Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast!
IGNORED

Difference between "A" Wedge and Pitching Wedge?

Slushy

By Slushy
in Golf Talk

 Share
Note: This thread is 3841 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Slushy Member

Slushy

Posted
Posted

Before the last 6 months I golfed probably once a year.  The last 6 months, myself and a couple of friends have been golfing on a weekly basis.  I'm slowly replacing 20-25 year old clubs with new ones.  I just bought a used set of Callaway X Hot irons.  I currently have the X2 hot woods and driver that I love, but the X Hot irons were too good of deal to pass up.

My question is what is an "A" Wedge used for?  Honestly I had never heard of one so I'm wondering in what situations you would use an "A" wedge instead of a PW or an SW?

Thanks.....


inthehole Great Member

inthehole

Posted
Posted

"A" wedge is commonly called a Gap wedge.   It's usually 50° loft.    It fits right between & bridges the GAP between your pitching wedge (45°) and your sand wedge (55°).

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1

dkolo Great Member

dkolo

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, Slushy said:

So is this like a chip club for when you are just off the green (within 0-20 yards)?

It's whatever you want it to be. You can use it for that. I use my gap wedge for most of my chipping. But that's really up to your preference. Big picture, it's just a club that's meant to go shorter than your pitching wedge but farther than your sand wedge. Manufacturers have started including these in sets because they've been increasing the lofts of the irons to make them go farther. The result was that the PW of many sets had started to get into where 9 irons used to be, while sand wedges remained about 56°. This created a gap in lofts and so there was a need for a wedge to fill that gap. Different manufacturers call it an Approach Wedge, Gap Wedge, Utility Wedge, etc. Same thing.

Dom's Sticks:

Callaway X-24 10.5° Driver, Callaway Big Bertha 15° wood, Callaway XR 19° hybrid, Callaway X-24 24° hybrid, Callaway X-24 5i-9i, PING Glide PW 47°/12°, Cleveland REG 588 52°/08°, Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind 56°/13°, 60°/10°, Odyssey Versa Jailbird putter w/SuperStroke Slim 3.0 grip, Callaway Chev Stand Bag, Titleist Pro-V1x ball

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1

Dave2512 Super Member

Dave2512

Posted
Posted

Funny all the renaming due to the arms race. This years model is 15 yards longer! Well yeah because this years model's PW was last year's 9i.

Personally I don't care what the club has stamped on it. I chip with 8i-58, pitch with 50-58 and every club has a full swing function.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1

Mr. Desmond Super Member

Mr. Desmond

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Slushy said:

Before the last 6 months I golfed probably once a year.  The last 6 months, myself and a couple of friends have been golfing on a weekly basis.  I'm slowly replacing 20-25 year old clubs with new ones.  I just bought a used set of Callaway X Hot irons.  I currently have the X2 hot woods and driver that I love, but the X Hot irons were too good of deal to pass up.

My question is what is an "A" Wedge used for?  Honestly I had never heard of one so I'm wondering in what situations you would use an "A" wedge instead of a PW or an SW?

Thanks.....

Use it to fill the distance gap - it's just an iron - it may be a 50 degree (or close to it). It is also called a gap wedge to fill the gap between a 45 PW and and a 56 SW.

  • Upvote 1

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1

dkolo Great Member

dkolo

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Mr. Desmond said:

Use it to fill the distance gap - it's just an iron - it may be a 50 degree (or close to it). It is also called a gap wedge to fill the gap between a 45 PW and and a 56 SW.

Yeah, as chunky as most manufacturers make their matched iron set wedges, the A wedge may as well just be called an 11-iron. Taylormade made their wedges a bit more bladed beginning with the Speedblades, but that's more of an exception to the rule from what I've seen.

Dom's Sticks:

Callaway X-24 10.5° Driver, Callaway Big Bertha 15° wood, Callaway XR 19° hybrid, Callaway X-24 24° hybrid, Callaway X-24 5i-9i, PING Glide PW 47°/12°, Cleveland REG 588 52°/08°, Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind 56°/13°, 60°/10°, Odyssey Versa Jailbird putter w/SuperStroke Slim 3.0 grip, Callaway Chev Stand Bag, Titleist Pro-V1x ball

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1

DrvFrShow Super Member

DrvFrShow

Posted
Posted

If my PW is my 115 yd club, my GW or AW is my 103 yd club.

Julia

:callaway:  :cobra:    :seemore:  :bushnell:  :clicgear:  :adidas:  :footjoy:

Spoiler

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha w/ Fubuki Z50 R 44.5"
FW: Cobra BiO CELL 14.5 degree; 
Hybrids: Cobra BiO CELL 22.5 degree Project X R-flex
Irons: Cobra BiO CELL 5 - GW Project X R-Flex
Wedges: Cobra BiO CELL SW, Fly-Z LW, 64* Callaway PM Grind.
Putter: 48" Odyssey Dart

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1

WUTiger Incredible Member

WUTiger

Posted
Posted

The A wedge has been variously called the Attack wedge or the Approach wedge by OEM marketing genies.

For some iron models I liked the AW (SLDR), others I didn't (Callaway X20).

Some TST players blend the PW and AW: go with 48*, plus a 54* and 60* in their wedge mix.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking Academy: Fitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha B16 OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:  image.png.0d90925b4c768ce7c125b16f98313e0d.png Inertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  :srixon: QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1

gregsandiego Great Member

gregsandiego

Posted
Posted

The golf industry really needs to form a standards body and unify some terminology. It's out of control. They can't even decide if a number system or the loft angle should be used.

I use old Taylor Made clubs from eBay and golf shops.


  • Administrator
iacas Hall of Fame Member

iacas

Posted
  • Administrator
Posted
2 minutes ago, gregsandiego said:

The golf industry really needs to form a standards body and unify some terminology. It's out of control. They can't even decide if a number system or the loft angle should be used.

That wouldn't work.

The Titleist CB and MB were 2° in loft apart, but could be blended at any club because they had nearly identical launch conditions. The lower CG in the CB helped launch the ball higher than the equivalent (and 2° weaker lofted) MB.

Add in the fact that shaft flex can lead to changes in delivered loft… and length changes things, clubhead speed changes how all of those things work, etc. There's no real way to have a standard.

Erik J. Barzeski — ⛳ I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • Author, Lowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

MrDC Dedicated Member

MrDC

Posted
Posted (edited)

PW is a 10 iron, gap or A is an 11 iron.

Edited by MrDC

Natural Patrick Great Member

Natural Patrick

Posted
Posted

I have one and the Taylor made rep called it an Approach wedge. Regardless, I hit mine about 10yds shorter than my regular wedge. I have 2 other wedges that I refer to as Gap and Lob.


gregsandiego Great Member

gregsandiego

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, iacas said:

That wouldn't work.

The Titleist CB and MB were 2° in loft apart, but could be blended at any club because they had nearly identical launch conditions. The lower CG in the CB helped launch the ball higher than the equivalent (and 2° weaker lofted) MB.

Add in the fact that shaft flex can lead to changes in delivered loft… and length changes things, clubhead speed changes how all of those things work, etc. There's no real way to have a standard.

Well for starters they could label both the club numbe/name e.g. PW, as well as angle i.e. 45 deg on every club head.  At least we'd know the manufacturer's intention.

 

 

 

I use old Taylor Made clubs from eBay and golf shops.


  • Administrator
iacas Hall of Fame Member

iacas

Posted
  • Administrator
Posted
Just now, gregsandiego said:

Well for starters they could label both the club numbe/name e.g. PW, as well as angle i.e. 45 deg on every club head.  At least we'd know the manufacturer's intention.

That's not any more of a standard than what we have now. You can write the loft on the clubhead all you want, but Titleist has clubs that launch at the same angle with different static lofts…

Erik J. Barzeski — ⛳ I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • Author, Lowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

gregsandiego Great Member

gregsandiego

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, iacas said:

That's not any more of a standard than what we have now. You can write the loft on the clubhead all you want, but Titleist has clubs that launch at the same angle with different static lofts…

What do you mean by angle, vs "static loft" ?

 

I use old Taylor Made clubs from eBay and golf shops.


Note: This thread is 3841 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up

  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).

  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • saevel25
      Andy Plummer on Abduction and Adduction

      By saevel25 · Posted

      No one should measure a joint mobility away from that joint. If you go to physical therapy, they are not measuring your knee mobility based on your midline. It is based at the joint. Shoulder mobility should be measured in reference to the shoulder joint. 
    • iacas
      Andy Plummer on Abduction and Adduction

      By iacas · Posted

      He's using a driver swing, while I used the iron swing. Bryson goes from about 65° B to 15° B, hence the 50°. If you bend your right elbow, you're going to pull your hands across your chest some. Conversely, if you abduct your right arm and hold onto a grip with your left arm, you can see how extending the right elbow as we do in the golf swing during the downswing will "pull" the right shoulder/humerus forward (adducting it, as going from 65° to 15° of abduction is). Even people who pull their right shoulder WAY too far around them eventually get it "back in front" when their right arm/elbow extends. So, such a motion shows up as shoulder adduction even though the movement that causes it is just widening the trail elbow. The left hand on the grip almost "pulls" the hands forward as the left arm can't stretch much (there's some shoulder protraction, but that's almost maxed out at P4). Oh, I downloaded it and watched it (and commented there) before he blocked me. It's what led to him posting the comment in the "update" above. 😄  Single shoulder range of 75°, and that's going out well into the follow-through. 50° Max range up to impact. Manavian's video is bad. He keeps saying "midline" which is just a horrible way to look at it. He also kept saying that the club was moving that amount — also wrong. Adding left and right together is really freaking dumb. Another golf instructor said "That's like saying the player has 100 degrees of knee bend (adding left knee bend to right knee bend) 🤦‍♂️" (similar to what the biomechanist said about squatting). Also, see my post above about elbow bend. That's why Plummer’s alignment stick demo is so intellectually dishonest. A golfer can't get anywhere near that position on the left with his left hand on the alignment stick (quoted below).  
    • saevel25
      Andy Plummer on Abduction and Adduction

      By saevel25 · Posted

      That makes no sense at all.  so, I watched that Instagram. Here is a summary...  Bryson.... Address: Trail Shoulder 0 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 65-deg abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 15-deg abduction. P9: 10 degrees adduction. Rory... Address: Trail Shoulder 16 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 26 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 0 degrees abduction.  P9: 18 degrees of adduction.  DJ... Address: Trail Shoulder 4 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 42 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 2 degrees abduction.  P9: 15 degrees of adduction.  Their point is that arm doesn't stay on the trail side. That the arms have to get across the chest from P4 to P9. I mean they do. What matters is the rate of which it happens relative to the position of the swing. The trail shoulder at P9 is not abducted a lot. The range of that total abduction movement is like 40 to 70 degrees. Bryson might be an outlier. Rory might be an outlier as well.  A couple of points.  1. None of them had any adduction at impact. So, this tells me the trail arms stays on the trail side of the body at impact. Is it moving towards lead shoulder, yes. It doesn't happen till post impact. The right side of the body is moving towards the target, so the arms don't have to as much as people think.  2. Trail shoulder adduction from Impact to P9 is 18 to 25 degrees.  3. P9 adduction of the trail shoulder is only about 2 to 12 degrees more adducted than at address. The arms/hands stay in front of the chest a long-time post impact. If Rory, from his address position just rotated his body towards the target and raised up his arms so he is at P9. He basically didn't have to move his trail arm further across his chest than where he started at address. Visualize that for a bit. I bet for people who tend to stall and drag their arms across their body to hit the ball, that would emphasize how much the arms stay in front of the body and how much you have to turn.             
    • BrooksButlerHays
      Andy Plummer on Abduction and Adduction

      By BrooksButlerHays · Posted

      Do you know how Manavian is measuring his shoulder adduction-abduction that purports to demonstrate 50 degrees or motion in Bryson's downswing? I know the broader biomechanics research/scientific literature on this suggests shoulder adduction-abduction is only a modest contributor of force generation in the downswing, so I'm definitely not convinced by anything he's arguing, I'm just curious how different people can be claiming to use ostensibly the same "data" to tell a much different story.
    • iacas
      Andy Plummer on Abduction and Adduction

      By iacas · Posted

      I have an update… I don't have much of a response, because the fact that they would ADD the numbers for the lead and trail shoulder together… I mean, wow. I was giving them too much credit. Nobody would think to assume they were doing THAT. That's beyond comical. One of the biomechanists I talked to put it this way: "So if I squatted down and went from 180 to 90 deg knee angle, then I would say 180 deg range of motion because I have two knees?" I'd type more (maybe), but honestly, I'm laughing a bit too hard. 🤣 Update: Mini Manavian blocked me on Instagram, so I cannot see his post showing Bryson with about 50° of range of motion (with a driver) from P4 to P7, and 75° only if you go out to the mid-follow-through. What a terrible loss for me. 😉 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

  I accept