determine whether to continue or try another one. Since starting my semi-loyal path to success, I've been playing the below, not in order: ProV1 ProV1x ProV1x left dash AVX Bridgestone BXS Srixon Z-star XV I am not sure if it has helped anything, but it gives a bit of confidence knowing that it at least is not the ball (while using the same one) that gives different results so one thing less to mind about I guess. On the level that I am, not sure whether it makes much difference but will continue since I have to play something so might as well go with the same ball for a number of rounds. Edit: favorite is probably the BXS followed by ProV1/Srixon Z-star XV. Haven't got any numbers to back it up but just by feel.  
    • Will not do it by myself, going to the pro shop I usually use after Cristmas for input and actually doing the changes, if any, but wanted to get some thoughts on whether this was worthwhile out of curiosity. 
    • In terms of ball striking, not really. Ball striking being how good you are at hitting the center of the clubface with the swing path you want and the loft you want to present at impact.  In terms of getting better launch conditions for the current swing you have, it is debatable.  It depends on how you swing and what your current launch conditions are at. These are fine tuning mechanisms not significant changes. They might not even be the correct fine tuning you need. I would go spend the $100 to $150 dollars in getting a club fitting over potentially wasting money on changes that ChatGPT gave you.  New grips are important. Yes, it can affect swing weight, but it is personal preference. Swing weight is just one component.  Overall weight effects the feel. The type of golf shaft effects the feel of the club in the swing. Swing weight effects the feel. You can add so much extra weight to get the swing weight correct and it will feel completely different because the total weight went up. Imagine swinging a 5lb stick versus a 15lb stick. They could be balanced the same (swing weight), but one will take substantially more effort to move.  I would almost say swing weight is an old school way of fitting clubs. Now, with launch monitors, you could just fit the golfer. You could have two golfers with the same swing speed that want completely different swing weight. It is just personal preference. You can only tell that by swinging a golf club.     
    • Thanks for the comments. I fully understand that these changes won't make any big difference compared to getting a flawless swing but looking to give myself the best chance of success at where I am and hopefully lessons will improve the swing along the way. Can these changes make minor improvements to ball striking and misses then that's fine. From what I understood about changing the grips, which is to avoid them slipping in warm and humid conditions, is that it will affect the swing weight since midsize are heavier than regular and so therefore adding weight to the club head would be required to avoid a change of feel in the club compared to before? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.