Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Trees Marked as Lateral Hazard - Playing from Them


Note: This thread is 3775 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
We all know resort courses and other places like to mark trees or tall grass or other things as lateral hazards to help speed up play-But here is my question. The Rules of golf define a water hazard and say that anything that meets the definition is one. So if you have a creek with no lines and your ball is in it you have to follow the water hazard rules-Like not grounding your club. But is the opposite true too? If a bunch of trees or tall grass that never has water in it is marked red can you just treat them as trees or grass through the green? Can you ground your club?

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

If the area is marked as a water hazard, even though it doesn't match the definition, play it as such.

If it isn't marked, play it as defined in the RoG.


  • Administrator
Posted
If the area is marked as a water hazard, even though it doesn't match the definition, play it as such.

Care to justify the thought process on that one?

An unmarked water hazard is to be played as a water hazard ( 26/3 )

Why should a player be prevented from picking up a loose impediment, say, or grounding his club in a stand of trees on a hill when the committee has clearly mis-marked the golf course?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Erik, I say play the course as it is marked (or mis-marked) or, if that's not good enough, play a second ball under 3-3 (assuming stroke play) and take it up with the Committee.

"Age improves with wine."
 
Wishon 919THI 11*
Wishon 925HL 4w
Wishon 335HL 3h & 4h
Wishon 755pc 5i, 6i, 7i, 8i & 9i
Tad Moore 485 PW
Callaway X 54*
Ping G2 Anser C
Callaway SuperSoft
Titleist StaDry
Kangaroo Hillcrest AB

  • Administrator
Posted

Erik, I say play the course as it is marked (or mis-marked) or, if that's not good enough, play a second ball under 3-3 (assuming stroke play) and take it up with the Committee.


I didn't ask the original question.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Erik, I say play the course as it is marked (or mis-marked) or, if that's not good enough, play a second ball under 3-3 (assuming stroke play) and take it up with the Committee.

Let us be real about this-There is no committee and nobody is going to play two balls. The area is clearly NOT a water hazard so why should a golfer not be allowed to do things he can do when he is just in regular old trees or tall grass? Like Erik said. But okay-If you were the committee what would you say? Play it as marked?-Seems dumb to me. The area is NOT a water hazard. There is precedent for golfers doing what is right in the face of a mismarked course.

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Care to justify the thought process on that one?

An unmarked water hazard is to be played as a water hazard (26/3)

Why should a player be prevented from picking up a loose impediment, say, or grounding his club in a stand of trees on a hill when the committee has clearly mis-marked the golf course?

The answer lies in the Decision you cited: " The Committee erred in not properly defining the margin of the hazard as required by Rule 33-2a , but a player is not entitled to take advantage of such an error . "


Posted

If you are playing in a competition on a course where the area of trees was marked wrongly as a LWH, grounding your club would not be a good idea. If the committee are made aware of your action they would penalize you. You would have no recourse to the USGA or any other authority.

They are the ultimate referee. Whether they are right or wrong, they are right.

Please ignore casual play aspects. Just do as you wish.


Posted
There is precedent for golfers doing what is right in the face of a mismarked course.

Disagree. There is precedent for golfers doing what is right in the face of an unmarked course. [quote name="Phil McGleno" url="/t/84014/trees-marked-as-lateral-hazard-playing-from-them#post_1189369"] The area is clearly NOT a water hazard....[/quote] It is if it's so marked. Having said that, I agree that it's wrong, and often used with no justification whatsoever....

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
The answer lies in the Decision you cited: "The Committee erred in not properly defining the margin of the hazard as required by Rule 33-2a, but a player is not entitled to take advantage of such an error. "

Martyn, you'd be taking advantage to take a drop where the ball crossed the margin of the water-hazard-that-wasn't-a-water-hazard, too.

And… I think you looked at the wrong decision. I cited 26/3. I think you cited 26/2 where a player was trying to claim that some water was casual water.

If you are playing in a competition on a course where the area of trees was marked wrongly as a LWH, grounding your club would not be a good idea. If the committee are made aware of your action they would penalize you. You would have no recourse to the USGA or any other authority.

That doesn't address the point of a guy just wanting to play by the proper Rules. These "resort course" rules are used far too frequently. If a committee was there they should remove the stakes, but for every day play what is the guy who just wants to play by the rules to do?

Disagree.

There is precedent for golfers doing what is right in the face of an unmarked course.

Look at 26/2 ( @Martyn W can help you find it). It sets a precedent for a mismarked hazard.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

A dry ditch can be deemed a water way of America if water runs through it just every so often;  like during heavy rains. There are few courses in southern Nevada that use this definition to mark their lateral hazards. There may be no water in the ditch, but there could be bushes, trees, boulders, and other things in that ditch.  I believe this definition is listed in the CFR 29 regulations regarding storm water control.

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Look at [URL=http://www.usga.org/rules/rules-and-decisions.html#!decision-26,d26-2]26/2[/URL] ( @Martyn W can help you find it). It sets a precedent for a mismarked hazard.

I don't need anyone's help to find a specific decision if I'm referred to it, but thanks. ;-) 26/2 is specific and provides precedence for doing what is right in the face of a mismarked margin but no precedence for changing the nature of the marked hazard itself. Neither could I play a marked WH (yellow staked) as a LWH just because that's how I would have designated it.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Some resort courses have "environmental sensitive areas" which are played as lateral hazards.

These areas are restricted "no entry"

I've seen native tall grass areas marked as lateral, but I guess "tree / wooded" areas could be also, to speed up play.

Definitely out of the norm...

Club Rat

Johnny Rocket - Let's Rock and Roll and play some golf !!!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
26/2 is specific and provides precedence for doing what is right in the face of a mismarked margin but no precedence for changing the nature of the marked hazard itself. Neither could I play a marked WH (yellow staked) as a LWH just because that's how I would have designated it.

@David in FL , you wanted a mismatched hazard, so I gave you an example of one. Rather than go on about semantics and stuff, let's actually discuss the OP and the topic.

When rating a golf course (for rating/slope), we rate the course as it SHOULD be marked, not as it is marked. If there are trees or tall grasses that clearly aren't water hazards, we rate them as trees or extreme rough or whatever - we do not rate them as water hazards.

If I were to encounter an area like this, I'd play it as through the green and ignore the red stakes. The red stakes, in areas like this, are concessions to golfers who don't play provisionals and who want to get around the golf course in a reasonable amount of time. It is also typically softer on the scorecards of those golfers.

@Club Rat , we aren't talking about ESAs. @Phil McGleno can correct me if I'm wrong but I think he's talking about areas that are definitely NOT water hazards (i.e. do not meet the definition) which are marked as such (typically red, for the two-clublength drop) to speed up play by letting people take drops.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
@Club Rat , we aren't talking about ESAs. @Phil McGleno can correct me if I'm wrong but I think he's talking about areas that are definitely NOT water hazards (i.e. do not meet the definition) which are marked as such (typically red, for the two-clublength drop) to speed up play by letting people take drops.

I am-Yes. Trees or grass or just things that are not water hazards marked with red stakes for golfers to basically cheat.-Hit the ball in the trees and get to take a drop because it is marked as a LWH.

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
So I have a question. There are a couple of holes in my home course where the is either drainage or some type of water in an area on one side of the hole. However the hazard lines are approx 150-200 yards along the side of the hole away from where the water is, in unmaintained areas. Does the meet the criteria of a LWH?

—Adam

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

So I have a question. There are a couple of holes in my home course where the is either drainage or some type of water in an area on one side of the hole. However the hazard lines are approx 150-200 yards along the side of the hole away from where the water is, in unmaintained areas. Does the meet the criteria of a LWH?


We need a better description.  You're saying the hazard lines are on the opposite side of the fairway from the water?  Show us a google Earth image perhaps.


Posted
That doesn't address the point of a guy just wanting to play by the proper Rules. These "resort course" rules are used far too frequently. If a committee was there they should remove the stakes, but for every day play what is the guy who just wants to play by the rules to do?

.

He's paid his money so makes his choice.

Re your comment about rating.

I had this from the USGA a few years ago.

When the authorized golf association rates a golf course to establish a USGA Course rating and Slope the rating is done as if the course was in mid-season playing conditions, and that the golf course was marked in accordance with the Rules of Golf.  If the course is using preferred lies or markings that are not in accordance with the Rules of Golf those would not be considered when performing the course rating.

Thank you, ***, USGA

The responder did not answer my question about what a player should do.


Note: This thread is 3775 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.