Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

The "Stop Conning Yourself" Thread


Note: This thread is 1648 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm conning myself that I can break 100 without spending more time practicing my short game.

"No man goes round boasting of his vices,” he said, “except golfers." 

-- Det. Elk in The Twister by Edgar Wallace

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm conning myself that I can break 100 without spending more time practicing my short game.

You are still conning yourself if you think short game is the #1 reason for not breaking 100.

Deryck Griffith

Titleist 910 D3: 9.5deg GD Tour AD DI7x | Nike Dymo 3W: 15deg, UST S-flex | Mizuno MP CLK Hybrid: 20deg, Project X Tour Issue 6.5, HC1 Shaft | Mizuno MP-57 4-PW, DG X100 Shaft, 1deg upright | Cleveland CG15 Wedges: 52, 56, 60deg | Scotty Cameron California Del Mar | TaylorMade Penta, TP Black LDP, Nike 20XI-X


  • Moderator
Posted

You are still conning yourself if you think short game is the #1 reason for not breaking 100.

@krupa in case you haven't seen these threads.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Quote:

Originally Posted by krupa

I'm conning myself that I can break 100 without spending more time practicing my short game.

You are still conning yourself if you think short game is the #1 reason for not breaking 100.


Totally agree, and what's funny is that everyone I talk to in a live situation universally states that their putting or short game is holding them back. This is the biggest con in my mind.

In fact, I'm convinced that long game is the main reason why anyone doesn't break 80.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

My biggest con is after I have a couple of good rounds, I think I have got it all figured out.  Only to go out and just blow the next one.................

In my bag: Cobra Bio Cell 10.5º driver ;  Cobra Bio Cell 3w;  Mizuno MP H4 3 - PW;  Mizuno MP T4 52º GW, 56º SW, 60º LW
Favorite ball Titleist Pro-V
One HIO....LUCK.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deryck Griffith

You are still conning yourself if you think short game is the #1 reason for not breaking 100.

@krupa in case you haven't seen these threads.

Thanks.  I saw the ratios thread before.  I will review the other one tonight.  The ratio thread says, to use those ratios unless you have a glaring weakness. Does averaging almost 3 putts per hole (so says Game Golf) count as a glaring weakness?  I don't know how to figure out stats for wedge shots.  I know I can't trust mine; I'm happier hitting a PW from 100yds than I am chipping from 10.  That's not to say I lay up to 100, I'm just more confident from 100yds than I am inside 100.

"No man goes round boasting of his vices,” he said, “except golfers." 

-- Det. Elk in The Twister by Edgar Wallace

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Quote:

Originally Posted by mvmac

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deryck Griffith

You are still conning yourself if you think short game is the #1 reason for not breaking 100.

@krupa in case you haven't seen these threads.

Thanks.  I saw the ratios thread before.  I will review the other one tonight.  The ratio thread says, to use those ratios unless you have a glaring weakness. Does averaging almost 3 putts per hole (so says Game Golf) count as a glaring weakness?  I don't know how to figure out stats for wedge shots.  I know I can't trust mine; I'm happier hitting a PW from 100yds than I am chipping from 10.  That's not to say I lay up to 100, I'm just more confident from 100yds than I am inside 100.

With a score over 95, I can confidently state that 3 putts is because of your chipping and further that your approach game is so far off that you need to scramble for bogey. The reason for scrambling for bogey is either that your tee shots are too short or too wild.

I've been in your shoes not too long ago. I remember struggling to get to the green. Once I stopped struggling to the greens better scores happened naturally.

Everyone has bad putting days, but the average score really depends upon your making greens.

At this point, if I 3 putt most of the holes, I would still shoot under 90. Over 90 scores are usually the result of bad tee shots or approach shots on multiple holes

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I'm conning myself that I can break 100 without spending more time practicing my short game.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lihu

With a score over 95, I can confidently state that 3 putts is because of your chipping and further that your approach game is so far off that you need to scramble for bogey. The reason for scrambling for bogey is either that your tee shots are too short or too wild.

I've been in your shoes not too long ago. I remember struggling to get to the green. Once I stopped struggling to the greens better scores happened naturally.

Everyone has bad putting days, but the average score really depends upon your making greens.

At this point, if I 3 putt most of the holes, I would still shoot under 90. Over 90 scores are usually the result of bad tee shots or approach shots on multiple holes


I have to agree with Lihu here. Unless you are routinely missing 2 foot putts, it is more likely that you that you are not hitting greens/near greens inside 20' - 30'  very often.  The key there is to hit fairways long enough to have good 2nd shots on green or near green.

In my bag: Cobra Bio Cell 10.5º driver ;  Cobra Bio Cell 3w;  Mizuno MP H4 3 - PW;  Mizuno MP T4 52º GW, 56º SW, 60º LW
Favorite ball Titleist Pro-V
One HIO....LUCK.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Thanks.  I saw the ratios thread before.  I will review the other one tonight.  The ratio thread says, to use those ratios unless you have a glaring weakness. Does averaging almost 3 putts per hole (so says Game Golf) count as a glaring weakness?  I don't know how to figure out stats for wedge shots.  I know I can't trust mine; I'm happier hitting a PW from 100yds than I am chipping from 10.  That's not to say I lay up to 100, I'm just more confident from 100yds than I am inside 100.

Your putting stats will improve as soon as your ball striking improves.  3 putting is a lot less likely to happen when you are "striking" the ball closer to the hole vs. "striking" it poorly and leaving yourself longer putts which brings 3 putting into play.

The same for your short game.  When you are striking the ball better and you miss the green, a stronger ball striker will leave their shots closer to the green.  Closer to the green equates to an easier executable chip and an easier executable chip equates a higher percentage chance chipping closer to the hole and being closer to the hole once again, equates to a higher percentage to not 3 putt or to even 1 putt.....you get the idea...

People who say they putt well wouldn't make much of a difference to a high handicappers score because most high handicappers use up their shots to par prior to even reaching the green.  That's where the conning yourself lies....  By the time a high handicapper reaches the green, they are usually putting for bogey or worst.

  • Upvote 1

Deryck Griffith

Titleist 910 D3: 9.5deg GD Tour AD DI7x | Nike Dymo 3W: 15deg, UST S-flex | Mizuno MP CLK Hybrid: 20deg, Project X Tour Issue 6.5, HC1 Shaft | Mizuno MP-57 4-PW, DG X100 Shaft, 1deg upright | Cleveland CG15 Wedges: 52, 56, 60deg | Scotty Cameron California Del Mar | TaylorMade Penta, TP Black LDP, Nike 20XI-X


Posted

A legit HI doesn't line.  There is no con there.

Before a round, I almost always think I'm going to play better than I do.  So that's the conning myself that I can think of.

Other than that, I think I'm pretty realistic... I suck.  However, I've been getting better this year.  But recently I've been playing worse and my HI is going to go up on the next revision.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm sure the guys I played with a few weeks ago thought I had a vanity handicap when I told them 6.5 and then promptly threw up a crowd pleasing 90 for the day. It happens. I went from playing very good golf (for me) for a 6 week period and now am in a tailspin. Yesterday it felt like I actually forgot how to play the game of golf almost breaking 90 the wrong way again. My handicap has shot up 1 full stroke since the last update and I have 3 very low scores (for me) about to drop off. My point being maybe it wasn't the guys best swing day and hopefully that 12 handicap was his 9 hole handicap.


Posted

My biggest con is after I have a couple of good rounds, I think I have got it all figured out.  Only to go out and just blow the next one.................


It is not a con if you have been purposefully mislead by the golfing gods.. :-D

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

With a score over 95, I can confidently state that 3 putts is because of your chipping and further that your approach game is so far off that you need to scramble for bogey. The reason for scrambling for bogey is either that your tee shots are too short or too wild.

I've been in your shoes not too long ago. I remember struggling to get to the green. Once I stopped struggling to the greens better scores happened naturally.

Everyone has bad putting days, but the average score really depends upon your making greens.

At this point, if I 3 putt most of the holes, I would still shoot under 90. Over 90 scores are usually the result of bad tee shots or approach shots on multiple holes

Originally Posted by krupa

I'm conning myself that I can break 100 without spending more time practicing my short game.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lihu

With a score over 95, I can confidently state that 3 putts is because of your chipping and further that your approach game is so far off that you need to scramble for bogey. The reason for scrambling for bogey is either that your tee shots are too short or too wild.

I've been in your shoes not too long ago. I remember struggling to get to the green. Once I stopped struggling to the greens better scores happened naturally.

Everyone has bad putting days, but the average score really depends upon your making greens.

At this point, if I 3 putt most of the holes, I would still shoot under 90. Over 90 scores are usually the result of bad tee shots or approach shots on multiple holes

I have to agree with Lihu here. Unless you are routinely missing 2 foot putts, it is more likely that you that you are not hitting greens/near greens inside 20' - 30'  very often.  The key there is to hit fairways long enough to have good 2nd shots on green or near green.

Quote:

Originally Posted by krupa

Thanks.  I saw the ratios thread before.  I will review the other one tonight.  The ratio thread says, to use those ratios unless you have a glaring weakness. Does averaging almost 3 putts per hole (so says Game Golf) count as a glaring weakness?  I don't know how to figure out stats for wedge shots.  I know I can't trust mine; I'm happier hitting a PW from 100yds than I am chipping from 10.  That's not to say I lay up to 100, I'm just more confident from 100yds than I am inside 100.

Your putting stats will improve as soon as your ball striking improves.  3 putting is a lot less likely to happen when you are "striking" the ball closer to the hole vs. "striking" it poorly and leaving yourself longer putts which brings 3 putting into play.

The same for your short game.  When you are striking the ball better and you miss the green, a stronger ball striker will leave their shots closer to the green.  Closer to the green equates to an easier executable chip and an easier executable chip equates a higher percentage chance chipping closer to the hole and being closer to the hole once again, equates to a higher percentage to not 3 putt or to even 1 putt.....you get the idea...

People who say they putt well wouldn't make much of a difference to a high handicappers score because most high handicappers use up their shots to par prior to even reaching the green.  That's where the conning yourself lies....  By the time a high handicapper reaches the green, they are usually putting for bogey or worst.

All right, I'll keep doing what I'm doing (practice wise) and see how it goes.

"No man goes round boasting of his vices,” he said, “except golfers." 

-- Det. Elk in The Twister by Edgar Wallace

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think I've got a relatively accurate view of my own game.  My basic stats (FW%, GIR%, putts per round, putts per GIR) are all pretty close to what you'd expect for someone with my cap.  In other words, I'm slightly better than the average random golfer at ball striking, short game, and putting, but not a lot better.  I'm probably a little worse at putting, and maybe with near the green short game shots, and make up the stroke or two with length leading to shorter approaches or reaching more par 5s in two (when the tee shot is solid).

The biggest con I probably pull on myself is that I'm getting better.  Even now where I only play 9 holes a week and my only practice is dry swings at home, I can convince myself I'm improving things!  But the scores don't lie.  I was a low-mid 80s player with a round in the 70s every once in a while for years when I was playing/practicing a good amount, and I'm a high 80s+ player now that I'm not getting to play or practice nearly as much.

I have succeeded at least in turning my shot around and drawing most shots, but my dispersion isn't any better...

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I con myself that I can still "get it out there" with driver.......then you tee it up against some rubber limbed youngster in the Saturday medal who lazily smashes his driver 40 yds past me...and then it lands and runs out!!!   hopefully he's a rubbish putter eh? I can con myself quite a bit!


Posted
I suppose I con myself the most with thinking I know what might be causing my problems from one round to the next. Reality is that I don't know much about it. From one week to the next, trying to fix what I'm doing is just as likely to make things worse as better. Actually doing something about this has proven difficult. Still haven't managed to find a camera to take some video.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
I'm happier hitting a PW from 100yds than I am chipping from 10.  That's not to say I lay up to 100, I'm just more confident from 100yds than I am inside 100.

You're really averaging a 3 putt?

I get that you're exaggerating when you say you're better from 100 yards than 10 yards (of the green) but if it's close to being that bad then yes spend some extra time improving your wedge technique.

Before a round, I almost always think I'm going to play better than I do.  So that's the conning myself that I can think of.

Well I think we all do that! ;-)

Other than that, I think I'm pretty realistic... I suck.  However, I've been getting better this year.  But recently I've been playing worse and my HI is going to go up on the next revision.

Golfers can realize they "suck" and still con themselves on why they suck (not saying this is you). They'll blame the mental game, putting, equipment or the swing tip that "stopped working".

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Golfers can realize they "suck" and still con themselves on why they suck (not saying this is you). They'll blame the mental game, putting, equipment or the swing tip that "stopped working".

This used to be me for sure.  I knew overall that I wasn't great, but thought my iron play was better than it was, my driver was closer to good than it was, didn't understand how bad my putting or course management were, and overall thought I was much closer than reality to turning a big corner, magically eliminating the errant drives and general blow up holes, and becoming a mid single digit.

Being around the game and TST longer, I've come to a much more accurate self-assessment.  All aspects of my game are decent but no better.  My mental game and course management have gotten better, but that's just brought them from something I didn't think about at all and were terrible to something at least okay.

I think a lot of this is the pretty cliched fact around here that we better remember our best (and worst) shots/rounds.  Because I hit the ball pretty far for an amateur, my best driver rounds were/are better than most people's, just because I'm outdriving most random golfers, so if I'm smoking it and hitting a lot of fairways, I'm putting myself in better positions than most random golfers can get to off the tee.  But that just adds a bit to the variance of my scores, doesn't make me a better golfer than I am like I used to like to think.

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1648 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.