Jump to content
IGNORED

Apple v. FBI


iacas
Note: This thread is 2934 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Hardspoon said:

Here's what I hope happens (I am 100% with Apple on this one):

tumblr_o2raetGnss1qgi9ofo1_1280.jpg.493f

(source: http://dustinteractive.tumblr.com/post/139553430811/apple-decides-to-cooperate-with-fbi)

On the actual topic...I suspect that the FBI has wanted to fight this battle for a long time, but they waited until the SB shooting specifically so that public opinion would be more likely to be on their side.

Exactly, the FBI along with the other agencies and local police departments have been trying to remove every bit of privacy we have.  The FBI has been on record in the past criticizing Apple and others for using and allowing apps to use encryption that they and NSA can't break. 

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, Hardspoon said:

On the actual topic...I suspect that the FBI has wanted to fight this battle for a long time, but they waited until the SB shooting specifically so that public opinion would be more likely to be on their side.

I agree that the FBI probably picked this one for a reason, but I don't see what public opinion has to do with the outcome.  It's an application for (and appeal from the issuance of) a judicial writ.  Only the facts directly bearing on this case are really relevant.  They may have picked this one because the "owner" consented to the search (thus the court doesn't really have to weigh privacy or the 4th Amendment) and the government can demonstrate a strong national security interest.  Those are good facts for the FBI.

Kevin

Titleist 910 D3 9.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Titleist 910F 13.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Adams Idea A12 Pro hybrid 18*; 23* with RIP S flex
Titleist 712 AP2 4-9 iron with KBS C-Taper, S+ flex
Titleist Vokey SM wedges 48*, 52*, 58*
Odyssey White Hot 2-ball mallet, center shaft, 34"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

31 minutes ago, k-troop said:

I agree that the FBI probably picked this one for a reason, but I don't see what public opinion has to do with the outcome.  It's an application for (and appeal from the issuance of) a judicial writ.  Only the facts directly bearing on this case are really relevant.  They may have picked this one because the "owner" consented to the search (thus the court doesn't really have to weigh privacy or the 4th Amendment) and the government can demonstrate a strong national security interest.  Those are good facts for the FBI.

The question is can the government force a private business to incur the expense of developing a back door to their software or device?  

Should Apple be forced to comply and if there is consumer fallout as a result of Apple developing a back door to their OS is the government responsible for business and shareholder losses?  

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Guys, let's not be naive here; this is just grandstanding for PR/business purposes. I'm sure Apple/Google/whoever are quietly giving the government what they want. And to be honest, I'm not losing any sleep over it. My bank guarantees that I'm not on the hook if someone hacks into my bank account, and the same goes for credit cards. Other than that, anyone hacking into my phone could find that I really suck at golf.

Edited by bogdan101
Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 minute ago, bogdan101 said:

Guys, let's not be naive here; this is just grandstanding for PR/business purposes. I'm sure Apple/Google/whoever are quietly giving the government what they want. And to be honest, I'm not losing any sleep over it. My bank guarantees that I'm not on the hook if someone hacks into my bank account, and the same goes for credit cards. Other than that, anyone hacking into my phone could find that I really suck at golf.

I used to think that way, I've got nothing to hide so why do I care if the government can hack my phone, tap my phone lines and monitor my computer activity.  

It seems trivial but then I realized that we're giving the government way too much power and establishing a precedent for a future we don't know.  Some might say it's paranoia to think of a government that would turn on its people but would the Revolutionary War even be possible today with all the information and access the government has to our information?  

It may already be too late but our rights are precious, imo we should do everything possible to protect them.  

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
24 minutes ago, bogdan101 said:

Guys, let's not be naive here; this is just grandstanding for PR/business purposes. I'm sure Apple/Google/whoever are quietly giving the government what they want. And to be honest, I'm not losing any sleep over it. My bank guarantees that I'm not on the hook if someone hacks into my bank account, and the same goes for credit cards. Other than that, anyone hacking into my phone could find that I really suck at golf.

I don't think you're right at all. As long as I've known Tim Cook he's been nothing but super thoughtful and honest.

I have no reason to believe he's lying now.

(I had several interactions with him in the late 90s and early 2000s re:campus programs.)

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

23 minutes ago, iacas said:

I don't think you're right at all. As long as I've known Tim Cook he's been nothing but super thoughtful and honest.

I have no reason to believe he's lying now.

(I had several interactions with him in the late 90s and early 2000s re:campus programs.)

I read the text at the link you posted, and it sounds like self serving b.s., playing on the public's fear of "invasion of privacy' by the government.

OMG, the government will be able to access the microphone and the camera on my phone at any time and see what I'm up to; well, I'm shaking in my golf shoes!

The government is no knight in shining armour, and neither is Apple, nor Google; but if we want the government to protect us, creating encryption without the possibility of legally breaking it is a bad idea.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
34 minutes ago, bogdan101 said:

I read the text at the link you posted, and it sounds like self serving b.s., playing on the public's fear of "invasion of privacy' by the government.

OMG, the government will be able to access the microphone and the camera on my phone at any time and see what I'm up to; well, I'm shaking in my golf shoes!

The government is no knight in shining armour, and neither is Apple, nor Google; but if we want the government to protect us, creating encryption without the possibility of legally breaking it is a bad idea.

You just say your opinions as if they're facts.

There's no point in discussing things with you. Countless better arguments (from both sides) have been presented.

You don't get to decide what is an acceptable violation of my rights to privacy.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I am on Apple's side.  They say they don't have a back door and I believe them.  Further I don't believe the constitution or any law I know says the Government can compel Apple to produce a back door.  

Lastly, my opinion, that if the Government had a back door its use would not be limited to just national security data gathering.  The IRS comes to mind or the SEC or several other agencies that don't always behave in ethical and/or lawful manner will surely be interested in such a tool.

Butch

Link to comment
Share on other sites


46 minutes ago, iacas said:

You just say your opinions as if they're facts.

There's no point in discussing things with you. Countless better arguments (from both sides) have been presented.

You don't get to decide what is an acceptable violation of my rights to privacy.

Of course they're my opinions only, and obviously I have no say in what is acceptable to anybody else. I said I'm shaking in my golf shoes, not you...  :)

You opened this thread by asking thoughts on the matter, and I just offered some.

I believe you when you say Mr. Cook comes across as honest and sincere; otherwise he would have failed the interview for CEO at the the largest corporation in the world.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
4 minutes ago, bogdan101 said:

I believe you when you say Mr. Cook comes across as honest and sincere; otherwise he would have failed the interview for CEO at the the largest corporation in the world.

Tim Cook didn't interview for the CEO position. :-)

"Those who would give up essential liberties for a little safety deserve neither." - Paraphrased Ben Franklin

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

23 minutes ago, iacas said:

Tim Cook didn't interview for the CEO position. :-)

"Those who would give up essential liberties for a little safety deserve neither." - Paraphrased Ben Franklin

I rest my case: why would I trust a guy who became CEO of Apple without even having to interview for the job?  ;-)

Okay, let me show my true colors: I'll never side with Apple on anything ever, for one single reason: Itunes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


6 minutes ago, bogdan101 said:

I rest my case: why would I trust a guy who became CEO of Apple without even having to interview for the job?  ;-)

Okay, let me show my true colors: I'll never side with Apple on anything ever, for one single reason: Itunes!

You do realize that big corporations do what they call head hunting. They basically have a short list and they go pick their guy and make an offer. 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
4 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

You do realize that big corporations do what they call head hunting. They basically have a short list and they go pick their guy and make an offer. 

Tim Cook was not hired after a head hunter.

He joined Apple in the late 90s as a senior VP or something and was named by Jobs as his successor.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Just now, iacas said:

Tim Cook was not hired after a head hunter.

He joined Apple in the late 90s as a senior VP or something and was named by Jobs as his successor.

Or that way :whistle:

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm under the impression that the key the FBI wants Apple to produce would require physical possession of the device, meaning it would not allow for remote intrusions and would require the government agency seeking to employ it to have a warrant. 

Am I misunderstanding?

Kevin

Titleist 910 D3 9.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Titleist 910F 13.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Adams Idea A12 Pro hybrid 18*; 23* with RIP S flex
Titleist 712 AP2 4-9 iron with KBS C-Taper, S+ flex
Titleist Vokey SM wedges 48*, 52*, 58*
Odyssey White Hot 2-ball mallet, center shaft, 34"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
15 minutes ago, k-troop said:

I'm under the impression that the key the FBI wants Apple to produce would require physical possession of the device, meaning it would not allow for remote intrusions and would require the government agency seeking to employ it to have a warrant. 

Am I misunderstanding?

Yes, you're misunderstanding.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

24 minutes ago, iacas said:

Yes, you're misunderstanding.

Care to elaborate?

Kevin

Titleist 910 D3 9.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Titleist 910F 13.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Adams Idea A12 Pro hybrid 18*; 23* with RIP S flex
Titleist 712 AP2 4-9 iron with KBS C-Taper, S+ flex
Titleist Vokey SM wedges 48*, 52*, 58*
Odyssey White Hot 2-ball mallet, center shaft, 34"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2934 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Backswing: Body is responsible for taking the club around. Arms are responsible for making the club go up.  Downswing: The process is reversed. Weight Forward So, your arms need to do stuff. Set up to the ball. Do not raise your arms at all. Rotate your body as you would in the swing. You will notice your hands stay down near your right hip. So, how does the club get up? Your arms raise it up. You can't take your arms out of the swing. What you are describing might be more of a feel, but it also might not be correct.
    • It depends on what you mean by "while the core remains still" I wouldn't consider his core "remaining still" here, DJ's abs, belly button, and belt buckle have rotated almost 90 degrees by the top of the backswing. Those components of his core then have to rotate/uncoil on the downswing. Far from remaining still IMO.
    • It’s going to change but your basic setup feel should be about the same. Your body kind of adjusts to length and lie angle of the club. You’ll want to pay attention more to ball position as you change clubs more than how bent over you are. I understood what you meant from what your wrote.
    • Oh I probably was thinking the wrong thing or the wrong way when I typed the golf swing was more of a body swing (in my mind).  The in my mind part probably should have said in my opinion or based on what I have read.  Just meant the body needs to be involved more than the hands and swinging the arms while the core remains still.
    • The answer to this question is a very small change in impact can cause a BIG impact in direction. This is with the driver, but its similar with the irons... How much does an open or closed clubface affect your drives? | RoboTest Want to hit more fairways? The latest edition of GOLF's RoboTest highlights the importance of driver face angle. For a driver, 1 degree of clubface open or shut causes 10 yards of left or right. When you think the rate of closure for a golf club, how fast the club face goes from open (top of the golf swing) to square (at impact), 1 degree is a small quantity.  This means, when you are looking at video of your swing, you can see the exact same swing, but present the clubface in two widely separate positions. More so if you have swing faults. You can make the same backswing, but not get your weight forward well and hit a fat shot. You then react to this, try not to fat it so you thin it. Maybe the timing is off on the extension part of the downswing and you thin it slightly. Also, certain swing movements cause the wrists to flip at impact. The intent is still to hit the ball with the club. So your hands are going to adjust to find the ball. The more they have to adjust, the more difficult it is to repeat. Nope, it is way less mental than physical. If we could all think our way to a better swing, we would all be PGA tour players.  #GOLF IS HARD!  Beginners have repeatable swings, just bad repeatable swing. We all just need to make repeatable better swings.  The golf swing is a battle of making movements that allow the club to do good things. You results are from a bad swing that has a wider range of outcomes. Your outcomes are probably the following. Way more thins, fats, skulls than most. You hardly see PGA Tour players fat, skull or thin a shot.  The first principle of golf is FEEL IS NOT REAL. Meaning, we can feel things in the golf swing, yet it produces results or shows on video as something else.  You just set up to the ball. The club has a different length, so you need to adjust. For most your arms extend more out as you have a longer club. You also bend over less for longer clubs. It is just something you get used to. If you make a fist and stick your thumb out. You want that width from the butt end of the club and your belt buckle. Now, if you taller or shorter than most, then you may need to adjust the length of your clubs.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...