Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3540 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, billchao said:

P.K. Subban for Shea Weber

The age difference makes me nervous. Weber is 31. Subban is 27. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
Just now, mcanadiens said:

The age difference makes me nervous. Weber is 31. Subban is 27. 

Defensemen don't age the same way forwards do, but Weber's contract is awful. Nashville is going to get creamed if he ever retires early.

They don't really have the same style either. Interested to see how this pans out.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yeah, Chiarelli really doesn't care for the draft class of 2010, that's for sure.  

Corey

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 minutes ago, billchao said:

Defensemen don't age the same way forwards do, but Weber's contract is awful. Nashville is going to get creamed if he ever retires early.

They don't really have the same style either. Interested to see how this pans out.

Yeah. If they were forwards I'd probably be a bit beyond nervous.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

Stunned to see the Subban trade.  Webber was pretty much exposed by the Sharks as being a liability defensively (conceding I don't watch the Preds day in and day out and he could have been hurt or something).  Giving up Subban for an older guy who already is on the down side just strikes me as nuts.  I have to wonder if there's something going on behind the scenes. 

Habs nation in full meltdown mode:

http://www.habseyesontheprize.com/2016/6/29/12061540/pk-subban-trade-analysis-shea-weber-montreal-canadiens-worst-trade-ever-fire-bergevin

Edited by tdiii
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
8 minutes ago, tdiii said:

Stunned to see the Subban trade.  Webber was pretty much exposed by the Sharks as being a liability defensively (conceding I don't watch the Preds day in and day out and he could have been hurt or something).  Giving up Subban for an older guy who already is on the down side just strikes me as nuts.  I have to wonder if there's something going on behind the scenes. 

I think that given the team leadership and balls that Webber brings  to the table, this is a win for the Habs IF they land some offence and go for it, but if they don't, it'll be a lose in 2-3 years as Webber's age catches up to him and Subban continues to rise. 

Rumour is that Subban was an issue in the room. 

There better be some more moves, and substantial ones, for this to make any sense. This has to be an all or nothing move as Webber's expiration date is looming. 

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
1 hour ago, billchao said:

and Stamkos re-signed with the Lightning.

A friend suggested it may be a "sign and trade" type situation.

The blood clots could make that a bad contract, even though it seems like a good one right now.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
1 hour ago, Warren Zevon said:

Yeah, Chiarelli really doesn't care for the draft class of 2010, that's for sure.  

Yea, those top 2 players that are currently top players in the league were totally expendable.

My thought is this is going to turn out to be a good hockey trade. Larsson isn't flashy but he is a solid workhorse who is good against top competition and gets the puck moving the right direction. His o zone start % was one of the worst in the league (actually I think it was the worst, just ahead of partner Andy Greene) but had +12% o zone finishes. NJ had a pitiful offense that was awful at generating shots, so his corsi #s aren't great, but I expect him to put up more points on the Oilers.

I'm excited to pick up Hall and sad to see Larsson go at the same time. He was easily my favorite Devil. He is definitely underrated. The Devils' D is not going to be the same without him.

1 hour ago, Ernest Jones said:

I think that given the team leadership and balls that Webber brings  to the table, this is a win for the Habs IF they land some offence and go for it, but if they don't, it'll be a lose in 2-3 years as Webber's age catches up to him and Subban continues to rise. 

Rumour is that Subban was an issue in the room. 

That could help explain it. This deal is a real head scratcher otherwise. On the ice it is obvious who the better player is, but there is a lot going on behind the scenes that fans aren't privvy to.

Subban did have that big hold out early in his career so maybe there is something to the rumors.

15 minutes ago, iacas said:

A friend suggested it may be a "sign and trade" type situation.

The blood clots could make that a bad contract, even though it seems like a good one right now.

I'm trying to understand why a team would want Stamkos for the 8th year that badly that they would want Tampa to sign him and then trade assets for it? I don't see the advantage in trading a real asset for an additional year on the declining years of Stamkos' career.

I thought blood clots were one of those freak things that just happens? I didn't realize that was indicative of a chronic health problem.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
6 minutes ago, billchao said:

I'm trying to understand why a team would want Stamkos for the 8th year that badly that they would want Tampa to sign him and then trade assets for it? I don't see the advantage in trading a real asset for an additional year on the declining years of Stamkos' career.

Because they could get the cap hit down. Eight years from now the cap will likely be higher, and teams leverage short term gains all the time… I'm not saying I agree with him. Just playing devil's advocate. No pun intended.

6 minutes ago, billchao said:

I thought blood clots were one of those freak things that just happens? I didn't realize that was indicative of a chronic health problem.

http://www.theplayerstribune.com/in-my-blood/

http://www.theplayerstribune.com/pascal-dupuis-penguins-comeback/

http://www.theplayerstribune.com/2016-5-30-pascal-dupuis-penguins-blood-clots/

Thomas Vokoun

http://www.si.com/edge/2014/12/16/blood-clots-pose-deadly-threat-to-athletes

http://www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/nhl/more-hockey-players-being-diagnosed-with-blood-clots-than-ever-1.2976686

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Now that the shock factor is subsiding, I think this was a good move by the Habs. Webber and Subban's production is very similar in terms of points, but Webber provides leadership and toughness far beyond what PK provided. In short, he gives the Habs the same production as PK plus the balls of solid steel the we lost when we let Prust go. To get that compete level without losing any productions is a good thing, better than giving a roster spot to a one dimensional "tough guy". This way we get a tough guy without losing a roster spot. 

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 minutes ago, Ernest Jones said:

Now that the shock factor is subsiding, I think this was a good move by the Habs. Webber and Subban's production is very similar in terms of points, but Webber provides leadership and toughness far beyond what PK provided. In short, he gives the Habs the same production as PK plus the balls of solid steel the we lost when we let Prust go. To get that compete level without losing any productions is a good thing, better than giving a roster spot to a one dimensional "tough guy". This way we get a tough guy without losing a roster spot. 

That sounds good and that's why I'm not jumping off a cliff right now.

Even on D, you worry about how much is left when they go over 30.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
32 minutes ago, iacas said:

Because they could get the cap hit down. Eight years from now the cap will likely be higher, and teams leverage short term gains all the time… I'm not saying I agree with him. Just playing devil's advocate. No pun intended.

Yea I get it, I just don't agree with it either. I don't see what Stamkos gets out of the deal either, higher pay on shorter term is better for him.

Thanks for sharing the articles, too. I didn't realize it was that big of a deal.

1 minute ago, mcanadiens said:

Even on D, you worry about how much is left when they go over 30.

Guys lose their speed and have to rely on better decision-making and positional play. Not a big problem for better players, huge problem for guys that depend purely on their athleticism to make up for mistakes. Weber is not going to be as good as he was 10 years ago but he's still going to be good... at least for a few more years.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
5 minutes ago, billchao said:

Yea I get it, I just don't agree with it either. I don't see what Stamkos gets out of the deal either, higher pay on shorter term is better for him.

8 * 8.5 = 68

7 * 9.5 = 66.5

That's all I'm saying (or he's saying).

I think he intends to stay in Tampa. And that Tampa intends on him staying there.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
Spoiler
5 minutes ago, iacas said:

8 * 8.5 = 68

7 * 9.5 = 66.5

That's all I'm saying (or he's saying).

PV = FV / (1+r)

Your friend didn't study Money and Banking? ;-)

 

7 minutes ago, iacas said:

I think he intends to stay in Tampa. And that Tampa intends on him staying there.

Agreed.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
12 minutes ago, billchao said:

Yea I get it, I just don't agree with it either. I don't see what Stamkos gets out of the deal either, higher pay on shorter term is better for him.

Thanks for sharing the articles, too. I didn't realize it was that big of a deal.

Guys lose their speed and have to rely on better decision-making and positional play. Not a big problem for better players, huge problem for guys that depend purely on their athleticism to make up for mistakes. Weber is not going to be as good as he was 10 years ago but he's still going to be good... at least for a few more years.

Remember Esa Tikkanen? Dude was clutch even when he had no legs left. Just knew where to be long before anyone else thought to go there. Some guys just see the ice from a higher altitude. Like Markov, he's not the Markov of old and you need to manage his minutes but he can still control the pace of a game and that is huge when it comes to Defence. 

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
13 hours ago, billchao said:

Yea, those top 2 players that are currently top players in the league were totally expendable.

My thought is this is going to turn out to be a good hockey trade. Larsson isn't flashy but he is a solid workhorse who is good against top competition and gets the puck moving the right direction. His o zone start % was one of the worst in the league (actually I think it was the worst, just ahead of partner Andy Greene) but had +12% o zone finishes. NJ had a pitiful offense that was awful at generating shots, so his corsi #s aren't great, but I expect him to put up more points on the Oilers.

I'm excited to pick up Hall and sad to see Larsson go at the same time. He was easily my favorite Devil. He is definitely underrated. The Devils' D is not going to be the same without him.

That could help explain it. This deal is a real head scratcher otherwise. On the ice it is obvious who the better player is, but there is a lot going on behind the scenes that fans aren't privvy to.

Subban did have that big hold out early in his career so maybe there is something to the rumors.

I'm trying to understand why a team would want Stamkos for the 8th year that badly that they would want Tampa to sign him and then trade assets for it? I don't see the advantage in trading a real asset for an additional year on the declining years of Stamkos' career.

I thought blood clots were one of those freak things that just happens? I didn't realize that was indicative of a chronic health problem.

I'll miss Taylor Hall.  He's got an attitude, for sure, but can really drive the offense better than most wingers.  He has his share of flaws, for sure, but I'm more confident in NJ helping him develop than I ever would be in the Oilers getting it done.  

I guess my only gripe about the trade is that it was straight up one for one. Like many Oiler fans, I figured he'd be worth a lot more.  

Corey

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

 

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3540 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • The first post is here:   Do you have an overly long backswing that ruins sequencing and leads to poor shots? In nearly 20 years of teaching, I've found 5 common faults. You don't have to swing like Jon Rahm, but a shorter swing will probably help you #PlayBetter golf. Which is your fatal flaw? #1 - Trail Elbow Bend Average golfers ♥️ bending their trail elbows. It can feel powerful! Tour players bend their trail elbows MUCH less. A wider trail elbow creates a longer hand path and preserves structure. It also forces more chest turn; not everything longer is bad! Overly bending your trail elbow can wreak havoc on your swing. It pulls your arms across/beside your body. It requires more time to get the elbow bend "out," ruining your sequencing. The lead arm often bends and low point control is destroyed. The misconception is that it will create more speed, but that's often the opposite of what happens. Golfers often feel they swing "easier" but FASTER with wider trail elbows. Want to play better golf with a shorter backswing? Don't bend your elbow so much. #2 - Hip (Pelvis) Turn I see this all the time: a golfer's hips are only 5-10° open at impact, but he turns them back 60°+ in the backswing. Unless your father is The Flash, your hips are probably not getting 40° open at impact from there! That's more rotation than Rory! Golfers who over-rotate their pelvis often over-turn everything - trail thigh/knee, chest/shoulders, etc. They have more work to do in the same ~0.3 seconds as a Tour player who turns back ~40° and turns through to impact 40° or so. Want to shorten the pelvis turn a bit? Learn to internally rotate into the trail hip, externally rotate away from the lead hip, and do "less" with your knees (extending and flexing) in the backswing. Learn some separation between chest and pelvis. #3 - Rolled Inside and Lifted Up Amateurs love to send the club (and their arms) around them. You see the red golfer here all the time at your local range. The problem? Your arms mostly take the club UP, not around. Going around creates no height until you have to hoist the club up in the air because you're halfway through your backswing and the club is waist high and three feet behind your butt! 😄  Learn to use your arms properly. Arms = up/down, body = around. Most golfers learn how little their arms really have to do in the backswing. The picture here is all you've gotta do (but maybe with a properly sized club!). #4 - Wide Takeaway Width is good, no? Yes, if you're wide at the right time and in the right spots. Golfers seeking width often don't hinge the club much early in the backswing… forcing them to hinge it late. Hinging the club late puts a lot of momentum into the club, wrists, and elbow just before we need to make a hairpin turn in transition and go the other direction at the start of the downswing. When you're driving into a hairpin curve, you go into it slowly and accelerate out of it. Waiting to hinge is like coasting down the straightaway and accelerating into the hairpin. Your car ends up off the road, and your golf ball off the course. Give hinging at a faster rate (earlier) then coasting to the top a try. You'll be able to accelerate out of the hairpin without the momentum of the arms and club pulling in the wrong direction.   #5 - Sway and Tilt Some sway is good but sometimes I see a golfer who just… keeps… swaying… Their chest leans forward a bit for balance, resulting in a whole lotta lean. The green line below is the GEARS "virtual spine." Pros sway a bit, but stay ~90°. This sway often combines with the extra pelvis turn because this golfer is not putting ANY limits on what the "middle of them" (their pelvis) is doing in the backswing. These golfers spend a lot of energy just to get back to neutral! The best players begin pushing forward EARLY in the backswing. Often before the club gets much past their trail foot! Pushing forward (softly) first stops your backward sway and then begins to get your body moving toward the target. Push softly, but early!  
    • I  no longer spend the time and effort trying to sell something I no longer need. Instead, if the clubs are in good condition, I go to my local golf shop or even Dicks Sporting Goods. Trade the clubs in for store credit and pick up something I need, like a hat. Cause you always need another golf hat!
    • Day 205 3-10 Wider backswing, reconnecting arm in downswing/arching wrist through. Also worked on less pause at the top. Recorded and hit a few foam balls. 
    • I really enjoyed this episode with Nick from Callaway. I didn't know the problem with swing weight and female golfers, but it makes sense. I actually think swing weight might not matter that much. If everyone senses the club differently, then wouldn't it mean that people might feel swing weights differently? Swing weight is a way to classify how heavy a club feels during the swing. Yet for a 70-year-old golfer, a D0 might feel like a D4 for a 25-year-old golfer? I think stronger people would consider higher swing weights lighter. Maybe a C8 equals a D2 in terms of feel?   
    • Wordle 1,725 3/6 ⬜🟨⬜🟨⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.