Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Taking good balls from range buckets


Note: This thread is 3754 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think it has to say "Range Ball" because that is the property they paid for and therefore own.

If I have hit 10 balls accidentally into the driving range and see a ball that could be mine, but I can't prove it, is that stealing too??  Or does the driving range now own the ball in your eyes?


You are looking for a loophole ... watch it or you may find yourself on the wrong side of ethical quandries.

You have the ability  to recognize the difference between right and wrong and make a choice.

It's another thing to delude yourself.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 461
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I don't care about morally convincing you of anything. I disagree with your morals if you believe stealing is justified because you're taking it from a business that's making money off of something they didn't purchase. Would you take a cupcake from a school fundraiser just because the school didn't pay for it?

Legally, it is theft. The range acquired ownership when the true owner lost or abandoned their ball.

As I mentioned, the true owner can come back at any time and reclaim ownership over their ball.

You don't want to see it as stealing from the range, fine. You're stealing from somebody else, not to mention making it harder for the true owner to come back and get his/her ball back because you've now relocated it (probably off the property).

At no time in this entire scenario are you entitled to the ball. You are NEVER the owner of the ball, whether you believe the driving range owns it or not.

I don't view it as stealing.  The ball is abandoned, and therefore I am taking possession of it.  I don't feel that driving range automatically gets to lay claim to it.  And your cupcake story is nowhere related.  The cupcake was donated with the sole purpose of raising money for the school.  The golf ball was accidentally lost, not donated to the range.

You are acting like I walk into the pro shop, grab a ball off the rack and think it's ok to take.

If they can claim a ball as abandoned, why can't I?

Tony  


:titleist:    |   :tmade:   |     :cleveland: 


Posted

You are looking for a loophole ... watch it or you may find yourself on the wrong side of ethical quandries.

You have the ability  to recognize the difference between right and wrong and make a choice.

It's another thing to delude yourself.

What loophole?

Explain how the abandoned ball is theirs automatically?

They didn't hand pick it, stamp a range mark on it and then place it into the range bin.  A ball picker happened to roll over it and it got thrown into the ball washer.  There was no "I claim this as my ball!" remark to be had.

Tony  


:titleist:    |   :tmade:   |     :cleveland: 


  • Moderator
Posted

I don't view it as stealing.  The ball is abandoned, and therefore I am taking possession of it.  I don't feel that driving range automatically gets to lay claim to it.

Why do you think have a greater claim over the abandoned ball than the driving range, who not only retrieved it first, but brought it back from the range into your bucket to be found by you to begin with? The range possessed it before you, for longer than you, and it was found on their property. They have a far stronger claim to ownership than you do.

And your cupcake story is nowhere related.  The cupcake was donated with the sole purpose of raising money for the school.  The golf ball was accidentally lost, not donated to the range.

It wasn't a great analogy, but it served its purpose.

You are acting like I walk into the pro shop, grab a ball off the rack and think it's ok to take.

Straw man.

If they can claim a ball as abandoned, why can't I?

Because the range did not abandon it and you did not find it where it was abandoned, therefore you did not find an abandoned golf ball.

Look, I'm done with this. You want to keep rationalizing stealing, that's fine. It's still stealing.

Also, this:

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Why do you think have a greater claim over the abandoned ball than the driving range, who not only retrieved it first, but brought it back from the range into your bucket to be found by you to begin with? The range possessed it before you, for longer than you, and it was found on their property. They have a far stronger claim to ownership than you do.

It wasn't a great analogy, but it served its purpose.

Straw man.

Because the range did not abandon it and you did not find it where it was abandoned, therefore you did not find an abandoned golf ball.

Look, I'm done with this. You want to keep rationalizing stealing, that's fine. It's still stealing.

Also, this:

It is your opinion that is it stealing, that does not make it the truth.  Don't act like you are the sole authority on this because you are not.   Until you show me actual legal precedent of this exact case, your opinion is no more correct than mine is.

I am acting like I have a greater claim to it because they never actually even saw the ball.  Their machine randomly found it.  If they did find a brand new ProV1, they would have placed it into their pro shop lost ball section, and not into the range bucket...  Come on man be serious.  They range attendant didn't find anything and claim it, surely you are not that dense.

Also, I have been a member of this forum for longer than you have, maybe you need to read that tread?

Tony  


:titleist:    |   :tmade:   |     :cleveland: 


Posted

What loophole?

Explain how the abandoned ball is theirs automatically?

They didn't hand pick it, stamp a range mark on it and then place it into the range bin.  A ball picker happened to roll over it and it got thrown into the ball washer.  There was no "I claim this as my ball!" remark to be had.


You are deluding yourself ... let's hope it does not intrude in other areas of your life. You are probably young. Maybe your eyes will open.

Good luck.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

You are deluding yourself ... let's hope it does not intrude in other areas of your life. You are probably young. Maybe your eyes will open.

Good luck.

That is your legal response?

Ha, show me actual precedent that proves your side.    I would love to see a legal case for this that proves it is theft.  In the absence of that proof, you are just stating your opinion like I am which does not make you more correct than I am.

Tony  


:titleist:    |   :tmade:   |     :cleveland: 


Posted
Puma - go find the legal definition of theft in any state (it will typically be pretty broad in context). It is theft, although petty in nature, in any state. I challenge you to prove me wrong. The only possible argument one could have, which you and others appear to be arguing, is the ownership of the ball when taken. However, the burden of proof would be on the taker to prove the ball was not owned by the range. So, to all of you who want to argue the above point of ownership... The burden is on you. I.e. Prove it

Posted

@pumaAttack - I'm genuinely curious what you think of my "house" bowling ball analogy.  Do you think it's the same thing?  Would you also not consider that stealing?

http://thesandtrap.com/t/84262/taking-good-balls-from-range-buckets/342#post_1197149

(hope it's not bad form to link to my own post - it seemed weirder to quote myself)

I'm really just asking, not trying to argue.

- John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Puma - go find the legal definition of theft in any state (it will typically be pretty broad in context).

It is theft, although petty in nature, in any state. I challenge you to prove me wrong.

The only possible argument one could have, which you are arguing, is the ownership of the ball when taken. However, the burden of proof would be on the taker to prove the ball was not owned by the range.

So, to all of you who want to argue the above point of ownership... The burden is on you. I.e. Prove it

It is pretty clear proof that they don't own it because of their "Lost Ball" bins.  If they actually saw it and claimed it, they ProV1 would be there.

They never he saw the ball, how can they claim it.  I have it in my hand, they never touched it.

Tony  


:titleist:    |   :tmade:   |     :cleveland: 


Posted
It is pretty clear proof that they don't own it because of their "Lost Ball" bins.  If they actually saw it and claimed it, they ProV1 would be there.   They never he saw the ball, how can they claim it.  I have it in my hand, they never touched it.

However, it is not. Prove it.


Posted

@pumaAttack - I'm genuinely curious what you think of my "house" bowling ball analogy.  Do you think it's the same thing?  Would you also not consider that stealing?

http://thesandtrap.com/t/84262/taking-good-balls-from-range-buckets/342#post_1197149

(hope it's not bad form to link to my own post - it seemed weirder to quote myself)

I'm really just asking, not trying to argue.

Apples and oranges.

You purchased a locker from the alley.  Paid them for a service.  You then abandoned said payment and therefore said object.  The alley then had to remove said object to free up space for another paying customer to use their service.  They simply made use of a product that truly was left behind.

The golfer never paid to keep his golf ball on the driving range.   It was accidentally lost there and a machine randomly placed it into a bucket.

Tony  


:titleist:    |   :tmade:   |     :cleveland: 


Posted

However, it is not. Prove it.

You need to be more explicit with your responses.

Tony  


:titleist:    |   :tmade:   |     :cleveland: 


Posted
To all of you who have voted "Take it without Hesitation", I would query you this: if the range buckets were full to the ever lovin' brim with shiny, bright, new ProVs...would ya snipe a few? C'mon, there's thousand of them, brightly, shiny, beautiful ProVs. We're talking a scenario where it's a pretty sure bet that the range paid for all those balls. But...there's a sea of them, buckets and buckets of brightly, shiny, new Tour balls. Who's gonna know the difference?? Grab a few. Do ya do it? Even just once? Be honest, do/would ya? I'll reveal my answer later. ADD* I also find it interesting how many just blithely refute the expertise of @Duff McGee and @Mr. Desmond who have given informed legal opinions on the question (albeit off the cuff) and I'm quite sure either one of them could provide ample jurisprudence if it was worth their time, which I gather it's not. Again, who cares, it's just a freakin' range ball. But why not just admit that you are in fact stealing absent any expressed (or arguably even implied?) consent from the range. You probably won't go to Hell or anything, but you do lose this argument. Sorry. :-P

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

To all of you who have voted "Take it without Hesitation", I would query you this: if the range buckets were full to the ever lovin' brim with shiny, bright, new ProVs...would ya snipe a few? C'mon, there's thousand of them, brightly, shiny, beautiful ProVs. Who's gonna know the difference?? Grab a few.

Do ya do it? Even just once? Be honest, do/would ya?

I'll reveal my answer later.

If the entire range bucket was full of them?  No.  I would assume those were the range balls at the course.  I have played at courses that use normal Titleists as their driving range balls...

I wouldn't steal a product that the range paid for and truly owned.

Tony  


:titleist:    |   :tmade:   |     :cleveland: 


Posted
Puma - go find the legal definition of theft in any state (it will typically be pretty broad in context). It is theft, although petty in nature, in any state. I challenge you to prove me wrong. The only possible argument one could have, which you and others appear to be arguing, is the ownership of the ball when taken. However, the burden of proof would be on the taker to prove the ball was not owned by the range. So, to all of you who want to argue the above point of ownership... The burden is on you. I.e. Prove it

I'm genuinely curious but if someone were being charged criminally for theft of one golf ball, wouldn't the burden of proof be on the prosecution to prove the theft for the person to be guilty and would part of that be the prosecution having to establish ownership?

Christian

:tmade::titleist:  :leupold:  :aimpoint: :gamegolf:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
You need to be more explicit with your responses.

And you will need to use your brain for this one, and throw out all of your made-up scenarios. Prove to me/us it is not theft.


Posted
I'm genuinely curious but if someone were being charged criminally for theft of one golf ball, wouldn't the burden of proof be on the prosecution to prove the theft for the person to be guilty and would part of that be the prosecution having to establish ownership?

If the ball was taken out of the range basket, the prosecution already established proof. The burden "ball" would be back in the defendants court


Note: This thread is 3754 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.